[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12401) Improved OFBiz configuration management for containers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448821#comment-17448821 ] Ioan Eugen Stan commented on OFBIZ-12401: - [~pierresmits] : I'm talking about the configurations you normally need to restart the application for: * ports * database configuration (url, credentials, etc) * Some good libraries for this are: [https://github.com/lightbend/config] - 0 dependency configuration library [https://github.com/cfg4j/cfg4j] - nice feature set - but seems not to be maintained so I am worried I also looked at commons-configuration but I think it brings a lot of baggage. One question is how to migrate existing configurations? > Improved OFBiz configuration management for containers > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12401 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > It's hard to use OFBiz with containers and other deployment scenarios because > the OFBiz configuration is intertwined with source files and there are a lot > of them. > We also need: > * the ability to override configuration properties > * load configs from a single / handful of files in a single location > * optionally load from multiple sources (files, db, configuration services > like kubernetes, consul ,etc) . > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12403) Duplicated possible payment at /accounting/control/editInvoiceApplications?invoiceId=8010
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-12403: --- Summary: Duplicated possible payment at /accounting/control/editInvoiceApplications?invoiceId=8010 Key: OFBIZ-12403 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12403 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: accounting Affects Versions: Trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux This is not something easy to reproduce. At least I was not able to do so locally, though trying hard. It seems it's easier to reproduce on trunk demo (ie at https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/accounting/control/editInvoiceApplications?invoiceId=8010). I guess it depends on already created orders, though even that is weird. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12402) Allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-12402: Parent: OFBIZ-11889 Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) > Allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12402 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: base >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > > As suggested by [~alexbodn] in OFBIZ-11889 we can use a security property to > allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters. > I did not originally, thinking that users would prefer to use their own > Content-Security-Policy-Report (ie no a report only) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12402) Allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448668#comment-17448668 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-12402: - More info at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Security-Policy/report-uri > Allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12402 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12402 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: base >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > > As suggested by [~alexbodn] in OFBIZ-11889 we can use a security property to > allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters. > I did not originally, thinking that users would prefer to use their own > Content-Security-Policy-Report (ie no a report only) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12402) Allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-12402: --- Summary: Allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters Key: OFBIZ-12402 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12402 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: base Affects Versions: Trunk Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Assignee: Jacques Le Roux As suggested by [~alexbodn] in OFBIZ-11889 we can use a security property to allow users to choose their Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only parameters. I did not originally, thinking that users would prefer to use their own Content-Security-Policy-Report (ie no a report only) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-11994) deprecation warnings in build with Java 11
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-11994: Parent: OFBIZ-10757 Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) > deprecation warnings in build with Java 11 > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-11994 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11994 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Alex Bodnaru >Priority: Major > Labels: 11, Java, jdk11 > > i'm getting these warnings when building with openjdk 11, i think > /apache/ofbiz/security/CsrfUtil.java:73: warning: [deprecation] newInstance() > in Class has been deprecated > setStrategy((ICsrfDefenseStrategy) c.newInstance()); > ^ > where T is a type-variable: > T extends Object declared in class Class > /usr/local/src/ofbiz/trunk/ofbiz-framework/plugins/ofbiz-rest-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ws/rs/openapi/OFBizOpenApiReader.java:211: > warning: [deprecation] newInstance() in Class has been deprecated > schema = (Schema) schemaClass.newInstance(); > ^ > where T is a type-variable: > T extends Object declared in class Class > /usr/local/src/ofbiz/trunk/ofbiz-framework/plugins/ofbiz-rest-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/ws/rs/openapi/OFBizOpenApiReader.java:234: > warning: [deprecation] newInstance() in Class has been deprecated > schema = (Schema) schemaClass.newInstance(); > ^ > where T is a type-variable: > T extends Object declared in class Class > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12400) Upgrade to gradle 7.3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448655#comment-17448655 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-12400: - I guess Michael is thinking about https://markmail.org/message/7mieaarw6wpv5x4p > Upgrade to gradle 7.3 > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Assignee: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > For working with Java 17, we need to upgrade to gradle 7.3 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12401) Improved OFBiz configuration management for containers
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448564#comment-17448564 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-12401: -- Grüß Gott Ioan, Which configuration options do you think that fall in the category of to be overridden? Many of those in the various components in applications, plugins and themes (if there some), can be loaded into the SystemProperties table as seed data. > Improved OFBiz configuration management for containers > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12401 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12401 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > It's hard to use OFBiz with containers and other deployment scenarios because > the OFBiz configuration is intertwined with source files and there are a lot > of them. > We also need: > * the ability to override configuration properties > * load configs from a single / handful of files in a single location > * optionally load from multiple sources (files, db, configuration services > like kubernetes, consul ,etc) . > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12401) Improved OFBiz configuration management for containers
Ioan Eugen Stan created OFBIZ-12401: --- Summary: Improved OFBiz configuration management for containers Key: OFBIZ-12401 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12401 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan It's hard to use OFBiz with containers and other deployment scenarios because the OFBiz configuration is intertwined with source files and there are a lot of them. We also need: * the ability to override configuration properties * load configs from a single / handful of files in a single location * optionally load from multiple sources (files, db, configuration services like kubernetes, consul ,etc) . -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10757) Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448552#comment-17448552 ] Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-10757: --- Hi Stan, see my comment in OFBIZ-12400. > Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11 > > > Key: OFBIZ-10757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Taher Alkhateeb >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, OFBIZ-10757_Fix-javadoc-build-for-OpenJDK-11.patch > > > To implement as per [Discussion > Thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71b8c1048f1dd4c5b3f104233c9af7b2cbc690863fe35b08ef91fcf5@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12400) Upgrade to gradle 7.3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448549#comment-17448549 ] Michael Brohl commented on OFBIZ-12400: --- I'd propose to start the Java 17 compatibility work on trunk after we have created the release branch following 18.12. There is an ongoing discussion in dev@ on when to do this. > Upgrade to gradle 7.3 > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Assignee: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > For working with Java 17, we need to upgrade to gradle 7.3 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #354: Improved: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 to support jdk 17 (OFBIZ-12400)
sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #354: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/354#issuecomment-977761767 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! ![Quality Gate passed](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/QualityGateBadge/passed-16px.png 'Quality Gate passed') [![Bug](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/bug-16px.png 'Bug')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png 'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [![Vulnerability](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/vulnerability-16px.png 'Vulnerability')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png 'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [![Security Hotspot](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/security_hotspot-16px.png 'Security Hotspot')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png 'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [![Code Smell](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/common/code_smell-16px.png 'Code Smell')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [![A](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/RatingBadge/A-16px.png 'A')](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [![No Coverage information](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/CoverageChart/NoCoverageInfo-16px.png 'No Coverage information')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354) No Coverage information [![0.0%](https://sonarsource.github.io/sonarcloud-github-static-resources/v2/checks/Duplications/3-16px.png '0.0%')](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) [0.0% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ofbiz.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] ieugen opened a new pull request #354: Improved: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 to support jdk 17 (OFBIZ-12400)
ieugen opened a new pull request #354: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/354 Improved: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 to support jdk 17 (OFBIZ-12400) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ofbiz.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-6164) Improve configurability of OFBiz
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448536#comment-17448536 ] Ioan Eugen Stan commented on OFBIZ-6164: We need to improve configuration for deployment as container. OFBiz has too many configuration files spread over many paths and intermingled with source files. This makes it very hard to deploy as containers. We need configuration federation - ability to read configuration from multiple sources - files, db, other configs. It would be also good to have the option of loading configs from less / single configuration file. > Improve configurability of OFBiz > > > Key: OFBIZ-6164 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6164 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ALL APPLICATIONS, ALL COMPONENTS >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Priority: Major > Labels: configuration, multi-tenant > > The configuration of an OFBiz is determined by 2 aspects: > # configuration settings required to successfully start the implementation > # configuration settings required to have component functions work properly > The latter involve default choices for various functions to cater to the > usability of business processes (and therefore screen/forms and/or > screens/templates. > Several of these configuration settings are already loaded into the > SystemProperty table in the underlying RDBMS, to enable adjustments of the > systemPropertyValue while the implementation is in use. While it is not > expected that these settings change often, it is possible that they are > required to be changed during the lifespan of the company/organisation. > However, it should not be required to go through a deployment process of > regarding such changed configuration settings in the OFBiz production > instance (which most - if not all - companies/organisations require when > files are changes). > Having all configuration settings of components in the SystemProperty table > enhances the usability of OFBiz allowing system administrators to adjust the > value(s) of system property records while the instance keeps running. > Some examples of the latter kind of configuration settings expected to change > during the lifespan of the company (and the production instance of OFBiz) are: > {code:java} > systemPropertyId="defaultFromEmailAddress" > systemPropertyValue="ofbizt...@example.com" description="general default > 'fromEmailAddress' can be overridden in: EmailTemplateSetting"/> > systemPropertyId="mail.notifications.enabled" systemPropertyValue="N" > description="mail notifications enabled (Y|N)"/> > systemPropertyId="mail.smtp.relay.host" description="the default mail server > to use"/> > systemPropertyId="mail.smtp.auth.user" description="SMTP Auth username > setting"/> > systemPropertyId="mail.smtp.auth.password" description="SMTP Auth password > setting"/> > {code} > > Furthermore, in a multi-tenancy OFBiz setup, configurations can differ per > tenant. > This is a placeholder issue to capture related issues to improve the > configurability of OFBiz. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-12400) Upgrade to gradle 7.3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ioan Eugen Stan reassigned OFBIZ-12400: --- Assignee: Ioan Eugen Stan > Upgrade to gradle 7.3 > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-12400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Assignee: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > For working with Java 17, we need to upgrade to gradle 7.3 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12400) Upgrade to gradle 7.3
Ioan Eugen Stan created OFBIZ-12400: --- Summary: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 Key: OFBIZ-12400 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan For working with Java 17, we need to upgrade to gradle 7.3 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12399) Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 17
Ioan Eugen Stan created OFBIZ-12399: --- Summary: Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 17 Key: OFBIZ-12399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12399 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan We should have ofbiz owrking with JDK17. This issue should track progress on making that happen. One think we need to do is upgrade gradle to 7.3 . -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12276) Improve Helveticus theme
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-12276: - Labels: usability (was: ) > Improve Helveticus theme > > > Key: OFBIZ-12276 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12276 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: themes >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Labels: usability > Fix For: Upcoming Branch > > > This is an umbrella tasks for minor or trivial changes in Helveticus theme -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12398) The product associations screen is weird
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-12398: - Labels: usability (was: ) > The product associations screen is weird > > > Key: OFBIZ-12398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12398 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: product/catalog >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Labels: usability > Attachments: Image 001.png > > > Hace a look at > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/catalog/control/EditProductAssoc?productId=GZ-BASKET > Here is an example: > !Image 001.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5976) Have the ability to configure SVN setup for scrum per tenant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448494#comment-17448494 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5976: - Salut Ioan, I guess it would still be as back then (if latest release(s) still functions properly regarding multi-tenancy, haven't checked that lately). However, there doesn't seem to be much interest in the (greater) community of OFBiz regarding this plugin given the (lack of) questions/issues raised since inclusion in the code base. Nor for OFBiz multi-tenancy feature. Feel free to close when it suits you. > Have the ability to configure SVN setup for scrum per tenant > > > Key: OFBIZ-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5976 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: scrum >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Priority: Major > Labels: configuration, multi-tenant, scrum, svn > > The scrum has the ability to use svn for sprint revisions. > These configuration attributes (properties) are currently referenced in > /scrum/config/revision.properties. > However, this is unusable in a multi-tenant setup as each tenant will need > its own setup to be used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5976) Have the ability to configure SVN setup for scrum per tenant
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448487#comment-17448487 ] Ioan Eugen Stan commented on OFBIZ-5976: [~pierresmits] Is this relevant? If not maybe we should close it. > Have the ability to configure SVN setup for scrum per tenant > > > Key: OFBIZ-5976 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5976 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: scrum >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Pierre Smits >Priority: Major > Labels: configuration, multi-tenant, scrum, svn > > The scrum has the ability to use svn for sprint revisions. > These configuration attributes (properties) are currently referenced in > /scrum/config/revision.properties. > However, this is unusable in a multi-tenant setup as each tenant will need > its own setup to be used. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12398) The product associations screen is weird
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-12398: Parent: OFBIZ-12276 Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement) > The product associations screen is weird > > > Key: OFBIZ-12398 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12398 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: product/catalog >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Minor > Attachments: Image 001.png > > > Hace a look at > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/catalog/control/EditProductAssoc?productId=GZ-BASKET > Here is an example: > !Image 001.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-10757) Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448471#comment-17448471 ] Ioan Eugen Stan edited comment on OFBIZ-10757 at 11/24/21, 9:34 AM: Can we make some progress on this? I'm looking into building and running ofbiz with jdk 17 and that will require a gradle upgrade - 7.3+ [https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/compatibility.html] was (Author: ieugen): Can we make some progress on this? I'm looking into building and running ofbiz with jdk 17 and that will require a gradle upgrade. > Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11 > > > Key: OFBIZ-10757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Taher Alkhateeb >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, OFBIZ-10757_Fix-javadoc-build-for-OpenJDK-11.patch > > > To implement as per [Discussion > Thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71b8c1048f1dd4c5b3f104233c9af7b2cbc690863fe35b08ef91fcf5@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10757) Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448471#comment-17448471 ] Ioan Eugen Stan commented on OFBIZ-10757: - Can we make some progress on this? I'm looking into building and running ofbiz with jdk 17 and that will require a gradle upgrade. > Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11 > > > Key: OFBIZ-10757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Taher Alkhateeb >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, OFBIZ-10757_Fix-javadoc-build-for-OpenJDK-11.patch > > > To implement as per [Discussion > Thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71b8c1048f1dd4c5b3f104233c9af7b2cbc690863fe35b08ef91fcf5@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-12398) The product associations screen is weird
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-12398: --- Summary: The product associations screen is weird Key: OFBIZ-12398 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12398 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: product/catalog Reporter: Jacques Le Roux Attachments: Image 001.png Hace a look at https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/catalog/control/EditProductAssoc?productId=GZ-BASKET Here is an example: !Image 001.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12395) In Helveticus in some places the labels are touching each other
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-12395: Description: Here are 2 examples in French, you can easily find more when you use Helveticus... h1. 1st example !Image 001.png! h2. 2nd example !Image 002.png! was: Here are some examples in French: h1. 1st example !Image 001.png! h2. 2nd example !Image 002.png! > In Helveticus in some places the labels are touching each other > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12395 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: themes >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: Image 001.png, Image 002.png > > > Here are 2 examples in French, you can easily find more when you use > Helveticus... > h1. 1st example > !Image 001.png! > h2. 2nd example > !Image 002.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12395) In Helveticus in some places the labels are touching each other
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-12395: Description: Here are some examples in French: h1. 1st example !Image 001.png! h2. 2nd example !Image 002.png! was: Here are some examples in French: !Image 001.png! !Image 002.png! > In Helveticus in some places the labels are touching each other > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12395 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12395 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: themes >Affects Versions: Trunk >Reporter: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: Image 001.png, Image 002.png > > > Here are some examples in French: > h1. 1st example > !Image 001.png! > h2. 2nd example > !Image 002.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)