[NTG-context] Re: how to get bottom-vertical-alignment in (natural) table cells?
Hi Willi,
thanks for your reply - it works. Just for completeness: is top
alignment termed high?
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi Stefan,
May be not quit logic, but when replacing the bottom by low you get
the desired result.
Kind regards
Willi
Stefan Wachter wrote:
Hi all!
I try to set a simple table that show the different horizontal and
vertical alignment capabilities (see below):
horizontal: left, middle, right
vertical: top(?), lohi, bottom(?)
Yet, the bottom alignment does not work. The texts in the third column
that should be placed at the bottom appear at the top of their cell.
Does anyone know how bottom alignment in table cells can be accomplished?
Many thanks for your attention.
--Stefan
\bTABLE[width=3cm,height=3cm]
\bTABLEbody
\bTR
\bTD[align={right,top}] top \eTD
\bTD[align={right,lohi}] middle \eTD
\bTD[align={right,bottom}] bottom \eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD[align={middle,top}] top \eTD
\bTD[align={middle,lohi}] middle \eTD
\bTD[align={middle,bottom}] bottom \eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD[align={left,top}] top \eTD
\bTD[align={left,lohi}] middle \eTD
\bTD[align={left,bottom}] bottom \eTD
\eTR
\eTABLEbody
\eTABLE
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] Re: proportional column widths in natural tables?
Hi Willi, thanks for your reply. Can you please tell me, what the makeupwidth is? It seems that I have to do some calculations for the widths by myself: I have a CALS table model where the widths are specified by proportional weights. - I have to sum the weigths of all columns and divide each of the weights by this sum in order to get the necessary stretch factors for each column. I hoped the ConTeXt has already a mechanism for this kind of specifiying the widths. --Stefan Willi Egger wrote: Hi Stefan sorry for sending an answer to your previous mail as reply to this one You can determin columnwidths by saying width=.3\textwidth or width=.3\makeupwidth or even though less ConTeXty width=.3\hsize Wheter to use \textwidth or \makeupwidth depends on the context where your table is placed. Kind regards Willi Stefan Wachter wrote: Hi all! Is there a possibility to specify proportional column widths when using natural tables? E.g. If i want to set column 1 and 2 to have 2/7 and column 3 3/7 of the available broadth. \setupTABLE[column][1][width=2*] \setupTABLE[column][2][width=2*] \setupTABLE[column][3][width=3*] Thanks for your attention, --Stefan ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: proportional column widths in natural tables?
Hi Stefan, From the english manual...p24-25 Basically textwidth is the width available at the moment i.e. when in any other sitation than one column. Makeupwidth is the total width of the typesetting area. Concerning you CALS table model, I assume indeed that you will have to calculate the individual widths... Kind reagards Willi Stefan Wachter wrote: Hi Willi, thanks for your reply. Can you please tell me, what the makeupwidth is? It seems that I have to do some calculations for the widths by myself: I have a CALS table model where the widths are specified by proportional weights. - I have to sum the weigths of all columns and divide each of the weights by this sum in order to get the necessary stretch factors for each column. I hoped the ConTeXt has already a mechanism for this kind of specifiying the widths. --Stefan Willi Egger wrote: Hi Stefan sorry for sending an answer to your previous mail as reply to this one You can determin columnwidths by saying width=.3\textwidth or width=.3\makeupwidth or even though less ConTeXty width=.3\hsize Wheter to use \textwidth or \makeupwidth depends on the context where your table is placed. Kind regards Willi Stefan Wachter wrote: Hi all! Is there a possibility to specify proportional column widths when using natural tables? E.g. If i want to set column 1 and 2 to have 2/7 and column 3 3/7 of the available broadth. \setupTABLE[column][1][width=2*] \setupTABLE[column][2][width=2*] \setupTABLE[column][3][width=3*] Thanks for your attention, --Stefan ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: how to get bottom-vertical-alignment in (natural) table cells?
Hi Stefan,
I would not know whether it can be generalized. In text you can place
text superscript with \high{superscripted text}. Mostly I would have a
look into the help-system for commands. You can start it with e.g.
texshow setuptabulate.
If you use the SciTe editor it is you can setup it in such a way, that
you can use F1 to get this help.
Yet another way to use this help is to use http://members.ping.de:8061/
this is a tool setup by Patrick Gundlach.
Kind regards
Willi
Stefan Wachter wrote:
Hi Willi,
thanks for your reply - it works. Just for completeness: is top
alignment termed high?
Willi Egger wrote:
Hi Stefan,
May be not quit logic, but when replacing the bottom by low you
get the desired result.
Kind regards
Willi
Stefan Wachter wrote:
Hi all!
I try to set a simple table that show the different horizontal and
vertical alignment capabilities (see below):
horizontal: left, middle, right
vertical: top(?), lohi, bottom(?)
Yet, the bottom alignment does not work. The texts in the third
column that should be placed at the bottom appear at the top of their
cell.
Does anyone know how bottom alignment in table cells can be
accomplished?
Many thanks for your attention.
--Stefan
\bTABLE[width=3cm,height=3cm]
\bTABLEbody
\bTR
\bTD[align={right,top}] top \eTD
\bTD[align={right,lohi}] middle \eTD
\bTD[align={right,bottom}] bottom \eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD[align={middle,top}] top \eTD
\bTD[align={middle,lohi}] middle \eTD
\bTD[align={middle,bottom}] bottom \eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD[align={left,top}] top \eTD
\bTD[align={left,lohi}] middle \eTD
\bTD[align={left,bottom}] bottom \eTD
\eTR
\eTABLEbody
\eTABLE
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] Re: proportional column widths in natural tables?
At 19:55 15/02/2004, you wrote: Hi Willi, thanks for your reply. Can you please tell me, what the makeupwidth is? It seems that I have to do some calculations for the widths by myself: I have a CALS table model where the widths are specified by proportional weights. - I have to sum the weigths of all columns and divide each of the weights by this sum in order to get the necessary stretch factors for each column. I hoped the ConTeXt has already a mechanism for this kind of specifiying the widths. \setupTABLE[option=stretch] - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE/POD/CTS Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com - information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf - ___ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
