[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1866) [Benchmark] Expanding read-write mixed scenarios

2021-10-20 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17432158#comment-17432158
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-1866:


I support this feature in [https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/pull/212.]

Just use IS_RECENT_QUERY to open.

> [Benchmark] Expanding read-write mixed scenarios
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1866
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1866
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> Because of the requirements, benchmark need to support query recent data in 
> read-write mixed scenarios.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1864) Record the output result selection in CSV, but it does not take effect after serverMODE is started.

2021-10-20 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17432157#comment-17432157
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-1864:


I fix this problems in

https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/pull/210

> Record the output result selection in CSV, but it does not take effect after 
> serverMODE is started.
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-1864
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1864
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Minor
>
> In ServerMode of IoTDB-Benchmark, it fails to record the result in csv.
> How to recur this problem:
> Step 1:
> Modify config.properties of Benchmark:
> `TEST_DATA_PERSISTENCE=CSV`
>  Step 2:
> Start ser-benchmark.sh



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1867) [Benchmark] Error when set OPERATION_PROPORTION=1:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x

2021-10-20 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1867?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17432160#comment-17432160
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-1867:


I fix this bug in master

> [Benchmark] Error when set OPERATION_PROPORTION=1:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1867
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1867
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> Error happens when set OPERATION_PROPORTION=1:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x:x, benchmark 
> will only write and not query



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1805) iotdb-grafana-connector docker image

2021-10-21 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1805:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> iotdb-grafana-connector docker image
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1805
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1805
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Xiangdong Huang
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
>
> From v0.12 on, iotdb-grafana-connector is not in apache/iotdb:-node 
> and apache/iotdb:-cluster.
> Therefore, we need a new docker image, called apache/iotdb:-grafana



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1843) log

2021-10-14 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1843:
-

 Summary: log
 Key: IOTDB-1843
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1843
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 刘珍






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1864) Record the output result selection in CSV, but it does not take effect after serverMODE is started.

2021-10-20 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1864:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> Record the output result selection in CSV, but it does not take effect after 
> serverMODE is started.
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-1864
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1864
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Minor
>
> In ServerMode of IoTDB-Benchmark, it fails to record the result in csv.
> How to recur this problem:
> Step 1:
> Modify config.properties of Benchmark:
> `TEST_DATA_PERSISTENCE=CSV`
>  Step 2:
> Start ser-benchmark.sh



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1846) Count the total number of devices incorrectly in cluster module

2021-10-14 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1846:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> Count the total number of devices incorrectly in cluster module
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-1846
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1846
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: 0.12.2
>Reporter: Xinyu Tan
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-10-14-17-10-27-581.png
>
>
> Testing found a bug where counting devices always returns 0 
> !image-2021-10-14-17-10-27-581.png! 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1850) Compaction rate limiter become invalid when use deserialize page compaction

2021-10-14 Thread Jira
张凌哲 created IOTDB-1850:
--

 Summary: Compaction rate limiter become invalid when use 
deserialize page compaction
 Key: IOTDB-1850
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1850
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Compaction
Reporter: 张凌哲
 Fix For: master branch, 0.12.2-SNAPSHOT


Compaction rate limiter become invalid when use deserialize page compaction 
because the rate limiter of deserialize page compaction use wrong file size 
statistics



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1750) 增强TsFileRewriteTool

2021-09-27 Thread Jira
周沛辰 created IOTDB-1750:
--

 Summary: 增强TsFileRewriteTool
 Key: IOTDB-1750
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1750
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Tools/Others
Reporter: 周沛辰
Assignee: 周沛辰
 Fix For: 0.12.2-SNAPSHOT


增强TsFileRewriteTool类,实现读取mods文件并过滤掉删除的数据后进行重写,生成新的TsFile。



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Reopened] (IOTDB-1645) benchmark correctness check

2021-09-28 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reopened IOTDB-1645:


> benchmark correctness check
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-1645
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1645
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Hai Liu
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> In this Problem, I optimize the logic of query generate and support point 
> verification between two database. The details are as follows.
>  # I modify the timestamp generate logic of Q1-Q10: timestamp increment for 
> each operation separately.
>  # I support point verification between two database: compare between each 
> other, use IS_POINT_COMPARISON to use this function.
>  # Add check of config: IS_COMPARISON and IS_POINT_COMPARISON only used in 
> double write mode and can't be both true
>  # And fix not aligned sensor for timescaleDB



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Reopened] (IOTDB-1734) [Benchmark]String value error of benchmark in generateMode

2021-09-28 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reopened IOTDB-1734:


> [Benchmark]String value error of benchmark in generateMode
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-1734
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1734
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> Now I use blank as delimiter in data txt, so error will happen if there is 
> blank in string value.
> I will fix this bug by changing file format from txt to csv.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Reopened] (IOTDB-1735) [Benchmark]Optimize for verificationQuery Mode

2021-09-28 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reopened IOTDB-1735:


> [Benchmark]Optimize for verificationQuery Mode
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-1735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1735
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> Because of the speed in VerificationMode is too slow, I optimize this query 
> which can get all data in one time for a batch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1779) The network of one node is unreachable,write blocking problem for three node three replica cluster

2021-09-29 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1779:
-

 Summary: The network of one node is unreachable,write blocking 
problem for three node three replica cluster
 Key: IOTDB-1779
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1779
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: 3节点3副本_拔网线_测试结果.docx, image-2021-09-29-15-49-33-180.png, 
image-2021-09-29-15-49-44-405.png, image-2021-09-29-15-51-24-108.png, 
拔网线_v12_config.properties

master 87e1ae444523c07b66b7bde1ec63d6b1924e3fca

Three node three replica cluster,benchmark connects a node to write sequential 
data,remove the network cable from  one node,Iotdb has the following problems:

(3节点3副本集群,benchmark连接其中1个节点写入顺序数据,拔掉其他节点的网线火停止其他节点的网络服务--每次操作只影响1个节点,iotdb有如下几个问题):

1.  Symptom of pulling out a network cable(拔网线的表现)
问题1:Benchmark got exception (benchmark写入异常):
org.apache.iotdb.rpc.StatementExecutionException: {color:#DE350B}701: Request 
timed out.{color}
org.apache.iotdb.rpc.StatementExecutionException: 702:{color:#DE350B}* Leader 
cannot be found.*{color}

cli 执行insert :
 
问题2:cli执行select耗时120秒:
  !image-2021-09-29-15-49-33-180.png! 
问题3:node status 耗时120多秒
  !image-2021-09-29-15-49-44-405.png! 
问题4:插上网线,网络恢复后
Benchmark依然报错:
org.apache.iotdb.rpc.IoTDBConnectionException: Fail to reconnect to server. 
Please check server status

 停止网络服务(systemctl stop network)
benchmark写入报同样的错误:
org.apache.iotdb.rpc.IoTDBConnectionException: Fail to reconnect to server. 
Please check server status
但是命令行方式停止网络服务期间,cli 执行insert,select正常:
insert into root.net.dev(col) values(now(),3);
insert into root.net.dev(col) values(now(),4);
insert into root.net.dev(col) values(now(),5);
 
select * from root.net.dev;
 !image-2021-09-29-15-51-24-108.png! 

详细结果见附件。




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1782) cluster : “DataMemberReport " log information should not be in debug logs & Print only when the node role changes

2021-09-29 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1782:
-

 Summary: cluster : “DataMemberReport " log information should not 
be in debug logs & Print only when the node role changes
 Key: IOTDB-1782
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1782
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍


cluster : “DataMemberReport " log information should not be in debug logs
Print only when the node role changes

集群版本的“DataMemberReport "日志不应该放到debug日志中,这个信息很重要,需要查看各data节点信息,LEADER 还是FOLLOWER
{color:#DE350B}*信息不要刷屏*{color},{color:#DE350B}*只需要在节点角色变更的时候打印日志。*{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1783) cluster:./sbin/nodetool.sh displays information about nodes in the Data raft group

2021-09-29 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1783:
-

 Summary: cluster:./sbin/nodetool.sh displays information about 
nodes in the Data raft group
 Key: IOTDB-1783
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1783
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍


./sbin/nodetool.sh displays information about nodes in the data raft group
集群:
./sbin/nodetool.sh{color:#DE350B}*工具需要支持打印所有data raft 组各节点信息*{color}




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1784) [Benchmark]No record of config when use csv record mode

2021-09-30 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17422553#comment-17422553
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-1784:


I Fix this bug in :https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/pull/200

> [Benchmark]No record of config when use csv record mode
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-1784
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1784
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> When use csv record mode, There is nothing in conf.csv file



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1784) [Benchmark]No record of config when use csv record mode

2021-09-30 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1784:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark]No record of config when use csv record mode
 Key: IOTDB-1784
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1784
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤


When use csv record mode, There is nothing in conf.csv file



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1787) The Implementation of benchmark of influxdb 2.0

2021-10-02 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1787:
--

 Summary: The Implementation of benchmark of influxdb 2.0
 Key: IOTDB-1787
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1787
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤


There are some users request us to check whether use influxdb client or HTTP or 
Apache的PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager is better. From my perspective, I 
think this should have a research and experiment.

The issue: https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/issues/187



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1788) There maybe some problem in Q4 in benchmark(opentsdb)

2021-10-02 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1788:
--

 Summary: There maybe some problem in Q4 in benchmark(opentsdb)
 Key: IOTDB-1788
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1788
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤


The issue: https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/issues/201



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1794) Node.js Client

2021-10-05 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张凌哲 reassigned IOTDB-1794:
--

Assignee: 张凌哲

> Node.js Client
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-1794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1794
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Client/Others
>Reporter: 张凌哲
>Assignee: 张凌哲
>Priority: Major
>
> We need node.js client for node.js users



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1794) Node.js Client

2021-10-05 Thread Jira
张凌哲 created IOTDB-1794:
--

 Summary: Node.js Client
 Key: IOTDB-1794
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1794
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Client/Others
Reporter: 张凌哲


We need node.js client for node.js users



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1795) [Benchmark]Errors that may be caused by using http requests

2021-10-05 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1795:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark]Errors that may be caused by using http 
requests
 Key: IOTDB-1795
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1795
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤


The issue: https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/issues/203



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1735) [Benchmark]Optimize for verificationQuery Mode

2021-09-25 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1735:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> [Benchmark]Optimize for verificationQuery Mode
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-1735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1735
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> Because of the speed in VerificationMode is too slow, I optimize this query 
> which can get all data in one time for a batch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1735) [Benchmark]Optimize for verificationQuery Mode

2021-09-25 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1735:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark]Optimize for verificationQuery Mode
 Key: IOTDB-1735
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1735
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: 张洪胤


Because of the speed in VerificationMode is too slow, I optimize this query 
which can get all data in one time for a batch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1734) [Benchmark]String value error of benchmark in generateMode

2021-09-24 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1734:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark]String value error of benchmark in generateMode
 Key: IOTDB-1734
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1734
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤


Now I use blank as delimiter in data txt, so error will happen if there is 
blank in string value.

I will fix this bug by changing file format from txt to csv.

 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1701) The naming rules of the tested database need to be unified (all uppercase is recommended)

2021-09-26 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1701:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> The naming rules of the tested database need to be unified (all uppercase is 
> recommended)
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1701
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1701
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Minor
>
> The current part of the database name has both uppercase and lowercase 
> letters, which is too cumbersome.
> Such as,DB_SWITCH=IoTDB-012-SESSION_BY_TABLET;DB_SWITCH=InfluxDB



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1876) enable_partition : higher write latency (14%) than “disable_partition”

2021-10-22 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1876:
-

 Summary: enable_partition : higher write latency (14%) than 
“disable_partition”
 Key: IOTDB-1876
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1876
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core/Server
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: image-2021-10-22-16-45-41-437.png, 配置参数.zip

rel/0.12 ( 0.12.3 rc1)

  !image-2021-10-22-16-45-41-437.png! 

Write only.
All written is sequential data.

只有写入操作,写入的数据为顺序数据。
10天1个分区,开分区写入延迟比不使用分区高14%。
配置文件见附件。

benchmark and iotdb's configuration files are attached.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1878) After benchmark reconstruction, the output results are persisted to IoTDB, and the benchmark reports Connection Error

2021-10-22 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1878:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> After benchmark reconstruction, the output results are persisted to IoTDB, 
> and the benchmark reports Connection Error
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1878
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1878
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: config.properties
>
>
> The steps to reproduce the problem are as follows:
> 1. Start IoTDB server
> 2.Modify config in benchmark
> 3.Execute benchmark.sh 
> 4. View log in Benchmark



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2077) master - Raw data query without value filtering(“limit 1” ) got an error log

2021-11-30 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2077:
-

 Summary: master - Raw data query  without value filtering(“limit 
1” ) got an error log
 Key: IOTDB-2077
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2077
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Query
Affects Versions: master branch
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: q.sh

master  521f5626297e834049e8f8af94bac09ede3b8143

1.  Run q.sh  (See the attachment)
2.  ./sbin/start-cli.sh  -e "select s_0  from root.ip5.ip50.d_10 
{color:#DE350B}*limit 1*{color}"   

2021-12-01 14:20:18,743 [pool-15-IoTDB-Query-5] ERROR 
o.a.i.d.q.d.RawQueryDataSetWithoutValueFilter$ReadTask:126 - Something gets 
wrong while reading from the series reader root.ip5.ip50.d_10.s_0:
java.io.IOException: no next page, neither non-overlapped nor overlapped
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesReader.nextPage(SeriesReader.java:701)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesRawDataBatchReader.readPageData(SeriesRawDataBatchReader.java:181)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesRawDataBatchReader.hasNextBatch(SeriesRawDataBatchReader.java:111)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.dataset.RawQueryDataSetWithoutValueFilter$ReadTask.runMayThrow(RawQueryDataSetWithoutValueFilter.java:83)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.concurrent.WrappedRunnable.run(WrappedRunnable.java:32)
at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2236) When read-only occurs, “set system to writable” is executed. No log_all.log file is generated,, and “kill query” does not work

2021-12-31 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2236:
-

 Summary: When read-only occurs, “set system to writable” is 
executed.  No log_all.log file is generated,, and “kill query” does not work
 Key: IOTDB-2236
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2236
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: screenshot-1.png

0.12.4 rc1

1. long test:No space left on device,iotdb read-only

2. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2218) [Benchmark] NPE when in verificationQueryMode

2021-12-27 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2218:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] NPE when in verificationQueryMode
 Key: IOTDB-2218
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2218
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤


Because of previous modify of session, there are NPE when in 
verificationQueryMode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2242) [Benchmark] Optimize verification mode in big mount data

2022-01-01 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2242:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] Optimize verification mode in big mount data
 Key: IOTDB-2242
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2242
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-2242) [Benchmark] Optimize verification mode in big mount data

2022-01-01 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17467540#comment-17467540
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-2242:


I will optimize on PR: https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/pull/235

> [Benchmark] Optimize verification mode in big mount data
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-2242
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2242
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 72h
>  Remaining Estimate: 72h
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2262) [Aligned timeseries] select .. into need to support aligned

2022-01-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2262:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] select .. into need to support 
aligned
 Key: IOTDB-2262
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2262
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 刘珍






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2263) [Aligned timeseries] insert into aligned timeseries without aligned , operation is successful

2022-01-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2263:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] insert into aligned timeseries 
without aligned , operation is successful
 Key: IOTDB-2263
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2263
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Reporter: 刘珍



CREATE ALIGNED TIMESERIES root.ln.wf01.GPS(latitude FLOAT encoding=PLAIN 
compressor=SNAPPY, longitude FLOAT encoding=PLAIN compressor=SNAPPY);
insert into root.ln.wf01.GPS(time,latitude,longitude ) values(1,111.2,222.8);
//insert应该报错
select * from root.ln.wf01.GPS
Msg: 500: [INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR(500)] Exception occurred: "select * from 
root.ln.wf01.GPS". executeStatement failed. 
org.apache.iotdb.db.exception.query.QueryProcessException: Meet error when init 
series reader.

error 日志:
2022-01-04 11:00:35,969 [pool-17-IoTDB-Query-2] ERROR 
o.a.i.d.q.e.RawDataQueryExecutor:132 - Meet error when init series reader
java.lang.ClassCastException: 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.memtable.WritableMemChunkGroup cannot be cast to 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.memtable.AlignedWritableMemChunkGroup
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.metadata.path.AlignedPath.getReadOnlyMemChunkFromMemTable(AlignedPath.java:381)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.memtable.AbstractMemTable.query(AbstractMemTable.java:409)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.TsFileProcessor.query(TsFileProcessor.java:1289)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.getFileResourceListForQuery(VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.java:1840)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.query(VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.java:1729)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.StorageEngine.query(StorageEngine.java:792)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.control.QueryResourceManager.getQueryDataSource(QueryResourceManager.java:95)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.executor.RawDataQueryExecutor.initManagedSeriesReader(RawDataQueryExecutor.java:115)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.executor.RawDataQueryExecutor.executeWithoutValueFilter(RawDataQueryExecutor.java:72)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.executor.QueryRouter.rawDataQuery(QueryRouter.java:110)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.processDataQuery(PlanExecutor.java:622)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.processQuery(PlanExecutor.java:252)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.basic.BasicServiceProvider.createQueryDataSet(BasicServiceProvider.java:243)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeQueryPlan(TSServiceImpl.java:725)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.access$200(TSServiceImpl.java:152)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl$QueryTask.call(TSServiceImpl.java:209)
at org.apa



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2271) [Aligned timeseries] Creating an unaligned timeseries under the aligned timeseries owning device succeeded

2022-01-05 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2271:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] Creating an unaligned timeseries 
under the aligned timeseries owning device succeeded
 Key: IOTDB-2271
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2271
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Affects Versions: 0.13.0
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: image-2022-01-05-16-16-46-143.png

在对齐时序所属设备下创建非对齐时序,期望失败,实际成功。
Delete storage group root.lz;
CREATE ALIGNED TIMESERIES root.lz.dev.GPS(latitude INT32 encoding=PLAIN 
compressor=SNAPPY, longitude INT32 encoding=PLAIN compressor=SNAPPY) ;
CREATE  TIMESERIES root.lz.dev.GPS.noalign_ts_tag with datatype=INT32 
tags(tag1=v1, tag2=v2) attributes(attr1=v1, attr2=v2);

show timeseries root.lz.dev.GPS.*
+--+-+-+++---+-+---+
|timeseries|alias|storage 
group|dataType|encoding|compression| tags| 
attributes|
+--+-+-+++---+-+---+
|root.lz.dev.GPS.noalign_ts_tag| null|  root.lz|   INT32| RLE| 
SNAPPY|{"tag1":"v1","tag2":"v2"}|{"attr2":"v2","attr1":"v1"}|
|  root.lz.dev.GPS.latitude| null|  root.lz|   INT32|   PLAIN| 
SNAPPY| null|   null|
| root.lz.dev.GPS.longitude| null|  root.lz|   INT32|   PLAIN| 
SNAPPY| null|   null|
+--+-+-+++---+-+---+
Total line number = 3

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=181307906
 !image-2022-01-05-16-16-46-143.png! 




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2266) [start-cli.sh]"WARNING: Unable to create a system terminal"

2022-01-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2266:
-

 Summary: [start-cli.sh]"WARNING: Unable to create a system 
terminal"
 Key: IOTDB-2266
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2266
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Tools/Others
Affects Versions: 0.13.0
Reporter: 刘珍


master  010af34dda85847b249775f7241e06594a740b9f

[cluster@i-r0x6sjak db_master_0104]$ ./sbin/start-cli.sh -e "show devices"|grep 
root
Jan 05, 2022 2:02:32 PM org.jline.utils.Log logr
WARNING: Unable to create a system terminal, creating a dumb terminal (enable 
debug logging for more information)

WARNING 信息处理去掉?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2264) [Aligned timeseries] load tsfile with aligned timeseries failed

2022-01-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2264:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] load tsfile with aligned timeseries 
failed
 Key: IOTDB-2264
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2264
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Tools/Others
Affects Versions: 0.13.0
Reporter: 刘珍


load包含对齐时序数据的tsfile失败: 
./sbin/start-cli.sh  -e "load './data_for_load' autoregister=false"
Msg: 411: Cannot load file 
/data/iotdb/db_master_0104/./data_for_load/1641288670353-1-0-0.tsfile because 
root.lz.dev.person. is not a legal path
日志:
2022-01-05 11:10:04,994 [pool-12-IoTDB-RPC-Client-2] ERROR 
o.a.i.d.q.e.PlanExecutor:1210 - fail to load file 1641288670353-1-0-0.tsfile
org.apache.iotdb.db.exception.metadata.IllegalPathException: 
root.lz.dev.person. is not a legal path
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.metadata.utils.MetaUtils.splitPathToDetachedPath(MetaUtils.java:60)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.metadata.path.PartialPath.(PartialPath.java:80)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.loadNewTsFileVerifyMetadata(PlanExecutor.java:1228)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.loadFile(PlanExecutor.java:1169)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.loadDir(PlanExecutor.java:1138)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.operateLoadFiles(PlanExecutor.java:1108)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.processNonQuery(PlanExecutor.java:322)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.basic.BasicServiceProvider.executeNonQuery(BasicServiceProvider.java:257)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeNonQueryPlan(TSServiceImpl.java:1900)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeNonQueryStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:1049)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeUpdateStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:1042)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:552)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.service.rpc.thrift.TSIService$Processor$executeStatement.getResult(TSIService.java:2733)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.service.rpc.thrift.TSIService$Processor$executeStatement.getResult(TSIService.java:2713)
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:38)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:38)
at 
org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadPoolServer$WorkerProcess.run(TThreadPoolServer.java:248)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2273) [Trigger] Examples in the document:alert-listener-sg1d1s1 ,double quotation marks are required

2022-01-05 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2273:
-

 Summary: [Trigger] Examples in the document:alert-listener-sg1d1s1 
 ,double quotation marks are required
 Key: IOTDB-2273
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2273
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Document
Affects Versions: 0.13.0
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: image-2022-01-05-19-21-42-907.png

https://iotdb.apache.org/zh/UserGuide/Master/Advanced-Features/Triggers.html

alert-listener-sg1d1s1触发器名字包含- ,需要加双引号。
 !image-2022-01-05-19-21-42-907.png! 




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-2194) [cluster] SHOW TIMESERIES will only display 2000 timeseries

2021-12-23 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17464419#comment-17464419
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-2194:


Fix this problem on https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/4627

> [cluster] SHOW TIMESERIES will only display 2000 timeseries
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-2194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2194
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.12.4
>
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> In current cluster version, if we have more than 2,000 timeseries, when we 
> commend SHOW TIMESERIES, it will only display 2,000 timeseries, the same as 
> the SHOW DEVICES...
> This problem is fixed on master branch, but not cherry-pick to rel/0.12
>  
> Related PR: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/2958



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2194) [cluster] SHOW TIMESERIES will only display 2000 timeseries

2021-12-23 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2194:
--

 Summary: [cluster] SHOW TIMESERIES will only display 2000 
timeseries
 Key: IOTDB-2194
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2194
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤
 Fix For: 0.12.4


In current cluster version, if we have more than 2,000 timeseries, when we 
commend SHOW TIMESERIES, it will only display 2,000 timeseries, the same as the 
SHOW DEVICES...

This problem is fixed on master branch, but not cherry-pick to rel/0.12

 

Related PR: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/2958



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-2230) The final result matrix numerical calculations performed by Benchmark need to be annotated in the Readme

2021-12-29 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-2230:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> The final result matrix numerical calculations performed by Benchmark need to 
> be annotated in the Readme
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-2230
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2230
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>
> Currently in readme, there is no detailed description of numerical 
> calculation of OkOperation and okPoint in the result matrix, which will make 
> people confused about how to calculate, need to be added



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-2231) Improved the ability of Benchmark to count all data points when performing precise point queries

2021-12-29 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-2231:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> Improved the ability of Benchmark to count all data points when performing 
> precise point queries
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-2231
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2231
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>
> When Benchmark performs precise point-only query, the result matrix only 
> displays the data points of one sensor under one device, and does not count 
> all the data points. This function needs to be improved



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-2226) The query function of LIMIT, OFFSET, OFFSET and SOFSET control in the Benchmark configuration file is not implemented

2021-12-29 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-2226:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> The query function of LIMIT, OFFSET, OFFSET and SOFSET control in the 
> Benchmark configuration file is not implemented
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-2226
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2226
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: xiaozhihong
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Minor
>
> In the Benchmark configuration file, the parameter function of the following 
> configuration is not implemented,such as:
> # 条件查询中结果输出项的最大数量
> QUERY_LIMIT_N=5
> # 条件查询中含有Limit子句的偏移量
> QUERY_LIMIT_OFFSET=5
> # 条件查询结果输出序列的最大数量
> QUERY_SLIMIT_N=5
> # 条件查询结果输出序列的偏移量
> QUERY_SLIMIT_OFFSET=5



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-2218) [Benchmark] NPE when in verificationQueryMode

2021-12-29 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17466710#comment-17466710
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-2218:


This Problem is also fixed

> [Benchmark] NPE when in verificationQueryMode
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-2218
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2218
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 12h
>  Remaining Estimate: 12h
>
> Because of previous modify of session, there are NPE when in 
> verificationQueryMode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2251) There are no response for iotdb when use large offset to query

2022-01-03 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2251:
--

 Summary: There are no response for iotdb when use large offset to 
query
 Key: IOTDB-2251
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2251
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 张洪胤


Data config:

There are 10 devices in 5 storage groups, each has 30 sensors. And there are 
1,000,000 timeseries per device.

Query SQL: select * from root.test.g_0.d_0 offset 40 limit 500.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2249) [Aligned timeseries] Delete from “one column of aligned timeseries ,“ select * NPE

2022-01-03 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2249:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] Delete from  “one column of aligned 
timeseries ,“ select *  NPE
 Key: IOTDB-2249
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2249
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Reporter: 刘珍


master :
1. 测试用例
CREATE ALIGNED TIMESERIES root.lz.dev.GPS(latitude FLOAT encoding=PLAIN 
compressor=SNAPPY, longitude FLOAT encoding=PLAIN compressor=SNAPPY)
insert into root.lz.dev.GPS(time,latitude,longitude ) aligned values(9,3.2,9.8);

insert into root.lz.dev.GPS(time,latitude ) aligned values(11,4.5);
insert into root.lz.dev.GPS(time,longitude ) aligned values(11,6.7);
select * from root.lz.dev.GPS
delete  from root.lz.dev.GPS.latitude;

IoTDB> select * from root.lz.dev.GPS
{color:#DE350B}Msg: 500: [INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR(500)] Exception occurred: 
"select * from root.lz.dev.GPS". executeStatement failed. 
java.lang.NullPointerException{color}

error日志:
2022-01-04 11:51:28,727 [pool-17-IoTDB-Query-4] ERROR 
{color:#DE350B}*o.a.i.d.q.d.RawQueryDataSetWithoutValueFilter:558 - exception 
happened in producer thread
java.lang.NullPointerException: null*{color}
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.utils.datastructure.AlignedTVList.getAlignedValueByValueIndex(AlignedTVList.java:191)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.utils.datastructure.AlignedTVList.getAlignedValue(AlignedTVList.java:160)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.utils.datastructure.AlignedTVList.getTimeValuePairForTimeDuplicatedRows(AlignedTVList.java:712)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.utils.datastructure.AlignedTVList$AlignedIte.hasNextTimeValuePair(AlignedTVList.java:951)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.chunk.MemAlignedPageReader.getAllSatisfiedPageData(MemAlignedPageReader.java:57)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesReader$VersionPageReader.getAllSatisfiedPageData(SeriesReader.java:1140)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesReader.nextPage(SeriesReader.java:712)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesRawDataBatchReader.readPageData(SeriesRawDataBatchReader.java:180)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesRawDataBatchReader.readChunkData(SeriesRawDataBatchReader.java:171)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.reader.series.SeriesRawDataBatchReader.hasNextBatch(SeriesRawDataBatchReader.java:118)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.dataset.RawQueryDataSetWithoutValueFilter$ReadTask.runMayThrow(RawQueryDataSetWithoutValueFilter.java:96)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.concurrent.WrappedRunnable.run(WrappedRunnable.java:32)
at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2252) There are no response when select * from device by jdbc.

2022-01-03 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2252:
--

 Summary: There are no response when select * from device by jdbc.
 Key: IOTDB-2252
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2252
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 张洪胤


Data config:

There are 10 devices in 5 storage groups, each has 30 sensors. And there are 
1,000,000 timeseries per device.

When use jdbc connection to query(sql: select * from root.test.g_0.d_0), there 
will be no response after a short time.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2259) [Aligned timeseries] insert into:Data type mismatch ,Error information is incorrect

2022-01-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2259:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] insert into:Data type mismatch 
,Error information is incorrect
 Key: IOTDB-2259
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2259
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Affects Versions: 0.13.0
Reporter: 刘珍


insert into 对齐时间序列,数据类型不匹配,报错信息不正确

CREATE ALIGNED TIMESERIES root.lz.dev.GPS(latitude INT32 encoding=PLAIN 
compressor=SNAPPY, longitude INT32 encoding=PLAIN compress   or=SNAPPY) ;

insert into root.lz.dev.GPS(time,latitude,longitude ) aligned values(1,1.3,6.7);
Msg: 500: [INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR(500)] Exception occurred: executeNonQueryPlan 
failed. Null

错误日志:
2022-01-04 14:40:38,428 [pool-12-IoTDB-RPC-Client-8] ERROR 
o.a.i.d.u.ErrorHandlingUtils:57 - Status code: INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR(500), 
operation: executeNonQueryPlan failed
java.lang.NullPointerException: null
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.utils.datastructure.AlignedTVList.alignedTvListArrayMemCost(AlignedTVList.java:866)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.TsFileProcessor.checkAlignedMemCostAndAddToTspInfo(TsFileProcessor.java:406)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.TsFileProcessor.insert(TsFileProcessor.java:219)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.insertToTsFileProcessor(VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.java:1149)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.storagegroup.VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.insert(VirtualStorageGroupProcessor.java:922)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.StorageEngine.insert(StorageEngine.java:600)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.insert(PlanExecutor.java:1482)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.processNonQuery(PlanExecutor.java:270)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.basic.BasicServiceProvider.executeNonQuery(BasicServiceProvider.java:257)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeNonQueryPlan(TSServiceImpl.java:1900)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeNonQueryStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:1049)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeUpdateStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:1042)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.thrift.impl.TSServiceImpl.executeStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:552)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.service.rpc.thrift.TSIService$Processor$executeStatement.getResult(TSIService.java:2733)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.service.rpc.thrift.TSIService$Processor$executeStatement.getResult(TSIService.java:2713)
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:38)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:38)
at 
org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadPoolServer$WorkerProcess.run(TThreadPoolServer.java:248)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2258) [Aligned timeseries] export-csv.sh & import-csv.sh need to support aligned timeseries

2022-01-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2258:
-

 Summary: [Aligned timeseries] export-csv.sh & import-csv.sh need 
to support aligned timeseries
 Key: IOTDB-2258
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2258
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Tools/Others
Reporter: 刘珍


如题。
1. 导出对齐时间序列的数据,再导入到干净的数据库,导入后的时间序列是非对齐的。



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2183) [Cluster] Fix the config problems in cluster mode

2021-12-20 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2183:
--

 Summary: [Cluster] Fix the config problems in cluster mode
 Key: IOTDB-2183
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2183
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 张洪胤


Because of the development of iotdb server, there are some problems in 
cluster/src/resources(for metric framework and influxdb rpc service), it will 
fail when you use these config to start iotdb cluster.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-2183) [Cluster] Fix the config problems in cluster mode

2021-12-20 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-2183:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> [Cluster] Fix the config problems in cluster mode
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-2183
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2183
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> Because of the development of iotdb server, there are some problems in 
> cluster/src/resources(for metric framework and influxdb rpc service), it will 
> fail when you use these config to start iotdb cluster.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2182) [Cluster] Fix the config problems in cluster mode

2021-12-20 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2182:
--

 Summary: [Cluster] Fix the config problems in cluster mode
 Key: IOTDB-2182
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2182
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: 张洪胤


Because of the development of iotdb server, there are some problems in 
cluster/src/resources(for metric framework and influxdb rpc service), it will 
fail when you use these config to start iotdb cluster.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2039) Compaction returning more records than expeced after “Too many open files ”

2021-11-20 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2039:
-

 Summary: Compaction returning more records than expeced  after 
“Too many open files ”
 Key: IOTDB-2039
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2039
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Compaction
Affects Versions: 0.12.3
Reporter: 刘珍


h1. rel/0.12 0.12.3 rc2
commit a8c5dc8a13a4b90303fec4b29e40a1b33e6b737d
Author: HTHou 
Date: Sun Nov 14 12:46:16 2021 +0800

[maven-release-plugin] prepare release v0.12.3

h1. 1. test data
10 sg / 100dev /100 sensor (DOUBLE)
10 dev/sg
1 sensor/dev
2 points/sensor

h1. 2. execte 100  queries  :  Too many open files

log_error.log :  Too many open files

++
|count(root.ip5.ip54.d_4.s_0)|
++
|   {color:#DE350B}*200117000*{color}|
++
Total line number = 1

expected : 2 





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2034) The IOTDB process was killed by the operating system (Query)

2021-11-19 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2034:
-

 Summary: The IOTDB process was killed by the operating system 
(Query)
 Key: IOTDB-2034
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2034
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Query
Affects Versions: master branch
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties, q_limit.sh

h1. 1. master
commit d63539b7ec78576b12484a731ac3ff2894f922ed
Author: Jackie Tien 
Date:   Fri Nov 19 10:50:06 2021 +0800

Support RawQueryWithoutValueFilter in aligned timeseries (#4422)

h1. 2. 10sg/100dev/100sensor
   10dev/sg
1 sensor/dev
 2 points/sensor

h1. 3. Query
h2.  cat run_limit.sh
#!/bin/bash
echo "  PID USER  PR  NIVIRTRESSHR S  %CPU  %MEM TIME+ 
COMMAND">./virt.txt
*pid_iotdb=29485*

./clear.sh
top -b -n 1 | grep ${pid_iotdb} >>./virt.txt

for i in {1..10}
do
   ./q_limit.sh
   top -b -n 1 | grep ${pid_iotdb} >>./virt.txt
   ./clear.sh
done
-
 cat clear.sh

#!/bin/bash
sudo su root </proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
EOF

-
cat q_limit.sh
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from  root.ip5.ip50.d_0  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_10  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_20  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_30  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_40  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_50  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_60  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_70  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_80  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip50.d_90  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from  root.ip5.ip51.d_1  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_0 from root.ip5.ip51.d_11  limit 1 
offset 1" >> count_2.out

.(See the attachment)

{color:#DE350B}*The iotdb pid's VIRT usage keeps increasing  gradually until it 
is killed by the operating system
*{color}

{color:#DE350B}*iotdb 的VIRT使用一直增加直到被操作系统杀死(iotdb 查询堆外内存没有控制)*{color}





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2035) The log level of config file error information should be "error" and the parameter name should be printed

2021-11-19 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2035:
-

 Summary: The log level of  config file error information should be 
"error" and the parameter name should be printed
 Key: IOTDB-2035
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2035
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Affects Versions: master branch, 0.12.3
Reporter: 刘珍


master & rel/0.12

1. WARN -> ERROR (WARN级别改为ERROR)
2. the parameter name should be printed (参数名称应该打印出来)

2021-11-19 17:17:08,924 [main] {color:#DE350B}*WARN  
*{color}o.a.i.d.c.IoTDBDescriptor:781 - Incorrect format in config file, use 
default configuration
{color:#DE350B}*java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "a"*{color}
at 
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:580)
at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:615)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor.initMemoryAllocate(IoTDBDescriptor.java:1213)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor.loadProps(IoTDBDescriptor.java:203)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor.(IoTDBDescriptor.java:52)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor$IoTDBDescriptorHolder.(IoTDBDescriptor.java:1300)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.conf.IoTDBDescriptor.getInstance(IoTDBDescriptor.java:56)
at org.apache.iotdb.db.metadata.MManager.(MManager.java:151)
at org.apache.iotdb.db.service.IoTDB.(IoTDB.java:55)




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1993) [Benchmark] Optimize TEST_DATA_PERSISTENCE

2021-11-11 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1993:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] Optimize TEST_DATA_PERSISTENCE
 Key: IOTDB-1993
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1993
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤


When test data is larger than 10,000,000, the cost of persistency of test 
data(such as latency) may influence the write of benchmark, so there is need to 
do some optimize, such as split into few tables or files.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1987) [Benchmark] Add DOUBLE_LENGTH and other meta config for IoTDB in benchmark

2021-11-10 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1987:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] Add DOUBLE_LENGTH and other meta config for 
IoTDB in benchmark
 Key: IOTDB-1987
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1987
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤


I think we need to use benchmark to control the double point number decimal 
places.

And when use to benchmark to register schema, I think there are needs to add 
some related config.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1995) master :" compaction_submission_interval " parameter is invalid

2021-11-11 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1995:
-

 Summary: master :" compaction_submission_interval "  parameter is 
invalid
 Key: IOTDB-1995
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1995
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Compaction
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: iotdb-engine.properties

master (1105)   0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31 

1.
{color:#DE350B}*compaction_submission_interval=36000*{color}
2. Start iotdb
The compaction thread continues to execute .
启动数据库,合并线程一直在执行。





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2012) [Benchmark] There are ClassCastExceptions when set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT and IS_CLIENT_BIND both false

2021-11-15 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2012:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] There are ClassCastExceptions when set 
IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT and IS_CLIENT_BIND both false 
 Key: IOTDB-2012
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2012
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤
 Attachments: image-2021-11-16-10-23-14-375.png

When set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT and IS_CLIENT_BIND both false, there are 
ClassCastException.

!image-2021-11-16-10-23-14-375.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2069) cluster : Internal error processing fetchMultSeries

2021-11-26 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2069:
-

 Summary: cluster : Internal error processing fetchMultSeries
 Key: IOTDB-2069
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2069
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties, image-2021-11-27-09-41-21-879.png, 
image-2021-11-27-09-41-28-576.png, iotdb-engine.properties, iotdb-env.sh, q.sh, 
q_limit.sh, run_limit.sh, run_q.sh

0.12.3 rc2   a8c5dc8a13a4b90303fec4b29e40a1b33e6b737d

1. iotdb conf
  3 node 1 rep
See the attachment

2. run  benchmark  (see the attach : config.properties)

3. 192.168.130.13
nohup ./run_q.sh &
nohup ./run_limit.sh &
4.192.168.130.10
nohup ./run_q.sh &
5. 192.168.130.4
nohup ./run_q.sh &

6. log error:
 !image-2021-11-27-09-41-21-879.png|thumbnail! 
 !image-2021-11-27-09-41-28-576.png|thumbnail! 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-2046) [Benchmark] support to run on windows using bat.

2021-11-21 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-2046:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> [Benchmark] support to run on windows using bat.
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-2046
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2046
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2046) [Benchmark] support to run on windows using bat.

2021-11-21 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2046:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] support to run on windows using bat.
 Key: IOTDB-2046
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2046
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2037) [Benchmark] NPE when set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT = false and IS_CLIENT_BIND = false

2021-11-19 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-2037:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] NPE when set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT = false 
and IS_CLIENT_BIND = false
 Key: IOTDB-2037
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2037
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
 Attachments: image-2021-11-20-10-56-37-680.png

!image-2021-11-20-10-56-37-680.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-2037) [Benchmark] NPE when set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT = false and IS_CLIENT_BIND = false

2021-11-22 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-2037:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> [Benchmark] NPE when set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT = false and IS_CLIENT_BIND = 
> false
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-2037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2037
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-11-20-10-56-37-680.png
>
>   Original Estimate: 12h
>  Remaining Estimate: 12h
>
> !image-2021-11-20-10-56-37-680.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2028) The file handle is not released immediately after query

2021-11-17 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2028:
-

 Summary: The file handle is not released immediately after query
 Key: IOTDB-2028
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2028
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Query
Affects Versions: 0.12.3
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: image-2021-11-18-10-27-28-502.png

rel/0.12  0.12.3 rc2
commit 0ee47a59d898cca7deb32fee35505b98022ab53b
Author: HTHou 
Date:   Sun Nov 14 12:46:27 2021 +0800

[maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration


1. 10 sg  / 100dev /100 sensor 
   10 dev/sg
  1 sensor/dev
   2 points/sensor
2. The test results
 !image-2021-11-18-10-27-28-502.png! 

3. Test steps
3.1   
echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
3.2 
start iotdb.
Get the pid of iotdb.
3.3
Run the test script
with sleep :

lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip50.d_0  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip51.d_1  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip52.d_2  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip53.d_3  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip54.d_4  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip55.d_5  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip56.d_6  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip57.d_7  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip58.d_8  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out
./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select count(*) from root.ip5.ip59.d_9  " >> 
count_1.out
sleep 120
lsof -p 10604|wc -l >> a.out


without sleep
The script above , deletes “sleep 120”




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-2021) BloomFilterCache does not take effect

2021-11-16 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17444984#comment-17444984
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-2021:
---

PR#4410 test results :
 !screenshot-1.png! 
 !screenshot-2.png! 

> BloomFilterCache does not take effect
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-2021
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2021
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Query
>Affects Versions: master branch
>Reporter: 刘珍
>Assignee: Yuan Tian
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: config.properties, image-2021-11-17-09-21-37-898.png, 
> image-2021-11-17-09-21-49-232.png, screenshot-1.png, screenshot-2.png
>
>
> Comparatives : PR#4350 & master 
>PR#4350 ( has been merged into the master branch)
>master (1105)  : 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31 
> PR#4350 & master (*close compaction*):
>enable_seq_space_compaction=false
>enable_unseq_space_compaction=false
>enable_cross_space_compaction=false
> PR#4350:
>chunk_timeseriesmeta_free_memory_proportion=*300*:100:200:300:400
> 1.Generate test data
> benchmark : config.properties (See the attachment)
> 2.Create 1 sensor without writing data
> create timeseries root.ip5.ip59.d_29.s_1 WITH DATATYPE=DOUBLE, ENCODING=PLAIN 
> ,compression=UNCOMPRESSED
> 3. The test script
> for i in {1..10}
> do
>./clear.sh
>./clear.sh
>./clear.sh
>sleep 7
>./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_1 from root.ip5.ip59.d_29" >> 
> bloom_cache.out
> done
> 
> cat clear.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> sudo su root <  echo 3 >/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> EOF
> 4.The test results
>  !image-2021-11-17-09-21-37-898.png! 
>  !image-2021-11-17-09-21-49-232.png! 
> {color:#DE350B}*PR#4350 : BloomFilter cache  does not take effect*{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2021) BloomFilterCache does not take effect

2021-11-16 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2021:
-

 Summary: BloomFilterCache does not take effect
 Key: IOTDB-2021
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2021
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Query
Reporter: 刘珍
 Fix For: master branch
 Attachments: image-2021-11-17-09-21-37-898.png, 
image-2021-11-17-09-21-49-232.png

PR#4350 ( has been merged into the master branch)
master (1105)  : 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31 

PR#4350 & master (*close compaction*):
enable_seq_space_compaction=false
enable_unseq_space_compaction=false
enable_cross_space_compaction=false

PR#4350:
chunk_timeseriesmeta_free_memory_proportion=300:100:200:300:400


1.Generate test data
benchmark : config.properties (See the attachment)

2.Create 1 sensor without writing data

create timeseries root.ip5.ip59.d_29.s_1 WITH DATATYPE=DOUBLE, ENCODING=PLAIN 
,compression=UNCOMPRESSED

3. The test script
for i in {1..10}
do
   ./clear.sh
   ./clear.sh
   ./clear.sh
   sleep 7
   ./sbin/start-cli.sh -p 6667 -e "select s_1 from root.ip5.ip59.d_29" >> 
bloom_cache.out
done

cat clear.sh
#!/bin/bash
sudo su root </proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
EOF

4.The test results

 !image-2021-11-17-09-21-37-898.png! 
 !image-2021-11-17-09-21-49-232.png! 

{color:#DE350B}*PR#4350 : BloomFilter cache  does not take effect*{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1895) Cache leader optimization for batch write interfaces on multiple devices

2021-11-24 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17448443#comment-17448443
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1895:
---

PASS. [^SessionExample.java] 
rc2 session:
real0m20.598s
rc1 session:
real0m37.477s


> Cache leader optimization for batch write interfaces on multiple devices
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1895
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1895
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Xinyu Tan
>Assignee: Quan Siyi
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: SessionExample.java
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> At present, the cache leader performance optimization for distributed write 
> performance is critical ([the design 
> document|https://shimo.im/docs/dYwjwtrTPXPWcqxj]) . Although the current 
> implementation in the session module for all equipment cache handling, On the 
> server side, however, only writes to a single device are passed clues, 
> causing the partition cache of the batch interface to be effectively 
> invalidated. As the number of users of multi-device interfaces increases, we 
> need to do this optimization.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1897) cluster : The result of "select count(sensor) .. " is inconsistent with that of "select sensor .."

2021-10-26 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1897:
-

 Summary: cluster :  The result of "select count(sensor)  .. " is 
inconsistent with that of "select sensor .."
 Key: IOTDB-1897
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1897
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: SessionExample.java, image-2021-10-26-17-38-05-803.png

测试版本:
rel/0.12  958628804c14e58e5083233a6ca6aa370521b504

问题描述:
1. 集群信息
cluster : 5 nodes 1 replication 
  
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.17:9003,192.168.130.20:9003

default_replica_num=1

2. 启动4/10/13/17/20

3.在17节点运行SessionExample.java (见附件)
编译与运行(运行时间约1.5分钟):
javac -cp ./lib/*:. SessionExample.java
java -cp ./lib/*:. SessionExample

4. cli查询
select count(s1) from root.sg5.d1
select s1 from root.sg5.d1
{color:#DE350B}*执行结果记录数不一致。*{color}
 !image-2021-10-26-17-38-05-803.png|thumbnail! 
select s1 from root.sg5.d1的结果为:
Total line number = 1









--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1899) ERROR o.a.i.d.e.c.t.AbstractCompactionTask:57 - Stream Closed

2021-10-26 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1899:
-

 Summary: ERROR o.a.i.d.e.c.t.AbstractCompactionTask:57 - Stream 
Closed
 Key: IOTDB-1899
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1899
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Affects Versions: master branch
Reporter: 刘珍


master (new_compaction) :

{color:#DE350B}*IOException during compaction :*{color}
(合并时,文件流异常)
{color:#DE350B}*2021-10-20 20:58:48,333 [pool-4-IoTDB-Compaction-6] ERROR 
o.a.i.d.e.c.t.AbstractCompactionTask:57 - Stream Closed
java.io.IOException: Stream Closed*{color}
at java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:326)
at 
java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:82)
at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:140)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.tsfile.write.writer.LocalTsFileOutput.getPosition(LocalTsFileOutput.java:65)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.tsfile.write.writer.TsFileIOWriter.writeChunk(TsFileIOWriter.java:224)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.inner.utils.InnerSpaceCompactionUtils.writeByAppendPageMerge(InnerSpaceCompactionUtils.java:174)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.inner.utils.InnerSpaceCompactionUtils.compact(InnerSpaceCompactionUtils.java:435)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.inner.sizetiered.SizeTieredCompactionTask.doCompaction(SizeTieredCompactionTask.java:136)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.task.AbstractCompactionTask.call(AbstractCompactionTask.java:55)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.task.AbstractCompactionTask.call(AbstractCompactionTask.java:36)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)


{color:#DE350B}*2021-10-20 23:08:36,137 [pool-4-IoTDB-Compaction-7] ERROR 
o.a.i.d.e.c.t.AbstractCompactionTask:57 - null
java.io.IOException: null*{color}
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.inner.utils.InnerSpaceCompactionUtils.compact(InnerSpaceCompactionUtils.java:298)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.inner.sizetiered.SizeTieredCompactionTask.doCompaction(SizeTieredCompactionTask.java:136)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.task.AbstractCompactionTask.call(AbstractCompactionTask.java:55)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.engine.compaction.task.AbstractCompactionTask.call(AbstractCompactionTask.java:36)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$201(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:293)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1888) [iotdb-benchmark] can't set point_step as 1us

2021-10-27 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17434818#comment-17434818
 ] 

张洪胤 commented on IOTDB-1888:


https://github.com/thulab/iotdb-benchmark/pull/215

> [iotdb-benchmark] can't set point_step as 1us
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1888
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: FengQingxin
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-10-25-16-12-40-132.png
>
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> Hi
>   There is bug in iotdb-benchmark,I can't use it to set  point_step as 1us.
>  # set iotdb conf as 'timestamp_precision=us'
>  # set iotdb-benchmark conf as 'TIMESTAMP_PRECISION=us' and 'POINT_STEP=200'
>  # start iotdb the start iotdb-benchmark
>  # using iotdb-cli to query the data:
> The point_step is 200ms.
> !image-2021-10-25-16-12-40-132.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1888) [iotdb-benchmark] can't set point_step as 1us

2021-10-27 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1888:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> [iotdb-benchmark] can't set point_step as 1us
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1888
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: FengQingxin
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-10-25-16-12-40-132.png
>
>
> Hi
>   There is bug in iotdb-benchmark,I can't use it to set  point_step as 1us.
>  # set iotdb conf as 'timestamp_precision=us'
>  # set iotdb-benchmark conf as 'TIMESTAMP_PRECISION=us' and 'POINT_STEP=200'
>  # start iotdb the start iotdb-benchmark
>  # using iotdb-cli to query the data:
> The point_step is 200ms.
> !image-2021-10-25-16-12-40-132.png!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1976) [Benchmark]Add log when register schema.

2021-11-08 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1976:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark]Add log when register schema.
 Key: IOTDB-1976
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1976
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤


When you set CREATE_SCHEMA = true, benchmark will register schema in your 
target database. I think add some log in this procedure and stop when register 
is failed can be a good idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1367) [Distributed] Runtime exception is not properly handled during forwarding

2021-11-08 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440863#comment-17440863
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1367:
---

rel/0.12  f295447aafc1687e8b3f55b360601fe1cffa53f1
5节点1副本
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
default_replica_num=1
不通过,表现同上(master)
IoTDB> select avg(s_1) from root.ip4.sg5.dev1
{color:#DE350B}*Msg: 313: Request "Query aggregate: root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 in 
[Node(internalIp:192.168.130.13, metaPort:9003, nodeIdentifier:-100054350, 
dataPort:40010, clientPort:6667, clientIp:192.168.130.13)]" timeout*{color}

日志:
2021-11-09 10:45:27,895 [ClusterClient-1] ERROR 
o.a.i.c.q.a.ClusterAggregator:251 - Meta: {color:#DE350B}Cannot query 
aggregation root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 from Node(internalIp:192.168.130.13, 
metaPort:9003, nodeIdentifier:-100054350, dataPort:40010, clientPort:6667, 
clientIp:192.168.130.13)
org.apache.thrift.TApplicationException: Internal error processing 
getAggrResult{color}
at org.apache.thrift.TServiceClient.receiveBase(TServiceClient.java:79)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.rpc.thrift.TSDataService$Client.recv_getAggrResult(TSDataService.java:641)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.rpc.thrift.TSDataService$Client.getAggrResult(TSDataService.java:628)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.query.aggregate.ClusterAggregator.getRemoteAggregateResult(ClusterAggregator.java:278)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.query.aggregate.ClusterAggregator.getRemoteAggregateResult(ClusterAggregator.java:231)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.query.aggregate.ClusterAggregator.getAggregateResult(ClusterAggregator.java:146)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.query.aggregate.ClusterAggregator.getAggregateResult(ClusterAggregator.java:108)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.query.aggregate.ClusterAggregateExecutor.aggregateOneSeries(ClusterAggregateExecutor.java:77)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.executor.AggregationExecutor.executeWithoutValueFilter(AggregationExecutor.java:111)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.query.executor.QueryRouter.aggregate(QueryRouter.java:136)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.qp.executor.PlanExecutor.processDataQuery(PlanExecutor.java:539)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.cluster.query.ClusterPlanExecutor.processQuery(ClusterPlanExecutor.java:101)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.TSServiceImpl.createQueryDataSet(TSServiceImpl.java:1100)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.TSServiceImpl.internalExecuteQueryStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:731)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.db.service.TSServiceImpl.executeStatement(TSServiceImpl.java:596)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.service.rpc.thrift.TSIService$Processor$executeStatement.getResult(TSIService.java:2373)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.service.rpc.thrift.TSIService$Processor$executeStatement.getResult(TSIService.java:2353)
at org.apache.thrift.ProcessFunction.process(ProcessFunction.java:38)
at org.apache.thrift.TBaseProcessor.process(TBaseProcessor.java:38)
at 
org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadPoolServer$WorkerProcess.run(TThreadPoolServer.java:248)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)



> [Distributed] Runtime exception is not properly handled during forwarding
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1367
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: Tian Jiang
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: client-me, distributed, query
> Attachments: image-2021-05-07-20-14-47-670.png, screenshot-1.png
>
>
> When I executed `select avg(s_0) from root.group_0.d_20` (notice that s_0 is 
> boolean and does not support avg), I got `Msg: 313: Request "Query aggregate: 
> root.group_0.d_20.s_0 in [Node(internalIp:192.168.130.4, metaPort:9003, 
> nodeIdentifier:1436654207, dataPort:40003, clientPort:6667, 
> clientIp:0.0.0.0)]" timeout`. While the log on node 192.168.130.4 says:
>  !image-2021-05-07-20-14-47-670.png|thumbnail! 
> The cause is that RunTimeExceptions are not caught explicitly in 
> DataClusterServer and MetaClusterServer, so they are converted to TExceptions 
> by Thrift and are recognized as network problems by the coordinator.
> The solution is either to catch runtime exceptions explicitly and create 
> status codes for them or make the coordinator capable of resolving more 
> TExceptions. Both ways have their difficulties, for the first one, it is 
> nearly impossi

[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1402) Support the auto-create-schema mechanism for insertRecords in cluster module

2021-11-08 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440921#comment-17440921
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1402:
---

rel/0.12  f295447aafc1687e8b3f55b360601fe1cffa53f1
{color:#00875A}*测试结果:通过*{color}
iotdb :
 
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
 default_replica_num=1

 default_storage_group_level=2

benchmark:
   DB_SWITCH=IoTDB-012-JDBC或IoTDB-012-SESSION_BY_RECORDS
   CREATE_SCHEMA=false

benchmark先启动写入测试,再启动查询。测试过程中,频繁执行
   delete storage group root.*
   count timeseries
结果正确:
IoTDB> count timeseries
+-+
|count|
+-+
|  {color:#00875A}*100*{color}|
+-+
Total line number = 1




> Support the auto-create-schema mechanism for insertRecords in cluster module
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1402
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: Xinyu Tan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-08-31-15-46-20-284.png, 
> insert_config.properties, query_config.properties, screenshot-1.png, 
> screenshot-2.png
>
>
> On 28 May's commit 363bda92dbdb0f2f4739138ec858c91bb7c81efb, after starting 
> three node single replica cluster, sessionExample insertrecords interface 
> will be written in the failure. This is mainly due to problems with the 
> automatic schema creation logic of InsertRowsPlan in the cluster, which does 
> not handle BatchProcessException well



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1628) error message=mid consistency,localAppliedId is smaller than the leaderCommitId

2021-11-08 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440932#comment-17440932
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1628:
---

rel/0.12   f295447aafc1687e8b3f55b360601fe1cffa53f1

iotdb:
   
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
   default_replica_num=1

   default_storage_group_level=2

benchmark : 
   先运行insert_config.properties配置
   过1分钟,再运行query_config.properties
   cli连接节点,执行多次(单用户):
   delete storage group root.* 
   count timeseries
   可复现。:
IoTDB> count timeseries
{color:#00875A}{color:#DE350B}*Msg: 411: Error occurred in query process: check 
consistency failed, error message=mid consistency, localAppliedId is smaller 
than the leaderCommitId*{color}{color}


> error message=mid consistency,localAppliedId is smaller than the 
> leaderCommitId
> ---
>
> Key: IOTDB-1628
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1628
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: FengQingxin
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-09-06-11-30-41-100.png, 
> image-2021-09-06-11-31-47-086.png
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> _强调文本_Dear Developers:
>   I met an error when I using iotdb-cluster,"error message=mid 
> consistency,localAppliedId is smaller than the leaderCommitId".
>  # start iotdb-cluster [3 nodes,default_replica_num=3]
>  # insert data with iotdb-benchmark[read and write]
> !image-2021-09-06-11-30-41-100.png!
> !image-2021-09-06-11-31-47-086.png!
> Please check this.
> Thanks.
> B.R.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1977) cluster(master) : delete storage group root.* Msg: 304: Path [root.*] does not exist

2021-11-08 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1977:
-

 Summary: cluster(master) : delete storage group root.*  Msg: 304: 
Path [root.*] does not exist
 Key: IOTDB-1977
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1977
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties, image-2021-11-09-15-55-50-438.png

master  0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31 

iotdb:
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
default_replica_num=1

default_storage_group_level=2

benchmark: config.properties

Once Benchmark gets up and running,cli :
IoTDB> show storage group
+-+
|storage group|
+-+
|root.test.g_9|
|root.test.g_8|
|root.test.g_1|
|root.test.g_0|
|root.test.g_3|
|root.test.g_2|
|root.test.g_5|
|root.test.g_4|
|root.test.g_7|
|root.test.g_6|
+-+
Total line number = 10
It costs 0.002s
IoTDB> delete storage group root.*
{color:#DE350B}*Msg: 304: Path [root.*] does not exist*{color}
 !image-2021-11-09-15-55-50-438.png! 

rel /0.12 can be executed successfully




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1393) Request timed out when create time series

2021-11-08 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440860#comment-17440860
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1393:
---

rel/0.12 f295447aafc1687e8b3f55b360601fe1cffa53f1
5节点1副本
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
default_replica_num=1
{color:#00875A}*通过。*{color}
IoTDB> CREATE TIMESERIES root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts0 WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, 
ENCODING=PLAIN, compression=UNCOMPRESSED
{color:#00875A}*Msg: The statement is executed successfully.*{color}
IoTDB> create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts1(elec_meter) with 
datatype=INT32, encoding=RLE, compression=SNAPPY,MAX_POINT_NUMBER=  
3 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)
{color:#00875A}*Msg: The statement is executed successfully.*{color}
IoTDB> create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2 with datatype=INT64, 
encoding=RLE, compression=LZ4 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attribute  
s(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)
{color:#00875A}*Msg: The statement is executed successfully.*{color}

IoTDB> insert into root.devices.wf03.wt01(time,ts0,ts1,ts2) 
values(1,true,23,31);
Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
IoTDB> select * from root.devices.wf03.wt01
+-+--+--+--+
| 
Time|root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts0|root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2|root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts1|
+-+--+--+--+
|1970-01-01T08:00:00.001+08:00|  true|  
  31|23|
+-+--+--+--+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.107s



> Request timed out when create time series
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1393
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1393
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Affects Versions: 0.12.0
>Reporter: LuMing
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: screenshot-1.png
>
>
> 1.client connected
> 2.execute statement
> CREATE TIMESERIES root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts0 WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, 
> ENCODING=PLAIN, compression=UNCOMPRESSED
>  create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts1(elec_meter) with 
> datatype=INT32, encoding=RLE, compression=SNAPPY,MAX_POINT_NUMBER=3 
> tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)
>  create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2 with datatype=INT64, 
> encoding=RLE, compression=LZ4 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, 
> attr2=a2)3.result
> 3. result
> !https://clouddevops.huawei.com/vision-file-storage/api/file/download/upload-v2/2021/4/18/z00293891/8ccad779814e46faaadc92ad27397141/image.png!
>  4. log segments
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,430 | DEBUG | [DataClientThread-5] | Meta: synchronizing 
> commitIndex -1/0 | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.member.RaftMember 
> (RaftMember.java:906) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,473 | DEBUG | 
> [Data(node1:22250)-HeartbeatThread@1621328224936] | Data(node1:22250): 
> Heartbeat from leader Node(internalIp:node1, metaPort:22250, 
> nodeIdentifier:-1394469830, dataPort:22252, clientPort:22260, clientIp:node1) 
> is still valid | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread 
> (HeartbeatThread.java:100) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,473 | DEBUG | 
> [Data(node2:22250)-HeartbeatThread@1621328224966] | Data(node2:22250): 
> Heartbeat from leader Node(internalIp:node2, metaPort:22250, 
> nodeIdentifier:-1395157557, dataPort:22252, clientPort:22260, clientIp:node2) 
> is still valid | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread 
> (HeartbeatThread.java:100) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,486 | DEBUG | 
> [Data(node3:22250)-HeartbeatThread@1621328224906] | Data(node3:22250): Send 
> heartbeat to 2 followers | 
> org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread 
> (HeartbeatThread.java:150) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:08,005 | DEBUG | [MetaHeartbeatClientThread-1] | Meta: 
> Inconsistent log found, leaderCommit: 0-6, localCommit: -1--1, localLast: 0-6 
> | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.member.RaftMember (RaftMember.java:423) 
> *2021-05-18 19:39:08,431 | WARN  | [DataClientThread-5] | Meta: Failed to 
> synchronize with the leader after 20018ms | 
> *org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.member.RaftMember (RaftMember.java:927) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:08,432 | DEBUG | [DataClientThread-5] | Exception occurred 
> when applying seriesPath: root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2, re

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1979) cluster:Insert into the nonexistent sequence succeeded, but show timeseries got "Empty set."

2021-11-09 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1979:
-

 Summary: cluster:Insert into the nonexistent sequence succeeded, 
but show timeseries got  "Empty set."
 Key: IOTDB-1979
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1979
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties.records.insert, 
config.properties.records.query, image-2021-11-09-18-04-58-188.png

master  0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31
rel/0.12  f295447aafc1687e8b3f55b360601fe1cffa53f1

1. cluster 
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
default_replica_num=1

* default_storage_group_level=1(default)*
* 
2. 192.168.130.10 benchmark
/home/iotdb/liuzhen_test/bm_1103
DB_SWITCH=IoTDB-012-SESSION_BY_RECORDS
HOST=192.168.130.10
DB_NAME=test
BATCH_SIZE_PER_WRITE=10
LOOP=100

GROUP_NUMBER=10
DEVICE_NUMBER=100
SENSOR_NUMBER=1
CLIENT_NUMBER=100

cd /home/iotdb/liuzhen_test/bm_1103
cp conf/config.properties.records.insert conf/config.properties
nohup ./benchmark.sh > records_insert.out &
sleep 120
cp conf/config.properties.records.query conf/config.properties
nohup ./benchmark.sh > records_query.out &

3. 192.168.130.4 cli

delete storage group root.*
count timeseries

If the result of count timeseries is 100,Continue to perform
delete storage group root.*
count timeseries
...
When the result of ”count timeseries “ is less than 100,Run “show timeseries ” 
to find the device that failed to create:
count(root.test.g_0~root.test.g_9) <10 .(当count timeseries 的值小于100,运行
show  
timeseries,在结果中找出是哪个设备创建失败,root.test.g_0到root.test.g_9的个数应该等于10,如果小于10,看看是哪个设备没创建成功,比如,我的环境是root.test.g_1.d_21没创建成功)

IoTDB> insert into root.test.g_1.d_21(time,s_0) values(1,3.45);
{color:#00875A}*Msg: The statement is executed successfully.*{color}
IoTDB>
IoTDB>
IoTDB> show timeseries root.test.g_1.d_21
+--+-+-+++---++--+
|timeseries|alias|storage group|dataType|encoding|compression|tags|attributes|
+--+-+-+++---++--+
+--+-+-+++---++--+
{color:#DE350B}*Empty set.*{color}

 !image-2021-11-09-18-04-58-188.png! 

-



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1937) cluster:The cluster could support sync

2021-11-04 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1937:
-

 Summary: cluster:The cluster  could support sync
 Key: IOTDB-1937
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1937
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍


集群应该支持sync。



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1939) sync : The receiver receives more data than the sender sends

2021-11-05 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1939:
-

 Summary: sync : The receiver receives more data than the sender 
sends
 Key: IOTDB-1939
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1939
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: Tools/Sync
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties, q.sh

iotdb:0.12.3 rc1

receiver: fit 130.19
sender: fit 130.21
benchmark: fit 130.5 (master_0807)

benchmark connect the sender.

Run for about 20mins:
   130.19
   service network stop
   sleep 5s
   service network start

After benchmark finished:
   execute q.sh
   The sender's results is right. (1/sensor)
  {color:#DE350B}* All the results on the receiver are incorrect*{color}






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1897) cluster : The result of "select count(sensor) .. " is inconsistent with that of "select sensor .."

2021-11-05 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17439122#comment-17439122
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1897:
---

master 5 nodes 1rep (0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31),Same problem

> cluster :  The result of "select count(sensor)  .. " is inconsistent with 
> that of "select sensor .."
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1897
>     URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1897
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Affects Versions: 0.12.3
>Reporter: 刘珍
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: SessionExample.java, image-2021-10-26-17-38-05-803.png
>
>
> 测试版本:
> rel/0.12  958628804c14e58e5083233a6ca6aa370521b504
> 问题描述:
> 1. 集群信息
> cluster : 5 nodes 1 replication 
>   
> seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.17:9003,192.168.130.20:9003
> default_replica_num=1
> 2. 启动4/10/13/17/20
> 3.在17节点运行SessionExample.java (见附件)
> 编译与运行(运行时间约1.5分钟):
> javac -cp ./lib/*:. SessionExample.java
> java -cp ./lib/*:. SessionExample
> 4. cli查询
> select count(s1) from root.sg5.d1
> select s1 from root.sg5.d1
> {color:#DE350B}*执行结果记录数不一致。*{color}
>  !image-2021-10-26-17-38-05-803.png|thumbnail! 
> select count(s1) from 
> root.sg5.d1的结果为30003({color:#DE350B}*这个结果也有问题,应该是3*{color})
> select s1 from root.sg5.d1的结果为:
> Total line number = 1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1927) [Benchmark] remove insertOneSensorBatch, use deviceSchema to control

2021-11-04 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1927:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] remove insertOneSensorBatch, use deviceSchema 
to control
 Key: IOTDB-1927
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1927
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤


Because of the structure change of benchmark, there is no place use 
insertOneSensorBatch, so I think remove it is a good idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (IOTDB-1927) [Benchmark] remove insertOneSensorBatch, use deviceSchema to control

2021-11-04 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

张洪胤 reassigned IOTDB-1927:
--

Assignee: 张洪胤

> [Benchmark] remove insertOneSensorBatch, use deviceSchema to control
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1927
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1927
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Benchmark
>Reporter: 张洪胤
>Assignee: 张洪胤
>Priority: Major
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Because of the structure change of benchmark, there is no place use 
> insertOneSensorBatch, so I think remove it is a good idea.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1619) There is an error msg when I restart iotdb-cluster

2021-11-03 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17437788#comment-17437788
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1619:
---

1203rc1 resolved.

> There is an error msg when I restart iotdb-cluster
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-1619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1619
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: FengQingxin
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: image-2021-09-03-17-36-27-985.png
>
>
> Hi
>   I met a error msg when I try to restart an iotdb-cluster[3 
> nodes,default_replica_num=2] .
> First I restarted the cluster,and try to insert data to it.
> Second using "stop-node.sh" to stop it.
> Third reboot server. Then using "start-node.sh" to restart it.
> At  this time , I met the error msg"2021-09-03 16:33:05,237 [main] ERROR 
> o.a.i.c.l.m.CommittedEntryManager:252 - missing log entry [last: -1, append 
> at: 5397176]"
> !image-2021-09-03-17-36-27-985.png!
> Please check this.
> Thanks.
> B.R.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1963) master :Compaction recover causes of data loss (Before this problem there was the kill operation in revover)

2021-11-08 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1963:
-

 Summary: master :Compaction recover causes of data loss (Before 
this problem there was the kill operation in revover)
 Key: IOTDB-1963
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1963
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Compaction
Affects Versions: master branch
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties.1, config.properties.2

master 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31 

1. Run the Benchmark tool ,Execute 2 times in serial
See the attachment for configuration parameters

2. Execute q.sh (All SQL results:2)
Ensure that data is correct before the restart

3. Back up data

4.Execute stop-server.sh when compacting

5. Execute start-server.sh
Execute q.sh (All SQL results:2)
Run for about 30 minutes
Execute stop-server.sh when compacting

6. Back up data

7. Execute start-server.sh
Execute “killall -u xx”  before "Congratulation, IoTDB is set up successfully. 
Now, enjoy yourself!" 
That is to say,
Execute “killall -u xx” when recovering.

8. Back up data

9. Execute start-server.sh
Execute q.sh(The expected value of all SQL results is:2) :
+-+
|count(root.ip5.ip52.d_12.s_0)|
+-+
|{color:red}*199804000*{color}|
+-+
Total line number = 1
It costs 69.841s
++
|count(root.ip5.ip52.d_2.s_0)|
++
|   {color:red}*199803000*{color}|
++
Total line number = 1
It costs 64.820s




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1402) Support the auto-create-schema mechanism for insertRecords in cluster module

2021-11-07 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440202#comment-17440202
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1402:
---

master 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31
5节点1副本
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003

benchmark 在 130.10机器。
benchmark配置见附件,先启动写入测试,(3分钟后)再启动benchmark查询,测试过程中,cli执行几次(比如 3,4,5次):
delete storage group root.*
count timeseries

期望结果:
IoTDB> count timeseries
+-+
|count|
+-+
|  100|
+-+
(执行几次delete storage group root.*后的)实际结果:
IoTDB> count timeseries
+-+
|count|
+-+
|   96|
+-+

benchmark异常日志:
2021-11-08 14:43:43,360 ERROR 
cn.edu.tsinghua.iotdb.benchmark.iotdb012.IoTDB:610 - exception occurred when 
execute query=SELECT count(s_0) FROM root.test.g_2.d_52 WHERE time >= 
1537383617000 AND time <= 1537383867000 AND root.test.g_2.d_52.s_0 > -5
org.apache.iotdb.jdbc.IoTDBSQLException: 411: Error occurred in query process: 
Storage group is not set for current seriesPath: [root.test.g_2.d_52.s_0]
at 
org.apache.iotdb.jdbc.IoTDBStatement.executeQuerySQL(IoTDBStatement.java:396)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.jdbc.IoTDBStatement.executeQuery(IoTDBStatement.java:367)
at 
org.apache.iotdb.jdbc.IoTDBStatement.executeQuery(IoTDBStatement.java:357)
at 
cn.edu.tsinghua.iotdb.benchmark.iotdb012.IoTDB.lambda$executeQueryAndGetStatus$0(IoTDB.java:588)
at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)




> Support the auto-create-schema mechanism for insertRecords in cluster module
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1402
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: Xinyu Tan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-08-31-15-46-20-284.png
>
>
> On 28 May's commit 363bda92dbdb0f2f4739138ec858c91bb7c81efb, after starting 
> three node single replica cluster, sessionExample insertrecords interface 
> will be written in the failure. This is mainly due to problems with the 
> automatic schema creation logic of InsertRowsPlan in the cluster, which does 
> not handle BatchProcessException well



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1960) cluster:count timeseries Msg: 304: Path [root.**] does not exist ,expect :0

2021-11-07 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1960:
-

 Summary: cluster:count timeseries Msg: 304: Path [root.**] does 
not exist  ,expect :0
 Key: IOTDB-1960
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1960
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Cluster
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: image-2021-11-08-15-14-57-155.png, 
image-2021-11-08-15-15-26-695.png

master 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31

5 nodes :
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
default_replica_num=1

IoTDB> delete storage group root.test;
Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
IoTDB> count timeseries
{color:#DE350B}*Msg: 304: Path [root.**] does not exist*{color}
IoTDB>

 !image-2021-11-08-15-14-57-155.png! 

expect :
 !image-2021-11-08-15-15-26-695.png! 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1367) [Distributed] Runtime exception is not properly handled during forwarding

2021-11-07 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440173#comment-17440173
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1367:
---

master (0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31) 

CREATE TIMESERIES root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, ENCODING=PLAIN;
CREATE TIMESERIES root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_2 WITH DATATYPE=FLOAT, ENCODING=PLAIN;
ALTER timeseries root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 ADD TAGS unit=kilometer
ALTER timeseries root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_2 ADD TAGS description=salary
ALTER timeseries root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 ADD ATTRIBUTES color=green, country=china
ALTER timeseries root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_2 ADD ATTRIBUTES loaction=shandong, 
customer=customer_name
ALTER timeseries root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 UPSERT ALIAS=newAlias ;
ALTER timeseries root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_2 UPSERT ALIAS=good ;
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(11000,true,1.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(12000,false,2.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(13000,true,3.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(14000,false,9.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(15000,true,4.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(16000,false,5.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(17000,true,6.14);
insert into root.ip4.sg5.dev1(time,s_1,s_2) values(18000,false,7.14);

select avg(s_1) from root.ip4.sg5.dev1
{color:#DE350B}*Msg: 313: Request "Query aggregate: root.ip4.sg5.dev1.s_1 in 
[Node(internalIp:192.168.130.19, metaPort:9003, nodeIdentifier:-854866469, 
dataPort:40010, clientPort:6667, clientIp:192.168.130.19)]" timeout*{color}
 !screenshot-1.png! 


> [Distributed] Runtime exception is not properly handled during forwarding
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1367
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: Tian Jiang
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: client-me, distributed, query
> Attachments: image-2021-05-07-20-14-47-670.png, screenshot-1.png
>
>
> When I executed `select avg(s_0) from root.group_0.d_20` (notice that s_0 is 
> boolean and does not support avg), I got `Msg: 313: Request "Query aggregate: 
> root.group_0.d_20.s_0 in [Node(internalIp:192.168.130.4, metaPort:9003, 
> nodeIdentifier:1436654207, dataPort:40003, clientPort:6667, 
> clientIp:0.0.0.0)]" timeout`. While the log on node 192.168.130.4 says:
>  !image-2021-05-07-20-14-47-670.png|thumbnail! 
> The cause is that RunTimeExceptions are not caught explicitly in 
> DataClusterServer and MetaClusterServer, so they are converted to TExceptions 
> by Thrift and are recognized as network problems by the coordinator.
> The solution is either to catch runtime exceptions explicitly and create 
> status codes for them or make the coordinator capable of resolving more 
> TExceptions. Both ways have their difficulties, for the first one, it is 
> nearly impossible to know how many runtime exceptions can occur; for the 
> second one, when an exception is converted to a TException, only its message 
> remains, so it is not easy to determine what exactly the problem is.
> ps: this only occurs when the coordinator does not have the corresponding 
> data, so try querying another node if you can not repeat it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1955) cluster :insert into root.test.g_5.d_85(s_0 ) values(1,4.56) expect syntax parsing error

2021-11-07 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-1955:
-

 Summary: cluster :insert into root.test.g_5.d_85(s_0 ) 
values(1,4.56)  expect syntax parsing error
 Key: IOTDB-1955
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1955
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Planner/SQLParser
Affects Versions: master branch
Reporter: 刘珍


master 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31

5 nodes single rep.

IoTDB> insert into root.test.g_5.d_85(s_0 ) values(1,4.56)
{color:#DE350B}*Msg: The statement is executed successfully.*{color}
expect :
Msg: 401: Error occurred while parsing SQL to physical plan: line 1:31 
mismatched input 's_0' expecting {'*', '.', '('}

IoTDB>
IoTDB> SELECT s_0 FROM root.test.g_5.d_85 WHERE time >= 1537383267000 AND time 
<= 1537383517000 AND root.test.g_5.d_85.s_0 > -5 order by time desc
Msg: 411: Error occurred in query process: Path [root.test.g_5.d_85.s_0] does 
not exist




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1402) Support the auto-create-schema mechanism for insertRecords in cluster module

2021-11-07 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440207#comment-17440207
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1402:
---

这个问题也解决一下:
IoTDB> delete storage group root.test;
Msg: The statement is executed successfully.
IoTDB> count timeseries
{color:#DE350B}*Msg: 304: Path [root.**] does not exist*{color}

期望结果:
 !screenshot-2.png! 


> Support the auto-create-schema mechanism for insertRecords in cluster module
> 
>
> Key: IOTDB-1402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1402
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Reporter: Xinyu Tan
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: image-2021-08-31-15-46-20-284.png, 
> insert_config.properties, query_config.properties, screenshot-1.png, 
> screenshot-2.png
>
>
> On 28 May's commit 363bda92dbdb0f2f4739138ec858c91bb7c81efb, after starting 
> three node single replica cluster, sessionExample insertrecords interface 
> will be written in the failure. This is mainly due to problems with the 
> automatic schema creation logic of InsertRowsPlan in the cluster, which does 
> not handle BatchProcessException well



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-1393) Request timed out when create time series

2021-11-07 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17440262#comment-17440262
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-1393:
---

master 0073a28384cdb84e9469dbf98705ab158dd43a31  :
seed_nodes=192.168.130.4:9003,192.168.130.10:9003,192.168.130.11:9003,192.168.130.13:9003,192.168.130.19:9003
default_replica_num=1

SQL:
CREATE TIMESERIES root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts0 WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, 
ENCODING=PLAIN, compression=UNCOMPRESSED
create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts1(elec_meter) with datatype=INT32, 
encoding=RLE, compression=SNAPPY,MAX_POINT_NUMBER=3 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) 
attributes(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)
create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2 with datatype=INT64, encoding=RLE, 
compression=LZ4 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)

RESULT:
IoTDB> CREATE TIMESERIES root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts0 WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, 
ENCODING=PLAIN, compression=UNCOMPRESSED
Msg: 401: Error occurred while parsing SQL to physical plan: line 1:23 
mismatched input 'devices' expecting ID
IoTDB> create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts1(elec_meter) with 
datatype=INT32, encoding=RLE, compression=SNAPPY,MAX_POINT_NUMBER=3 
tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)
Msg: 401: Error occurred while parsing SQL to physical plan: line 1:23 
mismatched input 'devices' expecting ID
IoTDB> create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2 with datatype=INT64, 
encoding=RLE, compression=LZ4 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, 
attr2=a2)
Msg: 401: Error occurred while parsing SQL to physical plan: line 1:23 
mismatched input 'devices' expecting ID
IoTDB>
 !screenshot-1.png! 


> Request timed out when create time series
> -
>
> Key: IOTDB-1393
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1393
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Cluster
>Affects Versions: 0.12.0
>Reporter: LuMing
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: screenshot-1.png
>
>
> 1.client connected
> 2.execute statement
> CREATE TIMESERIES root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts0 WITH DATATYPE=BOOLEAN, 
> ENCODING=PLAIN, compression=UNCOMPRESSED
>  create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts1(elec_meter) with 
> datatype=INT32, encoding=RLE, compression=SNAPPY,MAX_POINT_NUMBER=3 
> tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, attr2=a2)
>  create timeseries root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2 with datatype=INT64, 
> encoding=RLE, compression=LZ4 tags(tag1=t1, tag2=t2) attributes(attr1=a1, 
> attr2=a2)3.result
> 3. result
> !https://clouddevops.huawei.com/vision-file-storage/api/file/download/upload-v2/2021/4/18/z00293891/8ccad779814e46faaadc92ad27397141/image.png!
>  4. log segments
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,430 | DEBUG | [DataClientThread-5] | Meta: synchronizing 
> commitIndex -1/0 | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.member.RaftMember 
> (RaftMember.java:906) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,473 | DEBUG | 
> [Data(node1:22250)-HeartbeatThread@1621328224936] | Data(node1:22250): 
> Heartbeat from leader Node(internalIp:node1, metaPort:22250, 
> nodeIdentifier:-1394469830, dataPort:22252, clientPort:22260, clientIp:node1) 
> is still valid | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread 
> (HeartbeatThread.java:100) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,473 | DEBUG | 
> [Data(node2:22250)-HeartbeatThread@1621328224966] | Data(node2:22250): 
> Heartbeat from leader Node(internalIp:node2, metaPort:22250, 
> nodeIdentifier:-1395157557, dataPort:22252, clientPort:22260, clientIp:node2) 
> is still valid | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread 
> (HeartbeatThread.java:100) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:07,486 | DEBUG | 
> [Data(node3:22250)-HeartbeatThread@1621328224906] | Data(node3:22250): Send 
> heartbeat to 2 followers | 
> org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.heartbeat.HeartbeatThread 
> (HeartbeatThread.java:150) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:08,005 | DEBUG | [MetaHeartbeatClientThread-1] | Meta: 
> Inconsistent log found, leaderCommit: 0-6, localCommit: -1--1, localLast: 0-6 
> | org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.member.RaftMember (RaftMember.java:423) 
> *2021-05-18 19:39:08,431 | WARN  | [DataClientThread-5] | Meta: Failed to 
> synchronize with the leader after 20018ms | 
> *org.apache.iotdb.cluster.server.member.RaftMember (RaftMember.java:927) 
> 2021-05-18 19:39:08,432 | DEBUG | [DataClientThread-5] | Exception occurred 
> when applying seriesPath: root.devices.wf03.wt01.ts2, resultDataType: INT64, 
> encoding: RLE, compression: LZ4, tagOffset: -1,term:19,index:4 | 
> org.apache.iotdb.cluster.log.applier.AsyncDataLogApplier 
> (AsyncDataLogApplier.java:95) 
> org.apache.iotdb.db.exception.metadata.Stor

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-1900) [Benchmark] When set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT=true, there is need to control of the ratio of null sensor of a device

2021-10-27 Thread Jira
张洪胤 created IOTDB-1900:
--

 Summary: [Benchmark] When set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT=true, there 
is need to control of the ratio of null sensor of a device
 Key: IOTDB-1900
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-1900
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Benchmark
Reporter: 张洪胤
Assignee: 张洪胤


when set IS_SENSOR_TS_ALIGNMENT=true,  iotdb-benchmark will write data one 
sensor per time.

And I think there is need to control the ratio of null sensor number of a 
device at a timestamp, for example, the data that benchmark generate can be(eg. 
ratio = 0.5)
||Time||s_1||s_2||s_3||s_4||s_5||s_6||s_7||s_8||s_9||s_10||
||null|6|null|null|null|7|8|9|10|null|
|1|1|null|2|null|3|null|4|null|5|null|



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2097) Fix aborting compaction task when deleting time partition

2021-12-02 Thread Jira
周沛辰 created IOTDB-2097:
--

 Summary: Fix aborting compaction task when deleting time partition
 Key: IOTDB-2097
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2097
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: 周沛辰
Assignee: 周沛辰
 Fix For: 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT


Currently, there is a problem in aborting compaction tasks when a time 
partition dir is being deleted. And currently, we abort all compaction tasks 
under the physical storage group, we  should only abort the compaction tasks 
under the deleted time partition in the virtual storage group.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2096) Fix aborting compaction task when deleting time partition

2021-12-02 Thread Jira
周沛辰 created IOTDB-2096:
--

 Summary: Fix aborting compaction task when deleting time partition
 Key: IOTDB-2096
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2096
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: 周沛辰
Assignee: 周沛辰
 Fix For: 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT


Currently, there is a problem in aborting compaction tasks when a time 
partition dir is being deleted. And currently, we abort all compaction tasks 
under the physical storage group, we  should only abort the compaction tasks 
under the deleted time partition in the virtual storage group.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2098) Fix priority bug of cross space task

2021-12-02 Thread Jira
周沛辰 created IOTDB-2098:
--

 Summary: Fix priority bug of cross space task
 Key: IOTDB-2098
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2098
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: 周沛辰
Assignee: 周沛辰
 Fix For: 0.13.0-SNAPSHOT


We specify that when two compaction tasks have the same number of seqFiles, the 
task with more unseqFiles has higher priority. But the current 
CompactionTaskComparator is written backwards, and part of the CI should be 
modified.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2125) Create a session,open 2 “pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client” threads

2021-12-07 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2125:
-

 Summary: Create a session,open 2 “pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client” threads
 Key: IOTDB-2125
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2125
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/Server
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: config.properties

rel/0.12  *strong text*
Benchmark connects to IoTDB,and opens 2 “pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client” threads per 
session.
cli doesn't have this problem.

1. Run benchmark (config.properties)
CLIENT_NUMBER={color:#DE350B}20{color}
2. jstack iotdb_pid > a.out

grep "pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client" a.out |wc -l
{color:#DE350B}*40*{color}






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Commented] (IOTDB-2125) Create a session,open 2 “pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client” threads

2021-12-08 Thread Jira


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2125?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17455054#comment-17455054
 ] 

刘珍 commented on IOTDB-2125:
---

看起来还是benchmark的问题,创建单个Session连接,对应创建1个“pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client”线程,没发现新建1个session打开2个client的现象。

> Create a session,open 2 “pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client” threads
> --
>
> Key: IOTDB-2125
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2125
> Project: Apache IoTDB
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: Core/Server
>Affects Versions: 0.12.3
>Reporter: 刘珍
>Priority: Critical
> Attachments: config.properties
>
>
> rel/0.12 
> Benchmark connects to IoTDB,and opens 2 “pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client” threads 
> per session.
> cli doesn't have this problem.
> 1. Run benchmark (config.properties)
> DB_SWITCH=IoTDB-012-*SESSION_BY_TABLET*
> CLIENT_NUMBER={color:#DE350B}20{color}
> 2. jstack iotdb_pid > a.out
> grep "pool-14-IoTDB-RPC-Client" a.out |wc -l
> {color:#DE350B}*40*{color}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-2126) The content of the file header is not MAGIC_STRING(TsFile),after IoTDB is restarted, there is no exception and this tsfile is deleted

2021-12-08 Thread Jira
刘珍 created IOTDB-2126:
-

 Summary: The content of the file header is not 
MAGIC_STRING(TsFile),after IoTDB is restarted, there is no exception and this 
tsfile is deleted
 Key: IOTDB-2126
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-2126
 Project: Apache IoTDB
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Core/TsFile
Affects Versions: 0.12.3, 0.12.4
Reporter: 刘珍
 Attachments: image-2021-12-08-17-21-27-652.png, 
image-2021-12-08-17-22-10-608.png, image-2021-12-08-17-24-16-631.png

rel/0.12  fa2669824e681b34a2704242ad24b82325244a61

1. cli :generate test data
set storage group to root.sg;
CREATE TIMESERIES root.sg.d_0.s_0 WITH DATATYPE=INT64, ENCODING=PLAIN;
insert into root.sg.d_0(time,s_0) values(1,100);
insert into root.sg.d_0(time,s_0) values(2,200);
*flush*;
IoTDB> select * from root.sg.d_0;
+-+---+
| Time|root.sg.d_0.s_0|
+-+---+
|1970-01-01T08:00:00.001+08:00|100|
|1970-01-01T08:00:00.002+08:00|200|
+-+---+
Total line number = 2

2../sbin/stop-server.sh

[iotdb@i-k2e7btap db]$ ls -l data/data/sequence/root.sg/0/0/
total 8
-rw-rw-r-- 1 iotdb iotdb 244 Dec  8 17:10 1638954616788-1-0-0.tsfile
-rw-rw-r-- 1 iotdb iotdb  57 Dec  8 17:10 1638954616788-1-0-0.tsfile.resource

3.  vim data/data/sequence/root.sg/0/0/1638954616788-1-0-0.tsfile
 !image-2021-12-08-17-21-27-652.png! 

4. start-server.sh
{color:#DE350B}*MAGIC_STRING不正确的tsfile被删除,并且没有异常信息*{color}。
1638954616788-1-0-0.tsfile  is {color:#DE350B}*deleted*{color}
{color:#DE350B}*No exception message was thrown*{color}
 !image-2021-12-08-17-22-10-608.png! 
 !image-2021-12-08-17-24-16-631.png! 





--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)


<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >