Whei, dear friend, you're working with a module with the NS?
------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:55:55 +0100 (BST) > From: Wei Zhang <weizhang...@yahoo.com> > Subject: [ns] Error when testing DSR in NS2 with more than 10 nodes > To: ns-users@isi.edu > Message-ID: <870908.15497...@web29010.mail.ird.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hello All, > > I use Ns2.33 to run DSR. I cannot know why I test DSR with more than 10 > nodes it has an error > "error of segment" > Could you please explain me why?? If you have a > tcl script that run DSR well please send me. > > Thank you in advance. > Wei > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:31:30 +0100 > From: Zakia Khalfallah <zakia_khalfal...@hotmail.fr> > Subject: [ns] Traffic generator option ( "connection" vs "actives > nodes" ) > To: NS user <ns-users@isi.edu> > Message-ID: <blu117-w1325a28c2331a55da8e5c09d...@phx.gbl> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Hi Friends, > This is the options related to a traffic generator whith which i must work > in my project : > > ./trafgen -n <nodes> -a <active nodes> -t <simulation time> -c > <connections> > > Any one has an idea about the difference between : " active nodes" and " > connections"? > > Thank you > ZAK > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:09:42 -0700 (PDT) > From: "Fivos.K" <fivos....@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [ns] RTP over wireless connection between two nodes > To: ns-users@isi.edu > Message-ID: <31694258.p...@talk.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > try this link > > http://140.112.21.101/~maxmilian/ns2/ns-allinone-2.31_with_maodv.zip > > it contains a ready version of ns-allinone 2.31 with maodv included. > > Also note that by installing 2.26 all in one package you don't damage > anything. All the files of ns2 reside in its directory. if you wish to > uninstall it all you need to do is delete the dir. > > as for using the right tcl version ,you can have an if condition in your > bashrc as i do. > i have a variable called NS in it and set it according to the NS-version i > want to use .for example > > export NS=26 > source ~/.bashrc > > would load ns version 2.26 settings. > > It's quite easy once you understand how this works. I have 4 ns-versions on > my system all working fine. > > good luck ! > > > pebbles wrote: > > > > > > I tried to install the 2.26 but it needs older version of tcl and I don't > > want to damage the 2.34 installation. I installed 2.31 but when I tried > to > > add the maodv files it gave me this error: > > > > mac/channel.cc: In member function ?void > > WirelessChannel::calcHighestAntennaZ(Phy*)?: > > mac/channel.cc:625: error: ?class WirelessPhy? has no member named > > ?getAntennaZ? > > mac/channel.cc:626: error: ?class WirelessPhy? has no member named > > ?getAntennaZ? > > mac/channel.cc:632: error: ?class WirelessPhy? has no member named > > ?getDist? > > mac/channel.cc:632: error: ?class WirelessPhy? has no member named > > ?getCSThresh? > > mac/channel.cc:632: error: ?class WirelessPhy? has no member named > ?getPt? > > make: *** [mac/channel.o] Error 1 > > > > Did it give you such error when you installed it? It would be really > > helpful if you uploaded them anyway. Thank you in any case. > > > > > > Fivos.K wrote: > >> > >> i have ported them both for ns2.31 , i could upload them somewhere if > you > >> are interested but you could also use them in the ns version they > >> support. > >> > >> > >> pebbles wrote: > >>> > >>> Do I have to configure myself the unicast mechanism so as to send RTCP > >>> packets only to the sender node (and of course keeping the multicast > for > >>> RTP packets, so that the sender sends to every receiver node)? I'm > >>> asking this because in case of having more receiver nodes I'd want the > >>> RTP packets to be sent to all of them. > >>> > >>> Also, I couldn't find a working version of either protocol (MAODV,ADMR) > >>> for ns 2.34. I think it's been a long time since they have been > >>> updated... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Fivos.K wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> pebbles wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> The simple-rtp example uses the "multicast on" option so I'd rather > >>>>> stick to a multicast protocol for now. > >>>>> > >>>>> With ADMR one node can send RTP packets to nodes that belong to one > >>>>> multicast group but each one of them > >>>>> sends RTCP packets to that node (unicast), while with PUMA the nodes > >>>>> send RTCP packets to a multicast group address? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> They are all multicast protocols. Simply MAODV and ADMR allow use of > >>>> unicast as well. The RTCP packets should only be sent to the sender > and > >>>> not to the whole group, so by sending them using a unicast mechanism > >>>> you decrease the number of collisions in your setup. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/RTP-over-wireless-connection-between-two-nodes-tp31407109p31694258.html > Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ns-users mailing list > Ns-users@isi.edu > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/ns-users > > > End of Ns-users Digest, Vol 89, Issue 23 > **************************************** > -- att, Marllus de Melo Lustosa - lattes -> http://bit.ly/dlm86f / HomePage -> http://www.marllus.com Bacharelando em Ciência da Computação - UFPI Departamento de Informática e Estatística - DIE Grupo de Pesquisa e Estudos em Redes de computadores - GoPER - http://die.ufpi.br/goper/
