python documentation
On 04/19/2011 04:01 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf > wrote: >> Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain >> wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? >> I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to >> get a comparison of the two approaches. > > Invoking notmuch the script and piping the results? I wouldn't call that > python bindings anymore then. Also it is bound to be much more expensive > than directly interfacing libnotmuch.so. > >> Na?vely, I imagine there is a header file and the generation of the >> python bindings happens rather automagic. > > I wish it would be that easy. :-) I've never actually used it, so I may be way off base, but would it be possible to use SWIG (http://www.swig.org/) to automatically generate bindings when the C library is updated, or at least provide a decent starting point? Aaron
Re: python documentation
On 04/19/2011 04:01 PM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:03:01 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: Is it sane to have python bindings that need updates or would a plain wrapper of the notmuch script (that maybe needs less updates) be better? I don't want to imply that this can be answered with yes/no, but more to get a comparison of the two approaches. Invoking notmuch the script and piping the results? I wouldn't call that python bindings anymore then. Also it is bound to be much more expensive than directly interfacing libnotmuch.so. Naïvely, I imagine there is a header file and the generation of the python bindings happens rather automagic. I wish it would be that easy. :-) I've never actually used it, so I may be way off base, but would it be possible to use SWIG (http://www.swig.org/) to automatically generate bindings when the C library is updated, or at least provide a decent starting point? Aaron ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Debugging strangeness in To: field
Hi Mark, On 04/06/2011 02:58 PM, Mark Anderson wrote: > Do you have any hints about how I could figure out why gmime doesn't > like this To: list? > > To: One Big Happy , dist.Happy Group > I may be way off, but I wonder if it's seeing "dist.Happy" and confusing it for an email address (or at least a domain) rather than the display name for the email address. Maybe display names of the form xxx.yyy need quotes? Best, Aaron
Re: Debugging strangeness in To: field
Hi Mark, On 04/06/2011 02:58 PM, Mark Anderson wrote: Do you have any hints about how I could figure out why gmime doesn't like this To: list? To: One Big Happy onebigha...@amd.com, dist.Happy Group dist.happygr...@amd.com I may be way off, but I wonder if it's seeing dist.Happy and confusing it for an email address (or at least a domain) rather than the display name for the email address. Maybe display names of the form xxx.yyy need quotes? Best, Aaron ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
