Re: [NTG-context] Differences for \Vert in mkii and mkiv

2011-02-02 Thread Otared Kavian
Dear Aditya,

I am sorry I overlooked you answer… I just saw that you have answered my 
message regarding the \Vert symbol.
Thank you and please pardon me.

I tried to modify the mapping of  0x2016 to 0xFF605, but since I don't 
understand the way or where 0xFF605 is constructed, I didn't get any result.
0x2016 is described in char-def.lua, and in font-agl.lua.
FF605 is referred to only in math-vfu.lua.

Maybe if Hans has a little time, he can explain where the double vertical bar 
is constructed: the problem is that these bars are scaled swelled (or English) 
rules rather than bars as in Latin Modern.
Since more and more people are going to use only mkiv, this issue can be 
annoying for mathematical typesetting.

Best regards: OK

On 19 janv. 2011, at 17:44, Aditya Mahajan wrote:

 On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Otared Kavian wrote:
 
 Dear Aditya, dear Hans,
 
 I noticed a serious difference between what one gets for \left\Vert in mkii 
 and in mkiv.
 Probably this is due to the fact that in mkiv the glyph for \Vert is 
 constructed in a different manner, but as far as I know from what I see in 
 the mathematical printed materials, the correct one, or the expected one, is 
 the output from mkii.
 
 I don't know why the glyphs are different. In MkIV, the virtual font is 
 mapping 0x2016 to 0xFF605, but I don't know how FF605 is created.
 
 Is there a way to redefine locally \Vert (or \|) so that in mkiv one gets 
 the same output as with mkii?
 
 Not locally. You could change math-vfu.lua to change the mapping, but I don't 
 completely understand how those work (with the virtual glyphs like FF605)
 
 Aditya
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!
 
 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___


___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] Differences for \Vert in mkii and mkiv

2011-01-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan

On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Otared Kavian wrote:


Dear Aditya, dear Hans,

I noticed a serious difference between what one gets for \left\Vert in mkii and 
in mkiv.
Probably this is due to the fact that in mkiv the glyph for \Vert is 
constructed in a different manner, but as far as I know from what I see in the 
mathematical printed materials, the correct one, or the expected one, is the 
output from mkii.


I don't know why the glyphs are different. In MkIV, the virtual font is 
mapping 0x2016 to 0xFF605, but I don't know how FF605 is created.



Is there a way to redefine locally \Vert (or \|) so that in mkiv one gets the 
same output as with mkii?


Not locally. You could change math-vfu.lua to change the mapping, but I 
don't completely understand how those work (with the virtual glyphs like 
FF605)


Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___