Re: Re[2]: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

2004-02-23 Thread Thomas A . Schmitz
On Feb 18, 2004, at 4:20 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:

\textbraceleft and \textbraceright should
work ok if encodings are set up correctly.
Your're right, it works as expected. Thanks a lot!

All best

Thomas

___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


Re[2]: [NTG-context] Not seeing the wood because of so many trees

2004-02-19 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Tuesday, February 17, 2004 Thomas A.Schmitz wrote:

 Sorry for going back to an older thread, but I don't think the question
 was answered properly. Alexander Klink wanted to know how to typeset
 { and }. Suggestions were \type|{| and \type|}| or $\{$ and
 $\}$. Neither of which is satisfactory, because it will typeset them
 either in typewriter or in math font. We had a discussion about similar
 questions a while ago. I still think we should have \{ and \} for
 this kind of thing. As long as this isn't available, I see no better
 solution than \getglyph{Serif}{123} and
 \getglyph{Serif}{125} vel. 
 sim. For those of us working in the humanities, these curly braces are
 sometimes necessary (e.g., in critical editions), and having them in
 typewriter or math fonts isn't acceptable. So may I continue my rally
 for \{ etc.?

Sorry for the delay. \textbraceleft and \textbraceright should
work ok if encodings are set up correctly.

-- 
Giuseppe Oblomov Bilotta

___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context