[NSP] Re: malcom's final solution

2009-03-07 Thread Philip Gruar

Dear Malcolm,
Yes of course - I read your post more carefully after sending mine, and see 
that you were in fact referring to an old chanter rather than something one 
of our current pipemakers had done. Sorry to have reacted over-hastily!
I agree that some research and collating of measurements may be interesting 
and useful, though of course finger hole positioning is, and always has been 
with all wind instruments, a compromise between theoretical calculated 
positions and positions where the player's fingers can move most easily, and 
then undercut and adjusted for accurate tuning - making compromises and 
decisions to accomodate the balance between pure and tempered intevals. I do 
drill my fingerholes in the same very carefully measured places on all my 
chanters, though these have been refined and slightly changed over the 
years. However, the undercutting and fine tuning is always subtly different. 
I'm afraid I don't think chanter tuning can be reduced to an exact science, 
precisely the same on every instrument!


Philip

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com

To: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution


Dear Philip thank you for your mail. the half inch tone hole sizes came 
from a Fred Picknell chanter about 100 year old and been in constant use. 
This chanter belongs to Tommy Breckons and is in use today. I have had it 
here at Scunthorpe to fettle and believe me it does play. The 1/2 is a 
guesstimate and of course not to be taken as scientifically as this 
survey could be. Thank you and please try to be positive, no one is going 
to come to any harm over this.





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: malcom's final solution

2009-03-07 Thread colin
Excuse my ignorance on this but, many years ago (and I do mean MANY - 
possibly back in the 70's or 80's), there was a discussion regarding making 
plastic chanters for NSP as an aid to teaching in schools (thus swapping the 
pipes for the ever present recorder for music lessons etc).
I notice quite a few Scottish smallpipes now have the plastic option but I 
haven't seen plastic NSPs.
Plastic, of course, encompassing a number of man-made materials - as with 
clarinets etc.
Obviously, production of plastic pipes would be quite useless if the 
chanters have to be tuned on an individual basis (and probably take more 
time - plastic not being as amiable to work with as wood).
Is this one of the reasons why it never happened - that, even in plastic, 
each chanter would have to be tuned by hand?

Just wondering.
Colin Hill


- Original Message - 
From: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net

To: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:09 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution




Dear Malcolm,
Yes of course - I read your post more carefully after sending mine, and 
see that you were in fact referring to an old chanter rather than 
something one of our current pipemakers had done. Sorry to have reacted 
over-hastily!
I agree that some research and collating of measurements may be 
interesting and useful, though of course finger hole positioning is, and 
always has been with all wind instruments, a compromise between 
theoretical calculated positions and positions where the player's fingers 
can move most easily, and then undercut and adjusted for accurate tuning - 
making compromises and decisions to accomodate the balance between pure 
and tempered intevals. I do drill my fingerholes in the same very 
carefully measured places on all my chanters, though these have been 
refined and slightly changed over the years. However, the undercutting and 
fine tuning is always subtly different. I'm afraid I don't think chanter 
tuning can be reduced to an exact science, precisely the same on every 
instrument!


Philip

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com

To: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution


Dear Philip thank you for your mail. the half inch tone hole sizes came 
from a Fred Picknell chanter about 100 year old and been in constant use. 
This chanter belongs to Tommy Breckons and is in use today. I have had it 
here at Scunthorpe to fettle and believe me it does play. The 1/2 is a 
guesstimate and of course not to be taken as scientifically as this 
survey could be. Thank you and please try to be positive, no one is going 
to come to any harm over this.





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html








[NSP] Re: malcom's final solution

2009-03-07 Thread pipe...@tiscali.co.uk
Colin,

Some four to five years ago Mike Nelson devoted a great deal of time 
and effort to producing a set of pipes suitable for use in schools. The 
chanter was made from a plastic composite material so were parts of the 
drones.  The idea was that the pipes should be produced as cheaply as 
could be consistent with sounding as close to normal pipes as possible. 
The pipes had to be made to stand the knocks and pressures put on them 
by the children. 

I remember Mike saying that there were several problems with actually 
getting the chanters etc. into production but these were overcome and a 
protoyype set was produced for evaluation.  Anthony Robb became 
involved and I remember him playing a set at the Rothbury weekend 
course.

I have not been involved closely with piping for 2or 3 years now so 
can someone update us on how the sets progressed and has the scheme 
been a sucess in schools?

Prehps there is a place for beginners sets, or part sets, to be made 
from composite materials as there must be those who are put off taking 
up the pipes because of the relativly high initial cost.

Dicuss!!!

Regards to all,

Guy Tindale
Original Message
From: cwh...@santa-fe.freeserve.co.uk
Date: 07/03/2009 18:31 
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subj: [NSP] Re: malcom#39;s final solution

Excuse my ignorance on this but, many years ago (and I do mean MANY 
- 
possibly back in the 70's or 80's), there was a discussion regarding 
making 
plastic chanters for NSP as an aid to teaching in schools (thus 
swapping the 
pipes for the ever present recorder for music lessons etc).
I notice quite a few Scottish smallpipes now have the plastic option 
but I 
haven't seen plastic NSPs.
Plastic, of course, encompassing a number of man-made materials - as 
with 
clarinets etc.
Obviously, production of plastic pipes would be quite useless if the 
chanters have to be tuned on an individual basis (and probably take 
more 
time - plastic not being as amiable to work with as wood).
Is this one of the reasons why it never happened - that, even in 
plastic, 
each chanter would have to be tuned by hand?
Just wondering.
Colin Hill


- Original Message - 
From: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net
To: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:09 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution



 Dear Malcolm,
 Yes of course - I read your post more carefully after sending mine, 
and 
 see that you were in fact referring to an old chanter rather than 
 something one of our current pipemakers had done. Sorry to have 
reacted 
 over-hastily!
 I agree that some research and collating of measurements may be 
 interesting and useful, though of course finger hole positioning 
is, and 
 always has been with all wind instruments, a compromise between 
 theoretical calculated positions and positions where the player's 
fingers 
 can move most easily, and then undercut and adjusted for accurate 
tuning - 
 making compromises and decisions to accomodate the balance between 
pure 
 and tempered intevals. I do drill my fingerholes in the same very 
 carefully measured places on all my chanters, though these have 
been 
 refined and slightly changed over the years. However, the 
undercutting and 
 fine tuning is always subtly different. I'm afraid I don't think 
chanter 
 tuning can be reduced to an exact science, precisely the same on 
every 
 instrument!

 Philip

 - Original Message - 
 From: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com
 To: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net
 Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution


 Dear Philip thank you for your mail. the half inch tone hole sizes 
came 
 from a Fred Picknell chanter about 100 year old and been in 
constant use. 
 This chanter belongs to Tommy Breckons and is in use today. I have 
had it 
 here at Scunthorpe to fettle and believe me it does play. The 
1/2 is a 
 guesstimate and of course not to be taken as scientifically as 
this 
 survey could be. Thank you and please try to be positive, no one 
is going 
 to come to any harm over this.




 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

 









Fancy a job? - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/jobs/
__




[NSP] Re: malcom's final solution

2009-03-07 Thread colin
Thanks for that. It's nice to know that the idea was followed up. Being out 
of region (Liverpool) if it's not in the magazine or on the list, I probably 
won't know about it :-).

I'll be watching this list with interest for more news.
Colin Hill
- Original Message - 
From: pipe...@tiscali.co.uk

To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 8:23 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution




Colin,

Some four to five years ago Mike Nelson devoted a great deal of time
and effort to producing a set of pipes suitable for use in schools. The
chanter was made from a plastic composite material so were parts of the
drones.  The idea was that the pipes should be produced as cheaply as
could be consistent with sounding as close to normal pipes as possible.
The pipes had to be made to stand the knocks and pressures put on them
by the children.

I remember Mike saying that there were several problems with actually
getting the chanters etc. into production but these were overcome and a
protoyype set was produced for evaluation.  Anthony Robb became
involved and I remember him playing a set at the Rothbury weekend
course.

I have not been involved closely with piping for 2or 3 years now so
can someone update us on how the sets progressed and has the scheme
been a sucess in schools?

Prehps there is a place for beginners sets, or part sets, to be made
from composite materials as there must be those who are put off taking
up the pipes because of the relativly high initial cost.

Dicuss!!!

Regards to all,

Guy Tindale

Original Message
From: cwh...@santa-fe.freeserve.co.uk
Date: 07/03/2009 18:31
To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subj: [NSP] Re: malcom#39;s final solution

Excuse my ignorance on this but, many years ago (and I do mean MANY

-

possibly back in the 70's or 80's), there was a discussion regarding

making

plastic chanters for NSP as an aid to teaching in schools (thus

swapping the

pipes for the ever present recorder for music lessons etc).
I notice quite a few Scottish smallpipes now have the plastic option

but I

haven't seen plastic NSPs.
Plastic, of course, encompassing a number of man-made materials - as

with

clarinets etc.
Obviously, production of plastic pipes would be quite useless if the
chanters have to be tuned on an individual basis (and probably take

more

time - plastic not being as amiable to work with as wood).
Is this one of the reasons why it never happened - that, even in

plastic,

each chanter would have to be tuned by hand?
Just wondering.
Colin Hill


- Original Message - 
From: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net

To: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com
Cc: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:09 PM
Subject: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution




Dear Malcolm,
Yes of course - I read your post more carefully after sending mine,

and

see that you were in fact referring to an old chanter rather than
something one of our current pipemakers had done. Sorry to have

reacted

over-hastily!
I agree that some research and collating of measurements may be
interesting and useful, though of course finger hole positioning

is, and

always has been with all wind instruments, a compromise between
theoretical calculated positions and positions where the player's

fingers

can move most easily, and then undercut and adjusted for accurate

tuning -

making compromises and decisions to accomodate the balance between

pure

and tempered intevals. I do drill my fingerholes in the same very
carefully measured places on all my chanters, though these have

been

refined and slightly changed over the years. However, the

undercutting and

fine tuning is always subtly different. I'm afraid I don't think

chanter

tuning can be reduced to an exact science, precisely the same on

every

instrument!

Philip

- Original Message - 
From: Malcolm Sargeant malcolm.sargea...@ntlworld.com

To: Philip Gruar phi...@gruar.clara.net
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: malcom's final solution



Dear Philip thank you for your mail. the half inch tone hole sizes

came

from a Fred Picknell chanter about 100 year old and been in

constant use.

This chanter belongs to Tommy Breckons and is in use today. I have

had it

here at Scunthorpe to fettle and believe me it does play. The

1/2 is a

guesstimate and of course not to be taken as scientifically as

this

survey could be. Thank you and please try to be positive, no one

is going

to come to any harm over this.





To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html













Fancy a job? - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/jobs/
__