Re: [NTG-context] enattab example
Hi Patrick, Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hello, I tried the first example from the natrural tables pdf (enattab.pdf), and my output looks very compressed. Same on live.contextgarden.net. Is this the way it should look like? In contrast to the output of the enattab.pdf file. Combined columns are not taken into account when the column maxima are calculated. You can test that by inserting something very long and unbreakable. But it's not a very common case, that - the content of the combined column is shorter than the sum of the single columns *and* - the content can't (or shouldn't) be broken When you think about a table with several overlaping combined columns and their width dependencies (needed blow up), then you can imagine that it's not worth the trouble to consider these special cases. It can be done, but I doubt that the final result looks good (and in the end you have to edit the width values by hand). But maybe I'm wrong with this assumption. Greetings, Peter \starttext \bTABLE \bTR \bTD[nr=3] 1 \eTD \bTD[nc=2] 2/3 \eTD \bTD[nr=3] 4 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD[nc=3] 1/2/3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 1 \eTD \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Patrick ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] enattab example
Hi Patrick, Your example gives here the same narrow table. I inserted \setupTABLE[c][each][width=1cm] so then I get a better table Sorry for the second post, I found out the solution with the topframe in the second row, but saw then that others hav given this already. -- Too late. Kind regards Willi Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hello, I tried the first example from the natrural tables pdf (enattab.pdf), and my output looks very compressed. Same on live.contextgarden.net. Is this the way it should look like? In contrast to the output of the enattab.pdf file. \starttext \bTABLE \bTR \bTD[nr=3] 1 \eTD \bTD[nc=2] 2/3 \eTD \bTD[nr=3] 4 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD[nc=3] 1/2/3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 1 \eTD \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Patrick ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
[NTG-context] enattab example
Hello, I tried the first example from the natrural tables pdf (enattab.pdf), and my output looks very compressed. Same on live.contextgarden.net. Is this the way it should look like? In contrast to the output of the enattab.pdf file. \starttext \bTABLE \bTR \bTD[nr=3] 1 \eTD \bTD[nc=2] 2/3 \eTD \bTD[nr=3] 4 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD[nc=3] 1/2/3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \eTR \bTR \bTD 1 \eTD \bTD 2 \eTD \bTD 3 \eTD \bTD 4 \eTD \eTR \eTABLE \stoptext Patrick -- ConTeXt wiki and more: http://contextgarden.net ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
