[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Milles updated GROOVY-10376:
---------------------------------
Labels: varargs (was: )
> Consider supporting property syntax for variadic "getter" methods
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GROOVY-10376
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-10376
> Project: Groovy
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Eric Milles
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: varargs
>
> Consider the following:
> {code:groovy}
> @groovy.transform.TypeChecked
> class C {
> def getFoo(String[] strings) {
> }
> void test() {
> getFoo()
> foo
> }
> }
> @groovy.transform.TypeChecked
> void test(Class<?> type) {
> type.getDeclaredConstructor().newInstance() //
> getDeclaredConstructor(Class...)
> type.declaredConstructor.newInstance()
> }
> {code}
> Since "getFoo" can be called with zero arguments, does that make it a
> candidate for supporting property syntax? I submit this for consideration.
> We have style checks that suggest property syntax when "getName()" is
> encountered. But this case cannot be converted and so we must live with a
> warning or add an exclusion.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
