Hi, Hans, Thank you for the great works. But there is still a problem when
I test a more complicated file which is attached below. In this file,
both \bf and \bi give the same font lmroman10-bold.
I guess the reason is that I use the same Chinese font
AdobeHeitiStd-Regular for both SerifBold and SerifBoldItalic. But this
cannot be avoided since Chinese fonts have much fewer typefaces than
English fonts.
Would you give some suggestions to solve this problem? Thanks a lot.
Longmin Wang
i uploaded a beta
for some reason the fallbacks were not part of the hash that i use to
keep track of uniqueness of definitions
it seems to work ok now in the beta
this might also solve some of Thomas's problems
there will probably be a new current later today
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
