Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color). There had been a
> discussion on this in the past, and Taco had suggested a solution
>
> http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20050907.093522.baf795f5.en.html
>
> which is also posted on the wiki.
>
>
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Verbatim_text#In-line_text
>
> However, due to the recent changes in verbatim code, that solution no
> longer works. Can anyone suggest how to fix it?
>
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setuptype[option=TEX]
\definetype[typeTEX][option=tex]
\starttext
\type+\type{\type is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
\typeTEX+\typeTEX{\typeTEX is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
\stoptext
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
>> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color). There had been a
>> discussion on this in the past, and Taco had suggested a solution
>>
>> http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20050907.093522.baf795f5.en.html
>>
>> which is also posted on the wiki.
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Verbatim_text#In-line_text
>>
>> However, due to the recent changes in verbatim code, that solution no
>> longer works. Can anyone suggest how to fix it?
>>
> \setupcolors[state=start]
>
> \setuptype[option=TEX]
>
> \definetype[typeTEX][option=tex]
>
> \starttext
>
> \type+\type{\type is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
>
> \typeTEX+\typeTEX{\typeTEX is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
>
> \stoptext
Thanks, that looks easy :-)
However, there seems to be a bug, sometimes the color spills across
the type boundary.
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setuptype[option=TEX]
\definetype[typeTEX][option=tex]
\starttext
The options \type+before=\startsolutionbackground+ and
\type+after=\stopsolutionbackground+ take care of putting a frame,
which can
{\black
The options \typeTEX+before=\startsolutionbackground+ and
\typeTEX+after=\stopsolutionbackground+ take care of putting a frame,
which can
}
\stoptext
Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
>> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
>>> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color). There had been a
>>> discussion on this in the past, and Taco had suggested a solution
>>>
>>> http://archive.contextgarden.net/thread/20050907.093522.baf795f5.en.html
>>>
>>> which is also posted on the wiki.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Verbatim_text#In-line_text
>>>
>>> However, due to the recent changes in verbatim code, that solution no
>>> longer works. Can anyone suggest how to fix it?
>>>
>> \setupcolors[state=start]
>>
>> \setuptype[option=TEX]
>>
>> \definetype[typeTEX][option=tex]
>>
>> \starttext
>>
>> \type+\type{\type is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
>>
>> \typeTEX+\typeTEX{\typeTEX is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
>>
>> \stoptext
>
> Thanks, that looks easy :-)
>
> However, there seems to be a bug, sometimes the color spills across
> the type boundary.
Is is possible that everything written with \tex{command} is also
printed in color? I do not want to change \tex{command} to
\type{\command} since \tex is more robust (No catcode trickery and
stuff).
Aditya
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
On 10/25/06, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >
> >> Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
> >>> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color).
> >>
> >> \setupcolors[state=start]
> >>
> >> \setuptype[option=TEX]
> >>
> >> \definetype[typeTEX][option=tex]
> >>
> >> \starttext
> >>
> >> \type+\type{\type is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
> >>
> >> \typeTEX+\typeTEX{\typeTEX is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
> >>
> >> \stoptext
> >
> > Thanks, that looks easy :-)
> >
> > However, there seems to be a bug, sometimes the color spills across
> > the type boundary.
I wanted to warn you about that, but you were faster. A workaround is
to create an additional space: so to \type{\commands }like that.
There are many bugs in \type-ing code, but the code is rather complex
... even Taco complaind about complexity.
Hopefully lua will be able to do the task better ;)
Mojca
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 10/25/06, Aditya Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>>
>>>
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I define a command that is the inline version of \startTEX ...
> \stopTEX. (I need to show inline commands in color).
>
\setupcolors[state=start]
\setuptype[option=TEX]
\definetype[typeTEX][option=tex]
\starttext
\type+\type{\type is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
\typeTEX+\typeTEX{\typeTEX is a wonderful macro}+, isn't it?
\stoptext
>>> Thanks, that looks easy :-)
>>>
>>> However, there seems to be a bug, sometimes the color spills across
>>> the type boundary.
>>>
>
> I wanted to warn you about that, but you were faster. A workaround is
> to create an additional space: so to \type{\commands }like that.
>
> There are many bugs in \type-ing code, but the code is rather complex
> even Taco complaind about complexity.
>
> Hopefully lua will be able to do the task better ;)
actually, the mkiv code does it completely different already, but that's
on my machine -)
Hans
--
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
Mojca Miklavec wrote: > There are many bugs in \type-ing code, but the code is rather complex > even Taco complaind about complexity. > hm, that many? well, keep in mind that everything that involves catcode changes combined with arguments will be messy; also, much of this code evolved when mem and speed were issues, and of course there was this \type+crap+ kind of syntax to deal with as well Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > However, there seems to be a bug, sometimes the color spills across > the type boundary. > the problem is that we cannot mess around too much with egroup because otherwise we get into problems with alignments (which have their own idea about these things Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Hans Hagen wrote: > Aditya Mahajan wrote: >> >> However, there seems to be a bug, sometimes the color spills across >> the type boundary. >> > the problem is that we cannot mess around too much with egroup > because otherwise we get into problems with alignments (which have > their own idea about these things I understand that this is one of the more tricky things in TeX. Right now, Mojca's workaround of adding a space after the comand works most of the time. If there is a punctuations after the type+...+ one does not want a space between the type and the punctuation. \unskip and friends make the output look alright, but with a horrible looking source. I hope that lua will make doing these things a bit easier. Aditya ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Re: [NTG-context] In-line syntax highlighting for type
Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > I understand that this is one of the more tricky things in TeX. Right > now, Mojca's workaround of adding a space after the comand works most > of the time. If there is a punctuations after the type+...+ one does > not want a space between the type and the punctuation. \unskip and > friends make the output look alright, but with a horrible looking > source. > > I hope that lua will make doing these things a bit easier. > in that case the whole pretty printing is done in lua ; in tex we have to use aftergroup stuff and the problem is that info is lost on the way (ok, there is a solution, but it involves messy macros because we want to use all that stuff nested as well) Hans - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl - ___ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
