[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9316) Error displayed while adding WorkEffort Contact Mechs.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9316:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Error displayed while adding WorkEffort Contact Mechs.
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9316
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9316
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: workeffort
>Reporter: Jagpreet Kaur
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9316.patch, screenshot-1.png
>
>
> 1) Go to workEffort component.
> 2) Navigate to Task List tab. 
> [https://localhost:8443/workeffort/control/mytasks]
> 3) Select any task from the list.
> 4) Navigate to Contact Mechs tab and try to add any contact mech id after 
> choosing from look up.
> 5) Error will be displayed on screen.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9111) Service "deletePayHistory" does not have correct implementation

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit reassigned OFBIZ-9111:
---

Assignee: Deepak Dixit  (was: Michael Brohl)

> Service "deletePayHistory" does not have correct implementation
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9111
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9111
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: humanres
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pawan Verma
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9111.patch, OFBIZ-9111.patch
>
>
> Service "deletePayHistory" does not have correct implementation.This service 
> set thru_date then remove record of PayHistory.This should be corrected.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9473) Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication Event page.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9473.
---
Resolution: Fixed

Committed revision 1801347

Thanks Pallavi for your contribution.

> Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication 
> Event page.
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9473.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Party" component.
> 2. Click on [ Communications ] menu tab.
> 3. Find communication events.
> 4. Open any communication event view page for "Addressee" role from Find 
> Communication Event page.
> Actual - The role status of communication is marked "Read" on viewing 
> communication.
> Expected - There is no change in the role status of the communication event.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9473) Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication Event page.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9473:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication 
> Event page.
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9473.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Party" component.
> 2. Click on [ Communications ] menu tab.
> 3. Find communication events.
> 4. Open any communication event view page for "Addressee" role from Find 
> Communication Event page.
> Actual - The role status of communication is marked "Read" on viewing 
> communication.
> Expected - There is no change in the role status of the communication event.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9459) Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9459.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed revision 1801346.

Thanks Jagpreet and Priya for your contribution.

> Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9459
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: marketing
>Reporter: Jagpreet Kaur
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: Create Note.png, OFBIZ-9459.patch, Screenredirection.png
>
>
> 1) Go to SFA component.
> 2) Click on Leads tab 
> [https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/FindLeads|https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/FindLeads].
> 3) Choose any partyId from All Lead list, you will be navigated to Lead 
> profile. 
> [https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/viewprofile?roleTypeId=LEAD=DemoLead|https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/viewprofile?roleTypeId=LEAD=DemoLead]
> 4) Click on "Create New" button in the Notes section.
> 5) Add the Note content.
> 6) Click on "Save Button".
> View redirection should be profile but it shows the blank screen.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9459) Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9459:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9459
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: marketing
>Reporter: Jagpreet Kaur
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Attachments: Create Note.png, OFBIZ-9459.patch, Screenredirection.png
>
>
> 1) Go to SFA component.
> 2) Click on Leads tab 
> [https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/FindLeads|https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/FindLeads].
> 3) Choose any partyId from All Lead list, you will be navigated to Lead 
> profile. 
> [https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/viewprofile?roleTypeId=LEAD=DemoLead|https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/viewprofile?roleTypeId=LEAD=DemoLead]
> 4) Click on "Create New" button in the Notes section.
> 5) Add the Note content.
> 6) Click on "Save Button".
> View redirection should be profile but it shows the blank screen.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9143) The copyAgreement service fails

2017-07-08 Thread Renuka Srishti (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079390#comment-16079390
 ] 

Renuka Srishti commented on OFBIZ-9143:
---

Hii Jacques,
Please share the steps to regenerate this issue.

> The copyAgreement service fails
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9143
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9143
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: accounting
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
>
> Error (in French)
> Le service dispatcher a renvoyé une exception :Outgoing result (in runSync : 
> copyAgreement) does not match expected requirements (Le paramètre requis 
> suivant manque : [OUT] [copyAgreement.agreementId])
> In other words, [copyAgreement.agreementId [OUT] parameter misses



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9459) Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen

2017-07-08 Thread priya sharma (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

priya sharma updated OFBIZ-9459:

Attachment: OFBIZ-9459.patch

Resolved the issue by directing the response to backHome request, as 
viewprofile request uses save-home-view attribute.Thus home can be relocated 
and the request can be directed accordingly.

> Wrong screen redirection after adding note on Lead profile screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9459
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9459
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: marketing
>Reporter: Jagpreet Kaur
> Attachments: Create Note.png, OFBIZ-9459.patch, Screenredirection.png
>
>
> 1) Go to SFA component.
> 2) Click on Leads tab 
> [https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/FindLeads|https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/FindLeads].
> 3) Choose any partyId from All Lead list, you will be navigated to Lead 
> profile. 
> [https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/viewprofile?roleTypeId=LEAD=DemoLead|https://demo-trunk-ofbiz.apache.org:8443/sfa/control/viewprofile?roleTypeId=LEAD=DemoLead]
> 4) Click on "Create New" button in the Notes section.
> 5) Add the Note content.
> 6) Click on "Save Button".
> View redirection should be profile but it shows the blank screen.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9135) popup info about image in ordermgr shows html markup

2017-07-08 Thread Renuka Srishti (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079380#comment-16079380
 ] 

Renuka Srishti commented on OFBIZ-9135:
---

Hi Wai,
I have performed the mentioned steps and I think the issue is no more exist. 
Please check once, if there is any issue. we can discuss further.

> popup info about image in ordermgr shows html markup
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9135
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9135
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Wai
>
> -use https://localhost:8443/ordermgr/control/orderentry
> -fill all necessary required order info
> -select productId=WG-9943
> -click 'Add to Order'
> -Notice the images in the 'You might be interested in these as well:' section.
> -hover mouse over the image.
> -the popup shows html markup



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9402) Cut of unnecessary auto-stamp fields from Visit, ServerHit and ServerHitBin

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9402.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed revision 1801343.

Thanks Martin for your contribution.

> Cut of unnecessary auto-stamp fields from Visit, ServerHit and ServerHitBin
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9402
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Martin Becker
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9402-Visit_ServerHit_ServerHitBin_auto-stamps.patch
>
>
> Set no-auto-stamp flag for entities Visit, ServerHit and ServerHitBin in 
> entitymodel.xml to "true" since automatically created timestamps take up 
> space and hold nonessential time information for this statistic entities with 
> their more precise business time fields (e.g. fromDate and thruDate from 
> Visit)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9402) Cut of unnecessary auto-stamp fields from Visit, ServerHit and ServerHitBin

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9402:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Cut of unnecessary auto-stamp fields from Visit, ServerHit and ServerHitBin
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9402
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9402
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Martin Becker
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9402-Visit_ServerHit_ServerHitBin_auto-stamps.patch
>
>
> Set no-auto-stamp flag for entities Visit, ServerHit and ServerHitBin in 
> entitymodel.xml to "true" since automatically created timestamps take up 
> space and hold nonessential time information for this statistic entities with 
> their more precise business time fields (e.g. fromDate and thruDate from 
> Visit)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9404) Insufficient checking of checkOutPaymentId in CheckOutEvents.getSelectedPaymentMethods

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9404.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed revision 1801340.

Thanks Martin for your contribution.

> Insufficient checking of checkOutPaymentId in 
> CheckOutEvents.getSelectedPaymentMethods
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9404
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Martin Becker
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9404_empty-check_checkOutPaymentId.patch
>
>
> The following patch fixes a bug where the paymentMethod in 
> CheckOutEvents.getSelectedPaymentMethods might be filled with a phantom 
> payment method.
> It checks for an empty parameter, not only NULL, to avoid a phantom 
> paymentMethod with ID "" in selectedPaymentMethods, that causes subsequent 
> errors in payment handling (e.g. ShoppingCart.getValueObject).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9404) Insufficient checking of checkOutPaymentId in CheckOutEvents.getSelectedPaymentMethods

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9404:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Insufficient checking of checkOutPaymentId in 
> CheckOutEvents.getSelectedPaymentMethods
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9404
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Martin Becker
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9404_empty-check_checkOutPaymentId.patch
>
>
> The following patch fixes a bug where the paymentMethod in 
> CheckOutEvents.getSelectedPaymentMethods might be filled with a phantom 
> payment method.
> It checks for an empty parameter, not only NULL, to avoid a phantom 
> paymentMethod with ID "" in selectedPaymentMethods, that causes subsequent 
> errors in payment handling (e.g. ShoppingCart.getValueObject).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6760) Move all entity definitions from the applications components into a separate one

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079358#comment-16079358
 ] 

Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-6760:
-

Removed deprecated (entitymodel_old) entities under  OFBIZ-9327

> Move all entity definitions from the applications components into a separate 
> one
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6760
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6760
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL APPLICATIONS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
>
> See this thread for a previous discussion: 
> http://markmail.org/message/sfdm22wfy3fulpyb



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9327) Remove Deprecated Entities

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-9327:

Issue Type: Sub-task  (was: Improvement)
Parent: OFBIZ-6760

> Remove Deprecated Entities
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9327
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Deepak Dixit
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
>
> We have deprecated entities define in entitymodel suffix with "Old", we can 
> remove these entities as they are too old.
> [Deprecated Entities|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KYBr]
> [Dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45081cf2c344f2e0de709a3e987749798ad60390bb93cab3a6ab6c25@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9327) Remove Deprecated Entities

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-9327:

Description: 
We have deprecated entities define in entitymodel suffix with "Old", we can 
remove these entities as they are too old.

[Deprecated Entities|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KYBr]

[Dev list 
discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45081cf2c344f2e0de709a3e987749798ad60390bb93cab3a6ab6c25@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E]

  was:
We have deprecated entities define in entitymodel prefix with "Old", we can 
remove these entities as they are too old.

[Deprecated Entities|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KYBr]

[Dev list 
discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45081cf2c344f2e0de709a3e987749798ad60390bb93cab3a6ab6c25@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E]


> Remove Deprecated Entities
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9327
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Deepak Dixit
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
>
> We have deprecated entities define in entitymodel suffix with "Old", we can 
> remove these entities as they are too old.
> [Deprecated Entities|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KYBr]
> [Dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45081cf2c344f2e0de709a3e987749798ad60390bb93cab3a6ab6c25@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-9327) Remove Deprecated Entities

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15985313#comment-15985313
 ] 

Deepak Dixit edited comment on OFBIZ-9327 at 7/8/17 11:07 PM:
--

Removed old data migration service at r#1792788

Added note on Data Migration doc as well. 



was (Author: deepak.dixit):
Removed old data migration service at r#1792788

Added not on Data Migration doc as well. 


> Remove Deprecated Entities
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9327
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9327
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Deepak Dixit
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
>
> We have deprecated entities define in entitymodel suffix with "Old", we can 
> remove these entities as they are too old.
> [Deprecated Entities|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KYBr]
> [Dev list 
> discussion|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45081cf2c344f2e0de709a3e987749798ad60390bb93cab3a6ab6c25@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9377) fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit closed OFBIZ-9377.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 16.11.04

> fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Gaudin Pierre
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 16.11.04
>
> Attachments: menu-disable-if-empty.patch
>
>
> The purpose of this patch is to correct the behavior of the tag 
> "disable-if-empty" in menus. Indeed in certain cases it happens that the 
> value defines in "disable-if-empty" is present in the context but with no 
> valuee. In this case the menu item is shown  while it should be masked. This 
> patch corrects it by testing if emptie and without value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9377) fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079354#comment-16079354
 ] 

Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-9377:
-

Thanks  Gaudin Pierre and Humera Khan for your contribution.

This has been committed at 
ofbiz framework trunk at r#1801336 
R16.11 at r#1801337



> fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Gaudin Pierre
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: menu-disable-if-empty.patch
>
>
> The purpose of this patch is to correct the behavior of the tag 
> "disable-if-empty" in menus. Indeed in certain cases it happens that the 
> value defines in "disable-if-empty" is present in the context but with no 
> valuee. In this case the menu item is shown  while it should be masked. This 
> patch corrects it by testing if emptie and without value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9377) fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit reassigned OFBIZ-9377:
---

Assignee: Deepak Dixit

> fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Gaudin Pierre
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: menu-disable-if-empty.patch
>
>
> The purpose of this patch is to correct the behavior of the tag 
> "disable-if-empty" in menus. Indeed in certain cases it happens that the 
> value defines in "disable-if-empty" is present in the context but with no 
> valuee. In this case the menu item is shown  while it should be masked. This 
> patch corrects it by testing if emptie and without value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9377) fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value

2017-07-08 Thread Humera Khan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079352#comment-16079352
 ] 

Humera Khan commented on OFBIZ-9377:


I have reviewed the patch and it looks good to me, Thank you for your work.

> fix tag "disable-if-empty" in menus if field has no value
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9377
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Gaudin Pierre
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: menu-disable-if-empty.patch
>
>
> The purpose of this patch is to correct the behavior of the tag 
> "disable-if-empty" in menus. Indeed in certain cases it happens that the 
> value defines in "disable-if-empty" is present in the context but with no 
> valuee. In this case the menu item is shown  while it should be masked. This 
> patch corrects it by testing if emptie and without value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9460) Convert AgreementServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL

2017-07-08 Thread Rishi Solanki (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rishi Solanki updated OFBIZ-9460:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-9460.patch

Updated patch uses the groovy engine. Tested and verified the process.

> Convert AgreementServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9460
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9460
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: accounting
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Assignee: Rishi Solanki
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9460.patch, OFBIZ-9460.patch
>
>
> This file covers two services as cancelAgreement and copyAgreement.
> Need to follow practices in the parent ticket for this conversion. Ticket Id: 
> OFBIZ-9350.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9362) Screen rendering error on ViewForumMessage page

2017-07-08 Thread priya sharma (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

priya sharma updated OFBIZ-9362:

Attachment: OFBIz-9362.patch

1) Adding proper null check in the service in RenderSubContentCache.java, to 
avoid null pointer exceptions.
2) Removed the dataTemplateTypeId attribute from the TEMPLATE_TEXT_ONLY data 
resource for forum.

The issue has been resolved. Please verify and let me know in case of any 
concerns.

> Screen rendering error on ViewForumMessage page
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9362
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9362
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ecommerce
>Reporter: Aditya Sharma
>Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OFBIz-9362.patch
>
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Go to Ecommerce component 
> (https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/main)
> 2. Click on Gizmos from Browse Forum 
> section.(https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/showforum?forumId=GIZMOS)
> 3. Click on View button 
> (https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/ViewForumMessage?forumId=GIZMOS=thread10021=thread10021),
>  the message box shows an error message with ScreenRendererException.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9475) Refactor serialize and non-serialize inventory item implementaion

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)
Deepak Dixit created OFBIZ-9475:
---

 Summary: Refactor serialize and non-serialize inventory item 
implementaion
 Key: OFBIZ-9475
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9475
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Deepak Dixit


As discussed on dev mailing list [1][2] we need to refactor serialize and 
non-serialize inventory item design.

As per current implementation serialize inventory item work on status and 
non-serialized inventory item work on inventory item detail.
Proposed Design:
- Use inventory item detail for both serialize and non-serialize inventory 
item. Only one additional condition for serialized inventory item that qoh 
can't be greater then one.
- We can maintain inventory item status record for both type

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/bd2bpiv6c5wvl7km
[2] http://ofbiz.markmail.org/thread/kro5kcggp4fcose7



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9460) Convert AgreementServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL

2017-07-08 Thread Rishi Solanki (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rishi Solanki updated OFBIZ-9460:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-9460.patch

Here is the patch for the same. Need to do separate commit to remove the 
AgreementServices.xml

> Convert AgreementServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9460
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9460
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: accounting
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Assignee: Rishi Solanki
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9460.patch
>
>
> This file covers two services as cancelAgreement and copyAgreement.
> Need to follow practices in the parent ticket for this conversion. Ticket Id: 
> OFBIZ-9350.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9460) Convert AgreementServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL

2017-07-08 Thread Rishi Solanki (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rishi Solanki reassigned OFBIZ-9460:


Assignee: Rishi Solanki  (was: Saurabh Dixit)

> Convert AgreementServices.xml mini-lang to groovyDSL
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9460
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9460
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: accounting
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Assignee: Rishi Solanki
>
> This file covers two services as cancelAgreement and copyAgreement.
> Need to follow practices in the parent ticket for this conversion. Ticket Id: 
> OFBIZ-9350.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9471) Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9471.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed in plugin at revision 1801325
Committed in ofbiz-framework at revision 1801324

Thanks Ritesh Kumar for your contribution.



> Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9471
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9471-FRAMEWORK.patch, OFBIZ-9471-PLUGIN.patch
>
>
> The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best 
> practice to disable autocomplete on the password field as it will avoid 
> caching sensitive data on client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the 
> password in an insecure and hackable client-site database.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9358) Integrating google phone number library for validating telecom numbers

2017-07-08 Thread Renuka Srishti (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Renuka Srishti updated OFBIZ-9358:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-9358.patch

This patch contains following methods:

splitPhoneNumber(String phoneNumber, Delegator delegator):
It accepts a phoneNumber as a string and split the phoneNumber into 
countryCode, areaCode, and contactNumber. It returns a map which contains 
countryCode, areaCode, and contactNumber.

isValidPhoneNumber(String phoneNumber, Delegator delegator):
It returns true if parsed number is valid, or the number is either a possible 
fully-qualified number (containing the area code and country code), or if the 
number could be a possible local number (with a country code, but missing an 
area code).

> Integrating google phone number library for validating telecom numbers
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9358
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9358
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Upcoming Release
>Reporter: Suraj Khurana
>Assignee: Renuka Srishti
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9358.patch
>
>
> As per discussion at 
> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@ofbiz.apache.org:lte=1M:Validating%20telecom%20numbers
> Need to integrate Google telephone number to validate telephone numbers 
> formats of various countries.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9471) Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9471:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9471
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9471-FRAMEWORK.patch, OFBIZ-9471-PLUGIN.patch
>
>
> The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best 
> practice to disable autocomplete on the password field as it will avoid 
> caching sensitive data on client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the 
> password in an insecure and hackable client-site database.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9358) Integrating google phone number library for validating telecom numbers

2017-07-08 Thread Renuka Srishti (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Renuka Srishti reassigned OFBIZ-9358:
-

Assignee: Renuka Srishti

> Integrating google phone number library for validating telecom numbers
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9358
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9358
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Upcoming Release
>Reporter: Suraj Khurana
>Assignee: Renuka Srishti
>
> As per discussion at 
> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?d...@ofbiz.apache.org:lte=1M:Validating%20telecom%20numbers
> Need to integrate Google telephone number to validate telephone numbers 
> formats of various countries.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-6774) ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit closed OFBIZ-6774.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 16.11.04

> ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6774
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: birt, order
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07
> Environment: Ubuntu linux 15.04, JVM 7u91-2.6.3-0ubuntu0.15.04.1
>Reporter: Morten Jensen
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 16.11.04
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6774_16.11.patch, OFBIZ-6774_trunk.patch
>
>
> Whenever I click on the ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link in the invoice overview 
> screen I get the following error:
> org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request 
> [InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf]; this request does not exist or cannot be 
> called directly.
> A grep through the full ofbiz repo yields no results for an implementation or 
> freemarker template - only the link itself in accounting menus xml:
> git checkout release13.07
> find . -type f -exec grep -i InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf {} \; -ls
> 
> 528005   72 -rw-rw-r--   1 xxx  xxx 70103 Dec 17 07:05 
> ./applications/accounting/widget/AccountingMenus.xml



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9471) Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.

2017-07-08 Thread Ritesh Kumar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ritesh Kumar updated OFBIZ-9471:

Description: The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It 
is a best practice to disable autocomplete on the password field as it will 
avoid caching sensitive data on client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the 
password in an insecure and hackable client-site database.  (was: The login and 
Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best practice to disable 
autocomplete on the password field as it will avoid caching sensitive data on 
client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the password in an insecure and 
hackable client-site database)

> Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9471
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9471-FRAMEWORK.patch, OFBIZ-9471-PLUGIN.patch
>
>
> The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best 
> practice to disable autocomplete on the password field as it will avoid 
> caching sensitive data on client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the 
> password in an insecure and hackable client-site database.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9471) Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.

2017-07-08 Thread Ritesh Kumar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ritesh Kumar updated OFBIZ-9471:

Description: The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It 
is a best practice to disable autocomplete on the password field as it will 
avoid caching sensitive data on client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the 
password in an insecure and hackable client-site database  (was: The login and 
Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best practice to disable 
autocomplete on the password field.)

> Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9471
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9471-FRAMEWORK.patch, OFBIZ-9471-PLUGIN.patch
>
>
> The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best 
> practice to disable autocomplete on the password field as it will avoid 
> caching sensitive data on client site (CC numbers) and avoid storing the 
> password in an insecure and hackable client-site database



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6774) ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079302#comment-16079302
 ] 

Arun Patidar commented on OFBIZ-6774:
-

Committed in ofbiz framework trunk at revision 1801320.

Thanks Morten and Ankit Joshi for your contribution.

> ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6774
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: birt, order
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07
> Environment: Ubuntu linux 15.04, JVM 7u91-2.6.3-0ubuntu0.15.04.1
>Reporter: Morten Jensen
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6774_16.11.patch, OFBIZ-6774_trunk.patch
>
>
> Whenever I click on the ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link in the invoice overview 
> screen I get the following error:
> org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request 
> [InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf]; this request does not exist or cannot be 
> called directly.
> A grep through the full ofbiz repo yields no results for an implementation or 
> freemarker template - only the link itself in accounting menus xml:
> git checkout release13.07
> find . -type f -exec grep -i InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf {} \; -ls
> 
> 528005   72 -rw-rw-r--   1 xxx  xxx 70103 Dec 17 07:05 
> ./applications/accounting/widget/AccountingMenus.xml



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9470) Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9470.
---
Resolution: Fixed

Committed in ofbiz framework at revision 1801319.

Thanks Pallavi for your contribution.

> Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO 
> screen
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9470
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: missing-productId.png, OFBIZ-9470.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is -
> The productId vanishes from the input field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9474) Set default value of max-retry to zero.

2017-07-08 Thread Ritesh Kumar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ritesh Kumar updated OFBIZ-9474:

Attachment: OFBIZ-9474.patch

> Set default value of max-retry to zero.
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9474
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9474
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9474.patch
>
>
> Currently, the default value of the max-retry attribute (sets the max number 
> of times this service will retry when failed - persisted async only) of 
> service element is -1 which makes the service to retry unlimited times when 
> failed.
> This has to be set to zero, so when the service fails, it does not retry. 
> However, it can be manually set to any value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9470) Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9470:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO 
> screen
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9470
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: missing-productId.png, OFBIZ-9470.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is -
> The productId vanishes from the input field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9468) UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9468.
---
Resolution: Fixed

Committed revision 1801318.

Thanks Pallavi for your contribution.

> UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: atp-qoh-table-issue.png, OFBIZ-9468.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is-
> The table showing ATP and QOH is not in proper format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9468) UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9468:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: atp-qoh-table-issue.png, OFBIZ-9468.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is-
> The table showing ATP and QOH is not in proper format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9474) Set default value of max-retry to zero.

2017-07-08 Thread Ritesh Kumar (JIRA)
Ritesh Kumar created OFBIZ-9474:
---

 Summary: Set default value of max-retry to zero.
 Key: OFBIZ-9474
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9474
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
Priority: Minor


Currently, the default value of the max-retry attribute (sets the max number of 
times this service will retry when failed - persisted async only) of service 
element is -1 which makes the service to retry unlimited times when failed.
This has to be set to zero, so when the service fails, it does not retry. 
However, it can be manually set to any value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9469) POC: Using JSF

2017-07-08 Thread James Yong (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079287#comment-16079287
 ] 

James Yong commented on OFBIZ-9469:
---

Hi [~mbrohl],

I wanted to do complex forms like the picture below. 

Since JSF is also using declarative UI and has functions similar to OFBiz 
Widget's decorator-screen & action tags, I think it may get better acceptance 
from the developer community than using a purely javascript framework. Another 
good thing is that there is no request/view mapping required for JSF. 

I am also open to other alternatives to allow OFBiz to build forms that are on 
par with other ERP system.
At the end of the day, I hope to focus more on contributing business-related 
functionality rather than the UI framework.

Best Regards,
James

!https://smist08.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/cna2arinv.png|width=600px!



> POC: Using JSF
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: James Yong
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9469.patch
>
>
> JavaServerFaces (JSF) can be used to build Rich Internet Applications which 
> is suitable for business-facing part of an ERP system.
> Some Advantages
> ==
> JSF is similar to OFBiz widget; both can use declarative XML UI. 
> JSF can map directly to a backing bean and doesn't requires any request 
> mapping.
> JSF also allows the direct coding of HTML within the XML, while OFBiz widgets 
> need to link to external FTL file.
> I have done some initial work to add JSF capabilities for developers to 
> evaluate its suitability further. It is also possible to render OFBiz Widgets 
> (for reuse) and programmatically placed within JSF, but I haven't go into it 
> yet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9461) Alignment issue at Catalog Manager page

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9461.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed in ofbiz framework revision 1801316.

Thanks Sanjay Yadav and Humera Khan for your contribution.

> Alignment issue at Catalog Manager page 
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9461
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: catalog
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: AlignmentAfterAddingConditionAndAction.png, 
> AlignmentBugAtCatalogPriceRuleSection.png, AlignmentWithRemoveButton.png, 
> OFBIZ-9461.patch
>
>
> Go to:
> Application -> Catalog Manager -> Price Rule
> Actual - From Date, Through Date and Update section is not properly aligned. 
> Also due this horizontal scroll appearing at page.
> Expected - Fix this alignment issue and Horizontal scroll should not be 
> appear.
> Please refer attached screen shot.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9473) Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication Event page.

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pallavi Goyal updated OFBIZ-9473:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-9473.patch

*Steps to verify -*
1. Follow the steps in description.
2. On view communication page, in "Communication Event Role" section, the 
statuses should be-
"Addressee" --> "Created"
"Originator" --> "Closed"

Removed the service "setCommEventRoleToRead" from the screens 
"ViewCommunicationEvent" and "MyCommunicationEvents".

> Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication 
> Event page.
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9473
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9473.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Party" component.
> 2. Click on [ Communications ] menu tab.
> 3. Find communication events.
> 4. Open any communication event view page for "Addressee" role from Find 
> Communication Event page.
> Actual - The role status of communication is marked "Read" on viewing 
> communication.
> Expected - There is no change in the role status of the communication event.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9461) Alignment issue at Catalog Manager page

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9461:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Alignment issue at Catalog Manager page 
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9461
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: catalog
> Attachments: AlignmentAfterAddingConditionAndAction.png, 
> AlignmentBugAtCatalogPriceRuleSection.png, AlignmentWithRemoveButton.png, 
> OFBIZ-9461.patch
>
>
> Go to:
> Application -> Catalog Manager -> Price Rule
> Actual - From Date, Through Date and Update section is not properly aligned. 
> Also due this horizontal scroll appearing at page.
> Expected - Fix this alignment issue and Horizontal scroll should not be 
> appear.
> Please refer attached screen shot.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9466) Use serviceUtil() in place of hard-coded error/success messages.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9466.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed changes in ofbiz -framework revision 1801313.

Thanks Pawan for your contribution.

> Use serviceUtil() in place of hard-coded error/success messages.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9466
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9466
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pawan Verma
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9466.patch
>
>
> Use serviceUtil() in place of hard-coded error/success messages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9471) Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.

2017-07-08 Thread Ritesh Kumar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ritesh Kumar updated OFBIZ-9471:

Attachment: OFBIZ-9471-FRAMEWORK.patch
OFBIZ-9471-PLUGIN.patch

> Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9471
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: framework
>Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9471-FRAMEWORK.patch, OFBIZ-9471-PLUGIN.patch
>
>
> The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best 
> practice to disable autocomplete on the password field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Resolved] (OFBIZ-9413) Update Currency Uom data

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit resolved OFBIZ-9413.
-
Resolution: Fixed

> Update Currency Uom data 
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9413
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9413
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Deepak Dixit
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Fix For: 16.11.03, Release Branch 15.12, Release Branch 14.12
>
> Attachments: list_three.xls, OFBIZ-9413.patch
>
>
> While adding numericCode to currency UOM, I found that we need to update  
> some old currency UOM, as uomId has been updated. 
> https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/tables/table-a1.html
> https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/amendments.html
> Here is the short summary 
> *Following UomId not found*
> * Santo Domiongo(CDP)
> * Brazil (BRR)
> * Argentinian Austral(ARA)
> * Andoran peseta(ADP)
> * Maltese Lira (MTL)
> * Mexican Peso (old)(MXP)
> * Peruvian Inti(PEI)
> * Peruvian Sol(PES)
> * Tadzhikistani Ruble(TJR)
> *Following UOM using other currency* 
> Used Other
> * ANDORRA == Euro
> * Cyprus Pound(CYP) == Euro
> * Ecuador Sucre(ECS) =  USD
> * Estonian Krone(EEK) = EURO
> * Lithuanian Lita(LTL) == EURO
> * Latvian Lat(LVL) == EURO
> * Timor Escudo(TPE) == US Dollor
> *Following UOM has been changed*
> ||Old||New||
> |Belorussian Ruble(BYR)|Belarusian Ruble(BYN)|
> |Bosnia-Herzogovinian Dinar(BAD)|Convertible Mark(BAM)|
> |Azerbaijan Manat (AZM)|Azerbaijan Manat(AZN)|
> |Angolan Kwanza (AOK)|Kwanza (AOA)|
> |Afghani (AFA)|Afghani(AFN)|
> |Dominican Republic Peso(DRP)|Dominican Peso (DOP)|
> |Ghanian Cedi(GHC)|Ghana Cedi(GHS)|
> |Guinea Peso(GWP)| Guinean Franc(GNF)|
> |Kirghizstan Som(KIS)|KYRGYZSTAN  Som (KGS)|
> |Madagascan Franc(MGF)|Malagasy Ariary(MGA)|
> |Mozambique Metical(MZM)|Mozambique Metical(MZN)|
> |Nicaragua (NIC)|Cordoba Oro (NIO)|
> |New Israeli Shekel(NIS)|New Israeli Sheqel (ILS)|
> |Poland(PLZ)|Zloty (PLN)|
> |Romanian Leu(ROL)|Romanian Leu(RON)|
> |Russian Rouble(RUR)|Russian Ruble(RUB)|
> |Sudanese Pound(SDP)|Sudanese Pound(SDG)|
> |Peru (SOL)|Sol (PEN)|
> |Surinam Guilder(SRG)|Surinam Dollar (SRD)|
> |Turkmenistani Manat(TMM)|Turkmenistan New Manat(TMT)|
> |Uganda Shilling(UGS)|Uganda Shilling(UGX)|
> |Uruguayan New Peso(UYP)|Uruguay Peso en Unidades Indexadas (URUIURUI)(UYI)|
> |Venezuelan Bolivar(VEB)|Bolívar(VEF)|
> |Zambian Kwacha(ZMK)|Zambian Kwacha(ZMW)|
> |Zimbabwean Dollar(ZWD)|Zimbabwe Dollar(ZWL)|
> |Georgian Kupon (GEK)|GEORGIA Lari (GEL)|
> Some currency codes moved to historic denominations, we can remove them from 
> data.
> https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/tables/table-a3.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9457) Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9457.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
 Assignee: Arun Patidar
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed changes in ofbiz framework at revision 1801310.

Thanks Rishi Solanki and Aishwary for your contribution.

> Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9457.diff, OFBIZ-9457.patch
>
>
> Fix entity definition of OrderHeader and do the following changes in the 
> implementation;
> - Remove relations with OrderHeaderNoteView and OrderItemAndShipGroupAssoc 
> from the entity definition.
> - Check for the both views used at any place as getRelated() generic value 
> methods on OrderHeader then change them with appropriate EntityQuery method 
> or delegaor or other script as applicable.
> - Few find areas are;
> -- AddItemsFromOrder.groovy
> -- ReceiveInventoryAgainstPurchaseOrder.groovy
> Note: As we are removing relation from OrderHeader so only need to work on 
> the items where we are trying to get related data by using the relations. We 
> need to rewrite only those lines of code. Reverse in not true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9472) Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions

2017-07-08 Thread Sanjay Yadav (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sanjay Yadav reassigned OFBIZ-9472:
---

Assignee: Sanjay Yadav

> Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: humanres
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
>Assignee: Sanjay Yadav
> Attachments: UnwantedExceptionsatHRpage.PNG
>
>
> Go to:
> Application Url -> HR
> Actual - Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions.
> Expected - Please fix unwanted exception bug.
> Please refer attached screen shot for quick reference.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9472) Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions

2017-07-08 Thread Sanjay Yadav (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sanjay Yadav closed OFBIZ-9472.
---
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce

> Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: humanres
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
>Assignee: Sanjay Yadav
> Attachments: UnwantedExceptionsatHRpage.PNG
>
>
> Go to:
> Application Url -> HR
> Actual - Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions.
> Expected - Please fix unwanted exception bug.
> Please refer attached screen shot for quick reference.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9472) Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions

2017-07-08 Thread Sanjay Yadav (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079269#comment-16079269
 ] 

Sanjay Yadav commented on OFBIZ-9472:
-

Sure, Devanshu. Unable to recreate it at trunk. Hence, closing it. thanks!

> Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: humanres
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
> Attachments: UnwantedExceptionsatHRpage.PNG
>
>
> Go to:
> Application Url -> HR
> Actual - Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions.
> Expected - Please fix unwanted exception bug.
> Please refer attached screen shot for quick reference.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9328) Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9328.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed in ofbiz framework at revision 1801308

Thanks Devanshu and Humera for your contribution.

> Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Devanshu Vyas
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: CreateNewButton.png, OFBIZ-9328.patch, OFBIZ-9328.patch
>
>
> The Create New button is wrongly placed on the Party Content screen(navigated 
> from a Party Profile screen). The button should be placed outside of the 
> Content List section instead of inside. (CreateNewButton.png)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9472) Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions

2017-07-08 Thread Devanshu Vyas (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079267#comment-16079267
 ] 

Devanshu Vyas commented on OFBIZ-9472:
--

This issue is not regenerating on trunk. I think we can close this ticket.

> Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: humanres
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
> Attachments: UnwantedExceptionsatHRpage.PNG
>
>
> Go to:
> Application Url -> HR
> Actual - Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions.
> Expected - Please fix unwanted exception bug.
> Please refer attached screen shot for quick reference.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Reopened] (OFBIZ-9413) Update Currency Uom data

2017-07-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-9413:


Hi Deepak,

This introduced duplicates for  "Uom.description.ILS" which is the right ISO 
code (https://www.quora.com/Israeli-currency-is-NIS-or-ILS)

It seems to me that the ones under the same label than "New Israeli Shekel" 
should be kept, but for instance the French one need to be amended (wrong 
translation). I suggest this patch:
{code}
Index: framework/common/config/CommonEntityLabels.xml
===
--- framework/common/config/CommonEntityLabels.xml  (revision 1801301)
+++ framework/common/config/CommonEntityLabels.xml  (working copy)
@@ -18862,21 +18862,6 @@
 爱尔兰镑
 愛爾蘭鎊
 
-
-شكيل إسرائيلي
-Scheckel Israel
-Israeli Scheckel
-Scheckel israélien
-Scheckel Israeliano
-イスラエル・シェケル
-Israeli Scheckel
-Israel Scheckel
-Scheckel Israelian
-Израиль�кий шекель
-เชคเ�ิล 
อิสราเอล
-以色列谢克尔
-以色列�克爾
-
 
 روبية هندية
 Rupie Indien
@@ -19889,7 +19874,7 @@
 
 الشيكل الإسرائيلي 
الجديد
 New Israeli Shekel
-Shekel du nouvel Israël
+Nouveau shekel
 Shekel Nuovo Israele
 イスラエル・新シェケル
 New Israeli Shekel
{code}

> Update Currency Uom data 
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9413
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9413
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Deepak Dixit
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Fix For: Release Branch 14.12, Release Branch 15.12, 16.11.03
>
> Attachments: list_three.xls, OFBIZ-9413.patch
>
>
> While adding numericCode to currency UOM, I found that we need to update  
> some old currency UOM, as uomId has been updated. 
> https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/tables/table-a1.html
> https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/amendments.html
> Here is the short summary 
> *Following UomId not found*
> * Santo Domiongo(CDP)
> * Brazil (BRR)
> * Argentinian Austral(ARA)
> * Andoran peseta(ADP)
> * Maltese Lira (MTL)
> * Mexican Peso (old)(MXP)
> * Peruvian Inti(PEI)
> * Peruvian Sol(PES)
> * Tadzhikistani Ruble(TJR)
> *Following UOM using other currency* 
> Used Other
> * ANDORRA == Euro
> * Cyprus Pound(CYP) == Euro
> * Ecuador Sucre(ECS) =  USD
> * Estonian Krone(EEK) = EURO
> * Lithuanian Lita(LTL) == EURO
> * Latvian Lat(LVL) == EURO
> * Timor Escudo(TPE) == US Dollor
> *Following UOM has been changed*
> ||Old||New||
> |Belorussian Ruble(BYR)|Belarusian Ruble(BYN)|
> |Bosnia-Herzogovinian Dinar(BAD)|Convertible Mark(BAM)|
> |Azerbaijan Manat (AZM)|Azerbaijan Manat(AZN)|
> |Angolan Kwanza (AOK)|Kwanza (AOA)|
> |Afghani (AFA)|Afghani(AFN)|
> |Dominican Republic Peso(DRP)|Dominican Peso (DOP)|
> |Ghanian Cedi(GHC)|Ghana Cedi(GHS)|
> |Guinea Peso(GWP)| Guinean Franc(GNF)|
> |Kirghizstan Som(KIS)|KYRGYZSTAN  Som (KGS)|
> |Madagascan Franc(MGF)|Malagasy Ariary(MGA)|
> |Mozambique Metical(MZM)|Mozambique Metical(MZN)|
> |Nicaragua (NIC)|Cordoba Oro (NIO)|
> |New Israeli Shekel(NIS)|New Israeli Sheqel (ILS)|
> |Poland(PLZ)|Zloty (PLN)|
> |Romanian Leu(ROL)|Romanian Leu(RON)|
> |Russian Rouble(RUR)|Russian Ruble(RUB)|
> |Sudanese Pound(SDP)|Sudanese Pound(SDG)|
> |Peru (SOL)|Sol (PEN)|
> |Surinam Guilder(SRG)|Surinam Dollar (SRD)|
> |Turkmenistani Manat(TMM)|Turkmenistan New Manat(TMT)|
> |Uganda Shilling(UGS)|Uganda Shilling(UGX)|
> |Uruguayan New Peso(UYP)|Uruguay Peso en Unidades Indexadas (URUIURUI)(UYI)|
> |Venezuelan Bolivar(VEB)|Bolívar(VEF)|
> |Zambian Kwacha(ZMK)|Zambian Kwacha(ZMW)|
> |Zimbabwean Dollar(ZWD)|Zimbabwe Dollar(ZWL)|
> |Georgian Kupon (GEK)|GEORGIA Lari (GEL)|
> Some currency codes moved to historic denominations, we can remove them from 
> data.
> https://www.currency-iso.org/en/home/tables/table-a3.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9473) Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on View Communication Event page.

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)
Pallavi Goyal created OFBIZ-9473:


 Summary: Status of communication event role is marked "Read" on 
View Communication Event page.
 Key: OFBIZ-9473
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9473
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: party
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
 Fix For: Upcoming Release


*Steps to regenerate -*
1. Go to "Party" component.
2. Click on [ Communications ] menu tab.
3. Find communication events.
4. Open any communication event view page for "Addressee" role from Find 
Communication Event page.

Actual - The role status of communication is marked "Read" on viewing 
communication.
Expected - There is no change in the role status of the communication event.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6774) ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit reassigned OFBIZ-6774:
---

Assignee: Deepak Dixit

> ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6774
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: birt, order
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07
> Environment: Ubuntu linux 15.04, JVM 7u91-2.6.3-0ubuntu0.15.04.1
>Reporter: Morten Jensen
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6774_16.11.patch, OFBIZ-6774_trunk.patch
>
>
> Whenever I click on the ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link in the invoice overview 
> screen I get the following error:
> org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request 
> [InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf]; this request does not exist or cannot be 
> called directly.
> A grep through the full ofbiz repo yields no results for an implementation or 
> freemarker template - only the link itself in accounting menus xml:
> git checkout release13.07
> find . -type f -exec grep -i InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf {} \; -ls
> 
> 528005   72 -rw-rw-r--   1 xxx  xxx 70103 Dec 17 07:05 
> ./applications/accounting/widget/AccountingMenus.xml



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9328) Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen

2017-07-08 Thread Humera Khan (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Humera Khan updated OFBIZ-9328:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-9328.patch

> Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Devanshu Vyas
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CreateNewButton.png, OFBIZ-9328.patch, OFBIZ-9328.patch
>
>
> The Create New button is wrongly placed on the Party Content screen(navigated 
> from a Party Profile screen). The button should be placed outside of the 
> Content List section instead of inside. (CreateNewButton.png)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9472) Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions

2017-07-08 Thread Sanjay Yadav (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sanjay Yadav updated OFBIZ-9472:

Attachment: UnwantedExceptionsatHRpage.PNG

> Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: humanres
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
> Attachments: UnwantedExceptionsatHRpage.PNG
>
>
> Go to:
> Application Url -> HR
> Actual - Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions.
> Expected - Please fix unwanted exception bug.
> Please refer attached screen shot for quick reference.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9472) Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions

2017-07-08 Thread Sanjay Yadav (JIRA)
Sanjay Yadav created OFBIZ-9472:
---

 Summary: Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions
 Key: OFBIZ-9472
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9472
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: humanres
Reporter: Sanjay Yadav


Go to:

Application Url -> HR

Actual - Human Resource page throwing unwanted exceptions.

Expected - Please fix unwanted exception bug.

Please refer attached screen shot for quick reference.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7877) Set the default value for Html Menu Macro Library

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079252#comment-16079252
 ] 

Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-7877:
-

Thanks Renuka this has been done at ofbiz framework trunk at r#1801306

> Set the default value for Html Menu Macro Library
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7877
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7877
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Renuka Srishti
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7877.patch
>
>
> Need to set the default value for all the macros in html menu macro library 
> file.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-7877) Set the default value for Html Menu Macro Library

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit closed OFBIZ-7877.
---
   Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

> Set the default value for Html Menu Macro Library
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7877
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7877
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Renuka Srishti
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7877.patch
>
>
> Need to set the default value for all the macros in html menu macro library 
> file.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9471) Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.

2017-07-08 Thread Ritesh Kumar (JIRA)
Ritesh Kumar created OFBIZ-9471:
---

 Summary: Set autocomplete to off for all the password fields.
 Key: OFBIZ-9471
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9471
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: framework
Reporter: Ritesh Kumar
Priority: Minor


The login and Forget password screens have password inputs. It is a best 
practice to disable autocomplete on the password field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6949) Week and day overview of calendar doesn't show entries

2017-07-08 Thread Renuka Srishti (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079240#comment-16079240
 ] 

Renuka Srishti commented on OFBIZ-6949:
---

Hii Pierre,
I have done following steps:
1. I have created one party of type person and added ASSETMAINTTECH and 
VIEWADMIN security groups from its profile.
2. Go to ASSET MAINT component then click on Fixed Assets label which will show 
the list of Fixed Assets.
3. Clik on any one fixed asset Id, there you can see calendar label.
4. Click on calendar label where you can see week view, day view, and month 
view also.
5. Try to switch them all, its working fine.

Please check once, if you get any issue, we can discuss further.

> Week  and day overview of calendar doesn't show entries
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6949
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6949
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: workeffort
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pierre Smits
>Assignee: Renuka Srishti
>  Labels: calendar, entry
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 20.00.17.png, Screen Shot 
> 2016-03-21 at 20.00.40.png, Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 20.00.59.png
>
>
> In WorkEffort, the calendar overview the month overview shows all entries. 
> This not only applies to users with the WORKEFFORTMGR_ADMIN permission, but 
> also to users with the WORKEFFORTMGR_VIEW permission.
> However, when switching to the week view or or day view, the user with 
> permission WORKEFFORTMGR_VIEW permission doesn't see the entries for that 
> week or day view. While the user with permission WORKEFFORTMGR_ADMIN does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9461) Alignment issue at Catalog Manager page

2017-07-08 Thread Humera Khan (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Humera Khan updated OFBIZ-9461:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-9461.patch
AlignmentAfterAddingConditionAndAction.png
AlignmentWithRemoveButton.png

Done following:-
1. Improved text size value of 'Name' and 'Description' field under 'Edit Price 
Rule' section.
2. If the 'Condition' or 'Action' is not added to price rule then [ Remove ] 
button is also shown in 'Edit Price Rule' section, hence also check the 
alignment in that case.


> Alignment issue at Catalog Manager page 
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9461
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9461
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Sanjay Yadav
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: catalog
> Attachments: AlignmentAfterAddingConditionAndAction.png, 
> AlignmentBugAtCatalogPriceRuleSection.png, AlignmentWithRemoveButton.png, 
> OFBIZ-9461.patch
>
>
> Go to:
> Application -> Catalog Manager -> Price Rule
> Actual - From Date, Through Date and Update section is not properly aligned. 
> Also due this horizontal scroll appearing at page.
> Expected - Fix this alignment issue and Horizontal scroll should not be 
> appear.
> Please refer attached screen shot.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-7877) Set the default value for Html Menu Macro Library

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7877?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit reassigned OFBIZ-7877:
---

Assignee: Deepak Dixit  (was: Renuka Srishti)

> Set the default value for Html Menu Macro Library
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7877
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7877
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Renuka Srishti
>Assignee: Deepak Dixit
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7877.patch
>
>
> Need to set the default value for all the macros in html menu macro library 
> file.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6949) Week and day overview of calendar doesn't show entries

2017-07-08 Thread Renuka Srishti (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Renuka Srishti reassigned OFBIZ-6949:
-

Assignee: Renuka Srishti  (was: Gopal Yadav)

> Week  and day overview of calendar doesn't show entries
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6949
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6949
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: workeffort
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pierre Smits
>Assignee: Renuka Srishti
>  Labels: calendar, entry
> Attachments: Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 20.00.17.png, Screen Shot 
> 2016-03-21 at 20.00.40.png, Screen Shot 2016-03-21 at 20.00.59.png
>
>
> In WorkEffort, the calendar overview the month overview shows all entries. 
> This not only applies to users with the WORKEFFORTMGR_ADMIN permission, but 
> also to users with the WORKEFFORTMGR_VIEW permission.
> However, when switching to the week view or or day view, the user with 
> permission WORKEFFORTMGR_VIEW permission doesn't see the entries for that 
> week or day view. While the user with permission WORKEFFORTMGR_ADMIN does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079236#comment-16079236
 ] 

Deepak Dixit commented on OFBIZ-9464:
-

Backported to release 16.11 at r#1801304

> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory 
> from one facility to another
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Divesh Dutta
> Fix For: 16.11.04
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ_9464.patch
>
>
> when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
> _InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
> accountingQuantityTotal.
> This will create following issues in the system.
> # Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
> facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
> inventory valuation.
> # Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
> AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
> reservation happens.
> As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 
> according to my current understanding these processes are associated with the 
> respective statuses, which are as show below
> Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility 
> and QOH of To Facility should increase.
> b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
> yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the 
> xferquantity later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
> AQT = QOH
> b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as 
> of now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. 
> which shows the xferQuantity later 
> Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
> and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
> ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
> b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
> AQT = QOH
> Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
> already created  so 
> a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
> AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
> Key points: 
> If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. 
> Only Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.
> Before Changes:-
> As I know there are following processes are associated with respective 
> statuses 
> **Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
> Accounting quantity total
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
> created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.
> After Changes:-
> As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
> inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
> AQT=Transferred quantity
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Deepak Dixit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Deepak Dixit closed OFBIZ-9464.
---

> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory 
> from one facility to another
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Divesh Dutta
> Fix For: 16.11.04
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ_9464.patch
>
>
> when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
> _InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
> accountingQuantityTotal.
> This will create following issues in the system.
> # Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
> facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
> inventory valuation.
> # Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
> AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
> reservation happens.
> As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 
> according to my current understanding these processes are associated with the 
> respective statuses, which are as show below
> Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility 
> and QOH of To Facility should increase.
> b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
> yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the 
> xferquantity later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
> AQT = QOH
> b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as 
> of now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. 
> which shows the xferQuantity later 
> Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
> and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
> ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
> b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
> AQT = QOH
> Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
> already created  so 
> a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
> AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
> Key points: 
> If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. 
> Only Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.
> Before Changes:-
> As I know there are following processes are associated with respective 
> statuses 
> **Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
> Accounting quantity total
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
> created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.
> After Changes:-
> As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
> inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
> AQT=Transferred quantity
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer 

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9328) Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9328:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Devanshu Vyas
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CreateNewButton.png, OFBIZ-9328.patch
>
>
> The Create New button is wrongly placed on the Party Content screen(navigated 
> from a Party Profile screen). The button should be placed outside of the 
> Content List section instead of inside. (CreateNewButton.png)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9344) Incorrect MimeTypeId value shown if the form is submitted

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar closed OFBIZ-9344.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Upcoming Release

Committed in Ofbiz framework trunk at revision 1801303

Thanks Devanshu for your contribution.

> Incorrect MimeTypeId value shown if the form is submitted 
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9344
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Devanshu Vyas
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: IncorrectMimeTypeId.png, OFBIZ-9344.patch
>
>
> The 'Add Party Content' form shows incorrect Mime Type Id value if Submit 
> button is clicked without uploading any content. (IncorrectMimeTypeId.png)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Divesh Dutta (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079199#comment-16079199
 ] 

Divesh Dutta edited comment on OFBIZ-9464 at 7/8/17 5:07 PM:
-

Fixed this issue in revision number 1801300 in ofbiz-framework/trunk. Thanks 
[~vaibhav.jain] for providing the fix


was (Author: diveshdut):
Fixed this issue in revision number 1801300. Thanks [~vaibhav.jain] for 
providing the fix

> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory 
> from one facility to another
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Divesh Dutta
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ_9464.patch
>
>
> when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
> _InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
> accountingQuantityTotal.
> This will create following issues in the system.
> # Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
> facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
> inventory valuation.
> # Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
> AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
> reservation happens.
> As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 
> according to my current understanding these processes are associated with the 
> respective statuses, which are as show below
> Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility 
> and QOH of To Facility should increase.
> b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
> yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the 
> xferquantity later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
> AQT = QOH
> b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as 
> of now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. 
> which shows the xferQuantity later 
> Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
> and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
> ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
> b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
> AQT = QOH
> Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
> already created  so 
> a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
> AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
> Key points: 
> If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. 
> Only Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.
> Before Changes:-
> As I know there are following processes are associated with respective 
> statuses 
> **Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
> Accounting quantity total
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
> created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.
> After Changes:-
> As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
> inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is 

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Divesh Dutta (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Divesh Dutta updated OFBIZ-9464:

Fix Version/s: (was: Trunk)
   Upcoming Release

> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory 
> from one facility to another
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Divesh Dutta
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ_9464.patch
>
>
> when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
> _InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
> accountingQuantityTotal.
> This will create following issues in the system.
> # Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
> facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
> inventory valuation.
> # Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
> AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
> reservation happens.
> As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 
> according to my current understanding these processes are associated with the 
> respective statuses, which are as show below
> Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility 
> and QOH of To Facility should increase.
> b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
> yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the 
> xferquantity later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
> AQT = QOH
> b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as 
> of now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. 
> which shows the xferQuantity later 
> Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
> and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
> ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
> b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
> AQT = QOH
> Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
> already created  so 
> a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
> AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
> Key points: 
> If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. 
> Only Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.
> Before Changes:-
> As I know there are following processes are associated with respective 
> statuses 
> **Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
> Accounting quantity total
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
> created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.
> After Changes:-
> As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
> inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
> AQT=Transferred quantity
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Divesh Dutta (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Divesh Dutta reassigned OFBIZ-9464:
---

Assignee: Divesh Dutta  (was: Vaibhav Jain)

> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory 
> from one facility to another
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Divesh Dutta
> Fix For: Trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ_9464.patch
>
>
> when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
> _InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
> accountingQuantityTotal.
> This will create following issues in the system.
> # Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
> facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
> inventory valuation.
> # Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
> AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
> reservation happens.
> As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 
> according to my current understanding these processes are associated with the 
> respective statuses, which are as show below
> Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility 
> and QOH of To Facility should increase.
> b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
> yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the 
> xferquantity later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
> AQT = QOH
> b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as 
> of now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. 
> which shows the xferQuantity later 
> Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
> and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
> ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
> b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
> AQT = QOH
> Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
> already created  so 
> a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
> AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
> Key points: 
> If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. 
> Only Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.
> Before Changes:-
> As I know there are following processes are associated with respective 
> statuses 
> **Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
> Accounting quantity total
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
> created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.
> After Changes:-
> As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
> inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
> AQT=Transferred quantity
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new 

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9466) Use serviceUtil() in place of hard-coded error/success messages.

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9466:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar  (was: Aditi Patidar)

> Use serviceUtil() in place of hard-coded error/success messages.
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9466
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9466
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pawan Verma
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9466.patch
>
>
> Use serviceUtil() in place of hard-coded error/success messages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-9344) Incorrect MimeTypeId value shown if the form is submitted

2017-07-08 Thread Arun Patidar (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Arun Patidar reassigned OFBIZ-9344:
---

Assignee: Arun Patidar

> Incorrect MimeTypeId value shown if the form is submitted 
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9344
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9344
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Devanshu Vyas
>Assignee: Arun Patidar
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: IncorrectMimeTypeId.png, OFBIZ-9344.patch
>
>
> The 'Add Party Content' form shows incorrect Mime Type Id value if Submit 
> button is clicked without uploading any content. (IncorrectMimeTypeId.png)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7356) OFBIZ-6964: Document finalized design to support replenishment planning through any inter-company facility

2017-07-08 Thread Divesh Dutta (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079175#comment-16079175
 ] 

Divesh Dutta commented on OFBIZ-7356:
-

I liked the overall design. The only improvement I would suggest is to extend 
Facility tables instead of ProductStoreFacility for recording RMEI 
 (requirementhMethodEnumId)

Also from data preparation point of view, it might be a tedious job to manage 
data of ProductFacilityAssoc table for each product. For example, assume below 
given situation:

1) requirementhMethodEnumId is set to XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP  for Store 
StoreWarehouse_01 in Facility table
2) MRP engine runs for StoreWarehouse_01
3) GZ-8544 is below safety stock in StoreWarehouse_01
4) ProductFacilityAssoc record for 8544 is not created

Then system should pick parentFacilityID from Facility table and propose 
transfer request from parentFacilityID. This way if all the products of 
facility are replenished from one warehouse, then user will not have to create 
ProductFacilityAssoc records for each products. 


> OFBIZ-6964: Document finalized design to support replenishment planning 
> through any inter-company facility
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7356
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: manufacturing, order, product
>Reporter: Swapnil Shah
>Assignee: Swapnil Shah
>
> Here are high level design notes to based on the requirement specified under 
> OFBIZ-7355 to support the product level replenishment from any inter-company 
> facility before raising the ordering from an outside vendor.
> * We could extend the MRP logic (MrpEvent,Requirenent) to honor these new 
> types and create corresponding event & requirement for Stock transfer between 
> facilities.
> * Introduce two new entities ProductFacilityAssoc & FacilityAssocType and use 
> them in conjunction with MrpEventType and corresponding RequirementType to 
> serve the requirement for replenishing the store's via Inter-facility 
> transfers mode.  The data model & UI could be extended as follows:
> {code}
> 
>  title="Define associations between Product facilities">
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  rel-entity-name="Facility">
> 
> 
>  rel-entity-name="Facility">
> 
> 
>  rel-entity-name="FacilityAssocType">
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  title="Define associations between facilities">
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  description="Facility that serves another facility in terms of inventory"/>
> 
>  facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE" 
> sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
>  facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE" 
> sequenceNum="02" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
>  facilityIdTo="StoreWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE" 
> sequenceNum="03" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
>  facilityIdTo="RegionalWarehouse_01" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE" 
> sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
>  facilityIdTo="RegionalWarehouse_02" facilityAssocTypeId="BACKUP_WAREHOUSE" 
> sequenceNum="01" fromDate="2001-01-01 12:00:00"/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  requirementTypeId="TRANSFER_REQUIREMENT"/>
> 
>  enumTypeId="PROD_REQ_METHOD"/>
> 
>  checkInventory="N" oneInventoryFacility="N" requireInventory="N" 
> reserveInventory="Y" reserveOrderEnumId="INVRO_FIFO_REC" /> 
> 
>  requirementMethodEnumId="XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP" fromDate="2001-04-13 12:00:00"/>
> 
>  lastInventoryCount="20.00" minimumStock="100.00" productId="GZ-8544"/>
>  lastInventoryCount="40.00" minimumStock="200.00" productId="GZ-8544"/>
>  lastInventoryCount="60.00" minimumStock="200.00" productId="GZ-8544"/>
>  lastInventoryCount="200.00" minimumStock="300.00" 
> productId="GZ-8544"/>
> {code}
> MRP engine would start creating event beginning with store's primary facility 
> based on set RMEI under ProductStoreFacility e.g, XFERRQM_STOCK_ATP for 
> StoreWarehouse_01, In other words if MinStock < ATP , then MRP algorithm 
> would: 
> # Look up and consume the respective ATP from all the eligible "facilityIdTo" 
> (based on ProductFacilityAssoc), from where given product is transferable. 
> Based on their priorities start allocating ATP unless it meet the 
> (MinStock-ATP) requirement for a given store e.g., 'StoreWarehouse_01' .
> # Create new MRP Event with Event type "PROP_ATP_STOCK_TRANSFER" with 
> Proposed Quantity = MINIMUM STOCK - ATP from the facility (with highest 
> priority i.e.,RegionalWarehouse_01) to the destination facility.
> ## If demand for (MinStock-ATP) is still not fully met by any facility with 
> higher priority then repeat step#1 for all the associated facilities in 
> descending order of priority 

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9470) Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO screen

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pallavi Goyal updated OFBIZ-9470:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-9470.patch

*Steps to regenerate -*
1. Follow the steps in description.
2. Click the button [ Atp/Qoh ], the table is generated and the "Product Id" 
input field will have productId of selected product.

> Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO 
> screen
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9470
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: missing-productId.png, OFBIZ-9470.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is -
> The productId vanishes from the input field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9470) Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO screen

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pallavi Goyal updated OFBIZ-9470:
-
Attachment: missing-productId.png

Attaching screenshot for the issue.

> Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO 
> screen
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9470
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: missing-productId.png
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is -
> The productId vanishes from the input field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9468) UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pallavi Goyal updated OFBIZ-9468:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-9468.patch

*Steps to verify -*
1. Follow the steps in description.
2. The atp and qoh will render in basic table format with '0' cell spacing.

> UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: atp-qoh-table-issue.png, OFBIZ-9468.patch
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is-
> The table showing ATP and QOH is not in proper format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9469) POC: Using JSF

2017-07-08 Thread Michael Brohl (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079161#comment-16079161
 ] 

Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-9469:
--

Hi [~jamesyong],

thanks for your work!

As I said in the mailing list, I think this approach is too different from the 
OFBIz architecture (using beans etc. for the UI) and might be too heavy to 
adopt.
I think a (partial) rewrite of the UI html code and widgets using a standard 
css framework like Bootstrap will be less effort.

You kind of agreed here: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8371dcb855370ca780f03cd81ea42982b74470123409d438f7e12d77@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E

What would be the advantages of using JSF from your point of view?



> POC: Using JSF
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: James Yong
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9469.patch
>
>
> JavaServerFaces (JSF) can be used to build Rich Internet Applications which 
> is suitable for business-facing part of an ERP system.
> Some Advantages
> ==
> JSF is similar to OFBiz widget; both can use declarative XML UI. 
> JSF can map directly to a backing bean and doesn't requires any request 
> mapping.
> JSF also allows the direct coding of HTML within the XML, while OFBiz widgets 
> need to link to external FTL file.
> I have done some initial work to add JSF capabilities for developers to 
> evaluate its suitability further. It is also possible to render OFBiz Widgets 
> (for reuse) and programmatically placed within JSF, but I haven't go into it 
> yet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9470) Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is clicked on create PO screen

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)
Pallavi Goyal created OFBIZ-9470:


 Summary: Missing productId in input field after Atp/Qoh button is 
clicked on create PO screen
 Key: OFBIZ-9470
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9470
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: order
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Upcoming Release


*Steps to regenerate -*
1. Go to "Order" component.
2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.

The issue generated is -
The productId vanishes from the input field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9469) POC: Using JSF

2017-07-08 Thread James Yong (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

James Yong updated OFBIZ-9469:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-9469.patch

Test out the JSF page by navigating to 
https://localhost:8443/ordermgr/faces/index.xhtml

> POC: Using JSF
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9469
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: James Yong
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9469.patch
>
>
> JavaServerFaces (JSF) can be used to build Rich Internet Applications which 
> is suitable for business-facing part of an ERP system.
> Some Advantages
> ==
> JSF is similar to OFBiz widget; both can use declarative XML UI. 
> JSF can map directly to a backing bean and doesn't requires any request 
> mapping.
> JSF also allows the direct coding of HTML within the XML, while OFBiz widgets 
> need to link to external FTL file.
> I have done some initial work to add JSF capabilities for developers to 
> evaluate its suitability further. It is also possible to render OFBiz Widgets 
> (for reuse) and programmatically placed within JSF, but I haven't go into it 
> yet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9469) POC: Using JSF

2017-07-08 Thread James Yong (JIRA)
James Yong created OFBIZ-9469:
-

 Summary: POC: Using JSF
 Key: OFBIZ-9469
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9469
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: James Yong
Priority: Minor


JavaServerFaces (JSF) can be used to build Rich Internet Applications which is 
suitable for business-facing part of an ERP system.

Some Advantages
==
JSF is similar to OFBiz widget; both can use declarative XML UI. 
JSF can map directly to a backing bean and doesn't requires any request mapping.
JSF also allows the direct coding of HTML within the XML, while OFBiz widgets 
need to link to external FTL file.

I have done some initial work to add JSF capabilities for developers to 
evaluate its suitability further. It is also possible to render OFBiz Widgets 
(for reuse) and programmatically placed within JSF, but I haven't go into it 
yet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-9457) Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services

2017-07-08 Thread Rishi Solanki (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079146#comment-16079146
 ] 

Rishi Solanki commented on OFBIZ-9457:
--

[~aishwary]: Your patch looks good to me, thanks for providing patch for the 
same.

> Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9457.diff, OFBIZ-9457.patch
>
>
> Fix entity definition of OrderHeader and do the following changes in the 
> implementation;
> - Remove relations with OrderHeaderNoteView and OrderItemAndShipGroupAssoc 
> from the entity definition.
> - Check for the both views used at any place as getRelated() generic value 
> methods on OrderHeader then change them with appropriate EntityQuery method 
> or delegaor or other script as applicable.
> - Few find areas are;
> -- AddItemsFromOrder.groovy
> -- ReceiveInventoryAgainstPurchaseOrder.groovy
> Note: As we are removing relation from OrderHeader so only need to work on 
> the items where we are trying to get related data by using the relations. We 
> need to rewrite only those lines of code. Reverse in not true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9457) Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services

2017-07-08 Thread Rishi Solanki (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rishi Solanki updated OFBIZ-9457:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-9457.patch

Updating patch with correct naming pattern.


> Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9457.diff, OFBIZ-9457.patch
>
>
> Fix entity definition of OrderHeader and do the following changes in the 
> implementation;
> - Remove relations with OrderHeaderNoteView and OrderItemAndShipGroupAssoc 
> from the entity definition.
> - Check for the both views used at any place as getRelated() generic value 
> methods on OrderHeader then change them with appropriate EntityQuery method 
> or delegaor or other script as applicable.
> - Few find areas are;
> -- AddItemsFromOrder.groovy
> -- ReceiveInventoryAgainstPurchaseOrder.groovy
> Note: As we are removing relation from OrderHeader so only need to work on 
> the items where we are trying to get related data by using the relations. We 
> need to rewrite only those lines of code. Reverse in not true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9468) UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Pallavi Goyal updated OFBIZ-9468:
-
Attachment: atp-qoh-table-issue.png

Screen shot of generated issue.

> UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Upcoming Release
>
> Attachments: atp-qoh-table-issue.png
>
>
> *Steps to regenerate -*
> 1. Go to "Order" component.
> 2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
> 3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
> 4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
> 5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
> 6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.
> The issue generated is-
> The table showing ATP and QOH is not in proper format.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9468) UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen

2017-07-08 Thread Pallavi Goyal (JIRA)
Pallavi Goyal created OFBIZ-9468:


 Summary: UI issue in ATP/QOH table on Create Purchase Order screen
 Key: OFBIZ-9468
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9468
 Project: OFBiz
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: order
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Pallavi Goyal
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: Upcoming Release


*Steps to regenerate -*
1. Go to "Order" component.
2. Click on [ Order Entry ] menu button.
3. Fill the details in "Purchase Order" section and click on continue.
4. Fill the required order details and click on continue.
5. Open the product lookup table and select a product.
6. Click on [ Atp/Qoh ] button.

The issue generated is-
The table showing ATP and QOH is not in proper format.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9239) hot-deploy component cannot reference /ofbiz/lib/*

2017-07-08 Thread Michael Brohl (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-9239:
-
Component/s: (was: ALL COMPONENTS)

> hot-deploy component cannot reference /ofbiz/lib/*
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9239
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Wai
>
> I have a hotdeploy component that refers to jar files located in /ofbiz/lib/
> In /ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/ofbiz-component.xml I have the following 
> entries...
> 
> 
> When ofbiz is started I get the following relevant console messages...
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,639 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| Auto-Loading component directory : [/ofbiz/hot-deploy]
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,663 |main |ComponentContainer
> |W| Location '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/build/lib' does not exist
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,664 |main |ComponentContainer
> |W| Location '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/lib' does not exist
> Warning : Module classpath component 
> '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/../../lib/*' is not valid and will be 
> ignored...
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,666 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| Added class path for component : [mycomponent]
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,669 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| All components loaded



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9239) hot-deploy component cannot reference /ofbiz/lib/*

2017-07-08 Thread Michael Brohl (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Brohl updated OFBIZ-9239:
-
Priority: Minor  (was: Major)

> hot-deploy component cannot reference /ofbiz/lib/*
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9239
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Wai
>Priority: Minor
>
> I have a hotdeploy component that refers to jar files located in /ofbiz/lib/
> In /ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/ofbiz-component.xml I have the following 
> entries...
> 
> 
> When ofbiz is started I get the following relevant console messages...
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,639 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| Auto-Loading component directory : [/ofbiz/hot-deploy]
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,663 |main |ComponentContainer
> |W| Location '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/build/lib' does not exist
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,664 |main |ComponentContainer
> |W| Location '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/lib' does not exist
> Warning : Module classpath component 
> '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/../../lib/*' is not valid and will be 
> ignored...
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,666 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| Added class path for component : [mycomponent]
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,669 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| All components loaded



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Vaibhav Jain (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-9464:

Attachment: OFBIZ_9464.patch

Added accounting quantity total field for creating a new record for inventory 
item detail at the time inventory transfer.

> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory 
> from one facility to another
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Vaibhav Jain
>Assignee: Vaibhav Jain
> Fix For: Trunk
>
> Attachments: OFBIZ_9464.patch
>
>
> when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
> _InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
> accountingQuantityTotal.
> This will create following issues in the system.
> # Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
> facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
> inventory valuation.
> # Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
> AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
> reservation happens.
> As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 
> according to my current understanding these processes are associated with the 
> respective statuses, which are as show below
> Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility 
> and QOH of To Facility should increase.
> b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
> yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the 
> xferquantity later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
> AQT = QOH
> b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as 
> of now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. 
> which shows the xferQuantity later 
> Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
> and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
> ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
> Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
> a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
> b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
> ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
> AQT = QOH
> Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
> already created  so 
> a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
> AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
> Key points: 
> If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. 
> Only Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.
> Before Changes:-
> As I know there are following processes are associated with respective 
> statuses 
> **Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
> Accounting quantity total
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
> will change no new inventory item record will create. 
> 5.Cancelled:-
> No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
> created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.
> After Changes:-
> As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
> inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.
> 1. Requested:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 2. Scheduled:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 3.En-Route:-
> ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity
>AQT=0
> 4.Complete:-
> If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
> ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
> AQT=Transferred quantity
> If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id 

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-9239) hot-deploy component cannot reference /ofbiz/lib/*

2017-07-08 Thread Wai (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Wai closed OFBIZ-9239.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem

hot-deploy is not used anymore. Thanks

> hot-deploy component cannot reference /ofbiz/lib/*
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9239
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: ALL COMPONENTS
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Wai
>
> I have a hotdeploy component that refers to jar files located in /ofbiz/lib/
> In /ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/ofbiz-component.xml I have the following 
> entries...
> 
> 
> When ofbiz is started I get the following relevant console messages...
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,639 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| Auto-Loading component directory : [/ofbiz/hot-deploy]
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,663 |main |ComponentContainer
> |W| Location '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/build/lib' does not exist
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,664 |main |ComponentContainer
> |W| Location '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/lib' does not exist
> Warning : Module classpath component 
> '/ofbiz/hot-deploy/mycomponent/../../lib/*' is not valid and will be 
> ignored...
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,666 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| Added class path for component : [mycomponent]
> 2017-03-01 06:45:02,669 |main |ComponentContainer
> |I| All components loaded



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6510) Replace webtools/control/view/ModelInduceFromDb with widgets

2017-07-08 Thread Michael Brohl (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079128#comment-16079128
 ] 

Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6510:
--

Are you going to work on this further, [~jacques.le.roux]?

> Replace webtools/control/view/ModelInduceFromDb with widgets
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6510
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6510
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: framework
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Christian Carlow
>Assignee: Michael Brohl
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6510.patch, OFBIZ-6510.patch
>
>
> The page is written in JSP probably from very long ago when FTL and widgets 
> didn't even exist yet.  It should be implemented in widgets now that they are 
> available.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6595) Have the ability to test solr queries through widgets (screens & forms)

2017-07-08 Thread Michael Brohl (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079127#comment-16079127
 ] 

Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-6595:
--

[~pfm.smits],

can you please give us some answers to the questions of [~amardeepsj]?

If the query functionality does not differ from the Solr Admin and we are not 
going to make it functional, I propose to remove it from the codebase and put a 
link to the Solr Admin instead.

Thank you.

> Have the ability to test solr queries through widgets (screens & forms)
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6595
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6595
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: solr
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Pierre Smits
>Assignee: Michael Brohl
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6595-r1.patch
>
>
> Adding widgest (screens, forms, etc) so that an end-user can execute a search 
>  against the data indexed would enhance the applicability of the application.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7738) OFBIZ-7471: Improve all the service level error messages for missing required field for workeffort component

2017-07-08 Thread Dhaval Wagela (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16079126#comment-16079126
 ] 

Dhaval Wagela commented on OFBIZ-7738:
--

Improved: All the service level error messages for missing required field in 
workEffort component.

> OFBIZ-7471: Improve all the service level error messages for missing required 
> field for workeffort component
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7738
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7738
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: workeffort
>Affects Versions: 16.11.01
>Reporter: Ratnesh Upadhyay
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7738-16-11.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-6774) ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work

2017-07-08 Thread Ankit Joshi (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ankit Joshi reassigned OFBIZ-6774:
--

Assignee: (was: Ankit Joshi)

> ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link on invoiceOverview does not work
> -
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6774
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6774
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: birt, order
>Affects Versions: Release Branch 13.07
> Environment: Ubuntu linux 15.04, JVM 7u91-2.6.3-0ubuntu0.15.04.1
>Reporter: Morten Jensen
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-6774_16.11.patch, OFBIZ-6774_trunk.patch
>
>
> Whenever I click on the ACCTG TRANS ENTRIES PDF link in the invoice overview 
> screen I get the following error:
> org.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown request 
> [InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf]; this request does not exist or cannot be 
> called directly.
> A grep through the full ofbiz repo yields no results for an implementation or 
> freemarker template - only the link itself in accounting menus xml:
> git checkout release13.07
> find . -type f -exec grep -i InvoiceAcctgTransEntriesPdf {} \; -ls
> 
> 528005   72 -rw-rw-r--   1 xxx  xxx 70103 Dec 17 07:05 
> ./applications/accounting/widget/AccountingMenus.xml



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-7738) OFBIZ-7471: Improve all the service level error messages for missing required field for workeffort component

2017-07-08 Thread Dhaval Wagela (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dhaval Wagela updated OFBIZ-7738:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-7738-16-11.patch

> OFBIZ-7471: Improve all the service level error messages for missing required 
> field for workeffort component
> 
>
> Key: OFBIZ-7738
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7738
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: workeffort
>Affects Versions: 16.11.01
>Reporter: Ratnesh Upadhyay
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-7738-16-11.patch
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9457) Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services

2017-07-08 Thread Aishwary Shrivastava (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Aishwary Shrivastava updated OFBIZ-9457:

Attachment: OFBIZ-9457.diff

Here is the patch for the Improvement.
Thanks to Devanshu Vyas, Amit Gadaley, Vaibhav Jain and Rishi Solanki for the 
guidance.

Steps to verify the changes of AddItemFromOrder: 
1. Login
2.Go to Facility.
3.Go to Shipments.
4.Find an Outgoing - Sales type shipment.
5.Select the shipment.
6.Click on Order Items


Steps to verify the changes of ReceiveInventoryAgainstPurchaseOrder: 
1. Login
2.Go to Facility.
3.Go to Shipments.
4.Find an Incoming - Purchase type shipment.
5.Select the shipment.
6.Click on Receive against PO.


The data show on the screens remains same before and after applying the patch.


> Improvements in OrderHeader entity definition and services
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9457
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: order
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Rishi Solanki
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OFBIZ-9457.diff
>
>
> Fix entity definition of OrderHeader and do the following changes in the 
> implementation;
> - Remove relations with OrderHeaderNoteView and OrderItemAndShipGroupAssoc 
> from the entity definition.
> - Check for the both views used at any place as getRelated() generic value 
> methods on OrderHeader then change them with appropriate EntityQuery method 
> or delegaor or other script as applicable.
> - Few find areas are;
> -- AddItemsFromOrder.groovy
> -- ReceiveInventoryAgainstPurchaseOrder.groovy
> Note: As we are removing relation from OrderHeader so only need to work on 
> the items where we are trying to get related data by using the relations. We 
> need to rewrite only those lines of code. Reverse in not true.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Vaibhav Jain (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-9464:

Description: 
when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
_InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
accountingQuantityTotal.

This will create following issues in the system.
# Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
facility which shows the wrong result when we calculate facility specific 
inventory valuation.
# Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
reservation happens.





As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and according 
to my current understanding these processes are associated with the respective 
statuses, which are as show below
Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility and 
QOH of To Facility should increase.
b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the xferquantity 
later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
AQT = QOH
b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as of 
now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. which 
shows the xferQuantity later 
Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
AQT = QOH
Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
already created  so 
a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
Key points: 
If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. Only 
Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.

Before Changes:-

As I know there are following processes are associated with respective statuses 

**Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
Accounting quantity total

1. Requested:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
2. Scheduled:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
3.En-Route:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
4.Complete:-
If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
will change no new inventory item record will create. 
5.Cancelled:-
No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.

After Changes:-
As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.

1. Requested:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
2. Scheduled:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
3.En-Route:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
4.Complete:-
If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
AQT=Transferred quantity
If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
will change no new inventory item record will create. 
5.Cancelled:-
No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.

  was:
when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
_InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
accountingQuantityTotal.

This will create following issues in the system.
# Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
facility which shows wrong result when we calculate facility specific inventory 
valuation.
# Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
reservation happens.





As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and 

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9464) Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring inventory from one facility to another

2017-07-08 Thread Vaibhav Jain (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vaibhav Jain updated OFBIZ-9464:

Description: 
when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
_InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
accountingQuantityTotal.

This will create following issues in the system.
# Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
facility which shows wrong result when we calculate facility specific inventory 
valuation.
# Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
reservation happens.





As we manage 5 different statuses of inventory transfer in OFBiz and according 
to my current understanding these processes are associated with the respective 
statuses, which are as show below
Requested: As inventory transfer is requested for another facility. 
a)ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from the inventory item of From Facility and 
QOH of To Facility should increase.
b)ATP and AQT should be Zero in To Facility as inventory is not transferred 
yet. But QOH should increase at To Facility because QOH shows the xferquantity 
later. At the time of the completion of the transfer
ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP) (Adjustment in case of backorder)
AQT = QOH
b)AQT should not decrease because AQT is used for accounting purpose and as of 
now quantity is still in From Facility as the transfer is not done yet. which 
shows the xferQuantity later 
Scheduled: As inventory transfer is Scheduled for another facility. ATP, QOH 
and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
En-route: As inventory is routed to reach at To Facility. Even in this case 
ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect in both From Facility and To Facility.
Complete: As inventory transfer is completed 
a)ATP, QOH and AQT should not affect at From Facility. 
b)QOH will be same but ATP and AQT should affect respectively
ATP = ATP + (QOH - ATP)
AQT = QOH
Cancelled: As inventory transfer is cancelled and inventory item record is 
already created  so 
a) ATP, QOH and AQT should decrease from old inventory item and ATP, QOH and 
AQT should increase in the newly created inventory item.
Key points: 
If the whole ATP and QOH is moved then new inventory item will not create. Only 
Facility and location are changed for existing inventory item.

Before Changes:-

As I know there are following processes are associated with respective statuses 

**Note:   ATP-> Available to promiseQOH-> Quantity on handAQT-> 
Accounting quantity total

1. Requested:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
2. Scheduled:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
3.En-Route:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
4.Complete:-
If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   AQT=0
If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
will change no new inventory item record will create. 
5.Cancelled:-
No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.

After Changes:-
As shown above, accounting quantity transfer will not affect in transfer 
inventory. After the following changes, records will be updated a shown below.

1. Requested:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
2. Scheduled:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
3.En-Route:-
ATP =0QOH=Transferred quantity  
 AQT=0
4.Complete:-
If the partial quantity of any inventory item is transferred.
ATP =Transferred quantity   QOH=Transferred quantity   
AQT=Transferred quantity
If the whole quantity is transferred then only facility id and location 
will change no new inventory item record will create. 
5.Cancelled:-
No new inventory item record will create. An inventory transfer record is 
created with whole ATP/QOH in cancelled status.

  was:
when we transfer inventory, the accountingQuantityTotal field of 
_InventoryItem_ entity is always ZERO. There is no reflection of ATP/QOH in 
accountingQuantityTotal.

This will create following issues in the system.
# Accounting quantity total will mismatch with the original quantity in the 
facility which shows wrong result when we calculate facility specific inventory 
valuation.
# Inventory reservation also throws an error in some specific case like when 
AQT of respective product is zero in the specific facility from when 
reservation happens.


> Accounting quantity transfer should not be zero while transferring 

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-9328) Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen

2017-07-08 Thread Humera Khan (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Humera Khan updated OFBIZ-9328:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-9328.patch

Done following:-
1. Create new screen 'CreatePartyContent' that will be rendered on clicking [ 
Create New ] button.
2. Place [ Create New ] button outside of Content List section.
3. Used request-redirect as a response type in 'createPartyContent', 
'updatePartyContent' and 'removePartyContent' request because It would be quite 
handy while refreshing the page.

> Create New button is misplaced on Party Content Screen
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-9328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9328
> Project: OFBiz
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: party
>Affects Versions: Trunk
>Reporter: Devanshu Vyas
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: CreateNewButton.png, OFBIZ-9328.patch
>
>
> The Create New button is wrongly placed on the Party Content screen(navigated 
> from a Party Profile screen). The button should be placed outside of the 
> Content List section instead of inside. (CreateNewButton.png)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


  1   2   >