Re: [NTG-context] imposition broken again
Am 2012-07-09 um 19:06 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: With at least today’s and yesterday’s beta I can’t get no satisfaction WRT imposition. Before, only 2UP was broken, and I got a workaround. Now, every schema that I tried doesn’t do anything. Was there another syntax change? Of course I ran context with --arrange Sorry, I saw the thread modes + arranging by Thomas A. Schmitz just as I pressed send. I guess the next beta will fix it, yes? Greetlings, Hraban ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
Re: [NTG-context] imposition broken again
Am 2012-07-09 um 19:06 schrieb Henning Hraban Ramm: With at least today’s and yesterday’s beta I can’t get no satisfaction WRT imposition. Before, only 2UP was broken, and I got a workaround. Now, every schema that I tried doesn’t do anything. Was there another syntax change? Of course I ran context with --arrange Sorry, I saw Thomas’ thread modes + arranging only after pressing send. This is fixed with tonight’s beta, thank you! But the table of content is missing now... Greetlings, Hraban --- http://www.fiee.net/texnique/ http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer) ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___
