RE: certificate status could not be determined...

[Daniel Chenault]

No, but it's a moot point now. Long story.

From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 6:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: certificate status could not be determined...

What CRL and OCSP fields are on the cert?

Have you tried browsing to those URLs from the server?
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com>> wrote:
Yes, intermediate was installed using the Certificates MMC snap-in.

Daniel Chenault
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:30 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: certificate status could not be determined...

That shouldn't be a problem.  We use GoDaddy certs all the time for all kinds 
of things including Exchange.

This may be way off base, but are the GoDaddy intermediate certs installed?

--

I've also seen goofy stuff like this when the computer in question could not 
access the Internet to download the CRL because of some content filtering 
solution.  In my SonicWall content filtering environment, I've fixed this by 
allowing the computer to access the GoDaddy CRL without identifying a logged in 
user.  Is there any content filtering in place, or something that might be 
hindering http/s traffic out to the Internet by the server?


On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com>> wrote:
It's issued by GoDaddy (not my call).

Daniel Chenault
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]

From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: certificate status could not be determined...

I've also seen this error when the cert has no CRL information on it (i.e., the 
issuing CA policy includes zero CRL publication URLs).  Yes, the cert is 
valid... no, Exchange won't take it.

--Steve
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com>> wrote:
Exchange 2k10 on Win2k8R2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979694

Lots and lots on this in various forums. They all boil down to the same thing 
as cited in the article - set the proxy server in winhttp. There is no proxy 
server in this environment. The machine has direct access.

I've done many different things trying to clear this including clearing the 
ocsp and crl cache. Anyone else run into this? I know the cert is good; 
confirmed by the CA.

Daniel Chenault
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
Office: 972-528-6546 x 1002
Fax: 972-982-0054
9550 Skillman Road
Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75243
[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin<>

Re: there should be...

[Andrew S. Baker]

I set that on my laptop and desktop all the time :)

-ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker

Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
 On Aug 2, 2012 4:50 PM, "Steve Kradel"  wrote:

> Neat... I'd never paid attention to the alternate configuration tab before.
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc725638
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Lum  wrote:
>
>>  Oh?
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:22 AM
>>
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* RE: there should be...
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> You can set an alternate IP on the host that will take effect if no DHCP
>> server is found.
>>
>> -ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2012 12:17 AM, "Ken Schaefer"  wrote:***
>> *
>>
>> What about command centre PCs that might need network connectivity, even
>> during a DR situation where DHCP might not be available?
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 31 July 2012 2:44 AM
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* Re: there should be...
>>
>>  
>>
>> And for that, we have DHCP reservations...
>> 
>>
>> *ASB*
>>
>> *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker*
>>
>> *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…*
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Chinnery, Paul  wrote:
>> 
>>
>> We  have some pc's that need static addresses.As is often found with
>> IT especially, a lot depends on the organization and the software that runs
>> on the pc.
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* Daniel Chenault [mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, July 30, 2012 12:06 PM
>>
>> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
>> *Subject:* there should be...
>>
>>
>>
>> A special hell for someone that sets an entire office to use static
>> addresses when a perfectly good DHCP server is available.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Servers, printers and other network resources should be static, but
>> workstations should be dynamic. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> That’s just my opinion; I could be wrong.
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>>
>> ~   ~
>>
>>
>>  ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: certificate status could not be determined...

[Steve Kradel]

What CRL and OCSP fields are on the cert?

Have you tried browsing to those URLs from the server?

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Chenault  wrote:

>  Yes, intermediate was installed using the Certificates MMC snap-in.
>
> ** **
>
> Daniel Chenault
>
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
>
> [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:30 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: certificate status could not be determined...
>
> ** **
>
> That shouldn't be a problem.  We use GoDaddy certs all the time for all
> kinds of things including Exchange.
>
>
> This may be way off base, but are the GoDaddy intermediate certs installed?
> 
>
> ** **
>
> --
>
> ** **
>
> I've also seen goofy stuff like this when the computer in question could
> not access the Internet to download the CRL because of some content
> filtering solution.  In my SonicWall content filtering environment, I've
> fixed this by allowing the computer to access the GoDaddy CRL without
> identifying a logged in user.  Is there any content filtering in place, or
> something that might be hindering http/s traffic out to the Internet by the
> server?
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Chenault <
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com> wrote:
>
> It’s issued by GoDaddy (not my call).
>
>  
>
> Daniel Chenault
>
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
>
> [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]
>
>  
>
> *From:* Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:56 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: certificate status could not be determined...
>
>  
>
> I've also seen this error when the cert has no CRL information on it
> (i.e., the issuing CA policy includes zero CRL publication URLs).  Yes, the
> cert is valid... no, Exchange won't take it.
>
>  
>
> --Steve
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Chenault <
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com> wrote:
>
> Exchange 2k10 on Win2k8R2
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979694
>
>  
>
> Lots and lots on this in various forums. They all boil down to the same
> thing as cited in the article – set the proxy server in winhttp. There is
> no proxy server in this environment. The machine has direct access.
>
>  
>
> I’ve done many different things trying to clear this including clearing
> the ocsp and crl cache. Anyone else run into this? I know the cert is good;
> confirmed by the CA.
>
>  
>
> Daniel Chenault
>
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
>
> Office: 972-528-6546 x 1002
>
> Fax: 972-982-0054
>
> 9550 Skillman Road
>
> Suite 500
>
> Dallas, TX 75243
>
> [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin<>

RE: certificate status could not be determined...

[Daniel Chenault]

Yes, intermediate was installed using the Certificates MMC snap-in.

Daniel Chenault
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]

From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 5:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: certificate status could not be determined...

That shouldn't be a problem.  We use GoDaddy certs all the time for all kinds 
of things including Exchange.

This may be way off base, but are the GoDaddy intermediate certs installed?

--

I've also seen goofy stuff like this when the computer in question could not 
access the Internet to download the CRL because of some content filtering 
solution.  In my SonicWall content filtering environment, I've fixed this by 
allowing the computer to access the GoDaddy CRL without identifying a logged in 
user.  Is there any content filtering in place, or something that might be 
hindering http/s traffic out to the Internet by the server?


On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com>> wrote:
It’s issued by GoDaddy (not my call).

Daniel Chenault
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]

From: Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: certificate status could not be determined...

I've also seen this error when the cert has no CRL information on it (i.e., the 
issuing CA policy includes zero CRL publication URLs).  Yes, the cert is 
valid... no, Exchange won't take it.

--Steve
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Chenault 
mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com>> wrote:
Exchange 2k10 on Win2k8R2
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979694

Lots and lots on this in various forums. They all boil down to the same thing 
as cited in the article – set the proxy server in winhttp. There is no proxy 
server in this environment. The machine has direct access.

I’ve done many different things trying to clear this including clearing the 
ocsp and crl cache. Anyone else run into this? I know the cert is good; 
confirmed by the CA.

Daniel Chenault
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
Office: 972-528-6546 x 1002
Fax: 972-982-0054
9550 Skillman Road
Suite 500
Dallas, TX 75243
[Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
<>

Re: certificate status could not be determined...

[Richard Stovall]

That shouldn't be a problem.  We use GoDaddy certs all the time for all
kinds of things including Exchange.

This may be way off base, but are the GoDaddy intermediate certs installed?

--

I've also seen goofy stuff like this when the computer in question could
not access the Internet to download the CRL because of some content
filtering solution.  In my SonicWall content filtering environment, I've
fixed this by allowing the computer to access the GoDaddy CRL without
identifying a logged in user.  Is there any content filtering in place, or
something that might be hindering http/s traffic out to the Internet by the
server?



On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Chenault  wrote:

>  It’s issued by GoDaddy (not my call).
>
> ** **
>
> Daniel Chenault
>
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
>
> [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Steve Kradel [mailto:skra...@zetetic.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:56 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: certificate status could not be determined...
>
> ** **
>
> I've also seen this error when the cert has no CRL information on it
> (i.e., the issuing CA policy includes zero CRL publication URLs).  Yes, the
> cert is valid... no, Exchange won't take it.
>
> ** **
>
> --Steve
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Chenault <
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com> wrote:
>
> Exchange 2k10 on Win2k8R2
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979694
>
>  
>
> Lots and lots on this in various forums. They all boil down to the same
> thing as cited in the article – set the proxy server in winhttp. There is
> no proxy server in this environment. The machine has direct access.
>
>  
>
> I’ve done many different things trying to clear this including clearing
> the ocsp and crl cache. Anyone else run into this? I know the cert is good;
> confirmed by the CA.
>
>  
>
> Daniel Chenault
>
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
>
> Office: 972-528-6546 x 1002
>
> Fax: 972-982-0054
>
> 9550 Skillman Road
>
> Suite 500
>
> Dallas, TX 75243
>
> [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]
>
>  
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin<>

Re: there should be...

[Steve Kradel]

Neat... I'd never paid attention to the alternate configuration tab before.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc725638

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:03 AM, David Lum  wrote:

>  Oh?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 02, 2012 2:22 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* RE: there should be...
>
> ** **
>
> You can set an alternate IP on the host that will take effect if no DHCP
> server is found.
>
> -ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker
>
> Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
>
> On Jul 31, 2012 12:17 AM, "Ken Schaefer"  wrote:
>
> What about command centre PCs that might need network connectivity, even
> during a DR situation where DHCP might not be available?
>
>  
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 31 July 2012 2:44 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: there should be...
>
>  
>
> And for that, we have DHCP reservations...
> 
>
> *ASB*
>
> *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker*
>
> *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…*
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Chinnery, Paul  wrote:*
> ***
>
> We  have some pc's that need static addresses.As is often found with
> IT especially, a lot depends on the organization and the software that runs
> on the pc.
>
>  
>
> *From:* Daniel Chenault [mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 30, 2012 12:06 PM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* there should be...
>
>
>
> A special hell for someone that sets an entire office to use static
> addresses when a perfectly good DHCP server is available.
>
>  
>
> Servers, printers and other network resources should be static, but
> workstations should be dynamic. 
>
>  
>
> That’s just my opinion; I could be wrong.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>
> ~   ~
>
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Backup software

[Crawford, Scott]

+1, but then again, I don't have and AIX.

From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 11:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup software

I am so happy we don't use backup exec anymore. We are using Microsoft Data 
Protection Manager and absolutely love it. I mean it, if it was a girl I'd ask 
her out to dinner.

-Original Message-
From: Nigel Parker 
[mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup software

Hi
Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations

Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a couple of 
version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005 We were looking at Symantec 
backup exec These machine will have a dedicated backup server and an lto5 tape 
drive

We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an off site 
tape backup so this must remain)

The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this should be 
ok for 2-3 years

HOWEVER
We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1 These will 
backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape drive The IBM servers 
cant be upgraded!

Looking for a "supported" solution

We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none supported 
version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
work but would be unsupported! (no good for us) Also they are charging quite a 
high premium for backing up to tape

Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences

If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup windows and 
Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the costs

Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at ARKEIA (a 
spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: 
mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Kern Health Systems Confidentiality Statement:

This email and any attachments are legally privileged and can contain business 
proprietary and/or confidential information intended for a specific individual 
and purpose. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity named above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited 
from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by 
law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated 
need has been fulfilled.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents 
of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the 
return or destruction of these documents.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_foru

Re: certificate status could not be determined...

[Steve Kradel]

I've also seen this error when the cert has no CRL information on it (i.e.,
the issuing CA policy includes zero CRL publication URLs).  Yes, the cert
is valid... no, Exchange won't take it.

--Steve

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Daniel Chenault <
dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com> wrote:

>  Exchange 2k10 on Win2k8R2
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/979694
>
> ** **
>
> Lots and lots on this in various forums. They all boil down to the same
> thing as cited in the article – set the proxy server in winhttp. There is
> no proxy server in this environment. The machine has direct access.
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve done many different things trying to clear this including clearing
> the ocsp and crl cache. Anyone else run into this? I know the cert is good;
> confirmed by the CA.
>
> ** **
>
> Daniel Chenault
>
> dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com
>
> Office: 972-528-6546 x 1002
>
> Fax: 972-982-0054
>
> 9550 Skillman Road
>
> Suite 500
>
> Dallas, TX 75243
>
> [image: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CCF24C.F9B05160]
>
> **
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin<>

RE: Backup software

[Kennedy, Jim]

+1

From: James Kerr [mailto:cluster...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 12:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Backup software

I am so happy we don't use backup exec anymore. We are using Microsoft Data 
Protection Manager and absolutely love it. I mean it, if it was a girl I'd ask 
her out to dinner.

-Original Message-
From: Nigel Parker 
[mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup software

Hi
Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations

Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a couple of 
version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005 We were looking at Symantec 
backup exec These machine will have a dedicated backup server and an lto5 tape 
drive

We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an off site 
tape backup so this must remain)

The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this should be 
ok for 2-3 years

HOWEVER
We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1 These will 
backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape drive The IBM servers 
cant be upgraded!

Looking for a "supported" solution

We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none supported 
version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
work but would be unsupported! (no good for us) Also they are charging quite a 
high premium for backing up to tape

Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences

If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup windows and 
Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the costs

Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at ARKEIA (a 
spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: 
mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin



Kern Health Systems Confidentiality Statement:

This email and any attachments are legally privileged and can contain business 
proprietary and/or confidential information intended for a specific individual 
and purpose. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity named above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited 
from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by 
law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated 
need has been fulfilled.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents 
of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the 
return or destruction of these documents.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyr

Re: Backup software

[Richard Stovall]

I wonder what Mrs. Clusterpup would think of this revelation...

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:52 PM, James Kerr  wrote:

> I am so happy we don't use backup exec anymore. We are using Microsoft
> Data Protection Manager and absolutely love it. I mean it, if it was a girl
> I'd ask her out to dinner.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:07 AM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Backup software
>>
>> Hi
>> Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations
>>
>> Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a
>> couple of version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005 We were looking at
>> Symantec backup exec These machine will have a dedicated backup server and
>> an lto5 tape drive
>>
>> We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an off
>> site tape backup so this must remain)
>>
>> The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this
>> should be ok for 2-3 years
>>
>> HOWEVER
>> We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1
>> These will backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape drive
>> The IBM servers cant be upgraded!
>>
>> Looking for a "supported" solution
>>
>> We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none
>> supported version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
>> work but would be unsupported! (no good for us) Also they are charging
>> quite a high premium for backing up to tape
>>
>> Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences
>>
>> If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup windows
>> and Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the costs
>>
>> Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at
>> ARKEIA (a spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)
>>
>> Nigel Parker
>> Systems Engineer
>> Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
>> Tel:   01200 452329
>> Fax:   01200 452201
>> Web:   www.ultraframe.com
>> Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
>>
>>
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>>
>> The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may
>> not represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
>> This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is
>> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
>> intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised.
>> If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
>> or other use or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and unlawful.
>>
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
>> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> Kern Health Systems Confidentiality Statement:
>>
>> This email and any attachments are legally privileged and can contain
>> business proprietary and/or confidential information intended for a
>> specific individual and purpose. This information is intended only for the
>> use of the individual or entity named above. The authorized recipient of
>> this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any
>> other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required
>> to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.
>>
>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
>> disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
>> contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>> this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange
>> for the return or destruction of these documents.
>>
>> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
>> ~   ~
>>
>> ---
>> To manage subscriptions click here:
>> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
>> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
>> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>>
>>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbel

Re: Backup software

[James Kerr]

I am so happy we don't use backup exec anymore. We are using Microsoft Data
Protection Manager and absolutely love it. I mean it, if it was a girl I'd
ask her out to dinner.

>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:07 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Backup software
>
> Hi
> Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations
>
> Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a
> couple of version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005 We were looking at
> Symantec backup exec These machine will have a dedicated backup server and
> an lto5 tape drive
>
> We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an off
> site tape backup so this must remain)
>
> The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this
> should be ok for 2-3 years
>
> HOWEVER
> We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1 These
> will backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape drive The
> IBM servers cant be upgraded!
>
> Looking for a "supported" solution
>
> We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none
> supported version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
> work but would be unsupported! (no good for us) Also they are charging
> quite a high premium for backing up to tape
>
> Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences
>
> If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup windows
> and Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the costs
>
> Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at
> ARKEIA (a spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)
>
> Nigel Parker
> Systems Engineer
> Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
> Tel:   01200 452329
> Fax:   01200 452201
> Web:   www.ultraframe.com
> Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
> The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not
> represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
> This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
> intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised.
> If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or other use or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and unlawful.
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ <
> http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>
> 
>
> Kern Health Systems Confidentiality Statement:
>
> This email and any attachments are legally privileged and can contain
> business proprietary and/or confidential information intended for a
> specific individual and purpose. This information is intended only for the
> use of the individual or entity named above. The authorized recipient of
> this information is prohibited from disclosing this information to any
> other party unless required to do so by law or regulation and is required
> to destroy the information after its stated need has been fulfilled.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the
> contents of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange
> for the return or destruction of these documents.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Backup software

[Brad DeHart]

EMC's Networker can do what you are looking for.


Brad DeHart
Senior Network Systems Administrator
Kern Health Systems
(661)664-5068
brad.deh...@khs-net.com


-Original Message-
From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup software

Hi
Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations

Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a couple of 
version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005 We were looking at Symantec 
backup exec These machine will have a dedicated backup server and an lto5 tape 
drive

We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an off site 
tape backup so this must remain)

The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this should be 
ok for 2-3 years

HOWEVER
We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1 These will 
backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape drive The IBM servers 
cant be upgraded!

Looking for a "supported" solution

We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none supported 
version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
work but would be unsupported! (no good for us) Also they are charging quite a 
high premium for backing up to tape

Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences

If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup windows and 
Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the costs

Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at ARKEIA (a 
spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin




Kern Health Systems Confidentiality Statement:

This email and any attachments are legally privileged and can contain business 
proprietary and/or confidential information intended for a specific individual 
and purpose. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity named above. The authorized recipient of this information is prohibited 
from disclosing this information to any other party unless required to do so by 
law or regulation and is required to destroy the information after its stated 
need has been fulfilled.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution, or action taken in reliance on the contents 
of these documents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
information in error, please notify the sender immediately and arrange for the 
return or destruction of these documents.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Backup software

[Paul Hutchings]

At (very) face value Commvault will cover all of that.

-Original Message-
From: Nigel Parker [mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk] 
Sent: 02 August 2012 09:07
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Backup software

Hi
Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations 

Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a couple of 
version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005 We were looking at Symantec 
backup exec These machine will have a dedicated backup server and an lto5 tape 
drive

We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an off site 
tape backup so this must remain)

The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this should be 
ok for 2-3 years 

HOWEVER
We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1 These will 
backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape drive The IBM servers 
cant be upgraded!

Looking for a "supported" solution 

We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none supported 
version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
work but would be unsupported! (no good for us) Also they are charging quite a 
high premium for backing up to tape 

Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences 

If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup windows and 
Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the costs 
 
Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at ARKEIA (a 
spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ 
  ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


--
MIRA Ltd

Watling Street, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, CV10 0TU, England
Registered in England and Wales No. 402570
VAT Registration  GB 100 1464 84

The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are solely for the use of the 
intended recipient.  If you receive this e-mail in error, please delete it and 
notify us either by e-mail, telephone or fax.  You should not copy, forward or 
otherwise disclose the content of the e-mail as this is prohibited.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: there should be...

[David Lum]

Yes, much smaller environments, 99% of my experience is systems supporting 
under 750 users - sorry I should have clarified that up front. The only time 
I've supported more than that was when years ago when my only job was to patch 
1600+ servers worldwide, that was a challenge!

Dave

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: there should be...

I think you might be talking about small(er) environments then.

A DR typically involves failing over controller infrastructure for firewalls, 
NIPS, auditing software, updating load balancers, usually lots of DNS entries 
etc. People have to be able to connect to the SAN management software to up the 
LUNS at the target DC etc. Lots of steps have to happen before clients need to 
worry about DHCP.

In a larger environment, the DC command center will be a lot more than 1 PC - 
my last project had ~50 per DC. In a DR, we will have a couple of hundred 
people cycling through (I'm not involved in BCP design directly, so I'm not 
sure of the details). Those stations need to be static. And in a larger org, 
you'll find lots of other odd corner cases where you need static as well (to 
get around a dependency on DHCP, or network or whatever)

Cheers
Ken

From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org]
Sent: Thursday, 2 August 2012 1:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: there should be...

In those cases I manually set the IP once I realize the station isn't getting 
an IP addresses, and sometimes I remember to flip it back to DHCP right away, 
sometimes it's weeks later :). If trying to do this remote yeah, it could be a 
reason to keep a station static. Of course that makes it prime to be the one 
station you can't get to if a change ever does happen to a network (BTDT!).

In my fairly limited experience (I have 17 years' experience, but only about 7 
different Windows networks over the years) as long as the DC's / DHCP/VM Host 
servers are static, in a DR situation that's enough because if systems aren't 
getting DHCP then you're not ready for the next steps.

From: Ken Schaefer 
[mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: there should be...

What about command centre PCs that might need network connectivity, even during 
a DR situation where DHCP might not be available?

From: Andrew S. Baker 
[mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 31 July 2012 2:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: there should be...

And for that, we have DHCP reservations...
ASB

http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker

Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market...


On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Chinnery, Paul 
mailto:pa...@mmcwm.com>> wrote:
We  have some pc's that need static addresses.As is often found with IT 
especially, a lot depends on the organization and the software that runs on the 
pc.




~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: Microsoft New webmail

[Rod Trent]

Ok…so you caught me late on this one, so just responding.

 

I’m not seeing that issue in Chrome, IE9, Firefox, Safari or Opera.

 

From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:51 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Microsoft New webmail

 

IE9 and Firefox 14

 

From: Rod Trent [mailto:rodtr...@myitforum.com] 
Sent: Thursday, 2 August 2012 1:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Microsoft New webmail

 

What browser?

 

Ken Schaefer  wrote:

Anyone seeing an odd rendering issue – the top of the main frame/div (with the 
search box, or the subject line when composing mail etc.) is hidden behind the 
header frame/div (didn’t look into source to work out whether it’s a frame or 
div or whatever)

 

Cheers

Ken

 

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: Backup software

[Andrew S. Baker]

I think you'll find it more cost effective to choose one solution per
platform, than attempt to find a solution that will support both platforms
(and well not do so equally in any event).

Also, what budget are you looking at for this project?

-ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker

Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
 On Aug 2, 2012 4:11 AM, "Nigel Parker" 
wrote:

> Hi
> Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations
>
> Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a
> couple of version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005
> We were looking at Symantec backup exec
> These machine will have a dedicated backup server and an lto5 tape drive
>
> We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an
> off site tape backup so this must remain)
>
> The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this
> should be ok for 2-3 years
>
> HOWEVER
> We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1
> These will backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape
> drive
> The IBM servers cant be upgraded!
>
> Looking for a "supported" solution
>
> We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none
> supported version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
> work but would be unsupported! (no good for us)
> Also they are charging quite a high premium for backing up to tape
>
> Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences
>
> If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup
> windows and Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the
> costs
>
> Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at
> ARKEIA (a spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)
>
> Nigel Parker
> Systems Engineer
> Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
> Tel:   01200 452329
> Fax:   01200 452201
> Web:   www.ultraframe.com
> Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
> The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not
> represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
> This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for
> intended recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised.
> If you are not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or other use or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and unlawful.
>
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: there should be...

[Andrew S. Baker]

You can set an alternate IP on the host that will take effect if no DHCP
server is found.

-ASB: http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker

Sent from my Motorola Droid RAZR
 On Jul 31, 2012 12:17 AM, "Ken Schaefer"  wrote:

>  What about command centre PCs that might need network connectivity, even
> during a DR situation where DHCP might not be available?
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 31 July 2012 2:44 AM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: there should be...
>
> ** **
>
> And for that, we have DHCP reservations...
> 
>
> *ASB*
>
> *http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker*
>
> *Harnessing the Advantages of Technology for the SMB market…*
>
>
>
> 
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Chinnery, Paul  wrote:*
> ***
>
> We  have some pc's that need static addresses.As is often found with
> IT especially, a lot depends on the organization and the software that runs
> on the pc.
>
>  
>
> *From:* Daniel Chenault [mailto:dchena...@lgnetworksinc.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 30, 2012 12:06 PM
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* there should be...
>
>  
>
> A special hell for someone that sets an entire office to use static
> addresses when a perfectly good DHCP server is available.
>
>  
>
> Servers, printers and other network resources should be static, but
> workstations should be dynamic. 
>
>  
>
> That’s just my opinion; I could be wrong.
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Backup software

[Nigel Parker]

Hi 
Looking to change our backup software and are open to recommendations 

Our servers are a range of Windows 2000 2003 with Exchange 2003 and a
couple of version of Microsoft Sql server 2000 and 2005
We were looking at Symantec backup exec 
These machine will have a dedicated backup server and an lto5 tape drive

We will backup to disk and then to tape (we have a requirement for an
off site tape backup so this must remain)

The backup will easily fit on 1 lto 5 tape and with data volumes this
should be ok for 2-3 years 

HOWEVER
We also have 2 IBM AIX servers running version 4.3.3 and version 5.1
These will backup again to a dedicated server with an ultrium 5 tape
drive 
The IBM servers cant be upgraded!

Looking for a "supported" solution 

We looked at backupexec and netbackup however only Older an now none
supported version will work with our Aix versions the new version "may"
work but would be unsupported! (no good for us)
Also they are charging quite a high premium for backing up to tape 

Suggestions are welcome especially first hand experiences 

If any software is available that will do the whole thing (backup
windows and Aix)  this would be an advantage and of course keep down the
costs 
 
Currently we are using OPENBACKUP now unsupported and are looking at
ARKEIA (a spin-off of openbackup or parallel version)

Nigel Parker
Systems Engineer
Ultraframe (UK) Ltd
Tel:   01200 452329
Fax:   01200 452201
Web:   www.ultraframe.com
Email: mailto:nigel.par...@ultraframe.co.uk



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The statements and opinions expressed in this email are my own and may not 
represent those of Ultraframe (UK) Ltd.
This email is subject to copyright and the information contained in it is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is sent out only for intended 
recipient(s). Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are 
not an intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use 
or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
unlawful.


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin