[NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
hi list,
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve the
following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
in `context'? I've tried something like
\def\km{\math{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text but get sytnax errors when
putting it in this
\startformula
\km = 1
\stopformula
formula.
but this fails for obvious reasons (as would using `$$' instead of
`ensuremath' in the `latex' case).
so what I need is a way of defining (potentially complex) math-expressions
via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations (whatever) which I can
then use
in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as
well as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
joerg
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:41 schrieb j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com:
hi list,
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve the
following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
in `context'? I've tried something like
\def\km{\math{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text but get sytnax errors when
putting it in this
\startformula
\km = 1
\stopformula
formula.
but this fails for obvious reasons (as would using `$$' instead of
`ensuremath' in the `latex' case).
so what I need is a way of defining (potentially complex) math-expressions
via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations (whatever) which I can
then use
in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as well
as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
In ConTeXt you have to write
\define\km{\mathematics{K_m}}
but there is not much to gain from this because you can enter math mode in the
text with \m{…}.
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:42:03 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:41 schrieb j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.com:
hi list,
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve
the following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
in `context'? I've tried something like
\def\km{\math{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text but get sytnax errors when
putting it in this
\startformula
\km = 1
\stopformula
formula.
but this fails for obvious reasons (as would using `$$' instead of
`ensuremath' in the `latex' case).
so what I need is a way of defining (potentially complex)
math-expressions via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations
(whatever) which I can then use
in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as
well as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
In ConTeXt you have to write
\define\km{\mathematics{K_m}}
but there is not much to gain from this because you can enter math mode
in the text with \m{…}.
thanks for the response. in my silly example you are right (but even there
it saves more than 50% of keystrokes). but I'm thinking of course of more
tedious math expressions where it rapidly is handy to use such
abbreviations -- the more so, if you have, say, 20 different ones
appearing repeatedly in the document. but that would work with the
`\def..\math' construct in the body text. what does _not_ work, then, is
to use the definition in a display (\startformula...\stopformula) equation
(which it _does_ in latex when isolating the math expression with
`ensuremath'). so my real question(s) are:
1. is there any way to achieve the same functionality in `context'
(expansion of math-containing defintion/macro/abbreviation in text _and_
math environment? if yes, how would I do this?
2. if no, would it be sensible (and feasible) to modify `\math' behaviour
and to make it aware of whether it is called from within text or from
within a display equation (in which case it should do nothing...), i.e.
mkae it behave like `\ensuremath' in latex?
thx/joerg
Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
Am 09.12.2014 um 09:59 schrieb j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:42:03 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com mailto:schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:41 schrieb j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com:
hi list,
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve the
following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
in `context'? I've tried something like
\def\km{\math{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text but get sytnax errors when
putting it in this
\startformula
\km = 1
\stopformula
formula.
but this fails for obvious reasons (as would using `$$' instead of
`ensuremath' in the `latex' case).
so what I need is a way of defining (potentially complex) math-expressions
via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations (whatever) which I can
then use
in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...) as
well as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
In ConTeXt you have to write
\define\km{\mathematics{K_m}}
but there is not much to gain from this because you can enter math mode in
the text with \m{…}.
thanks for the response. in my silly example you are right (but even there it
saves more than 50% of keystrokes). but I'm thinking of course of more
tedious math expressions where it rapidly is handy to use such abbreviations
-- the more so, if you have, say, 20 different ones appearing repeatedly in
the document. but that would work with the `\def..\math' construct in the
body text. what does _not_ work, then, is to use the definition in a display
(\startformula...\stopformula) equation (which it _does_ in latex when
isolating the math expression with `ensuremath'). so my real question(s) are:
1. is there any way to achieve the same functionality in `context' (expansion
of math-containing defintion/macro/abbreviation in text _and_ math
environment? if yes, how would I do this?
2. if no, would it be sensible (and feasible) to modify `\math' behaviour and
to make it aware of whether it is called from within text or from within a
display equation (in which case it should do nothing...), i.e. mkae it
behave like `\ensuremath' in latex?
1 + 2:
\define\Foo{\mathematics{f(x)}}
\define\Bar{\mathortext {f(x)}{\m{g(x)}}}
\starttext
a \Foo\ \Bar\ b
\startformula
\Foo\ \Bar
\stopformula
\stoptext
Wolfgang___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Pass a lua table to metapost
On 12/8/2014 4:48 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:34 PM, DesdeChaves wrote: I use the last context minimals. In my system a have a new luatex binary (v. 0.78.2) but I don't know how install it in minimals. If i just copy/paste the new binary to the folder .../tex/texmf-osx-64/bin I found a eeror message This went wrong: .../Context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/spac-ver.lua:933: attempt to index field 'properties' (a nil value) Why context minimals don't coming with the last luatex? Hans, what version of LuaTeX is needed? we have 0.79.2 now but 0.79.1 is also ok i think Jorge, which version of luatex do you have in minimals / what OS are you using? It's not 100% clear to me whether you have 0.78.2 in minimals or somewhere else. If 0.78.2 comes from minimals, you must be using PowerPC or armel and we need to ask the maintainer of these binaries for a rebuild. If LuaTeX 0.79.2 is needed, we just need to send an email to everyone (or rather: we should do that anyway). Maybe I just forgot to send a notice to the builders to make new builds when LuaTeX 0.79.2 came out. indeed, 0.79.2 is the latest greatest Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:05:22 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 09.12.2014 um 09:59 schrieb j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.com:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 09:42:03 +0100, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com mailto:schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:41 schrieb j. van den hoff
veedeeh...@googlemail.com:
hi list,
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve
the following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
in `context'? I've tried something like
\def\km{\math{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text but get sytnax errors when
putting it in this
\startformula
\km = 1
\stopformula
formula.
but this fails for obvious reasons (as would using `$$' instead of
`ensuremath' in the `latex' case).
so what I need is a way of defining (potentially complex)
math-expressions via some shortcuts/definitions/macros/abbreviations
(whatever) which I can then use
in the formula environment (or whatever it's called in `context'...)
as well as in the body text.
any help appreciated,
In ConTeXt you have to write
\define\km{\mathematics{K_m}}
but there is not much to gain from this because you can enter math
mode in the text with \m{…}.
thanks for the response. in my silly example you are right (but even
there it saves more than 50% of keystrokes). but I'm thinking of course
of more tedious math expressions where it rapidly is handy to use such
abbreviations -- the more so, if you have, say, 20 different ones
appearing repeatedly in the document. but that would work with the
`\def..\math' construct in the body text. what does _not_ work, then,
is to use the definition in a display (\startformula...\stopformula)
equation (which it _does_ in latex when isolating the math expression
with `ensuremath'). so my real question(s) are:
1. is there any way to achieve the same functionality in `context'
(expansion of math-containing defintion/macro/abbreviation in text
_and_ math environment? if yes, how would I do this?
2. if no, would it be sensible (and feasible) to modify `\math'
behaviour and to make it aware of whether it is called from within text
or from within a display equation (in which case it should do
nothing...), i.e. mkae it behave like `\ensuremath' in latex?
1 + 2:
\define\Foo{\mathematics{f(x)}}
\define\Bar{\mathortext {f(x)}{\m{g(x)}}}
\starttext
a \Foo\ \Bar\ b
\startformula
\Foo\ \Bar
\stopformula
\stoptext
feeling silly: now it works (so there was no real problem in the first
place...), but previously I definitely got syntax errors when compiling if
the `\def'
was used in the display equation (no idea, why, but I must have overlooked
some dumb typo or similar). anyway, sorry for the noise and thanks again...
since I'm really new to `context': are there any potential problems with
inserting white space in `\define' lines like `\define \Foo {
\mathematics{f(x)} }' which I might miss? `context' seems to ignore them
and they don't creep into the formatted output AFAICS (which is good).
j.
ps: `\mathortext' is nice. should this not be in the manuals/documentation
somewhere? it seems it is not ...
Wolfgang
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On 12/9/2014 1:36 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
since I'm really new to `context': are there any potential problems with
inserting white space in `\define' lines like `\define \Foo {
\mathematics{f(x)} }' which I might miss? `context' seems to ignore them
and they don't creep into the formatted output AFAICS (which is good).
in math mode spaces don't matter much
in definitions you can do this:
\starttexdefinition foo
f
o
o
\stoptexdefinition
and get 'foo'
\starttexdefinition foo
\starttexdefinition unexanded foo
\starttexdefinition foo #1#2
\starttexdefinition unexpanded foo #1#2
in a mkvi document you can also say:
\starttexdefinition foo #first#second
\starttexdefinition unexpanded foo #first#second
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Problems with repeating layers
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es wrote:
On 12/08/2014 08:42 AM, Reza Housseini wrote:
Hello
I try to use layers to position a figure on top of the leftmargin area.
I use code like the following:
\definelayer[MyLayer][option=test]
\setupbackgrounds[text][leftmargin][background=MyLayer]
\setlayer[MyLayer][x=0cm,y=0cm]
{\externalfigure[cow][width=2cm]}
This image get's repeated every page but I only want it on the first
page. The parameter state=start does not change anything. Is there a way
to disable the layer on the next page?
Hi Reza,
I don’t know whether this is a bug or a feature.
But this document might achieve what (I guess) you want (as you wrote
yourself):
\definelayer[MyLayer]
\setlayer[MyLayer][x=0cm,y=4.5cm]
{\externalfigure[cow][width=2cm]}
\setupbackgrounds[page][background=MyLayer]
\starttext
\dorecurse{5}{\input knuth}
\stoptext
Also there seems to be a bug with \showframe. When I use this command
my figure is only displayed on the first page (as desired).
I wasn’t able to reproduce this.
Placing \showframe before of after \setupbackgrounds in the previous
document, states (http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Layers#State) work fine.
I hope it helps,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Thanks Pablo
I already used this solution. For me it looks like a bug that the state
argument does not change anything because the manual clearly states the
expected behaviour of state.
But anyhow I'll use the other solution.
Cheers,
Reza
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, j. van den hoff wrote:
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve the
following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
As a side remark, you should normally avoid using lowercase commands like
\km (especially if they are small) as you may inadvertently overwrite an
inbuilt TeX command (e.g., if you redefine \span or \omit, amongst
others). Unlike LaTeX, ConTeXt does not halt at the redefinition of these
commands; it simply spews a warning. Personally, I find that a safer
alternative is to use uppercase or camelcase words to define your own
commands: either \KM or \Km. This way you avoid conflict with inbuilt
commands.
If you are using macros for abbreviations, you can also use the following:
\definesynonyms[mathnotation][mathnotations][\infull]
\mathnotation [KM] {\mathematics{K_m}} {Viscosity of membrane}
\starttext
\placelistofmathnotations
\section{Test}
We can use \KM\ to denote \infull{KM}.
\startformula
\KM = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
This way, you get a list of notation for free.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] MP/Lua binding information flow
In the code in the attachment I have intend that everytime the data generated by Lua are updated metapost should make immediately their representation. However, it insists into represent only the last data generated. How can I fix this problem? thanks Jorge calltemplates.tex Description: TeX document ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:12:08 +0100, Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu
wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, j. van den hoff wrote:
new to `context' and my first question to the list: how can I achieve
the following (`latex') behaviour:
\newcommand{\km}{\ensuremath{K_m}}
We can now use \km\ in the body text as well as in this
\begin{equation}
\km = 1
\end{equation}
display equation.
As a side remark, you should normally avoid using lowercase commands
like \km (especially if they are small) as you may inadvertently
overwrite an inbuilt TeX command (e.g., if you redefine \span or \omit,
amongst others). Unlike LaTeX, ConTeXt does not halt at the redefinition
of these commands; it simply spews a warning. Personally, I find that a
is this behavior configurable (I think I'd rather prefer `latex' behavior
here
and still use lowercase abbreviations until I hit a real names clash)
safer alternative is to use uppercase or camelcase words to define your
own commands: either \KM or \Km. This way you avoid conflict with
inbuilt commands.
understood.
If you are using macros for abbreviations, you can also use the
following:
\definesynonyms[mathnotation][mathnotations][\infull]
\mathnotation [KM] {\mathematics{K_m}} {Viscosity of membrane}
\starttext
\placelistofmathnotations
\section{Test}
We can use \KM\ to denote \infull{KM}.
\startformula
\KM = 10
\stopformula
\stoptext
really thanks a lot for this tip. this seems to be the way to go for any
serious document. (and `viscosity of membrane' is tight, but not right:
it's a metabolic rate (which could be influenced by membrane permeability)
in my context ;-))
joerg
This way, you get a list of notation for free.
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On Tue, Dec 09 2014, Aditya Mahajan wrote: \definesynonyms[mathnotation][mathnotations][\infull] Perhaps better: \inFull ;) -- Peter ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
[NTG-context] Parameters of a table that interfere on another table
Hi,
I do not understand why the parameters of the first table apply to the
second table.
Best regards,
Fabrice
\setuppapersize[A4][A4]
\setuplayout[
backspace=15mm,
width=middle,
topspace=15mm,
height=middle,
header=0pt,
footer=0pt,
]
\definelabel[TableRow][text=,headcolor=red,numberconversion=characters,numberstopper=.]
\starttext
\starmidaligned
\blank[big]
\setupTABLE[row][first][align={right}]
\setupTABLE[row][first][align={right,lohi},
topframe=off,leftframe=off,rightframe=off]
\bTABLE[width=0.25\textwidth,offset=1ex]
\bTR[nc=4]
\bTD text \eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD \TableRow \ text \eTD
\bTD \TableRow \ text \eTD
\bTD \TableRow \ text \eTD
\bTD \TableRow \ text \eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD
\eTD
\bTD
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stopmidaligned
\blank[big]
\startmidaligned
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\setupTABLE[column][first][width=0.3\textwidth]
\setupTABLE[column][two][width=0.7\textwidth]
\bTR
\bTD[nc=3]
text
\eTD
\bTD[nr=2]
\eTD
\eTR
\bTR
\bTD
text
\eTD
\bTD[nc=2]
text
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stopmidaligned
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] equivalent to \newcommand{...}{\ensuremath{...}}
On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:30:50 +0100, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
On 12/9/2014 1:36 PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
since I'm really new to `context': are there any potential problems with
inserting white space in `\define' lines like `\define \Foo {
\mathematics{f(x)} }' which I might miss? `context' seems to ignore them
and they don't creep into the formatted output AFAICS (which is good).
in math mode spaces don't matter much
in definitions you can do this:
\starttexdefinition foo
f
o
o
\stoptexdefinition
and get 'foo'
\starttexdefinition foo
\starttexdefinition unexanded foo
\starttexdefinition foo #1#2
\starttexdefinition unexpanded foo #1#2
in a mkvi document you can also say:
\starttexdefinition foo #first#second
\starttexdefinition unexpanded foo #first#second
thanks for clarifying this.
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Parameters of a table that interfere on another table
Am 09.12.2014 um 23:01 schrieb Fabrice Couvreur fabrice1.couvr...@gmail.com: Hi, I do not understand why the parameters of the first table apply to the second table. What is the problem? Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] Parameters of a table that interfere on another table
Am 09.12.2014 um 23:01 schrieb Fabrice Couvreur fabrice1.couvr...@gmail.com: Hi, I do not understand why the parameters of the first table apply to the second table. Best regards, Fabrice \setupTABLE[column][two][width=0.7\textwidth] This setup doesn’t work because „two“ isn’t a valid keyword for \setupTABLE, you have to replace it with 2. Wolfgang ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
