[NSP] Re: [NPS-Discussion] NSP Lists duplication

2011-07-04 Thread Julia Say
On 4 Jul 2011, Francis Wood wrote: 
 
 The Dartmouth list is for anyone interested in Northmbrian Small-pipes. 

It is administered and monitored entirely from without NPS membership. No 
member or 
officer of the society has any say in how it is run, although several (only 
about 
half) committee members read it and some contribute (obviously).
Very occasionally Wayne (who does run it) and I consult on whether names are 
actual 
people or not, that is all.

The NPS
 Discussion list was subsequently established for Society-specific discussion. 
 I remain as a subscriber to the second list because I don't know whether it 
 still is
 useful. I have no means of knowing. 

Tim  I set it up, and do the necessary admin (mostly non-subscribers trying to 
cross post from Dartmouth) to keep NPS announcements / politics from annoying 
non-
members.

It presently has only 89 subscribers. As a consequence it is of little use to 
reach 
most NPS members.

It was also set up as a stop-gap until a discussion forum could be activated 
on 
the NPS website, where political discussions could be held in separate 
threads 
which need not bother those had no interest.

If (and this is not for me to decide, but NPS-discussion subscribers) we have 
reached the point where it could realistically be suspended, we can do so.

What I would actually propose (wearing my secretarial hat for a moment) is to 
convert it to an NPS-info list, subscribe all NPS members who have an email 
address unless they opt out, and use it for Society announcements with the 
reply 
function set to come to the sec.only. That is to say, not a discussion list, 
but an 
info-list, with discussions pointed to the website forum.

This would have to be passed by the committee and announced in the NL, since it 
is 
a further change, so it isn't going to happen now before the autumn, although 
we 
(the 89 subscribers) could all agree that NPS Discussion has passed its use-by 
date, and agree not to post to it, but rather use the forum.

Hope this helps
Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: [NPS-Discussion] NSP Lists duplication

2011-07-04 Thread Francis Wood
Thanks Julia. A really helpful response.

I'm in favour of your suggestions.

Francis


On 4 Jul 2011, at 14:23, Julia Say wrote:

 On 4 Jul 2011, Francis Wood wrote: 
 
 The Dartmouth list is for anyone interested in Northmbrian Small-pipes. 
 
 It is administered and monitored entirely from without NPS membership. No 
 member or 
 officer of the society has any say in how it is run, although several (only 
 about 
 half) committee members read it and some contribute (obviously).
 Very occasionally Wayne (who does run it) and I consult on whether names are 
 actual 
 people or not, that is all.
 
 The NPS
 Discussion list was subsequently established for Society-specific 
 discussion. 
 I remain as a subscriber to the second list because I don't know whether it 
 still is
 useful. I have no means of knowing. 
 
 Tim  I set it up, and do the necessary admin (mostly non-subscribers trying 
 to 
 cross post from Dartmouth) to keep NPS announcements / politics from annoying 
 non-
 members.
 
 It presently has only 89 subscribers. As a consequence it is of little use to 
 reach 
 most NPS members.
 
 It was also set up as a stop-gap until a discussion forum could be 
 activated on 
 the NPS website, where political discussions could be held in separate 
 threads 
 which need not bother those had no interest.
 
 If (and this is not for me to decide, but NPS-discussion subscribers) we 
 have 
 reached the point where it could realistically be suspended, we can do so.
 
 What I would actually propose (wearing my secretarial hat for a moment) is to 
 convert it to an NPS-info list, subscribe all NPS members who have an email 
 address unless they opt out, and use it for Society announcements with the 
 reply 
 function set to come to the sec.only. That is to say, not a discussion list, 
 but an 
 info-list, with discussions pointed to the website forum.
 
 This would have to be passed by the committee and announced in the NL, since 
 it is 
 a further change, so it isn't going to happen now before the autumn, although 
 we 
 (the 89 subscribers) could all agree that NPS Discussion has passed its 
 use-by 
 date, and agree not to post to it, but rather use the forum.
 
 Hope this helps
 Julia
 
 
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html