[NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?
Hi,
I reactivated some code that was working a year ago. But now it seems
that \expanded has no effect in my case (see below). I also tried it
with \normalexpanded and \expandedafter but both had also no effect. My
problem seems to be this line of the full example below:
\doifsomething\Paragraphmark{\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\fullheadnumber/\rawnumber[ParagraphNumber]}}}%
The error shows itself in the line:
Should be 1/1: \in[test]
As \in[test] gives me 1/3 instead of 1/1. (1 was the number assigned to
the first paragraph - 3 is the acutal number).
Can someone tell me what I need to change?
Thanks in advanced
P.
-8---full example---
\unprotect
\definenumber[ParagraphNumber][way=bysection,prefixsegments=100]
\unexpanded\def\startParagraph
{\dosingleempty\dostartParagraph}
\def\dostartParagraph[#1]%
{\getrawparameters[Paragraph][heading=,mark=,#1]%
\incrementnumber[ParagraphNumber]%
\ininner{\tfx\getnumber[ParagraphNumber]}%
\doifsomething\Paragraphheading{\inouter{\Paragraphheading}}%
\doifsomething\Paragraphmark{\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\fullheadnumber/\rawnumber[ParagraphNumber]}}}%
\ignorespaces}
\unexpanded\def\stopParagraph
{\blank[medium]}
\protect
\starttext
\chapter{Alter novom}
\startParagraph[heading={lorem ipsum},mark=test]
\input tufte
\stopParagraph
\startParagraph
\input tufte
\stopParagraph
\startParagraph
Should be 1/1: \in[test]
\stopParagraph
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?
On 05/11/2012 01:28 PM, Peter Schorsch wrote:
Hi,
I reactivated some code that was working a year ago. But now it seems
that \expanded has no effect in my case (see below). I also tried it
with \normalexpanded and \expandedafter but both had also no effect. My
problem seems to be this line of the full example below:
\doifsomething\Paragraphmark{\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\fullheadnumber/\rawnumber[ParagraphNumber]}}}%
The error shows itself in the line:
Should be 1/1: \in[test]
As \in[test] gives me 1/3 instead of 1/1. (1 was the number assigned to
the first paragraph - 3 is the acutal number).
Can someone tell me what I need to change?
Thanks in advanced
P.
See this thread:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20120402.144627.e46a9f9f.en.html
and try to construct a minimal example next time.
Thomas
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?
See this thread:
http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20120402.144627.e46a9f9f.en.html
and try to construct a minimal example next time.
I converted my number to counter and shrinked my example - but the
problem still occurs:
Instead of the counter value when I set the reference I get always the
latest value:
Should be 1: 3
Should be 2: 3
Should be 3: 3
instead of
Should be 1: 1
Should be 2: 2
Should be 3: 3
---8--shrinked example--
\unprotect
\definecounter[ParagraphCounter][way=bysection,prefix=no]
\def\markParagraph[#1]%
{\getrawparameters[Paragraph][mark=,#1]%
\incrementcounter[ParagraphCounter]%
\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\convertedcounter[ParagraphCounter]}}}
\protect
\starttext
\markParagraph[mark=aaa]
\input tufte
\markParagraph[mark=bbb]
\input tufte
\markParagraph[mark=ccc]
Should be 1: \in[aaa]
Should be 2: \in[bbb]
Should be 3: \in[ccc]
\stoptext
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Did usage of \expanded changed?
On 11-5-2012 16:59, Peter Schorsch wrote:
\unprotect
\definecounter[ParagraphCounter][way=bysection,prefix=no]
\def\markParagraph[#1]%
{\getrawparameters[Paragraph][mark=,#1]%
\incrementcounter[ParagraphCounter]%
\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\convertedcounter[ParagraphCounter]}}}
\protect
\starttext
\markParagraph[mark=aaa]
\input tufte
\markParagraph[mark=bbb]
\input tufte
\markParagraph[mark=ccc]
Should be 1: \in[aaa]
Should be 2: \in[bbb]
Should be 3: \in[ccc]
\stoptext
you need to use expandable macros like \rawcountervalue:
\def\markParagraph[#1]%
{\getrawparameters[Paragraph][mark=,#1]%
\incrementcounter[ParagraphCounter]%
\expanded{\textreference[\Paragraphmark]{\rawcountervalue[ParagraphCounter]}}}
this is due to optional argument parsing in the other ones
Hans
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
