RE: Azure?

[Ryan Finnesey]

It is my understand that Microsoft has no access to the VMs.  I have been very 
impressed with the disk I/O and Windows 2012 SQL 2012 but I understand the 
public cloud is not for everyone.

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Azure?

If you don't have control of the host OS, do you really have control?

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Ryan Finnesey 
mailto:r...@finnesey.com>> wrote:
>From what I can see we have control of the images we upload just not control 
>of the host OS.

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 8, 2012, at 7:55 AM, "Hank ." 
mailto:hgedr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I know it is trendy but have no interest on putting out company's data on 
someone elses equipment that is not under our control.


On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Ryan Finnesey 
mailto:r...@finnesey.com>> wrote:
Has anyone been deploying VMs on Azure?  I need to role out SharePoint, XenAPP, 
AD, System Center , Dynamics CRM and Dynamics AX. I was thinking of completely 
using Azure.

Cheers
Ryan



~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to 
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

Re: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection

[Anders Blomgren]

Same server. I have my other wsus install coexisting for now. SP1 will
support bringing in an existing wsus server. RTM requires that you use an
unconfigured wsus installation.

I have two distribution points on other sites. I guess I could have used
DFS-R since there are already replication groups setup to those sites but
that would require packages without source files and I don't see that one
in the new application model.

If it's for a lab or small environment, what would be the benefit in a
separate SQL install? If you have an existing large scale SQL cluster I can
understand but then you'd have to be properly licensed for SQL for all
managed users/devices - the included SQL license needs to be dedicated to
system center.

For me, separate SQL means another VM which means another OS overhead.

-Anders

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Joseph L. Casale  wrote:

>  Anders,
> Just started playing around with this in a lab scenario. Did you install
> all roles including WSUS on this single server?
> When I get around to deploying this in production, I have an existing WSUS
> server, but in reality I wouldn't object to decommissioning it as a result
> of setting it all up on this single server.
>
>  That also being said, I may setup SQL on its own server just for the
> sake of forward thinking...
>
>  Thanks!
> jlc
>
>  --
> *From:* Anders Blomgren [chanks...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 21, 2012 2:21 AM
>
> *To:* NT System Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection
>
>  Run it that way here, 200 managed computers. SCCM 2012 is the first
> version I'd even consider using for such a small environment. Still need
> 16GB ram though...
>
> -Anders
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>
> ---
> To manage subscriptions click here:
> http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
> or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
> with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin

RE: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection

[Joseph L. Casale]

Anders,
Just started playing around with this in a lab scenario. Did you install all 
roles including WSUS on this single server?
When I get around to deploying this in production, I have an existing WSUS 
server, but in reality I wouldn't object to decommissioning it as a result of 
setting it all up on this single server.

That also being said, I may setup SQL on its own server just for the sake of 
forward thinking...

Thanks!
jlc


From: Anders Blomgren [chanks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 2:21 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: System Center 2012 Endpoint Protection

Run it that way here, 200 managed computers. SCCM 2012 is the first version I'd 
even consider using for such a small environment. Still need 16GB ram though...

-Anders

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin