[NSP] Re: TOTM/Drones

2011-08-01 Thread barry07

If I can change the tune in question to illustrate a point.

Oyster Wives' Rant which appears in Peacock's Tunes is also well known  
in another tradition as Mullen Dhu.  In that tradition it is played  
against A drones and becomes yet another Scottish tune with not a lot  
to recommend it.  When the Northumbrian pipers got hold of it, I am  
sure they would have played it against G drones and played in this way  
it becomes to me a very exciting and harmonically interesting tune.


In the days of the simple chanter, Northumbrian pipers mercilessly  
butchered tunes from other traditions to fit them to the pipes. -  
Anyone remember the story of The Bed of Procrustes? In doing so we got  
such gems as The Bonny Pit Lad.


I remember well being at a 'G' music session with Johnny Handle  
playing accordion and at one time he stopped playing, and at the end  
of the tune said, That's a real pipe tune. Ye cannot put any chords  
to it.


I don't think we should expect our music to always obey rules derived  
from other traditions.


From an earlier e-mail

Quoting gibbonssoi...@aol.com:

   But is the best thing we can say about it that it's grammatical?
   So is Chomsky's 'Colourless green ideas sleep furiously',
   though it is totally meaningless.

 The sentence may be meaningless but it is still pleasant to the ear,  
and very challenging in a 1960s sort of way.


Barry




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: TOTM/Drones

2011-08-01 Thread Matt Seattle
   On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:43 AM, [1]barr...@nspipes.co.uk wrote:

 If I can change the tune in question to illustrate a point.

   or rather, to miss the point (IMO)! The point is that, in a tune such
   as Oyster Wife or Wild Hills or 'Skye Crofters' or Swallow's Tail,
   which all have the modal centre of A throughout, drones tuned to A/E
   make good musical sense. In tunes which have a modal centre shifting
   between A and C (Cuckold, Peacock Follows, Fairly Shot, Little Wat Ye),
   A/E drones disguise this shift to the point of obliterating it. That is
   my point, made in an earlier response. Of course I recognise that I am
   against the tide with this view, and that's fine by me.
   As for the Oyster Wife, IMO it is the ONLY tune in Peacock's Tunes
   which suits a change of drone tuning, and in my experience it has
   plenty to recommend it. I even like it so much that my version has
   twice as many strains.
   Fraternally and grumpily yours! :-)

 Oyster Wives' Rant which appears in Peacock's Tunes is also well
 known in another tradition as Mullen Dhu.  In that tradition it is
 played against A drones and becomes yet another Scottish tune with
 not a lot to recommend it.  When the Northumbrian pipers got hold of
 it, I am sure they would have played it against G drones and played
 in this way it becomes to me a very exciting and harmonically
 interesting tune.
 In the days of the simple chanter, Northumbrian pipers mercilessly
 butchered tunes from other traditions to fit them to the pipes. -
 Anyone remember the story of The Bed of Procrustes? In doing so we
 got such gems as The Bonny Pit Lad.
 I remember well being at a 'G' music session with Johnny Handle
 playing accordion and at one time he stopped playing, and at the end
 of the tune said, That's a real pipe tune. Ye cannot put any chords
 to it.
 I don't think we should expect our music to always obey rules
 derived from other traditions.
 From an earlier e-mail
 Quoting [2]gibbonssoi...@aol.com:

   But is the best thing we can say about it that it's grammatical?
   So is Chomsky's 'Colourless green ideas sleep furiously',
   though it is totally meaningless.

  The sentence may be meaningless but it is still pleasant to the
 ear, and very challenging in a 1960s sort of way.
 Barry

   --

References

   1. mailto:barr...@nspipes.co.uk
   2. mailto:gibbonssoi...@aol.com


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


[NSP] Re: TOTM/Drones

2011-08-01 Thread John Dally
   Being a drone musician Peacock might have had an insight into the
   tonality of the tune.  The first impulse is to think he just wanted to
   fit it on the keyless chanter.  It's in Em (the relative minor of
   G).  Ending on an A, the tune is usually said to be in Am which, which,
   as Barry points out, misses the point altogether.



   Another Highland tune that moves intact to the NSP and also seems
   happier there is The Little Cascade.  William Donaldson called it a
   Modernist masterpiece, but I think he didn't hear that the tune would
   lose all it's supposed Modernism when played against G drones, which
   fit its modality better than A drones.  Like the other meddling
   Modernist, Campbell of Kilberry, he imposed his 20th century High Art
   ideals on a music that gets along quite nicely without them.

   On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:43 AM, [1]barr...@nspipes.co.uk wrote:

 If I can change the tune in question to illustrate a point.
 Oyster Wives' Rant which appears in Peacock's Tunes is also well
 known in another tradition as Mullen Dhu.  In that tradition it is
 played against A drones and becomes yet another Scottish tune with
 not a lot to recommend it.  When the Northumbrian pipers got hold of
 it, I am sure they would have played it against G drones and played
 in this way it becomes to me a very exciting and harmonically
 interesting tune.
 In the days of the simple chanter, Northumbrian pipers mercilessly
 butchered tunes from other traditions to fit them to the pipes. -
 Anyone remember the story of The Bed of Procrustes? In doing so we
 got such gems as The Bonny Pit Lad.
 I remember well being at a 'G' music session with Johnny Handle
 playing accordion and at one time he stopped playing, and at the end
 of the tune said, That's a real pipe tune. Ye cannot put any chords
 to it.
 I don't think we should expect our music to always obey rules
 derived from other traditions.
 From an earlier e-mail
 Quoting [2]gibbonssoi...@aol.com:

   But is the best thing we can say about it that it's grammatical?
   So is Chomsky's 'Colourless green ideas sleep furiously',
   though it is totally meaningless.

  The sentence may be meaningless but it is still pleasant to the
 ear, and very challenging in a 1960s sort of way.
 Barry
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:barr...@nspipes.co.uk
   2. mailto:gibbonssoi...@aol.com
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



[NSP] Re: TOTM/Drones

2011-08-01 Thread Dave S
Hi -- I have posted the Mad Moll on Northumbrianpipers forum so all 
interested can have a look at an early version of the tune.
Quite possibly it is a droneless undefined key tune -- I have no idea 
and am not qualified to hazard a quess


Dave

On 8/1/2011 7:37 PM, Matt Seattle wrote:

  On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:12 PM, John
  Dally[1]dir...@gmail.com  wrote:

Being a drone musician Peacock might have had an insight into the
tonality of the tune.  The first impulse is to think he just
  wanted to
fit it on the keyless chanter.  It's in Em (the relative minor of
G).  Ending on an A, the tune is usually said to be in Am which,
  which,
as Barry points out, misses the point altogether.

It's in 'A neutral', a gapped scale, neither major nor minor (although
Peacock's version has a fleeting c, absent from other versions), it
just happens to start on the 5th of the scale (e). I can't agree that
it's in E anything. It fits perfectly because unlike most Highland pipe
tunes the high a is absent, so no clipping required.

--

References

1. mailto:dir...@gmail.com


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3800 - Release Date: 07/31/11