Re: [NTG-context] xml and lpath
Am 25.10.2011 14:20, schrieb Hans Hagen:
\startxmlsetups xml:hiding
\doifelse {\xmlatt{#1}{type}} {begin} {
\startnointerference
} {
\stopnointerference
}
\stopxmlsetups
\starttext
\xmlprocessbuffer{main}{text}{}
\stoptext
maybe it makes sense to have a 'hide' flag built in the serializer (or
maybe some explicit stream related hooks)
Hans
Thank you very much. Now every thing works. It helps me a lot. I am glad
about such possibilities with XML and ConTeXt.
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
Re: [NTG-context] xml and lpath
On 25-10-2011 12:52, Martin Fechner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm testing the possibilities of xml and ConTeXt. I was wondering if it
is possible to make an extra setup for every text-element. So it would
be possible to have an setup in a very flexible way. It should be
something like this:
\startbuffer[text]
First text.
Second text.
Third text.
Fourth text.
\stopbuffer
\startxmlsetups xml:textsetups
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{a|b}{xml:*}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{hiding[type='begin']}{xml:hiding:begin}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{hiding[type='end'}{xml:hiding:end}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{text()}{xml:text} % Something like this is needed
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:a
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:b
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:hiding:begin
\enablemode[hiding]
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:hiding:end
\disablemode[hiding]
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:text
\startnotmode[hiding]
\xmlflush{#1}
\crlf
\stopnotmode
\stopxmlsetups
So that the result will be:
First text.
Fourth text.
Is something like this possible or is there still another way?
it really depends on how the nesting works out as explicit grouping can
interfere
\startbuffer[text]
First text.
Second text.
Third text.
Fourth text.
\stopbuffer
\startxmlsetups xml:textsetups
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{a|b|hiding}{xml:*}
\stopxmlsetups
\xmlregistersetup{xml:textsetups}
\startxmlsetups xml:a
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:b
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:hiding
\doifelse {\xmlatt{#1}{type}} {begin} {
\startnointerference
} {
\stopnointerference
}
\stopxmlsetups
\starttext
\xmlprocessbuffer{main}{text}{}
\stoptext
maybe it makes sense to have a 'hide' flag built in the serializer (or
maybe some explicit stream related hooks)
Hans
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
[NTG-context] xml and lpath
Hi all,
I'm testing the possibilities of xml and ConTeXt. I was wondering if it
is possible to make an extra setup for every text-element. So it would
be possible to have an setup in a very flexible way. It should be
something like this:
\startbuffer[text]
First text.
Second text.
Third text.
Fourth text.
\stopbuffer
\startxmlsetups xml:textsetups
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{a|b}{xml:*}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{hiding[type='begin']}{xml:hiding:begin}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{hiding[type='end'}{xml:hiding:end}
\xmlsetsetup{#1}{text()}{xml:text} % Something like this is needed
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:a
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:b
\xmlflush{#1}
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:hiding:begin
\enablemode[hiding]
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:hiding:end
\disablemode[hiding]
\stopxmlsetups
\startxmlsetups xml:text
\startnotmode[hiding]
\xmlflush{#1}
\crlf
\stopnotmode
\stopxmlsetups
So that the result will be:
First text.
Fourth text.
Is something like this possible or is there still another way?
Best regards,
Martin
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___
