[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-10757) Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640622#comment-17640622 ] Ioan Eugen Stan commented on OFBIZ-10757: - I managed to start ofbiz locally (not without some errors and warnings) with JDK17 using the PR in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 . As discussed on ML I think we can migrate to JDK17 and skip JDK 11 which was EOL'ed . > Upgrade OFBiz to use Java JDK Version 11 > > > Key: OFBIZ-10757 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10757 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Improvement >Affects Versions: Trunk, Upcoming Branch >Reporter: Taher Alkhateeb >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-framework.patch, OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, > OFBIZ-10757-plugins.patch, OFBIZ-10757_Fix-javadoc-build-for-OpenJDK-11.patch > > > To implement as per [Discussion > Thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/71b8c1048f1dd4c5b3f104233c9af7b2cbc690863fe35b08ef91fcf5@%3Cdev.ofbiz.apache.org%3E] -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12400) Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 8 -> 17
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640620#comment-17640620 ] Ioan Eugen Stan commented on OFBIZ-12400: - I've rebased my PR on latest trunk and bumped gradle to 7.6. I can start ofbiz locally with java 17 (see image in PR) [https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/354#issuecomment-1330424495] . The build passed. > Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 8 -> 17 > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Assignee: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > For working with Java 17, we need to upgrade to gradle 7.3 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework]: Workflow run "Java CI with Gradle" is working again!
The GitHub Actions job "Java CI with Gradle" on ofbiz-framework.git has succeeded. Run started by GitHub user ieugen (triggered by ieugen). Head commit for run: aab4b335830dc87e8da1354cc51c8e25679fb3d2 / Eugen Stan Improved: Fixed checkstyle issues (OFBIZ-12400) Report URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/3573410009 With regards, GitHub Actions via GitBox
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12400) Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 8 -> 17
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ioan Eugen Stan updated OFBIZ-12400: Summary: Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 8 -> 17 (was: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 - support jdk 8 -> 17) > Upgrade to gradle 7.6 - support jdk 8 -> 17 > --- > > Key: OFBIZ-12400 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12400 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Sub-task >Reporter: Ioan Eugen Stan >Assignee: Ioan Eugen Stan >Priority: Major > > For working with Java 17, we need to upgrade to gradle 7.3 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #354: Improved: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 to support jdk 8 -> 17 (OFBIZ-12400)
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #354: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/354#issuecomment-1330452325 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) [2.1% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ofbiz.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] ieugen commented on pull request #354: Improved: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 to support jdk 8 -> 17 (OFBIZ-12400)
ieugen commented on PR #354: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/354#issuecomment-1330424495 I've upgraded to gradle 7.6 and I can start ofbiz with jdk17 locally. I do see some errors but it runs. Perhaps a few other libs will need to be upgraded.  -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ofbiz.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] commented on pull request #354: Improved: Upgrade to gradle 7.3 to support jdk 8 -> 17 (OFBIZ-12400)
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #354: URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/354#issuecomment-1330410902 Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! [](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [0 Bugs](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=BUG) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [0 Vulnerabilities](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=VULNERABILITY) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=SECURITY_HOTSPOT) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [0 Code Smells](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&resolved=false&types=CODE_SMELL) [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354) No Coverage information [](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) [2.1% Duplication](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_ofbiz-framework&pullRequest=354&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscr...@ofbiz.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [ofbiz-framework]: Workflow run "Java CI with Gradle" failed!
The GitHub Actions job "Java CI with Gradle" on ofbiz-framework.git has failed. Run started by GitHub user ieugen (triggered by ieugen). Head commit for run: 1fecd3a5088cc059af6db32cb3bedca40b277fbd / Eugen Stan Improved: Upgrade to asciidoctorj 3.3.2 - Windows build issue (OFBIZ-12400) * Opted out of PDF generation on Windows - does not work Report URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/3573158394 With regards, GitHub Actions via GitBox
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17638563#comment-17638563 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-12715 at 11/29/22 8:42 AM: --- Hi Balaji, Not a big deal, it's clear enough, so more FYI. The image can't be shown because it needs an access: https://lab.ilma.world/users/sign_in was (Author: jacques.le.roux): Hi Balaji, Not a big deal, it's clear enough, so more FYI. The image can be shown because it needs an access: https://lab.ilma.world/users/sign_in > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Fix For: 22.01.01 > > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-12715. --- Fix Version/s: 22.01.01 Resolution: Fixed > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Fix For: 22.01.01 > > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640476#comment-17640476 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-12715: - Commit 0a93aca6e050e33d52d44e360dddff68a96fe057 in ofbiz-plugins's branch refs/heads/release22.01 from Jacques Le Roux [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-plugins.git;h=0a93aca6e ] Fixed: PartyId field not populating in timeEntry (OFBIZ-12715) Using the project component, I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. (jleroux: in my case and Balaji's video the party was not referenced) I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw that: The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) The second timeEntry was created without a party The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a party. Thanks: Balaji Yendamuri for a video and the fix > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640475#comment-17640475 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-12715: - Commit d6c148e234d1db0f8294c9397c092da1d4f28870 in ofbiz-plugins's branch refs/heads/release18.12 from Jacques Le Roux [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-plugins.git;h=d6c148e23 ] Fixed: PartyId field not populating in timeEntry (OFBIZ-12715) Using the project component, I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. (jleroux: in my case and Balaji's video the party was not referenced) I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw that: The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) The second timeEntry was created without a party The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a party. Thanks: Balaji Yendamuri for a video and the fix > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640477#comment-17640477 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on OFBIZ-12715: - Commit e56be8b274dbf8551ca6ae7598a887b3d6cfda9f in ofbiz-plugins's branch refs/heads/trunk from Jacques Le Roux [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-plugins.git;h=e56be8b27 ] Fixed: PartyId field not populating in timeEntry (OFBIZ-12715) Using the project component, I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. (jleroux: in my case and Balaji's video the party was not referenced) I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw that: The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) The second timeEntry was created without a party The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a party. Thanks: Balaji Yendamuri for a video and the fix > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17640457#comment-17640457 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-12715: - Hi Balaji, Thanks for the video. I was using workeffort/control/EditTimesheet so were not on the same page. I'll commit and backport your fix. > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-12715) PartyId field not populating in timeEntry
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-12715: Component/s: projectmgr (was: workeffort/workeffort) > PartyId field not populating in timeEntry > - > > Key: OFBIZ-12715 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12715 > Project: OFBiz > Issue Type: Bug > Components: projectmgr >Affects Versions: 22.01.01 >Reporter: Balaji Yendamuri >Assignee: Jacques Le Roux >Priority: Major > Attachments: 2022_11_28 08-26-42.mp4, Image 005.png, > partyId-missing-in-time-entry-bug-fix.patch > > > I created a new timeEntry on a fresh Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that the timeEntry is referenced to the correct party. > I created a second timeEntry on that Timesheet. I opened the webtools and saw > that: > # The first timeEntry was deleted and newly created (new ID) > # The second timeEntry was created without a party > # The newly created first timeEntry was also deleted without a party > # Any timeEntry created afterwards on that Timesheet doesn't incorporate a > party. > !https://lab.ilma.world/eso-0819-00-l14-h0100-erp/ofbiz-plugins/uploads/ff98b39d754bc0862dc35b5537eabca8/grafik.png! -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
