RE: System Center Essentials
Um, just boot it up and uninstall the extensions, reboot, then install the Hyper-V integration services. Of you if prefer to be safer, then uninstall the extensions when it's running under Virtual Server. Then copy across the VHD to your Hyper-V box. Then start it up and install Integration Services. Cheers Ken From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 July 2008 12:01 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Center Essentials Tim, Do you know if this VHD already had the extensions for Virtual Server installed? I only ask as instead of running it in my Virtual Server I am thinking if running it in Hyper-V instead. I have just migrated 2 VM from Virtual Server to Hyper-V and those extensions cause issues, as do the network cards installed. Jon On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not see that option before, strange I guess old age is catching up to me faster than I thought. I will pull the VHD tomorrow. I should know soon enough if I can run it in Hyper-V. One of the downsides to Hyper-V is machines created in Virtual Server do not run in Hyper-V or at least I have yet to find a way to get them to run. Opps just found out how to do that! That is going to speed up my deployment of the server big time and also save me a ton of time. Jon On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you go to www.microsoft.com/scehttp://www.microsoft.com/sce and then select the Try It tab at the top of the page, Virtual Hard Drive is one of the options along with Trial Software and Virtual Labs. For checking out SCE's capabilities it is better than installing the trial. Once you decide that SCE is the way you want to go, then install the trial version on your production network in the configuration that you want so that you can just enter the product key when you purchase it without reconfiguring anything. Having to change your topology with SCE after the fact isn't a lot of fun. Tim From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:32 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: System Center Essentials The version I found to download did not have any VHD's just the time limited install. Would these VHD's work in Hyper-V? I have found that any VM built in VS will not run in Hyper-V but sure would be nice if it did. Jon On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon, Are you using the virtual demo of SCE that you can download? It contains prebuilt vhd's for the DC and SCE as well as for clients. I use it on a virtual server with no network access to my true domain just for testing purposes. It has always worked well for me. Tim From: Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:53 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: System Center Essentials I need to test System Center Essentials and during the setup it is requesting access to Active Directory. I don't have a lab so testing is going to be very tight. I can build an DC just for this test but will I be able to see enough to really decide if it is worth the cost or not if the DC is empty of any machines but the 2 test machines? Hyper-V is nice I must say. I am still bringing it up the moment but it is much nicer than Virtual Server. The interface is better, to me any way, than either Virtual Server or the free VMWare product. Thanks for any comments, Jon ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Your fav AV?
On a quite night you can hear a Ford rust. From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2008 16:49 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? Fix Or Repair Daily Funky Old Rusty Derelict From: Sean Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Your fav AV? FORD = Found On Road Dead Sean Houston On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you buy a Chevy, you'd better get used to being at the shop. Ford rules! J Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? Mike, So if you buy a Chevy and a part goes bad do you refuse to take it to a dealer to have it serviced putting all your trust in only local small shops with hit-and-miss quality and reliability? That's the same argument that you just made regarding anti-malware, since it is obviously in the manufacturer's best interest to make a shoddy product so you have to get it serviced more often. The same argument can be made for any other product ever created, and yet quality as a whole in our world continues to improve as opposed to degrading. My personal approach is to buy the best product available for the solution I am in need of. I used to be a huge fan of Eset and NOD32 (I believe I actually got a number of people on the list to start using it), but I believe that their product quality took a hit when they went from v2.x to v3.x (I had been using it since v1.35 or so). I still think that Eset makes a good product also, but in my opinion it is no longer as good as ForeFront IMHO. And if you have ever dealt with Microsoft before then you know that the left hand definitely has no idea what the right hand is doing, you're lucky if people in the same product group are all on the same page. TVK From: Mike Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? It's weird for me to think about paying MS for software to cover the insecurities in their own software. It doesn't surprise me a bit that Client Security could catch more problems than maybe everyone, as they would know best how to attack the issue for obvious reasons. This also makes a case for why they would be the best choice. But to need the software there must be problems to justify the solution, so for Forefront Client Security to be successful, it's in Client Security's best interest that the client isn't secure. It's not a big deal when one guy fixes another guys problem, but when you're paying one guy to fix his own problems, I guess you better trust that one guy. And stay away from BitDefender. Their new v3 enterprise solution is just not thought through. I don't know what they were thinking and all the acknowledged bugs I'm finding are show stoppers and killing me. -- Mike Gill From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? I just went through removing NOD32 and installing Microsoft's ForeFront Client Security product and I am thrilled. FF does deployment via AD integrated policies allowing for all machines to be covered with no manual installation required. It has anti-virus and anti-spyware capabilities (it found, and removed, a fairly large amount of spyware that NOD had not picked up), but it also does Security State checks where it looks at the overall security stance of your computers. i.e. - It will inform you of machines with blank admin passwords, passwords without expirations set, admin groups with too many members, Windows security updates missing, and a lot of other things. These security checks give you a view into your overall security situation that I have not seen provided by other products yet. Great product IMO, Tim __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration no. 310635. Inspop.com Limited (also trading as Confused.com) is registered in England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted with it, including replies and forwarded copies (which may contain alterations) subsequently transmitted from the Company, are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient.
Yahoo! Auto Response
I#39;m currently on hols in France and have no access to my email. Cheers Andy ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: Your fav AV?
Quite = quiet. Need coffee.. From: Kelsay, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 July 2008 09:22 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? On a quite night you can hear a Ford rust. From: Damien Solodow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 July 2008 16:49 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? Fix Or Repair Daily Funky Old Rusty Derelict From: Sean Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Your fav AV? FORD = Found On Road Dead Sean Houston On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Andy Shook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you buy a Chevy, you'd better get used to being at the shop. Ford rules! J Shook From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? Mike, So if you buy a Chevy and a part goes bad do you refuse to take it to a dealer to have it serviced putting all your trust in only local small shops with hit-and-miss quality and reliability? That's the same argument that you just made regarding anti-malware, since it is obviously in the manufacturer's best interest to make a shoddy product so you have to get it serviced more often. The same argument can be made for any other product ever created, and yet quality as a whole in our world continues to improve as opposed to degrading. My personal approach is to buy the best product available for the solution I am in need of. I used to be a huge fan of Eset and NOD32 (I believe I actually got a number of people on the list to start using it), but I believe that their product quality took a hit when they went from v2.x to v3.x (I had been using it since v1.35 or so). I still think that Eset makes a good product also, but in my opinion it is no longer as good as ForeFront IMHO. And if you have ever dealt with Microsoft before then you know that the left hand definitely has no idea what the right hand is doing, you're lucky if people in the same product group are all on the same page. TVK From: Mike Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? It's weird for me to think about paying MS for software to cover the insecurities in their own software. It doesn't surprise me a bit that Client Security could catch more problems than maybe everyone, as they would know best how to attack the issue for obvious reasons. This also makes a case for why they would be the best choice. But to need the software there must be problems to justify the solution, so for Forefront Client Security to be successful, it's in Client Security's best interest that the client isn't secure. It's not a big deal when one guy fixes another guys problem, but when you're paying one guy to fix his own problems, I guess you better trust that one guy. And stay away from BitDefender. Their new v3 enterprise solution is just not thought through. I don't know what they were thinking and all the acknowledged bugs I'm finding are show stoppers and killing me. -- Mike Gill From: Tim Vander Kooi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 4:28 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Your fav AV? I just went through removing NOD32 and installing Microsoft's ForeFront Client Security product and I am thrilled. FF does deployment via AD integrated policies allowing for all machines to be covered with no manual installation required. It has anti-virus and anti-spyware capabilities (it found, and removed, a fairly large amount of spyware that NOD had not picked up), but it also does Security State checks where it looks at the overall security stance of your computers. i.e. - It will inform you of machines with blank admin passwords, passwords without expirations set, admin groups with too many members, Windows security updates missing, and a lot of other things. These security checks give you a view into your overall security situation that I have not seen provided by other products yet. Great product IMO, Tim __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email __ ** This email is sent for and on behalf of Inspop.com Limited ** Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registration no. 310635. Inspop.com Limited (also trading as Confused.com) is registered in England and Wales at 2nd Floor, Friary House, Greyfriars Road, Cardiff, CF10 3AE (Reg. No. 03857130 ). Any opinions expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily the company. This email and any files transmitted
xp sp3 keyless
Hi everyone, Unless I am mistaken xp sp3 should allow you have an installation without a key entered. This is great for testing. But when I am doing the install it will still ask for a number and wont bypass. Any idea what I am missing? Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
R: xp sp3 keyless
Your XP didn't pass the Product key check GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Ara Avvali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: venerdì 4 luglio 2008 16.39 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: xp sp3 keyless Hi everyone, Unless I am mistaken xp sp3 should allow you have an installation without a key entered. This is great for testing. But when I am doing the install it will still ask for a number and wont bypass. Any idea what I am missing? Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
R: xp sp3 keyless
I understand he intended to install xp with sp3 embedded. Rumors were it should be like vista (you give the code before expiration of the trial9 GuidoElia HELPPC -Messaggio originale- Da: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di NTSysAdmin Inviato: venerdì 4 luglio 2008 16.46 A: NT System Admin Issues Oggetto: RE: xp sp3 keyless And you gleaned this information from where? S -Original Message- From: Ara Avvali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: xp sp3 keyless Hi everyone, Unless I am mistaken xp sp3 should allow you have an installation without a key entered. This is great for testing. But when I am doing the install it will still ask for a number and wont bypass. Any idea what I am missing? Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: xp sp3 keyless
That's a feature of XP SP3 -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: xp sp3 keyless And you gleaned this information from where? S -Original Message- From: Ara Avvali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: xp sp3 keyless Hi everyone, Unless I am mistaken xp sp3 should allow you have an installation without a key entered. This is great for testing. But when I am doing the install it will still ask for a number and wont bypass. Any idea what I am missing? Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: Server Room - Suggestions on rack enclosures
+1 for APC. Easy to deal with. Easy to rack and unrack equipment.
David Mazzaccaro wrote:
@font-face { font-family: Wingdings; } @font-face { font-family:
Wingdings; } @font-face { font-family: Calibri; } @page Section1
{size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; } P.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Calibri,sans-serif } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in
0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif } DIV.MsoNormal {
FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Calibri,sans-serif } A:link { COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION:
underline; mso-style-priority: 99 } SPAN.MsoHyperlink { COLOR: blue;
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 } A:visited {
COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 }
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline;
mso-style-priority: 99 } SPAN.EmailStyle17 { COLOR: windowtext;
FONT-FAMILY: Calibri,sans-serif; mso-style-type: personal-compose
} .MsoChpDefault { mso-style-type: export-only } DIV.Section1 { page:
Section1 }
I've been very happy with APC.
The options and accessories are excellent and the configurator was a
great help with the initial setup.
*From:* Tim Wagerle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:21 PM
*To:* NT System Admin Issues
*Subject:* Server Room - Suggestions on rack enclosures
I came to this job with a basement room 13’x20’ filled to the brim
with old tech equipment and 5 servers (AS400, 3-Windows, NT, IBM Tape
Drive and Dell 122T Tape Drive) wedged into nooks and crannies. This
was to be the Server room only, but now my work area also. L NOISE!
Side effect, I have no one watching over my shoulder. J Now that I
have cleaned out the previous occupants, got a 1950’s modular desk in
place and got the Servers in a place I can actually manage them, I
though a Server room redesign was in order.
I am looking for recommendations on full rack enclosures.
Tim Wagerle, TSS
Josephine County Circuit Court
Oregon Judicial Department
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: System Center Essentials
Sorry I should have said that I have migrated a couple of servers from Virtual Server to Hyper-V already. The first time I got a supprise with the issue with the extensions but yeah I know how to get rid of them. I just did not want any suprises guess I will see on Tuesday or Monday when I have some time to work on this. Jon On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Ken Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Um, just boot it up and uninstall the extensions, reboot, then install the Hyper-V integration services. Of you if prefer to be safer, then uninstall the extensions when it's running under Virtual Server. Then copy across the VHD to your Hyper-V box. Then start it up and install Integration Services. Cheers Ken *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, 4 July 2008 12:01 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: System Center Essentials Tim, Do you know if this VHD already had the extensions for Virtual Server installed? I only ask as instead of running it in my Virtual Server I am thinking if running it in Hyper-V instead. I have just migrated 2 VM from Virtual Server to Hyper-V and those extensions cause issues, as do the network cards installed. Jon On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Jon Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not see that option before, strange I guess old age is catching up to me faster than I thought. I will pull the VHD tomorrow. I should know soon enough if I can run it in Hyper-V. One of the downsides to Hyper-V is machines created in Virtual Server do not run in Hyper-V or at least I have yet to find a way to get them to run. Opps just found out how to do that! That is going to speed up my deployment of the server big time and also save me a ton of time. Jon On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you go to www.microsoft.com/sce and then select the Try It tab at the top of the page, Virtual Hard Drive is one of the options along with Trial Software and Virtual Labs. For checking out SCE's capabilities it is better than installing the trial. Once you decide that SCE is the way you want to go, then install the trial version on your production network in the configuration that you want so that you can just enter the product key when you purchase it without reconfiguring anything. Having to change your topology with SCE after the fact isn't a lot of fun. Tim *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 01, 2008 1:32 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: System Center Essentials The version I found to download did not have any VHD's just the time limited install. Would these VHD's work in Hyper-V? I have found that any VM built in VS will not run in Hyper-V but sure would be nice if it did. Jon On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Tim Vander Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon, Are you using the virtual demo of SCE that you can download? It contains prebuilt vhd's for the DC and SCE as well as for clients. I use it on a virtual server with no network access to my true domain just for testing purposes. It has always worked well for me. Tim *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:53 AM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* System Center Essentials I need to test System Center Essentials and during the setup it is requesting access to Active Directory. I don't have a lab so testing is going to be very tight. I can build an DC just for this test but will I be able to see enough to really decide if it is worth the cost or not if the DC is empty of any machines but the 2 test machines? Hyper-V is nice I must say. I am still bringing it up the moment but it is much nicer than Virtual Server. The interface is better, to me any way, than either Virtual Server or the free VMWare product. Thanks for any comments, Jon ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
How can I remove Facebook from my BB's
I have about 30 BB users on Pearl and Curves, our provider Rogers, decided to push out Facebook as an application, is it possible to remove it using my BES server 4.1.5? I can see it on the device under applications but it's read only. __ Stefan Jafs This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of the Amico Corpoartion company. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: How can I remove Facebook from my BB's
Just an excuse to use bandwidth/airtime/data...let me know what you find. On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Stefan Jafs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have about 30 BB users on Pearl and Curves, our provider Rogers, decided to push out Facebook as an application, is it possible to remove it using my BES server 4.1.5? I can see it on the device under applications but it's read only. *__* *Stefan Jafs* This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you should not read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions expressed in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of Amico Corporation . Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this email or attachments. ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
My Docs Redirection
Strange issue, we have a client that has been using 2003 SBS for a couple of years now, on and off for the past few months they will be working remotely, OFFLINE, and the contents of the My Docs just poofs vanishes. All of the data is on the server, and when they come back in it all syncs back and is fine. Sometimes this works for weeks, months, other times they lose it several times daily. XP Pro SP2, they have PGP loaded on them doing whole disk encryption but that's been there for quite awhile. Its killer when they go overseas and poof the files go bye bye and they have 25 gigs of data in their My Docs. I also verified that the laptops have at least 30 or 45 gig free after a full sync. If I look in the Offline Store the files are gone. They are not deleting them, I have watched it happen. This seems to have been a big issue a few years ago but nothing real recent I have found using googlefu. Any ideas? Thanks Greg ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
RE: xp sp3 keyless
Hmm, I have a slipstreamed VLK XP3 install. It asks for a key. S -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 12:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: xp sp3 keyless That's a feature of XP SP3 -Original Message- From: Steve Moffat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of NTSysAdmin Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 7:46 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: xp sp3 keyless And you gleaned this information from where? S -Original Message- From: Ara Avvali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: xp sp3 keyless Hi everyone, Unless I am mistaken xp sp3 should allow you have an installation without a key entered. This is great for testing. But when I am doing the install it will still ask for a number and wont bypass. Any idea what I am missing? Thanks ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~ ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Emergency - My Docs Redirection
Sorry, the owner is now calling stating they are all flying out Monday and need this fixed before then. Any ideas where to look? I just made a GP change to force the cache to 40% of the users drive. Not sure why we can store 30 gig on one for months and then poof most of or all of the files go poof. This states it will force automatic caching which is what My Docs Redirection is via GP to not go higher than that amount. Anything else I can try, we have already reset the CSC cache several times. I should also state this is on two different laptops, recently rebuilt as well. Happened once before rebuild and at least one time after. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 3:25 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: My Docs Redirection Strange issue, we have a client that has been using 2003 SBS for a couple of years now, on and off for the past few months they will be working remotely, OFFLINE, and the contents of the My Docs just poofs vanishes. All of the data is on the server, and when they come back in it all syncs back and is fine. Sometimes this works for weeks, months, other times they lose it several times daily. XP Pro SP2, they have PGP loaded on them doing whole disk encryption but that's been there for quite awhile. Its killer when they go overseas and poof the files go bye bye and they have 25 gigs of data in their My Docs. I also verified that the laptops have at least 30 or 45 gig free after a full sync. If I look in the Offline Store the files are gone. They are not deleting them, I have watched it happen. This seems to have been a big issue a few years ago but nothing real recent I have found using googlefu. Any ideas? Thanks Greg ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
Re: My Docs Redirection
I wish I had a solution for you. I've seen this happen randomly enough that I no longer allow workstations to work offline. On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Strange issue, we have a client that has been using 2003 SBS for a couple of years now, on and off for the past few months they will be working remotely, OFFLINE, and the contents of the My Docs just poofs vanishes. All of the data is on the server, and when they come back in it all syncs back and is fine. Sometimes this works for weeks, months, other times they lose it several times daily. XP Pro SP2, they have PGP loaded on them doing whole disk encryption but that's been there for quite awhile. Its killer when they go overseas and poof the files go bye bye and they have 25 gigs of data in their My Docs. I also verified that the laptops have at least 30 or 45 gig free after a full sync. If I look in the Offline Store the files are gone. They are not deleting them, I have watched it happen. This seems to have been a big issue a few years ago but nothing real recent I have found using googlefu. Any ideas? Thanks Greg -- ME2 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~ ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm ~
