RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

2008-03-29 Thread Oliver Marshall
Exchange 2003 sp2, Nokias run symbian

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 March 2008 21:31
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

You both need to tell us what version of Exchange and what version of
Windows Mobile. Both key facts.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Nitsan Reznik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

Hi olly
In fact, we've got into certificate problems connecting to exchange on
Nokia
E61.
Nitsan 

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

Anyone got Mail for Exchange working on an N95 ? I'm having real
problems
here with a few of them. Works fine on e61's and 61i's, but our N95s
just
instantly fail with System error. The log shows that there's a ping
exception. I can, however, ping the external address of the server just
fine. OMA is accessible via a browser on a pc, though oddly not on the
t-mobile browser on the N95 itself.

I guess it's either an N95 issue or a T-Mobile one, however we have
other
devices with T-Mobile which work fine.

Anyone got any comments ?

Olly

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



 
 



This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.









 
 



This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer
viruses.







~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Friday OT: Nine Words Women Use

2008-03-29 Thread RichardMcClary
#1 also needs a reference to #3!  It can also mean they're admitting to 
being wrong, but that really does the man no good at all (again, see #3).
--
Richard McClary, Systems Administrator
ASPCA Knowledge Management
1717 S Philo Rd, Ste 36, Urbana, IL  61802
217-337-9761
http://www.aspca.org


Angus Scott-Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/28/2008 10:02:10 
AM:

 'Nine Words Women Use' (seen online this morning)
 
 (1) Fine: This is the word women use to end an argument when they 
 are right and 
 you need to shut up.
 
 (2) Five Minutes: If she is getting dressed, this means a half an hour. 
Five 
 minutes is only five minutes if you have just been given five more 
minutes to 
 watch the game before helping around the house.
 
 (3) Nothing: This is the calm before the storm. This means something, 
and you 
 should be on your toes. Arguments that begin with nothing usually end in 
fine.
 
 (4) Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don 't Do It!
 
 (5) Loud Sigh: This is actually a word, but is a non-verbal statement 
often 
 misunderstood by men. A loud sigh means she thinks you are an idiot 
 and wonders 
 why she is wasting her time standing here and arguing with you 
aboutnothing. 
 (Refer back to # 3 for the meaning of nothing.)
 
 (6) That's Okay: This is one of the most dangerous statements a 
 woman can make 
 to a man. That's okay means she wants to think long and hard before 
deciding 
 how and when you will pay for your mistake.
 
 (7) Thanks: A woman is thanking you, do not question, or Faint. Just
 say you're 
 welcome. (I want to add in a clause here - This is true, unless she says 

 'Thanks a lot' - that is PURE sarcasm and she is not thanking you at 
all. DO 
 NOT say, 'you're welcome' ... that will bring on a 'whatever').
 
 (8) Whatever: Is a woman's way of saying [EMAIL PROTECTED] YOU!
 
 (9) Don't worry about it: I got it: Another dangerous statement, meaning 
this 
 is something that a woman has told a man to do several times, but isnow 
doing 
 it herself. This will later result in a man asking 'What's wrong?' For 
the 
 woman's response refer to # 3.
 
 --
 Angus Scott-Fleming
 GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
 1-520-290-5038
 +---+
 
 
 
 
 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

2008-03-29 Thread Michael B. Smith
Ok, my bad. Windows mobile has specific certification roots that it
supports. While I can suspect the same thing is true about Symbian, I really
have no idea.

If OMA doesn't work, I would be wondering about your carrier, more than
Exchange though. It's a simple cHTML application, it does nothing fancy.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 4:51 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

Exchange 2003 sp2, Nokias run symbian

-Original Message-
From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 28 March 2008 21:31
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

You both need to tell us what version of Exchange and what version of
Windows Mobile. Both key facts.

Regards,

Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com


-Original Message-
From: Nitsan Reznik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

Hi olly
In fact, we've got into certificate problems connecting to exchange on
Nokia
E61.
Nitsan 

-Original Message-
From: Oliver Marshall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 2:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Mail for Exchange on Nokia N95 with T-Mobile

Anyone got Mail for Exchange working on an N95 ? I'm having real
problems
here with a few of them. Works fine on e61's and 61i's, but our N95s
just
instantly fail with System error. The log shows that there's a ping
exception. I can, however, ping the external address of the server just
fine. OMA is accessible via a browser on a pc, though oddly not on the
t-mobile browser on the N95 itself.

I guess it's either an N95 issue or a T-Mobile one, however we have
other
devices with T-Mobile which work fine.

Anyone got any comments ?

Olly

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



 
 



This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.









 
 



This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer
viruses.







~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Lyris Archives

2008-03-29 Thread Stu Sjouwerman
erm, yes there are some angles after I looked. Let's table that.  ;-D

Stu 

-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:02 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Lyris Archives

lol, actually I'm going have to to recind that offer since looking at
the archive sign-up on Nabble.

You would want to take a look at Nabble first and see if you/Sunbelt
truly would want that tied to your lists.  Its can be more than just
simple archiving.


On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Micheal Espinola Jr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Okey doke!   I think Nabble is a great resource for stuff like this.


 On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Stu Sjouwerman 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Sure go ahead !
 
  Stu
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 3:36 PM
  To: NT System Admin Issues
  Subject: Re: Lyris Archives
 
  If no one sees a problem with it, and of course with Stu's blessing 
  if he/Sunbelt doesnt want to do it on thier own - I could add the 
  lists to Nabble.
 
 
  On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Barsodi.John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
  
  
  
   Try google cache.
  
  
  
  
   From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 8:43 AM
   To: NT System Admin Issues
 
   Subject: Lyris Archives
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Arghh...
   I need to review that recent thread about Smart Phones, and it 
   appears
  the
   webserver with Lyris on it has tanked, anyone know if this list is
  archived
   elsewhere?
  
   Thanks!
   jlc
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  ME2
 
  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
  ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
 
  ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
  ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
 



 --
 ME2




--
ME2

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Question on domain controller certificates

2008-03-29 Thread Ski Kacoroski
Hi,

I have two separate windows 2003 domains.  In domainA I have a
certificate authority and for domainA DC I was able to sign a cert
with no problems.  However, when I try to sign the a cert using the
certificate authority in domainA for the domainB DC I keep getting
errors like:

DNS name is unavailable and cannot be added to Subject Alternate name

Appreciate any hints and ideas on how to get a certificate set up for
my domainB DC.

Thanks in advance.

Ski

-- 
When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it
 connected to the entire universeJohn Muir

Chris Ski Kacoroski, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 206-501-9803
or ski98033 on most IM services and gizmo

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Question on domain controller certificates

2008-03-29 Thread Benjamin Zachary
You may want to check the event log for errors to help you further, I had a
problem similar but not exact to this recently and it was resolved by adding
Domain Controllers to the DCOM_CERT_SRV group.

-Original Message-
From: Ski Kacoroski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 11:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Question on domain controller certificates

Hi,

I have two separate windows 2003 domains.  In domainA I have a
certificate authority and for domainA DC I was able to sign a cert
with no problems.  However, when I try to sign the a cert using the
certificate authority in domainA for the domainB DC I keep getting
errors like:

DNS name is unavailable and cannot be added to Subject Alternate name

Appreciate any hints and ideas on how to get a certificate set up for
my domainB DC.

Thanks in advance.

Ski

-- 
When we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it
 connected to the entire universeJohn Muir

Chris Ski Kacoroski, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 206-501-9803
or ski98033 on most IM services and gizmo

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Server 2003 32bit vs 64bit AD and mem 4GB

2008-03-29 Thread Jeremy Young
Great responses guys.  A Dell engineer confirmed that we'd be fine but 
hearing it from this group gives me the warm fuzzies.


On the question of why buy 16GB for a box that does nothing but AD? A: 
We had the money in the budget.  Also, I know, at some point, that we'll 
upgrade to 2008 during the five year lifespan (but currently own 
Server2003 Std) of this box so I figured it couldn't hurt to try to 
future proof those boxes.  Also, Bill Gates once said no one would need 
more that 640K and we know how that logic played out  : )


Thanks again everyone!!

- Jer

Ken Schaefer wrote:

Either use Windows Server 2003 x86 Enterprise Edition (if you want to see the 
extra RAM) or the Windows Server 2003 x64 Standard Edition.

From memory GPMC doesn't run on x64 (But I could be mistaken about that).

No issue with AD itself on x64 - runs fine. Actually you get 4GB per user mode 
process (rather than 2GB out of 4GB), so you can sustain a larger AD 
.dit/database.

Cheers
Ken


-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 29 March 2008 3:22 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Server 2003 32bit vs 64bit AD and mem  4GB

Dumb question but I'm replacing my existing AD boxes (server2003 Std
32bit) and want to be prepared for Server2008 (probably an AD upgrade in
early 2009).  In doing so I want to add extra RAM to the box.  If I put
16GB RAM into the new box and install Server2003 Std 32bit what will the
system do?  Simply ignore the extra RAM?  Any harm in doing this?

If it's better to use Server2003 Std 64bit to properly see the RAM is
there anything that changes in AD?  My gut tells me 99% this is OK and I
can't find anything online stating otherwise but I want to be sure.
These boxes only do AD so I don't have to worry about any external apps
being 64bit.

Thanks!

- Jer

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
  


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Server 2003 32bit vs 64bit AD and mem 4GB

2008-03-29 Thread Martin Blackstone
Why don't you put VMWare ESX on this thing and run the DC in a VM?
Then you could do other things on it as well.

-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 11:00 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Server 2003 32bit vs 64bit AD and mem  4GB

Great responses guys.  A Dell engineer confirmed that we'd be fine but 
hearing it from this group gives me the warm fuzzies.

On the question of why buy 16GB for a box that does nothing but AD? A: 
We had the money in the budget.  Also, I know, at some point, that we'll 
upgrade to 2008 during the five year lifespan (but currently own 
Server2003 Std) of this box so I figured it couldn't hurt to try to 
future proof those boxes.  Also, Bill Gates once said no one would need 
more that 640K and we know how that logic played out  : )

Thanks again everyone!!

- Jer

Ken Schaefer wrote:
 Either use Windows Server 2003 x86 Enterprise Edition (if you want to see
the extra RAM) or the Windows Server 2003 x64 Standard Edition.

 From memory GPMC doesn't run on x64 (But I could be mistaken about that).

 No issue with AD itself on x64 - runs fine. Actually you get 4GB per user
mode process (rather than 2GB out of 4GB), so you can sustain a larger AD
.dit/database.

 Cheers
 Ken


 -Original Message-
 From: Jeremy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, 29 March 2008 3:22 AM
 To: NT System Admin Issues
 Subject: Server 2003 32bit vs 64bit AD and mem  4GB

 Dumb question but I'm replacing my existing AD boxes (server2003 Std
 32bit) and want to be prepared for Server2008 (probably an AD upgrade in
 early 2009).  In doing so I want to add extra RAM to the box.  If I put
 16GB RAM into the new box and install Server2003 Std 32bit what will the
 system do?  Simply ignore the extra RAM?  Any harm in doing this?

 If it's better to use Server2003 Std 64bit to properly see the RAM is
 there anything that changes in AD?  My gut tells me 99% this is OK and I
 can't find anything online stating otherwise but I want to be sure.
 These boxes only do AD so I don't have to worry about any external apps
 being 64bit.

 Thanks!

 - Jer

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~
   

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Issues on browsing with WM (5 or 6)

2008-03-29 Thread HELP_PC

In  WM machines I tried ,I experienced issues in viewing correctly many
web pages .
I don't know if it is related to missing Flash player or other but the
fact is that I have no problems when I use cheaper Symbian devices!

Any idea?

TIA 

GuidoElia
HELPPC


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

MIgrating SP 2003 discussion boards to MoSS

2008-03-29 Thread Greg Mulholland
Hi guys



I am migrating a portal 2003 to another server and in the process taking the

chance to move to sharepoint 2007 on the new server. Since the existing

server has only on web app with very small amount of content i have

exported most of the content to spreadsheets and imported.

However, i have 2 discussion forums which I am finding a pain to migrate.

Essentially what i tried was to save the site as a template with content

included and import that into the moss web app as it doesn't allow you to 
export to spreadsheet.

If I go to site  settings

and upload the template, even after restarting iis the template never

shows up when i go to build a new site with it.



I did manage to use the stsadm tool to import the template however when i

select it for my site I get and error saying the template is invalid. I

think this may be because it is being saved as a list template not a site

template. Unfortunately in 2003 you can seem to edit anything in the datasheet

view and you can only sort lists or links etc.



I would have hoped that importing these discussion boards was fairly straight

forward. I have googled around for a while and haven't been able to come up with

any good info.



I'd be very interested in anyone's feedback or help.



Thanks

Greg





~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Vista 64bit and Cisco VPN

2008-03-29 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I understand there are some Linux grown vpn clients that work on windows. Have 
a search...
jlc

From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Vista 64bit and Cisco VPN

From reading this list and other articles, I know that the Cisco VPN client 
does not work on Vista 64bit.

I thought I saw something that said SSL VPN is supported, however, I cannot get 
SSL VPN to work on Vista 64bit.  (I have made sure the concentrator and SSL VPN 
works with other platforms such as XP and it does)

I found the below on a Cisco FAQ.  So my question is, does anyone know of a way 
to VPN to a Cisco Concentrator 3005 from Vista 64bit?  (Not pptp please)

Q. SSL VPN Client fails to launch on Windows Vista with Internet Explorer 7, 
and the user gets the Installer is downloading Active xInstaller was not 
able to start SSL VPN client error message.
A. Cause:
The error appears because the SSL VPN Client (SVC) fails to initiate a 
connection.
This happens because of ActiveX install/download problems on Windows Vista with 
Microsoft Internet Explorer 7. Windows Vista is shipped with Internet Explorer 
7, which has an entirely new model that deals with ActiveX. Aside from the 
differences in ActiveX, the networking stack has been rewritten, and the 
routing table is different. There are a few other quirks that can affect the 
client, as well.
Resolution:
SVC is not compatible with or supported on Windows Vista with the Internet 
Explorer 7 browser as of now.
The workaround is to use supported platforms, such as Windows XP, with Internet 
Explorer 7.



This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, 
distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this 
email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Davis H. Elliot 
Company . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses 
are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any 
loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Issues on browsing with WM (5 or 6)

2008-03-29 Thread Nitsan Reznik
can you more specific
Which VM machines?
Can you give an example of bad view website?
Nitsan

  _  

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 9:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Issues on browsing with WM (5 or 6)




In  WM machines I tried ,I experienced issues in viewing correctly many web
pages . 
I don't know if it is related to missing Flash player or other but the fact
is that I have no problems when I use cheaper Symbian devices!

Any idea? 

TIA 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 
















 


 






This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by


PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer
viruses.















 
 

This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer 
viruses.




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

R: Issues on browsing with WM (5 or 6)

2008-03-29 Thread HELP_PC
I intended Windows mobile not Virtual machines
 
GuidoElia
HELPPC
 

  _  

Da: Nitsan Reznik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2008 6.36
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Issues on browsing with WM (5 or 6)


can you more specific
Which VM machines?
Can you give an example of bad view website?
Nitsan

  _  

From: HELP_PC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 9:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Issues on browsing with WM (5 or 6)




In  WM machines I tried ,I experienced issues in viewing correctly many
web pages . 
I don't know if it is related to missing Flash player or other but the
fact is that I have no problems when I use cheaper Symbian devices!

Any idea? 

TIA 

GuidoElia 
HELPPC 














 


 






This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by


PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses.



























 


 






This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by


PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses.












~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~