[NTG-context] Subjects on this list - general request

2013-03-20 Thread Robert Blackstone
Dear all,
Considering all complaints about the difficulties to find, in the Garden, or in 
the NTG mail archive,  answers to specific problems, wouldn't it be a good idea 
to ask everybody to clearly state the subject of their message, preferably 
starting with the most important keyword, and in particular to avoid (no 
subject) or [***SPAM***], and similar things as subjects.
Also, if you forgive me,  subjects like "upto current" or "Bug in \column" are 
not really helpful when on tries to search in the archive for a solution to a 
specific problem. In the last-mentioned example, wouldn't "\column, Bug in - " 
or even "\column, Bug in \column" be better? 
More specific subject titles in the mails might save some of us hours of 
unfruitful searching and lots of teeth grinding.
This is probably not the first request on this topic but, if so, I thought it 
would do no harm to repeat it.

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Robert Blackstone

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Subjects on this list - general request

2013-03-20 Thread Mica Semrick
I would agree with the (no subject) or SPAM titles, but if your search tool
can't tell the difference between "\column, Bug in - " - "\column, Bug in
\column" and "Bug in \column" then you probably need to find a new search
tool. I subscribe  to the list in non-digest format, e.g. I get every
email. I used to get it in digest, but I found that made my searching
tougher. I use gmail and have all the list messages skip my inbox and go
directly to a tag. This has helped a ton!

-Mica

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Robert Blackstone <
blackstone.rob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> Considering all complaints about the difficulties to find, in the Garden,
> or in the NTG mail archive,  answers to specific problems, wouldn't it be
> a good idea to ask everybody to clearly state the subject of their message,
> preferably starting with the most important keyword, and in particular to
> avoid (no subject) or [***SPAM***], and similar things as subjects.
>
> Also, if you forgive me,  subjects like "upto current" or "Bug in \column"
> are not really helpful when on tries to search in the archive for a
> solution to a specific problem. In the last-mentioned example, wouldn't 
> "\column,
> Bug in - " or even "\column, Bug in \column" be better?
>
> More specific subject titles in the mails might save some of us hours of
> unfruitful searching and lots of teeth grinding.
>
> This is probably not the first request on this topic but, if so, I thought
> it would do no harm to repeat it.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Robert Blackstone
>
>
>
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
> the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
>
> ___
>
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Subjects on this list - general request

2013-03-20 Thread Keith J. Schultz
Hi Robert,

I see no advantage in your suggestion. just search the subject.

As for the [***Spam***] that is inroduce by mail servers. A user should maybe 
remove
it to avoid it. But a nuisance, yes, a problem no.

regards
Keith.

Am 20.03.2013 um 16:12 schrieb Robert Blackstone :

> Dear all,
> Considering all complaints about the difficulties to find, in the Garden, or 
> in the NTG mail archive,  answers to specific problems, wouldn't it be a good 
> idea to ask everybody to clearly state the subject of their message, 
> preferably starting with the most important keyword, and in particular to 
> avoid (no subject) or [***SPAM***], and similar things as subjects.
> Also, if you forgive me,  subjects like "upto current" or "Bug in \column" 
> are not really helpful when on tries to search in the archive for a solution 
> to a specific problem. In the last-mentioned example, wouldn't "\column, Bug 
> in - " or even "\column, Bug in \column" be better? 
> More specific subject titles in the mails might save some of us hours of 
> unfruitful searching and lots of teeth grinding.
> This is probably not the first request on this topic but, if so, I thought it 
> would do no harm to repeat it.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Robert Blackstone
> 
> ___
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
> Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___

Re: [NTG-context] Subjects on this list - general request

2013-03-21 Thread Robert Blackstone

On 20 Mar 2013, at 19:46 ,  "Keith J. Schultz"  wrote
> 
> I see no advantage in your suggestion. just search the subject.
> 
> As for the [***Spam***] that is inroduce by mail servers. A user should maybe 
> remove
> it to avoid it. But a nuisance, yes, a problem no.
> 
> regards
>   Keith.

and on 20 Mar 2013, at 19:21 ,  Mica Semrick  wrote
> 
> 
> I would agree with the (no subject) or SPAM titles, but if your search tool
> can't tell the difference between "\column, Bug in - " - "\column, Bug in
> \column" and "Bug in \column" then you probably need to find a new search
> tool. I subscribe  to the list in non-digest format, e.g. I get every
> email. I used to get it in digest, but I found that made my searching
> tougher. I use gmail and have all the list messages skip my inbox and go
> directly to a tag. This has helped a ton!
> 
> -Mica
> 
> Am 20.03.2013 um 16:12 schrieb Robert Blackstone 
> :
> 
>> …. wouldn't it be a good idea to ask everybody to clearly state the subject 
>> of their message, preferably starting with the most important keyword, and 
>> in particular to avoid (no subject) or [***SPAM***], and similar things as 
>> subjects. ...
>>   ..

Hi Mica and Keith,

Thanks for your reaction. It is informative to hear your opninon. 
I did not want to start a discussion -- it was rather a "cri de coeur" born out 
of frustration -- so I will leave it at this. 

Best regards,

Robert
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___