Federation?
How hard is it to enable federation with Active Directory? 2003 AD schema. David Lum Systems Engineer // NWEATM Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Federation?
More of an application question and what federation tooling you'll use. ADFS from Microsoft is free and reasonably straight forward to setup. The work is in each application integration. Some are easy, some aren't. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 11:32 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Federation? How hard is it to enable federation with Active Directory? 2003 AD schema. David Lum Systems Engineer // NWEATM Office 503.548.5229 // Cell (voice/text) 503.267.9764 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
IIS 6 redirects
I have a website bound to port 81 443 with some redirects. One vdir has a single redirect, another has two, then there is 4th I am unsure about. Is there a programmatic way to enumerate the redirects in a clear way, and can I just drop a redirect by clearing out the associated start and end tags for the redirect? I assume unless enabling direct metabase edits I will have to restart iis? Thanks guys, jlc ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: IIS 4.0 and .docx MIME types
Win 2000 and IIS 4 ??? ouch ! How could docx not be compatible with an end of life'd unsupported system ? sorry for sarcasm On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Blasko, Margo margo.bla...@dcc-cdc.gc.cawrote: All, Entered application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document as the .docx MIME type in ISS 4.0 on a Windows 2000 server. The server was then rebooted. Unfortuantely the docx documents still will not open. The error is 'Word cannot open the file because the file format does not match the file extension' Is this a compatibility issue? Can I get .docx to work on IIS4.0? Or could there be something else? Thanks in advance, Margo ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: IIS 4.0 and .docx MIME types
I think I see your problem... Windows 2000 should be IIS5. ;) DAMIEN SOLODOW Systems Engineer 317.447.6033 (office) 317.447.6014 (fax) HARRISON COLLEGE From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:51 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: IIS 4.0 and .docx MIME types Win 2000 and IIS 4 ??? ouch ! How could docx not be compatible with an end of life'd unsupported system ? sorry for sarcasm On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Blasko, Margo margo.bla...@dcc-cdc.gc.camailto:margo.bla...@dcc-cdc.gc.ca wrote: All, Entered application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document as the .docx MIME type in ISS 4.0 on a Windows 2000 server. The server was then rebooted. Unfortuantely the docx documents still will not open. The error is 'Word cannot open the file because the file format does not match the file extension' Is this a compatibility issue? Can I get .docx to work on IIS4.0? Or could there be something else? Thanks in advance, Margo ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: IIS 4.0 and .docx MIME types
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Blasko, Margo margo.bla...@dcc-cdc.gc.ca wrote: Entered application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document as the .docx MIME type in ISS 4.0 on a Windows 2000 server. The server was then rebooted. Unfortuantely the docx documents still will not open. Serving up documents and opening files are two different things. What HTTP headers is the web server offering when you HEAD the URL? -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: IIS 4.0 and .docx MIME types
Sounds like IIS is successfully serving the file if Word is complaining about the format. Could the document be from a different (prob. older) version of word? Rather than opening, can you save the file locally and try extension as .doc and see if Word will open. Jeff On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Blasko, Margo margo.bla...@dcc-cdc.gc.cawrote: All, Entered application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document as the .docx MIME type in ISS 4.0 on a Windows 2000 server. The server was then rebooted. Unfortuantely the docx documents still will not open. The error is 'Word cannot open the file because the file format does not match the file extension' Is this a compatibility issue? Can I get .docx to work on IIS4.0? Or could there be something else? Thanks in advance, Margo ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: IIS 4.0 and .docx MIME types
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Blasko, Margo margo.bla...@dcc-cdc.gc.ca wrote: This is an intranet site that I don't manage - not sure what you mean about 'What HTTP headers is the web server offering when you HEAD the URL'. HEAD is one of the HTTP commands (methods). It gets headers without retrieving the content. http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.4 By examining the HTTP headers, we can get an idea of what the server is doing/thinking. From a Linux shell: $ *telnet www.purple.com 80* Trying 153.104.63.227... Connected to www.purple.com (153.104.63.227). Escape character is '^]'. *HEAD /purple.html HTTP/1.1 Host: purple.purple.com *HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:40:48 GMT Server: Unknown Last-Modified: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:14:47 GMT ETag: 46e94-299-3ea313c0 Accept-Ranges: bytes Content-Length: 665 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 *^]* telnet *quit* Connection closed. $ Stuff I sent (typed) is in bold green.^] represents CTRL+]. One has to type the blank line after the Host: header to signify the end of the client request to the server. I'm using Linux here because the Telnet client works better than Microsoft's. You can use the one that comes with Windows, but it doesn't handle raw TCP connections well. In particular, it doesn't echo what you type, so you have to type blind. You could also use any other terminal client that supports raw TCP connections. PuTTY does. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ BR ~ lt;http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/gt; ~ BR BR --- BR To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ BR or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com BR with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: Interesting Windows 8 logon feature
I just clean my screen regularly. :) * * *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market… * On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Crawford, Scott crawfo...@evangel.eduwrote: I like it. Of course, you could implement this feature now on your own.** ** ** ** *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2011 3:36 PM *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Interesting Windows 8 logon feature ** ** After you've traced the correct password, the cursor should move in a random path for 5 seconds, and you should have to follow it before completely logging on. :) *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…* On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: I don't disagree with that. I also don't see it happening anytime soon, or any way of ensuring that this feature is only used on smudge resistant screens. ** ** On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Andrew S. Baker asbz...@gmail.com wrote: It's actually a good idea, but we need to see more development of smudge-resistant screens... *ASB* *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…* On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Jonathan Link jonathan.l...@gmail.com wrote: Sure, but if you're making a consisent motion to authenticate, whether it is in different locations or one location it will likely stand out enough. If it's in different locations you can better sort out the common elements to making the motion. This just seems ill-advised. ** ** On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Joseph Heaton jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote: Well, the screen’s going to be smudged from normal usage anyway. Not sure how they’d be able to figure out which smudges were for what. *From:* Mike Hoffman [mailto:m...@drumbrae.net] *Sent:* Tuesday, December 20, 2011 11:34 AM *To:* Joseph Heaton; NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* RE: Interesting Windows 8 logon feature It’s enabled in the Preview build – and it’s so much easier than typing a password. I used a family photo for a while and the password was to draw a noose round the mother-in-law’s head – what fun. What would be good is if they could move the photo around that way you don’t get smudge marks in the same place. Mike *From:* Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] *Sent:* 20 December 2011 18:39 *To:* NT System Admin Issues *Subject:* Re: Interesting Windows 8 logon feature This was demo'd in the Build videos if you want to see a demo of it. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:29 AM, James Rankin kz2...@googlemail.com wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16247659 ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
w32tm.exe Help Understanding
Hello and Merry Christmas, I am feeling pretty dumb here and would like to wrap up one of my projects before the holiday. Currently I am trying to do some calculations using w32tm.exe to validate my math...and my math appears to be wrong. For example I Google how many nanoseconds in a day. From multiple sources I get 86,400,000,000,000. Fine then w32tm.exe should match saying 1 daybut it doesn't It says 100 days C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 864000 100 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM A day is a day regardless so I can't see that time zone would matter for this simple calculation?? So let's say Google is wrong and I use 864,000,000,000 which does show as one day. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 8640 1 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM Fine w32tm.exe has an epoch of 1-1-1601. I want the number of nanoseconds till 1-1-1901. That would be 300 (1901-1601) 365 (days in a year) 300 * 365 = 109,500 days 109500 days * 8640 (nanoseconds in a day) = 94,608,000,000,000,000 Close but no dice. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 94608 109500 00:00:00.000 - 10/20/1900 5:00:00 PM So I am pretty confused and any clarification would be greatly appreciated. JB * This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further distribution or use thereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and delete/destroy it. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
w32tm.exe Help Understanding--Update
OK I figured out the first one. It is not the number of naonoseconds. It is 100 nanosecond intervals. So that makes sense as for the 100 days when it should be one day. Still working on the second one. Hello and Merry Christmas, I am feeling pretty dumb here and would like to wrap up one of my projects before the holiday. Currently I am trying to do some calculations using w32tm.exe to validate my math...and my math appears to be wrong. For example I Google how many nanoseconds in a day. From multiple sources I get 86,400,000,000,000. Fine then w32tm.exe should match saying 1 daybut it doesn't It says 100 days C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 864000 100 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM A day is a day regardless so I can't see that time zone would matter for this simple calculation?? So let's say Google is wrong and I use 864,000,000,000 which does show as one day. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 8640 1 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM Fine w32tm.exe has an epoch of 1-1-1601. I want the number of nanoseconds till 1-1-1901. That would be 300 (1901-1601) 365 (days in a year) 300 * 365 = 109,500 days 109500 days * 8640 (nanoseconds in a day) = 94,608,000,000,000,000 Close but no dice. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 94608 109500 00:00:00.000 - 10/20/1900 5:00:00 PM So I am pretty confused and any clarification would be greatly appreciated. JB * This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further distribution or use thereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and delete/destroy it. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: w32tm.exe Help Understanding
W32tm.exe doesn't use nanoseconds, it uses 0.1 microseconds. w32tm /ntte NT time epoch Convert a NT system time, in (10^-7)s intervals from 0h 1-Jan 1601, into a readable format. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bonner, John [mailto:johnbon...@centura.org] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 5:57 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: w32tm.exe Help Understanding Hello and Merry Christmas, I am feeling pretty dumb here and would like to wrap up one of my projects before the holiday. Currently I am trying to do some calculations using w32tm.exe to validate my math...and my math appears to be wrong. For example I Google how many nanoseconds in a day. From multiple sources I get 86,400,000,000,000. Fine then w32tm.exe should match saying 1 daybut it doesn't It says 100 days C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 864000 100 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM A day is a day regardless so I can't see that time zone would matter for this simple calculation?? So let's say Google is wrong and I use 864,000,000,000 which does show as one day. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 8640 1 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM Fine w32tm.exe has an epoch of 1-1-1601. I want the number of nanoseconds till 1-1-1901. That would be 300 (1901-1601) 365 (days in a year) 300 * 365 = 109,500 days 109500 days * 8640 (nanoseconds in a day) = 94,608,000,000,000,000 Close but no dice. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 94608 109500 00:00:00.000 - 10/20/1900 5:00:00 PM So I am pretty confused and any clarification would be greatly appreciated. JB * This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further distribution or use thereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and delete/destroy it. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
w32tm.exe Help Understanding-Resolved
And for the second one I need to use 365.242199 days in a year. Over 300 years that fraction adds up. DOH! Well have a blessed Christmas and thanks for all your help during the year. JB From: Bonner, John Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:57 PM To: 'NT System Admin Issues' Subject: w32tm.exe Help Understanding Hello and Merry Christmas, I am feeling pretty dumb here and would like to wrap up one of my projects before the holiday. Currently I am trying to do some calculations using w32tm.exe to validate my math...and my math appears to be wrong. For example I Google how many nanoseconds in a day. From multiple sources I get 86,400,000,000,000. Fine then w32tm.exe should match saying 1 daybut it doesn't It says 100 days C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 864000 100 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM A day is a day regardless so I can't see that time zone would matter for this simple calculation?? So let's say Google is wrong and I use 864,000,000,000 which does show as one day. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 8640 1 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM Fine w32tm.exe has an epoch of 1-1-1601. I want the number of nanoseconds till 1-1-1901. That would be 300 (1901-1601) 365 (days in a year) 300 * 365 = 109,500 days 109500 days * 8640 (nanoseconds in a day) = 94,608,000,000,000,000 Close but no dice. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 94608 109500 00:00:00.000 - 10/20/1900 5:00:00 PM So I am pretty confused and any clarification would be greatly appreciated. JB * This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further distribution or use thereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and delete/destroy it. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: w32tm.exe Help Understanding--Update
A year contains (more-or-less, but more accurately than what you've specified) 365.25 days (a leap-year happens each four years, but not ALWAYS every four years). 300 * 365.25 = 109,575 109,575 * (24 * 60 * 60 * 10,000,000) = 94,672,800,000,000,000 C:\ W32tm /ntte 946728000 109575 00:00:00.000 - 1/3/1901 7:00:00 PM Using PowerShell to perform these types of date calculations is a LOT easier than attempting to do it manually, as well as less prone to error (it knows all of the proper adjustments to make). Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Bonner, John [mailto:johnbon...@centura.org] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 6:13 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: w32tm.exe Help Understanding--Update OK I figured out the first one. It is not the number of naonoseconds. It is 100 nanosecond intervals. So that makes sense as for the 100 days when it should be one day. Still working on the second one. Hello and Merry Christmas, I am feeling pretty dumb here and would like to wrap up one of my projects before the holiday. Currently I am trying to do some calculations using w32tm.exe to validate my math...and my math appears to be wrong. For example I Google how many nanoseconds in a day. From multiple sources I get 86,400,000,000,000. Fine then w32tm.exe should match saying 1 daybut it doesn't It says 100 days C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 864000 100 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM A day is a day regardless so I can't see that time zone would matter for this simple calculation?? So let's say Google is wrong and I use 864,000,000,000 which does show as one day. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 8640 1 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM Fine w32tm.exe has an epoch of 1-1-1601. I want the number of nanoseconds till 1-1-1901. That would be 300 (1901-1601) 365 (days in a year) 300 * 365 = 109,500 days 109500 days * 8640 (nanoseconds in a day) = 94,608,000,000,000,000 Close but no dice. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 94608 109500 00:00:00.000 - 10/20/1900 5:00:00 PM So I am pretty confused and any clarification would be greatly appreciated. JB * This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further distribution or use thereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and delete/destroy it. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: w32tm.exe Help Understanding-Resolved
Which is why we have leap years every 4 years :) From: John Bonner [mailto:johnbon...@centura.org] Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:17 PM To: Heaton, Joseph@DFG; NT System Admin Issues Subject: w32tm.exe Help Understanding-Resolved And for the second one I need to use 365.242199 days in a year. Over 300 years that fraction adds up. DOH! Well have a blessed Christmas and thanks for all your help during the year. JB From: Bonner, John Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 3:57 PM To: 'NT System Admin Issues' Subject: w32tm.exe Help Understanding Hello and Merry Christmas, I am feeling pretty dumb here and would like to wrap up one of my projects before the holiday Currently I am trying to do some calculations using w32tm.exe to validate my math...and my math appears to be wrong. For example I Google how many nanoseconds in a day. From multiple sources I get 86,400,000,000,000. Fine then w32tm.exe should match saying 1 daybut it doesn't It says 100 days C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 864000 100 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM A day is a day regardless so I can't see that time zone would matter for this simple calculation?? So let's say Google is wrong and I use 864,000,000,000 which does show as one day. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 8640 1 00:00:00.000 - 4/10/1601 5:00:00 PM Fine w32tm.exe has an epoch of 1-1-1601. I want the number of nanoseconds till 1-1-1901. That would be 300 (1901-1601) 365 (days in a year) 300 * 365 = 109,500 days 109500 days * 8640 (nanoseconds in a day) = 94,608,000,000,000,000 Close but no dice. C:\Users\jbonnerw32tm.exe /ntte 94608 109500 00:00:00.000 - 10/20/1900 5:00:00 PM So I am pretty confused and any clarification would be greatly appreciated. JB * This communication is for the use of the intended recipient only. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, any disclosure, copying, further distribution or use thereof is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please advise me by return e-mail or by telephone and delete/destroy it. * ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Re: w32tm.exe Help Understanding-Resolved
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Heaton, Joseph@DFG jhea...@dfg.ca.gov wrote: Which is why we have leap years every 4 years J Except when the year is divisible by 100. Except when the year is divisible by 400. Then it's a leap year again. And don't even ask about September 1752. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
