Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Eric DÉTREZ

Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :

 Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.

It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Eric DÉTREZ


Le 29 août 08 à 08:59, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :


On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :


Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.


It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
The problem is only with Lucida fonts.


This is *not* Latin/Computer Modern.


Allright, I'm not a font expert.
Here is what I get when I disable
\def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.920}}
\def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
\def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
\def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
:

inline: Image 1.png




___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :

 Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.

 It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
 The problem is only with Lucida fonts.

This is *not* Latin/Computer Modern.

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
 Allright, I'm not a font expert.
 Here is what I get when I disable
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.920}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
 :

Oh, My God~
Make sure your font installation are right.
Which TFM do you use?
Please follow http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2008/033517.html.
big braces are working fine on my documents.
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
(The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
large attachments.  that's it.)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :

 Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.

 It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
 The problem is only with Lucida fonts.

 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :

 Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
 It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
 The problem is only with Lucida fonts.
 
 This is *not* Latin/Computer Modern.

The jpg from Yue Wang looks like it is using Times.

Best wishes,
Taco



___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :

 Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
 It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
 The problem is only with Lucida fonts.

 This is *not* Latin/Computer Modern.

 The jpg from Yue Wang looks like it is using Times.

Definitely not, Times is different.

Wolfgang
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.

s/sent/send/g
btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...


t.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document


t.tex
Description: TeX document
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Le 29 août 08 à 04:51, Yue Wang a écrit :

 Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.
 It seems that the text you sent is writen with CM fonts.
 The problem is only with Lucida fonts.

 This is *not* Latin/Computer Modern.

 The jpg from Yue Wang looks like it is using Times.

 Definitely not, Times is different.

 Wolfgang
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Hi,

Yue Wang wrote:
 This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
 (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
 large attachments.  that's it.)

What does your typescript look like? Lucida Expert may not be the
same as the Lucida Bright fonts from TUG (previously YandY).

Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello

 The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
 lucida.

 I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
 **
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{8.20}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{10.80}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}}
 **
 Shouldn't it says
 **
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.920}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
 **
 ?

How do you get these variables? the symbols in lucida math are different.
you can also refer to
ftp://ftp.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/pub/TeX/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/psnfssx/lucidabr/lucidabr.pdf.
page 9, line 263-273


 There is a strange behavior :  if I put
  \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.930}}
 big is bigger than Big.
 How is this possible ?

 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Hans Hagen
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
 Yue Wang wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.

 s/sent/send/g
 
 Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(
 
 btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...
 
 I do not think we can enlarge the value by much, this mailing list
 has a whole lot of people on it, and some of them are on slow
 connections. But maybe just a bit more will be ok. Hans?

64k


-
   Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
   Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
  tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
  | www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
There is one possible condition:

He failed to install the math part of the lucida font (either pfbs or tfms) .
and then to some unknown reasons
ConTeXt switch to the Latin Modern Font.
But it still use value like 8.20 (defined in math-lbr) instead of 0.85
(defined in plain TeX, core-mat and math-tex)
Then the braces are gigantic big...

please have a check if this is the cause -_-

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yue Wang wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.

 s/sent/send/g

 Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(

 btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...

 I do not think we can enlarge the value by much, this mailing list
 has a whole lot of people on it, and some of them are on slow
 connections. But maybe just a bit more will be ok. Hans?

 Best wishes,
 Taco
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Yue Wang wrote:
 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Yue Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 OK, I will re sent the pdf tonight.

 s/sent/send/g

Thank you. Now I no longer understand why Eric got wrong output :(

 btw, Taco, the attachment restriction (40k) is too stirct...

I do not think we can enlarge the value by much, this mailing list
has a whole lot of people on it, and some of them are on slow
connections. But maybe just a bit more will be ok. Hans?

Best wishes,
Taco
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Eric DÉTREZ

Le 29 août 08 à 12:00, Yue Wang a écrit :

 On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello

 The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
 lucida.

 I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
 **
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{8.20}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{10.80}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}}
 **
 Shouldn't it says
 **
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.920}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
 **
 ?

 How do you get these variables? the symbols in lucida math are  
 different.

I just divided the size by 10 with a modification for big (doesn't  
understand why, see the second part of my question).
They look like the sizes in math-tex
**
\def\PLAINbig {\@@dobig{0.85}}
\def\PLAINBig {\@@dobig{1.15}}
\def\PLAINbigg{\@@dobig{1.45}}
\def\PLAINBigg{\@@dobig{1.75}}
**

 you can also refer to
 ftp://ftp.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/pub/TeX/CTAN/macros/latex/contrib/psnfssx/lucidabr/lucidabr.pdf
  
 .
 page 9, line 263-273

Indeed the original sizes are the same.
But the lucidabr package uses 8.20 pt and context uses a multiple of  
fontsize :
**
\def\@@dobig#1#2%
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**

Does anybody understand why big with \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.930}} is  
bigger than Big with \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}} ?

 There is a strange behavior :  if I put
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.930}}
 big is bigger than Big.
 How is this possible ?



___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-29 Thread Yue Wang
oh, I made a another mistake. I mean __complete__ set (not basic set)
font from TUG:)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Taco Hoekwater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,

 Yue Wang wrote:
 This is of course Lucida Expert fonts.
 (The quality of the image is not so good, because I cannot upload
 large attachments.  that's it.)

 What does your typescript look like? Lucida Expert may not be the
 same as the Lucida Bright fonts from TUG (previously YandY).

 Best wishes,
 Taco
 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


Re: [NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-28 Thread Yue Wang
Are you sure? see the first line of the attachment.

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Eric DÉTREZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello

 The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with
 lucida.

 I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
 **
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{8.20}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{10.80}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}}
 **
 Shouldn't it says
 **
 \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.920}}
 \def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}}
 \def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
 \def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
 \def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
 \def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
 **
 ?

 There is a strange behavior :  if I put
  \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.930}}
 big is bigger than Big.
 How is this possible ?

 ___
 If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
 Wiki!

 maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
 webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
 archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
 wiki : http://contextgarden.net
 ___

attachment: example.jpg___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___


[NTG-context] big are big with lucida

2008-08-22 Thread Eric DÉTREZ
Hello

The bigl, bigr ans so on are really BIG (huge even) when used with  
lucida.

I think that math-lbr is guilty : it says
**
\def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{8.20}}
\def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{10.80}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{13.42}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{16.03}}
\def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{17.72}}
\def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{21.25}}
**
Shouldn't it says
**
\def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.920}}
\def\LBRBig  {\@@dobig{1.080}}
\def\LBRbigg {\@@dobig{1.342}}
\def\LBRBigg {\@@dobig{1.603}}
\def\LBRbiggg{\@@dobig{1.772}}
\def\LBRBiggg{\@@dobig{2.125}}
**
?

There is a strange behavior :  if I put
  \def\LBRbig  {\@@dobig{0.930}}
big is bigger than Big.
How is this possible ?

___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___