Re: [NTG-context] Parsing \...luacode within a \def
Hello,
thanks for explanation -
I could not understand difference in behavior inside \def ("--" dismiss all following)
and out of \def ("--" acts on the one line only);
so the explanation is "\startluacode INSIDE MACRO body acts like any such catcode
regime changing operation"...
Best regards,
Lukas
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:41:28 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 6/14/2018 9:20 PM, Tomas Hala wrote:
Hi Lukáš,
I am not sure but I guess that the problem is related with the behaviour of
the input processor which erases characters at the end of line (CR, LF) and
replace them by a space. Then, the whole content between \start/stopluacode
is at only one line. If you the second way of comment marks, the letter "u"
will be shown at the output.
Tomáš
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--[[ blahblah
]]--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
indeed, \startluacode inside a macro body acts like any such catcode
regime changing operation ..
\def\foo{%
f%oo
}
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o. | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz |
IDDS:nrpt3sn
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4
Mob.: +420 702 033 396
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Parsing \...luacode within a \def
On 6/14/2018 9:20 PM, Tomas Hala wrote:
Hi Lukáš,
I am not sure but I guess that the problem is related with the behaviour of
the input processor which erases characters at the end of line (CR, LF) and
replace them by a space. Then, the whole content between \start/stopluacode
is at only one line. If you the second way of comment marks, the letter "u"
will be shown at the output.
Tomáš
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--[[ blahblah
]]--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
indeed, \startluacode inside a macro body acts like any such catcode
regime changing operation ..
\def\foo{%
f%oo
}
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] Parsing \...luacode within a \def
Hi Lukáš,
I am not sure but I guess that the problem is related with the behaviour of
the input processor which erases characters at the end of line (CR, LF) and
replace them by a space. Then, the whole content between \start/stopluacode
is at only one line. If you the second way of comment marks, the letter "u"
will be shown at the output.
Tomáš
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--[[ blahblah
]]--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
Thu, Jun 14, 2018 ve 08:48:40PM +0200 Procházka Lukáš Ing. napsal(a):
# Hello,
#
# I encountered a phenomena that I cannot understand. Let's have the following
code:
#
#
# \def\T{%
# \startluacode
# context("t")
# \stopluacode
# }
#
# \def\U{%
# \startluacode
# --
#
# context("u")
# \stopluacode
# }
#
# \starttext
# A
# \startluacode
# --
#
# context("b")
# \stopluacode
# \T
# \U
# \stoptext
#
#
# This gives "Abt" - but there is no "u".
#
# It seems that the (first) comment mark "--" within a \startluacode within
\def (here: \def\U) causes all code till \stopluacode is being ignored.
#
# But why?
#
# Maybe I'm missing something very basic...
#
# Best regards,
#
# Lukas
#
#
# --
# Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
# Pontex s. r. o. | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz |
IDDS:nrpt3sn
# Bezová 1658
# 147 14 Praha 4
#
# Mob.: +420 702 033 396
#
#
___
# If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
#
# maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
# webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
# archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
# wiki : http://contextgarden.net
#
___
Tomáš Hála
Mendelova univerzita, Provozně ekonomická fakulta, ústav informatiky
Zemědělská 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, tel. +420 545 13 22 28
http://akela.mendelu.cz/~thala
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Parsing \...luacode within a \def
Hello,
I encountered a phenomena that I cannot understand. Let's have the following
code:
\def\T{%
\startluacode
context("t")
\stopluacode
}
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
\starttext
A
\startluacode
--
context("b")
\stopluacode
\T
\U
\stoptext
This gives "Abt" - but there is no "u".
It seems that the (first) comment mark "--" within a \startluacode within \def
(here: \def\U) causes all code till \stopluacode is being ignored.
But why?
Maybe I'm missing something very basic...
Best regards,
Lukas
--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o. | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz |
IDDS:nrpt3sn
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4
Mob.: +420 702 033 396
t3.mkiv
Description: Binary data
t3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] Parsing \...luacode within a \def
Hello,
I encountered a phenomena that I cannot understand. Let's have the following
code:
\def\T{%
\startluacode
context("t")
\stopluacode
}
\def\U{%
\startluacode
--
context("u")
\stopluacode
}
\starttext
A
\startluacode
--
context("b")
\stopluacode
\T
\U
\stoptext
This gives "Abt" - but there is no "u".
It seems that the (first) comment mark "--" within a \startluacode within \def
(here: \def\U) causes all code till \stopluacode is being ignored.
But why?
Maybe I'm missing something very basic...
Best regards,
Lukas
--
Ing. Lukáš Procházka | mailto:l...@pontex.cz
Pontex s. r. o. | mailto:pon...@pontex.cz | http://www.pontex.cz |
IDDS:nrpt3sn
Bezová 1658
147 14 Praha 4
Mob.: +420 702 033 396
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
