Re: Forcing a sync of maildir flags?
Hello, On Thu 20 Feb 2020 at 08:06PM -04, David Bremner wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> So, your hypothesis is that notmuch is opting not to add the Seen flag >> in order to avoid having to move the message from new to cur, for the >> sake of mutt, but that's a bug because I've explicitly requested adding >> Seen, so it ought to go ahead and move it from new to cur? > > Yeah, I think that's the case. This is based only vague memories of when > I wrote 0082a557. Thanks. Let me record in this thread what I will believe it will take a reproduce this in a test: 1) inbox and sent are Maildirs 1) Compose mail to a mailing list which will return copies of submissions, with `Fcc: sent -unread` 2) notmuch new, and in post-new hook, notmuch tag -unread -- folder:sent Expected result: copy of message in both inbox and sent has Seen flag Actual result: only copy of message in sent has Seen flag -- Sean Whitton ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Port notmuch-show's x/X bindings to notmuch-tree
On Friday, 2020-02-21 at 09:06:46 -08, William Casarin wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > >> On Sat 2019-12-28 10:01:17 -0500, William Casarin wrote: >>> These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience >>> of notmuch-show by adding the x/X bindings. >> >> It looks like this series has been reviewed by dme, and is presumably >> approved by him, with the exception of patch 3/7, which >> id:m25zhyxasu@dme.org suggests some improvement on. >> >> William, would you be up for doing one last re-spin of this series to >> address dme's comments? it'd be nice to land this series unless someone >> raises objections. > > I was planning on it but it fell by the wayside. The only comment was > just a naming thing, perhaps we can just pull this and rename it in a > future patch? That would be fine with me. > I could do a whole new series but I feel like that is overkill. dme. -- You make me feel like a natural woman. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Port notmuch-show's x/X bindings to notmuch-tree
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > On Sat 2019-12-28 10:01:17 -0500, William Casarin wrote: >> These patches bring notmuch-tree more in line with the user experience >> of notmuch-show by adding the x/X bindings. > > It looks like this series has been reviewed by dme, and is presumably > approved by him, with the exception of patch 3/7, which > id:m25zhyxasu@dme.org suggests some improvement on. > > William, would you be up for doing one last re-spin of this series to > address dme's comments? it'd be nice to land this series unless someone > raises objections. I was planning on it but it fell by the wayside. The only comment was just a naming thing, perhaps we can just pull this and rename it in a future patch? I could do a whole new series but I feel like that is overkill. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
