[NTG-context] bug in layers

[Hans Hagen]

Hi,
If you think that in the current version layers are using too many 
resources, you're right and may patch:

\def\checkproperty[#1]%
 {\bgroup
  \def\currentproperty{#1}%
  \csname\??py\s!check\currentproperty\endcsname
  \egroup}
Hans
-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] Two texexec.ini files?

[Hans Hagen]

Matt Gushee wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:13:23PM +0200, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
 

I have noticed that the ConTeXt distribution contains both
  $TEXMF/context/config/texexec.rme
and
  $TEXMF/scripts/context/perl/texexec.rme
Are they both supposed to be used? What happens if they're not the 
same?
 

This is a FAQ.
   

Oops, sorry. Except ... is there a list of FAQs somewhere? I've never
seen it.
 

They're both unused. You must rename or copy one to texexec.ini (I 
prefer it in config).
   

Yes, I knew they had to be copied. I take it, then, that texexec.ini can
be in either of the above locations ... maybe anywhere accessible to
kpathsea?
Anyway, it's a bit confusing to have two texexec.rme files. I would
suggest removing one of them from the distribution.
Thanks for your reply!
 

The reason why there are two files is that in the new tds the scripts are now in a 
separate branch of the tree (scripts); in order to keep some downward compatibility 
(also with respect to expectations) i put two copies in the tree; the one in scripts 
will go away next year
(btw, you can use textools to move files to the new locations) 

Hans 

-
 Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
 Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

[NTG-context] Re: Can \note repeat its footnote?

[Stefan Wachter]

Hi Hans,
many thanks for your help. Now it works. Great!
I try to come along without having the same footnote marker for repeated 
footnotes. (This would make sense only if footnotes are sequentially 
numbered over a whole document.)

Thanks again,
--Stefan
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context