RE: FTP & IIS user access

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









In 2000 he’ll
need to go to the Local Security Settings I believe.  We still use NT4 for the domain, but on my Win2000 Pro box
it is under Admin ToolsàLocal Security PolicyàLocal PoliciesàUser Rights Assignment.

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Peter Pearson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19,
2001 1:38 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FTP & IIS user
access

 

In User Manager - under "user
rights" scroll down the "log on locally". 

 

Are you using IIS for the FTP sites? Also
check your client FTP app (unless of course you're using DOS. 

 

See attached articles (hope they help)

 

http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q200475

http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q221934

 

Cheers.

 



-
Original Message - 



From: Murray
Binette 



To: NT System Admin Issues 

Sent: Wednesday, September
19, 2001 2:04 PM

Subject: RE:
FTP & IIS user access

 

Just a
simple domain with 30 users. The SBServer is the PDC which is connected directly
to the internet. I want users that hold a valid domain account to have access
to the ftp site (no annonymous access).

Arghh, I
forget how to manipulate attributes such as 'log on locally'thats done
through 'poledit' right?

 

 

Thanks
for you patience! :)





-Original
Message-
From: Peter Pearson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19,
2001 11:45 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: FTP & IIS user
access

What is
your network setup? Domain model etc.. What type of access are you allowing to
the FTP site? If the FTP server is a member server, do the users have the
"right to log on locally?"





-
Original Message - 



From: Murray
Binette 



To: NT System Admin Issues 

Sent: Wednesday, September
19, 2001 1:33 PM

Subject: FTP
& IIS user access

 

I'm
running SBS2000 and I'm trying to set up an FTP site so that users can access
their folders from home. The problem is only users with Admin privileges are
able to get onto the server. The error their getting is "530 User x cannot
login in !Logon failure, so quitting".

 

I'm not
sure what attribute or privilege I have to assign to users to allow them in. 

 

 

Thanks a
lot guys!

 

Murray B

Cybertech
Automation

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

IIS4/5 patches

[Allen Crawford]

Title: IIS4/5 patches





If anyone is struggling with getting current on locking down your IIS servers, I have spent some time creating an HTML page with links to the downloads, except that I've created it for our LAN.  So, I can email you the self-extracting zipped up version of it offline if you are interested.  I don't think I've left anything out of it, but I wouldn't be surprised if I missed a few items.  It includes the Post-SP6 NT 4 security rollup as well, which adds a good 14MB to the file size, so I can remove that if you would like.

Anyway, I'm emailing this list so hopefully it can help push the admins to install these updates that haven't done so already so we can start putting an end to this Code Red stuff.  Of course, if you are already infected you'll need to get yourself clean.  Does eEye have that Code Red scanner available still?  Doesn't it detect if you are already infected and clean it?  I can't remember and couldn't find it last time I checked their site.  However, the last I checked was a while back.  I'm leaving for the day so I don't have time to check it now and won't get any replies to this message until tomorrow.

Trying to be of assistance to people that are short on time and haven't updated their servers since I personally have found Microsoft's web pages to be extremely cluttered and hard to figure out what you should and shouldn't install.


Allen


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)





Hopefully we won't have to find out.  Unlikely, but hopefully.


 -Original Message-
From:   Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)


I had the same thought.


 
- ASB
 



-Original Message-
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:53 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)



Can you imagine being a passenger on a hijacked plane after this? It
won't happen again, because the next time a hijack happens, the
passengers will think of New York and storm the hijackers before being
used as a guided missile.


Clayton Doige 
IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I
Gameday International N.V. 
Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... 


T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537
C: +5 999 563 1845 
F: +5 999 733 1259 
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)



Airport security in Buffalo has gone to the extreme. Way overboard in my
opinion. If a terrorist wants to strike again, they will find a way.
my 2 cents.


--Charles



 


    Andrew Baker


    
Issues"  
    ew.com>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   
 cc:


    09/13/2001   Subject: RE: Airport
security (was: The idiocy continues!)    
    04:14 PM


   Please


    respond to


    "NT System


    Admin Issues"


 


 






>> If anything these airports need to be privatized and
>> the security force needs to be trained  and made to
>> do their jobs.  It's that simple.


And what job were they supposed to be doing that they didn't?



If you took a poll last week about airplane/airport security, would
there
have been the same level of outcry?



There is often a tendency to over-react in situations like this and
suggest
that every process in the equation is broken. I am not suggesting that
airport security is stellar and could not be improved.  However, to my
knowledge, there was no particular breach of security that was taken
advantage of, for this event.


If anything, having an Air Marshall (or two) on board might have had a
positive impact.  Likewise, denying access to the cockpit would be a
good
idea.


The problem is that everyone wants to be secure, but they don't want to
spend any time or money to do it.





- ASB




- ASB




-Original Message-
From: Kent Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 1:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)



Ya gotta be kidding.  Most of the airports are "managed" by local
governments and they can't get it right.  What makes you think the Feds
are


able to do it.  Where I live (Atlanta), the General Manager is a
politcal
crony of the Mayor and is an incompetent clown at best.  If anything
these
airports need to be privatized and the security force needs to be
trained
and made to do their jobs.  It's that simple.  I work around the airport
so


I see it all the time.


My 2 cents.


Regards,


Kent Neff



>From: Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Airport security (was: The idiocy continues!)
>Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:13:46 -0400 (EDT)
>
>On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Phillips, Glen wrote:
> > I've noticed that in amongst all the criticism of poor security at
> > Boston airport, no-one has suggested paying the people who operate
the
> > metal detector screens and x-ray machines a bit more than what they
> > currently get (which is reported as on a par with someone who flips
> > burgers in a diner).
>
>   I have seen mentioned several times that the people supposedly
guarding
>air-travel security are minimum wage workers who have not been trained.
>Many are calling for the government to take over airport security.
>
>   Myself, I think that makes sense.  One of the functions of
government
is
>to protect the people, i.e., to establish and maintain a police force.
The
>government already patrols roads, trains, and general property.  To me,
it
>makes sense to extend that same protection to air travel.
>
>--
>Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
not



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: WAKE UP!!!!

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: WAKE UP





Yeah, some of these changes would increase ticket prices, which is sad since I'm assuming the airlines make a large enough profit to eat some of these extra costs up.  How much does human life cost though?  I think they need to eat a lot of costs being in the business they are in.  But that's just me, someone who isn't quite as money-hungry as many other people are.

 -Original Message-
From:   Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: WAKE UP




 - Require inspection of all luggage and persons boarding aircraft.
That's fine with me.


 - Require passengers to show photo ID at the security gate.
I showed it 5 times at Heathrow, what's another time or two?


 - Forbid un-ticketed people beyond the security gate.
I agree.  Domestic as well as international?


 - Forbid allow any weapons or sharp objects in the passenger compartment.
No CD's? (break 'em)  How am I supposed to cut that thing that passes for
chicken dinner?


 - Require aircraft crew to enter with the same checks as passengers.
Absolutely.


 - Secure service areas against unchecked entry.
Absolutely.


 - Require people entering service areas to show photo ID.
I got a guy in Phoenix that makes the best!


 - Require inspection of people and materials entering service areas.
Absolutely.


 - Monitor service areas with closed-circuit cameras.
Hi Mom!


 - Patrol service areas with armed police.
Did my ticket price just jump from $250 to $350?


 - Deploy a program of armed and uniformed police aboard every flight.
Did they used to have Marshals?


 - Supplement said police with random undercover agents.
My ticket price just went up again.


 - Restrict and protect access to the flight deck, as already noted.
I think this is a current recommendation somewhere.


 - Replace the existing Air Traffic Control system with one that functions
correctly (their equipment is known to be inadequate for the tasks of the
past, let alone today), and track all flights at all times.  Require pilots
to remain in regular contact.  If contact is lost, assume the flight may be
hostile, and be prepared to intercept it as a last resort.


It definitely can't run on NT then.




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: WAKE UP!!!!

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: WAKE UP





I got that in coach with American...and leg room!


 -Original Message-
From:   Smith Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: WAKE UP


No more silverware in first class...



Joseph Smith


Network Administrator
Perlos, Inc.
5201 Alliance Gateway
Fort Worth, TX 76178-3729
Work: 817-224-9012
Cell: 817-999-7703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:44 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WAKE UP



On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Lefkovics, William wrote:
>>  - Forbid un-ticketed people beyond the security gate.
>
> I agree.  Domestic as well as international?


  Of course.  Witness Tuesday's events.


>> - Forbid allow any weapons or sharp objects in the passenger
>> compartment.
>
> No CD's? (break 'em)


  Granted that weapons can always be improvised.  Failing anything else, a
fist makes a passable weapon against even a knife.  However, I still think
banning any weapon or cutting implement has some advantages.  First, I don't
think we should make it any easier for the bad guys.  Second, there is a
physiological impact when someone holds up something designed to cut.  A man
with a knife is a terrorist.  A man with a broken CD is a crazy person.


> How am I supposed to cut that thing that passes for chicken dinner?


  I dunno about you, but I have never been able to cut it with those plastic
objects that pass for knifes, so nothing lost there.  ;-)


>>  - Require people entering service areas to show photo ID.
> I got a guy in Phoenix that makes the best!


  Defense in depth.


  Every additional hurdle is one more place they might get caught.


>>  - Patrol service areas with armed police.
>
> Did my ticket price just jump from $250 to $350?


  No, it jumped to 10,000 innocent people dead.  :-(


  If $100 per ticket is all it costs to prevent this from happening again, I
will gladly pay it.


>>  - Deploy a program of armed and uniformed police aboard every flight.
>
> Did they used to have Marshals?


  Yes.


-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not
|
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or
|
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.
|



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: SQL Lists?

[Allen Crawford]

Title: SQL Lists?









Looks like
Sunbelt has one:

http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?join=sql-list

 

Here’s the
link for all their lists:

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/community.cfm

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Zangara, Jim
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001
3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: SQL Lists?

 

 

Does anyone know of a good SQL mailing list?  Just starting
to work with it. 

TIA 

Jim 

For a while I didn't have a car...I had a helicopter...no place to
park it, so I just tied it to a lamp post and left it running...[slow glance
upward] -- Steven Wright 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: WAKE UP!!!!

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: WAKE UP





The measures that need to be changed are the security checkpoints.  The metal detectors and x-rays.  Keeping the U.S. Marshals on the planes like they did in the past.  Restricting (and actually ENFORCING) the carry-on bags (quantity and size).  All these things would help prevent getting weapons on board.  Granted people could still carry makeshift, non-metal weapons on themselves, but maybe we need a general pat-down as well.  I would gladly deal with that extra "hassle" to prevent this sort of thing from happening again.  Providing more leg room would even help if you ask me.  I'd be more apt to display action vs. a hijacker if I could get out of my seat quick enough.  It's really a shame if the hijackers only had knives on those planes, but then again, the passengers had no idea what their intentions were I imagine.

It is just a shame to see us get lax on security.  Would any of you set up a brand new firewall and then not update it for five years?

 -Original Message-
From:   Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: WAKE UP


>>Preventing access to the cockpit from the fuselage 
>>while the plane is in flight?  


I completely agree.



>>Ground-based override of plane controls? 
>>(no corruption possibilities there, eh?). 


You've just pointed out a problem with that one... :)



>>Are you suggesting that nothing be changed?


Of course not.  Your suggestions, however, do nothing to minimize our
freedoms.


I'm opposed to the mentality that would have cameras everywhere, and require
us to get permission to geo to the bathroom.


Can anyone point out any specific things that airport security could have
done to avert the atrocities of 09/11/01?   If not, it means you're probably
barking up the wrong tree.


Our strength is our freedom, and it was used against us.  However, rigid
controls against movement, and having to fly virtually unclothed in order to
eliminate the likelihood of carrying any weapons, is not the way to go.


As an aside, hijackers are going to find it somewhat harder to subdue a
plane full of people in the future, since the risk of death via action (vs.
inaction) has been largely minimized.


 
- ASB
 



-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:48 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WAKE UP



I don't know if Benjamin Franklin can assess what I deserve, nor would he
know my definition of those terms.


I have no idea what would need to be changed.


Preventing access to the cockpit from the fuselage while the plane is in
flight?  Ground-based override of plane controls? (no corruption
possibilities there, eh?). I don't know.  


Are you suggesting that nothing be changed?


William



-Original Message-
From: Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: WAKE UP



>>Please, explain to the families of those missing or dead 
>>why we should not give up any liberty in exchange for security;


"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin 



Please explain what SECURITY measures should have been taken on the morning
of the 11th that would have prevented the tragedy...


 
- ASB
 



-Original Message-
From: PITNEY,LDENISE (A-Sonoma,ex1) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:12 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: WAKE UP



A friend of mine who just had a baby told me "You know they only call it
morning sickness. It actually lasts all day."  It's kinda like 'free'dom,
it's not really free that's just what it's called.


Econ 200 Professor Wells, The University of Arizona in Tucson --"There is no
such thing as a free lunch, ..and if you say love...we know you're a
freshman."


The 'free'dom we've had all these years has never been FREE!! Ask anyone
whose served during a war -- personally our 'free'dom has cost me an uncle
(whom I never met), a father who still can't watch war movies and has skin
problems because of agent orange, another uncle who is slightly off, and
let's not forget about taxes; 'free'dom costs me more than 30% a year.


You can_not_have_it_all. It is as simple as supply and demand -- in your
personal life, can you spend all of the money you work for on any whimsical
idea that pops into your head? No, because you will be less; homeless,
clothes-less, penniless but if that is your decision you have the choice to
make it so, but you can not have it both ways. As we've learned recently,
the 'free'dom we all think is 'free' has cost us around $20billion, (I think
that's a low figure too) -- it doesn't include lives either. Please, explain
to the families of those missing or dead why we should not give up any
liberty in exchange for secur

RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK





Too bad we can't care and stick together all the time.


 -Original Message-
From:   C.E. GENE CONNOR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:56 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK


this is just another prime example of how the people of the u.s cares and
sticks together in times like these!!


Gene C. aka C.E. Gene Connor
Gene's Custom PC Service since 1989
Serving the U.S., Canada & London,England



-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:17 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK



Wow...


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 12:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK



 Just to get an idea of how broadly this whole thing has affected us...


 http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,8811,00.html



- ASB




-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 3:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK



Why is it you feel compelled to complain about the discussion of the
worst terrorist attack on the US?


No one is stopping you from using this forum for it's original purpose.
The list owner has given us permission to discuss this event.


Regards,


Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-Original Message-
From: Wil Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:52 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] NY ATTACK



why is it ok to have non technical discussions in this list?
I don't think so.


wil



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Off-Site Tape Storage NYC Area

[Allen Crawford]

Same here.

 

-Original Message-
From: Kelly Borndale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001
11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Off-Site Tape Storage
NYC Area

 

We also swap out tapes to take home...
just in case ;)


K.Borndale

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-home email




-
Original Message - 



From: Matt Wehnes




To: NT System Admin Issues 

Sent: Thursday, September 13,
2001 12:48 PM

Subject: RE:
Off-Site Tape Storage NYC Area

 

This may not
be a real Hi-tech way of doing things.

Have you considered buying a fire-proof safe and renting a mini-storage
unit?
Make sure the safe is data grade, ordinary fire-proof safe's won't protect
tapes or disks.
Typical small 5' X 10' self storage unit is 20/month here (Illinois).

Matt Wehnes 
System Administrator
Morton Machining & MFG


-Original Message-
From: Robert Mezzone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 11:32 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Off-Site Tape Storage NYC Area


Is there anyone on this list from the NYC area sending tapes off-site for
storage. What companies are you using and are you satisfied with the service
they provide. I'm looking to store @25 DLT tapes.

Thanks.

Robert

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: ADSL query

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: ADSL query





We are lucky to have a great ISP in town that actually cares about our connection.  Unfortunately Verizon has the local line, so if it does go down, we are still at their mercy.  Same goes for the new T-1 though...

 -Original Message-
From:   Erik Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, September 12, 2001 10:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: ADSL query


We are using ADSL in some of our stores here. They all have public IP's. The
one thing that you might want to consider, and it may be different with
worldcomm, is that most providers (especially ours) are still treating ADSL
like home connectivity and therefore are in no rush to fix problems.


Erik


-Original Message-
From: Brian Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: ADSL query



ADSL has just been introduced in Ireland. I was in the process of installing
a leased line Internet connection with Worldcom, and discovered that ADSL
would be about 30% of the price. My one worry is IP address allocation. Does
anyone know if ADSL supports public Ips? IE, will my exchange server work?
Will my users be able to connect in via a VPN etc.?


Thanks,
Brian Judge.




The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with
it) is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended for
the addressee only. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. It
is not to be relied upon by any other person other than the addressee except
with our prior approval. If no such approval is given, we will not accept
liability (in negligence or otherwise) rising from any third party acting,
or refraining from acting, on such information. Unauthorised recipients are
required to maintain confidentiality.
If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately,
destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. Any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of the email is prohibited.
Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us will be and remain
vested in us and will not be transferred to you. We assert the right to be
identified as the author of and to object to any misuses of the contents of
this email or such documents.
Grant Thornton is authorised by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
Ireland to carry on investment business. A list of partners may be inspected
at Grant Thornton, Ashford House, Tara Street, Dublin 2, Ireland


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: ADSL query

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: ADSL query





I use ADSL for FTP, Exchange, web-surfing, etc.  We have five public IPs.  We recently got a T-1 line though and will be making some changes.  We plan to use the DSL as a backup to the T-1, however.

 -Original Message-
From:   Brian Judge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, September 12, 2001 9:44 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    ADSL query


ADSL has just been introduced in Ireland. I was in the process of installing
a leased line Internet connection with Worldcom, and discovered that ADSL
would be about 30% of the price. My one worry is IP address allocation. Does
anyone know if ADSL supports public Ips? IE, will my exchange server work?
Will my users be able to connect in via a VPN etc.?


Thanks,
Brian Judge.




The information in this e-mail (which includes any files transmitted with
it) is confidential and may also be legally privileged. It is intended for
the addressee only. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. It
is not to be relied upon by any other person other than the addressee except
with our prior approval. If no such approval is given, we will not accept
liability (in negligence or otherwise) rising from any third party acting,
or refraining from acting, on such information. Unauthorised recipients are
required to maintain confidentiality. 
If you have received this e-mail in error please notify us immediately,
destroy any copies and delete it from your computer system. Any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of the email is prohibited.
Copyright in this e-mail and any document created by us will be and remain
vested in us and will not be transferred to you. We assert the right to be
identified as the author of and to object to any misuses of the contents of
this email or such documents. 
Grant Thornton is authorised by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
Ireland to carry on investment business. A list of partners may be inspected
at Grant Thornton, Ashford House, Tara Street, Dublin 2, Ireland


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack





Note:  I quoted Murray below.  Definitely not my thoughts.

 

-Original Message-

From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:58 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

 

With all due respect - if WWIII is the result of this it won't have been

Bush who started it.

 

Yes, a measured response is appropriate at this time -- but there will be a

response.  Count on it.

 

 

-Ben- 

Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 

Director of Information Services 

Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert 

http://www.hawaiilawyer.com <http://www.hawaiilawyer.com/>  

-Original Message-----

From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:26 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

How is this relevant?

 

"Well, I just hope that Bush (or the 'Puppet' as many Canadians refer to him

as) doesn't fly off the handle and start WWIII."

 

-Original Message-

From: Murray Binette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:43 PM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

 

How is this relevant to NT system administration?

-Original Message-

From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:18 AM

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

Basically, 40K people work in the Towers and there is estimated 200K people

who pass thru the towers. most people who live in NJ and work in NY have to

take the path trains to get into the city which passes right under the WTC!

i actually witnessed the first plane hitting the tower from Brooklyn while

waiting for a cab. I am now at work and trapped in the city because all

trains & buses are locked down.


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack





Let's not get into semantics.  By catastrophe, I'm talking about something that happened unexpectedly and instantly, or as close to instantly as you can get.  Sneak attacks and major accidents fit into this category.

 -Original Message-
From:   Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:31 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack


On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Allen Crawford wrote:
> 2)  We've all basically agreed this is the biggest catastrophe in recent
> history, if not all of history.


  "All of history" is a bit much.  Stalin alone killed millions.


-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack









Same thing
with msnbc.com

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
1:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

 

I like what CNN has done.

 

It seems they've stripped ads and
unnecessary info from sites that they may load quicker and provide info to more
people, faster.

 

www.cnn.com

 

 

-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
11:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

Let's just hope it's a side effect of the dust. 

-Original Message- 
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:23 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

There are people reporting flu symptoms in NYC. Some people are 
suggesting a second wave of attacks via biological warfare. This
is 
truly a horrible day, and I am caught right in the middle of it.
This is 
one day I wish I didn't live in NY and work in NYC! 

-Original Message- 
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:09 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

Now is not the time to get even. It is a time to reflect. My
condolences 
go out to everyone who is affected by this most tragic event. 

Clayton Doige 
IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I 
Gameday International N.V. 
Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... 

T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 
C: +5 999 563 1845 
F: +5 999 733 1259 
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

-Original Message- 
From: Bryan Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:49 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Re: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

May I add my sympathys to everyone affected by this. Thinking of
you 
from 
the UK 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack









Don’t
forget that the West Nile Virus has been running around.

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
1:25 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

 

Let's just hope it's a side effect of the dust. 

-Original Message- 
From: Paul Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:23 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

There are people reporting flu symptoms in NYC. Some people are 
suggesting a second wave of attacks via biological warfare. This
is 
truly a horrible day, and I am caught right in the middle of it.
This is 
one day I wish I didn't live in NY and work in NYC! 

-Original Message- 
From: Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:09 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

Now is not the time to get even. It is a time to reflect. My
condolences 
go out to everyone who is affected by this most tragic event. 

Clayton Doige 
IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I 
Gameday International N.V. 
Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... 

T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537 
C: +5 999 563 1845 
F: +5 999 733 1259 
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

-Original Message- 
From: Bryan Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:49 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Re: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

May I add my sympathys to everyone affected by this. Thinking of
you 
from 
the UK 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack









How is
this relevant?

 

“Well, I just hope that Bush (or the ‘Puppet’
as many Canadians refer to him as) doesn’t fly off the handle and start WWIII.”

 

-Original Message-
From: Murray Binette
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
12:43 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

 

How is this relevant to NT system
administration?

-Original
Message-
From: Paul Armstrong
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
11:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

Basically, 40K people
work in the Towers and there is estimated 200K people who pass thru the towers.
most people who live in NJ and work in NY have to take the path trains to get
into the city which passes right under the WTC! i actually witnessed the first
plane hitting the tower from Brooklyn while waiting for a cab. I am now at work
and trapped in the city because all trains & buses are locked down.

-Original
Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
11:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

I heard
50+ thousand

-Original
Message-
From: David N. Precht
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
10:44
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

any
stats on how many people work/live in the WTC and/or area?  i estimated
around 25k-50k ...

-Original
Message-
From: MLewis
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
11:37
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

Both
World Trade Center buildings have fallen.  There is only rubble where
these historic structures stood.

 

Marcella D. Lewis

Network
Administrator

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 "Excellence
is in the details. Give attention to the details and excellence will
come."  (Perry Paxton)

-Original
Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
11:30 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

Could you
confirm either more or less whether the structures are basically now grade
level? 

-Original
Message- 
From: Roman Bogdanov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:24 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

Im about 40
blocks from the towers and we were all told we can go home 
but all the bridges and subways are closed so here i am trying to
figure 
out a way to get to brooklyn. 

Roman
Bogdanov 
Head of IT Support 
Jnana Technologies Corp. 
www.jnana.com 
212-560-9151 ext. 202 
212-560-9066 fax 

 

-Original
Message- 
From: Richard Newton Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:24 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

Us in Jersey
City, NJ (just across the water) were evacuated and sent 
home. 
Its going to be a long day for all. 

-Original
Message- 
From: Jeff Pace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:26 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

and it
doesn't seem to be over yet. 

Jeff 

-Original
Message- 
From: Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 8:19 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

This is an
incredibly tragic day.


Probably the
most tragic for the US since the assassination of JFK 


- ASB 
  

 

-Original
Message- 
From: Richard McMahon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:07 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

Check out
this link. 

http://www.skynews.co.uk/skynews/storytemplate/storytoppic/0,,3-1029 
102, 
00.html 

Hope out all
you guys in the New York area are still with us.. 

Good luck, 

Richard 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



This
e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above. This e-mail may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee, you
are not authorized to retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any
part of it. In addition, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution or reproduction of this communication is strictly prohibited. 

 

The
sender of this message does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in
the contents of this message that arise as a result of e-mail transmission.
This message is provided for informational purposes and shou

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack





Somehow my NT servers don't seem as important today.


 -Original Message-
From:   Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:10 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    Re: NewYork Terrorist Attack


glad to see were all following the rule today.  this is a forum for nt sys
admin not current events.  how bout we break out the instant messaging
(aol,msn,...)  for the of topic stuff.  we all agree it terrible and we all
have TV's and radios.


- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Atherton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack



> And you don't think, that with over 20,000 people dead, World War 3 has
not
> been started on our shores now
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Murray Binette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 9:56 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
>
>
> Well, I just hope that Bush (or the 'Puppet' as many Canadians refer to
> him as) doesn't fly off the handle and start WWIII.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:08 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
>
>
> I would say that the US already feels pretty alienated right now
>
>
> - ASB
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:51 AM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack
>
>
> Well, that's one of the reactions terrorism is trying to provoke.  Most
> of
> the world finds US policy to be obnoxious, and a violent large scale
> reaction will effectively alienate the US from the rest of the world.
>
> >I don't mean to promote war, but we as a country HAVE to retaliate to
> this...
> >F00k the 3rd world countries that harbor terrorists...
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
>
>


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack









I must vent:

 

1)   If you don’t
like the off-topic replies, just delete them.  It is simple, the subject is “NewYork Terrorist Attack” for
crying out loud, not difficult.

2)   We’ve all
basically agreed this is the biggest catastrophe in recent history, if not all
of history.  I think that calls for
some exceptions.

 

-Original Message-
From: Nelson Aguillon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
12:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

 

Now, I
know everyone has an opinion on this matter. But can we make an effort to get
back to using this forum properly.

 

We can
pray for the victims, relatives, and friends of anyone directly affected by
this terrible event. We can also pray for our leaders so that they may have the
wisdom to act accordingly in all areas.

 

Having
said that, lets try to get back to using the forum for the proper issues. 

 

I
apologize in advance if anyone is offended my remarks… the intent is not to
offend anyone.

 

 

 

-Original
Message-
From: Murray Binette
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
9:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

 

Has anyone heard about
wether or not any attacks of any kind have happened up here in Canada??

-Original
Message-
From: Phillips, Glen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
9:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

And there's another one
from United has gone downcrashed or shot down I don't know

 

Original Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 11 September 2001
16:42
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

I heard one,
like a 767, crashed about 80 miles from Pittsburg, Camp David. 

-Original
Message- 
From: Brenden C. Bryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:41 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

 

The US
military shot down a hijacked airplane near Pittsburgh. That is the 
initial reports, don't' take it as truth. 


_


Brenden C.
Bryan 
Network Manager 
Organized Living, Inc. 
913.894.4844x264 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  

-Original
Message- 
From: Gareth Campling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:36 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Re: NewYork Terrorist Attack 

deepest
sympathys to everyone involved in this tragic day. can anyone 
in the states elaberate on the rumours on UK TV about a 4th
airplane ? 
and US military to shoot down ? , all i can say is i hope it is
pure 
speculation. 

Best wishes
to all 

-- 
Best regards, 
 Gareth,
MCP  
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]< /P>

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



*
If you
receive this e-mail in error, please contact +44 20 7280 5500. 
The
information contained in this e-mail and in the attachments if 
any, is
confidential. Unauthorised use, disclosure, printing, 
forwarding
or copying is strictly prohibited. 
*
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Retaliation for executing McVey?

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
10:57 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

 

unlikely, yes.  But Oklahoma City was
done by an American.  Wow, did I just get a deja vu while typing this. 

-Original
Message-
From: John Hornbuckle
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
8:53 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

That seems very, very
unlikely. I heard earlier that a Palestinian group had claimed responsibility,
and my hunch is that such a group (whether or not it was this specific group)
is to blame.




John Hornbuckle
Network Manager
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347 

 

 

-Original
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001
11:43 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist
Attack

You can't retaliate for
the sake of retaliating.  It could be Americans.

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack





2,588--2,403 Americans and 185 Japanese died in the attack.


 -Original Message-
From:   John Hornbuckle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:07 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack


How many were killed at Pearl Harbor?




John Hornbuckle
Network Manager
Taylor County School District
318 North Clark Street
Perry, FL 32347 


-Original Message-
From: Nail, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack



Try Perl Harbor...


-Original Message-
From: Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack



This is an incredibly tragic day.


Probably the most tragic for the US since the assassination of JFK


 
- ASB



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack





Pearl Harbor is more like it...


 -Original Message-
From:   Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: NewYork Terrorist Attack


No, I can't think of anything that touches this event for US!  This is in 
the order of Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Dresden...


At 11:19 AM 9/11/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>This is an incredibly tragic day.
>
>Probably the most tragic for the US since the assassination of JFK



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Jetdirect substitute

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Well, my experience with Web JetAdmin is minimal to say the least, and
we only have about 9 or 10 printers here, so maybe that’s why I don’t notice
the old JetAdmin running slow.  I
may just give TCP/IP printing a try though (never played with it) and ditch
that stuff altogether.  I haven’t
worried about it much though since I’ve tried my best to stick with HP
printers.  We just bought a color
laser printer and I thought for a minute we’d have a non-HP printer to deal
with, but that wasn’t the case.  Anyway,
it would be good to learn in case we do buy a non-HP printer.

 

-Original Message-
From: Tim VanDeWalle
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
2:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

The old JetAdmin could take its time on
some tasks as well. Updating and filtering the list of printers found was a job
best done during lunch breaks (or weekends, in some cases) at one of my
previous jobs. Of course, that was a college campus with a fairly flat network
and literally hundreds of HP printers... 

 

My only concern with Webjetadmin is the
reliance on something that has already proven vulnerable to an attack that will
continue to be frequent. (CodeRed and IIS worms in general). Granted, you could
do a lot more damage running hpdwnld and doing some "specific things"
during a firmware upgrade, but at least that was not related to any common IIS
exploit or other internet worm.

 

-Tim VanDeWalle 
Information
Systems/Product Testing 
Evergreen Technologies, Inc 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original
Message-----
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

Except that it is extremely slow.

 

-Original
Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

WebJet Admin beats the
hell out of the old JetAdmin app

-Original
Message-
From: Michael Plotsker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Mikelist (E-mail)
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

they are discontinuing
jetadmin not jetdirect. the replacement for the jetadmin software is
webjetadmin.

 

-- 
Michael D. Plotsker 
Technology
Consultant 
KJ Technology
Consulting, Inc. 
T.
718-575-1595 
C.
917-406-4215 
F.
212-202-5013 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

-Original
Message-
From: Juned Shaikh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Jetdirect substitute

Hi
guys,

 

I
heard that HP is discontinuing Jetdirect and is goign
to roll-out some something else? Has anybody heard about this.. How
are you guys gearing up for that. We had some unresolve issues with Jetdirect
on MCluster servers. Thanks,

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Jetdirect substitute

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Ah….  Thanks.  J

 

-Original Message-
From: Sullivan, Glenn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
2:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

Print the test page, by pushing the little
button in the back...

 

Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I  MCDBA 
David Clark Company Inc. 

-Original
Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
3:04 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

Ok, one more question.  How do you find the original IP address of the JetDirect
card (i.e. when you buy a new one)? 
I currently use telnet to make my changes as well, but I have to use
JetAdmin (or WebJetAdmin) to find the original IP (which is usually assigned
via DHCP).  After that I make it a
static IP so I can always telnet to it when I need to make changes.

 

-Original
Message-
From: Jim Busick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

telnet



-Original
Message-
From: Allen Crawford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

How do you configure the
JetDirect cards then?

 

-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

I just didn't like JetAdmin so I switched to TCP/IP printing.

 

Regards,

 

Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-Original
Message-
From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
9:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

We
'geared up' for it by using TCP/IP printing instead of the JetAdmin
app.

 

-Jim

 

 

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Network Engineer 
Advertising.com 

Anytime, anywhere, any Internet channel-- we touch tens of millions
online each day. 
Advertising.com--
Superior Technology, Superior Performance. 

 





-Original
Message-
From: Juned Shaikh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Jetdirect substitute

Hi guys,

 

I heard that HP is discontinuing Jetdirect and is goign
to roll-out some something else? Has anybody heard about this.. How
are you guys gearing up for that. We had some unresolve issues with Jetdirect
on MCluster servers. Thanks,

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are
the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or
privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received
this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and
ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender
and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in
error.



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Jetdirect substitute

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Ok, one more question.  How
do you find the original IP address of the JetDirect card (i.e. when you buy a
new one)?  I currently use telnet
to make my changes as well, but I have to use JetAdmin (or WebJetAdmin) to find
the original IP (which is usually assigned via DHCP).  After that I make it a static IP so I can always telnet to
it when I need to make changes.

 

-Original Message-
From: Jim Busick
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
2:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

telnet



-Original
Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
11:56 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

How do you configure the
JetDirect cards then?

 

-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

I just didn't like JetAdmin so I switched to TCP/IP printing.

 

Regards,

 

Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-Original
Message-
From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
9:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

We
'geared up' for it by using TCP/IP printing instead of the JetAdmin
app.

 

-Jim

 

 

Jim Holmgren MCSE, CCNA 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Network Engineer 
Advertising.com 

Anytime, anywhere, any Internet channel-- we touch tens of millions
online each day. 
Advertising.com--
Superior Technology, Superior Performance. 

 





-Original
Message-
From: Juned Shaikh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:12
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Jetdirect substitute

Hi guys,

 

I heard that HP is discontinuing Jetdirect and is goign
to roll-out some something else? Has anybody heard about this.. How
are you guys gearing up for that. We had some unresolve issues with Jetdirect
on MCluster servers. Thanks,

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

DO NOT
read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended
addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged
information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication
in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the
sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the
sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Jetdirect substitute

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









How do you
configure the JetDirect cards then?

 

-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
12:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

I just didn't like JetAdmin so I
switched to TCP/IP printing.

 

Regards,

 

Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: Jim Holmgren
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
9:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

We 'geared up' for it by using TCP/IP
printing instead of the JetAdmin app.

 

-Jim

 

 

Jim Holmgren
MCSE, CCNA 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Network Engineer 
Advertising.com 

Anytime,
anywhere, any Internet channel-- we touch tens of millions online each day. 
Advertising.com--
Superior Technology, Superior Performance. 

 

-Original
Message-
From: Juned Shaikh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Jetdirect substitute

Hi
guys,

 

I
heard that HP is discontinuing Jetdirect and is goign
to roll-out some something else? Has anybody heard about this.. How
are you guys gearing up for that. We had some unresolve issues with Jetdirect
on MCluster servers. Thanks,

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

***
The information transmitted in this email is intended only for
the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this email in error, please contact the
sender and permanently delete the email from any computer.
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.

RE: Jetdirect substitute

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Except that
it is extremely slow.

 

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
12:23 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

 

WebJet Admin beats the hell out of the old
JetAdmin app

-Original Message-
From: Michael Plotsker
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Mikelist (E-mail)
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
10:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Jetdirect substitute

they are discontinuing jetadmin not
jetdirect. the replacement for the jetadmin software is webjetadmin.

 

-- 
Michael D. Plotsker 
Technology
Consultant 
KJ Technology
Consulting, Inc. 
T.
718-575-1595 
C.
917-406-4215 
F.
212-202-5013 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

-Original
Message-
From: Juned Shaikh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
10:12 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Jetdirect substitute

Hi guys,

 

I heard that HP is
discontinuing Jetdirect and is goign to roll-out some something
else? Has anybody heard about this.. How are you guys gearing up for that. We
had some unresolve issues with Jetdirect on MCluster servers. Thanks,

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0





I just tested a PDF on IE 6 (Win2K) and it worked fine. I'm running the full version of Adobe Acrobat 4.05a (not just the reader) but I doubt that makes much of a difference.

 -Original Message-
From:   Andrew Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Tuesday, September 04, 2001 12:49 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: Internet Explorer 6.0


I had/have no problems with Acrobat in IE6 either in Win2K or WinXP


 
- ASB
 



-Original Message-
From: CIGNA DTS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:54 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0



I see several peopl have had no problems with IE 6.0.  Amazing.  Don't you
run Adobe Acrobat Reader?  Never need to read PDF files from web sites?



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: installing NT

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: installing NT





You can enter 4096MB as the first partition with the NT4 SP1 CD, can't remember what build that CD is though.  I'm assuming it is the same with them all...

 -Original Message-
From:   Erich Voigt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Monday, September 03, 2001 4:16 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: installing NT


Hi!


We are GMT+2 so I am only now reading your conversation!


You don't need any fdisk.  a blank disk is best place to start. Boot from CD
(or 3 stiffies) and it will self detect that nothing is set up.


It will then ask you to define partitions and when you play along, it will
give you the option to use the whole disk as the partition BUT (I think this
has changed but my server CD build 1381 I think) will allow a maximum of 2GB
as the first partition else you get that message you mentioned.


You can increase this partition later using Partition Magic or the like -
there might be other suggestions but I set up our drives as c=2 or 1.5(OS),
f=±50%of remainder for APPS and R:=the rest for Data unless the installation
requires different.


Then remember to do the sup pack (6a) before trying to do fancy NIC's and
Video drivers.


Good Luck


Erich


-Original Message-
From: HADI, ALI (ALI)** CTR ** [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:23 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: installing NT



I'll go over it again tonight and will beat it.  Any tips you give me will
be grateful.  By the way  am designing this "wonderful" dual boot system
with w2k, both clients and both servers on 2 PCs in anticipation of a
company roll out soon ,



thanks


-Message d'origine-
De: Ryan McBride [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: lundi 3 septembre 2001 09:11
À: NT System Admin Issues
Objet: RE: installing NT




Ok start back at the fdisk. You have obviously done something incorrect in
FDISK


-Original Message-
From: HADI, ALI (ALI)** CTR ** [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ]
Sent: Monday, 3 September 2001 4:55 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: installing NT



well quite simply there a blue screen, physical mem dump etc > fdisked it
all, formated drives > tried to re-install and that's when things started
going wrong !




-Message d'origine-
De: Ryan McBride [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  ]


Date: lundi 3 septembre 2001 08:52
À: NT System Admin Issues
Objet: RE: installing NT




Its harddrive dependant. Try seeing if you have an Auto Detect Feature for
you HDD's. If your not sure then maybe you need to get someone onsite to
give you a little more help. It sounds like a HDD Config Prob though. Only
other thing is u mentioned, it was running nt4 until it crashed and had to
format it. Can you be a little more specific about what happened.


Thanx


Ryan


-Original Message-
From: HADI, ALI (ALI)** CTR ** [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  > ]
Sent: Monday, 3 September 2001 4:42 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: installing NT



what should they be ideally ?



-Message d'origine-
De: Ryan McBride [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  > ]


Date: lundi 3 septembre 2001 08:43
À: NT System Admin Issues
Objet: RE: installing NT




check BIOS settings for the HDD. Sounds like your settings are wrong


-Original Message-
From: HADI, ALI (ALI)** CTR ** [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >
< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > > ]
Sent: Monday, 3 September 2001 4:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: installing NT




Hi guys,


This maybe little easy for some, but I am trying to install NT server &
wkstation on a Dell PC > after starting the instal I get an error msg that
my cylinder size is over the recommended size (1024) and halts the instal.
Can someone pls advise, I installed NT before ok until the crash happened
and I had to format and start again !!


thanks



Best Regards / Meilleures salutations
 <<...OLE_Obj...>>
Ali Hadi
Compaq EUS Technicien
Lucent Technologies
16 Avenue Descartes
92350 Plessis Robinson
France
Tel : 00 331 41 28 5596  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 >
< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

< http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
 > >


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Screen Saver to Lock Workstation

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Screen Saver to Lock Workstation









With
NT/2000 a password protected screensaver = locked workstation.

 

-Original Message-
From: Ryan McBride
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001
10:33 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Screen Saver to Lock
Workstation

 

Hey All, 

Just wondering if anyone knows of a screen saver
or something that will lock a NT Workstation if it isnt used for X minutes. We
have a machine behind reception which is used for DB Queries and everyone
always leaves it loged in. Ive decided to make it hard for them by having the
workstation lock if they dont use it for 5 minutes. That way the next person to
use it will have to track down the previous user to unlock it. Im sure the
annoyance will fix it REALLY quick!!!

Any ideas how i could achieve this, i dont want
a screensaver password i want the workstation locked. 

Tanx 

- - 
Ryan McBride
(MCSE) 
Network &
Comms Administrator 
Strategic
Management Works 
http://www.smw.com.au 
+612-9906-9611 


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









What exactly is the problem with McAfee and IE6?

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001
11:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

 

Got this from Lockergnome Tech Specialist:


IE6 and McAfee No less than four readers
wrote in to complain about Internet Explorer 6 and McAfee virus scanning
software. While I don't consider this a Microsoft problem, some might. Norton
AV seems to work just fine on one of my systems, but I can't personally speak
for McAfee. Tread lightly around the issue, as their support has told two of
those that wrote in very bluntly that they should simply reinstall IE 5.5x.
That's a complete cop-out in my book. There was plenty of lead-time on IE6 for
McAfee to get their act together, so I don't think there's any excuse for not
having an update available. Just wanted to warn you. 



From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 15:49 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Hmmm...No 
We have done a test rollout here to about 6 WKs. Nobody has
reported any 
issues yet. 

-Original
Message- 
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:39 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Well, a
couple of us have installed IE 6.0 and we seem to be having 
frame problems. Pages display ads, but not the text just like when
we 
print them sometimes. And on some, we get the text, but no
sidebars. Any 
ideas? 

Murray 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IE6 released

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: IE6 released









Well, when
I installed it here good ol’ Windows File Protection kicked in and kept asking
me for my Service Pack 2 CD, which of course does not exist.  I installed it off my local hard drive
and the files are still there, yet it prompts me for a CD that doesn’t exist
and doesn’t give me the option of browsing to a local or network folder or even
tell me what file it is looking for. 
Maybe Microsoft will fix this with SP3…

 

-Original Message-
From: Phillips, Glen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:45
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IE6 released

 

It's to do with Windows File Protection. I
can only assume that, as the base install files are in the dllcache area, any
customisation that changes what Windows expects to see would get replaced by
the 'original' files.

 

File protection is a good idea but seems
to still need a few tweaks yet.

 

-Original
Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 30 August 2001
20:15
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IE6 released

I was wondering, Allen,
what do you think of the customised IE6 install restriction on Windows2000 and
XP?

 

I also had the same
problem with W2K sp2.

 

-Original
Message-----
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
12:11 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: IE6 released

The
customized install does not work if you are running Windows 2000 and probably
Windows XP.  Only 9x, ME, and NT give you that option.  Very stupid
if you ask me, but hey, no one asked me right?

 -Original
Message- 
From:   Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:41 AM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject:    RE: IE6
released 

Strange, I
aborted 3 attempts as I was never offered the opportunity to do 
a customized install.  I know that's how I did it on the
previous few IE 
downloads.  However, I ran the app, looked over all the
dialog boxes, 
clicked the license agreement, and -POOF!- it appeared to have
started 
doing the install. 

For others
with similar experiences, does it download several files 
_before_ offering the chance for a custom install?  (Like I
said, I aborted 
the process after it appeared to be doing a regular install.) 

>No need
for a command line, run the install file in place, select customised 
>install and then select full download, install later under
advanced after 
>selecting all opsys's you want to install to. 

 

>thing
that wasn't so clear was how to invoke a corporate download only 
>version of the setup.  After some diggin, here is the
syntax to run after 
>you download the ie6setup.exe file. 
> 
>ie6setup.exe /c:"ie6wzd.exe /d
/s:""E#"


 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









I’m not having any problems and have no garbage apps…

 

-Original Message-
From: Greg Page
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
4:07 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

 

I've been running 6.x for a month and
haven't had any problem. maybe it's your your setup and some other garbage apps
you're running

 

Greg

-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
5:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

I'm not sure if this has anything to do with you or
Murray's problem, but I read an article about QuickTime not working correctly
and just searched the eWeek news archives for it and found this (not the one I
read originally, but an updated one).

 

http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2806938,00.html

 

 

-Original
Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
3:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

 

I just installed over IE 5.5, no file
associations carried over.  Go to joblo's movie trailers.  nothing
plays.  :(  LOL

~ 
Jeff Rogers,    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Operation & Maintenance 
Information Technology Services -  Room 20 
1501 S. Oak 
Champaign, IL 61820 
Desk:  217-244-8013    Pager: 
217-265-3682 
 
    Work like you don't need the money. 
    Love like you've never been hurt. 
    Dance like nobody is watching. 
 

 

-Original Message- 
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 15:49 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Hmmm...No 
We have done a test rollout here to about 6 WKs. Nobody has
reported any 
issues yet. 

-Original Message- 
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:39 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Well, a couple of us have installed IE 6.0
and we seem to be having 
frame problems. Pages display ads, but not the text just like when
we 
print them sometimes. And on some, we get the text, but no
sidebars. Any 
ideas? 

Murray 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









I’ve yet to even try a QuickTime link.  Heck, I don’t even have QuickTime installed on this PC.  I hate QuickTime.

 

-Original Message-
From: David James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
4:21 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

 

I got a message from Quicktime saying it
needed to repair the association, it fixed it and went on...

-Original
Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
4:01 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

I'm not
sure if this has anything to do with you or Murray's problem, but I read an
article about QuickTime not working correctly and just searched the eWeek news
archives for it and found this (not the one I read originally, but an updated
one).

 

http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2806938,00.html

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
3:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

 

I just installed over IE 5.5, no file associations carried
over.  Go to joblo's movie trailers.  nothing plays.  :( 
LOL

~ 
Jeff Rogers,    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Operation & Maintenance 
Information Technology Services -  Room 20 
1501 S. Oak 
Champaign, IL 61820 
Desk:  217-244-8013    Pager: 
217-265-3682 
 
    Work like you don't need the money. 
    Love like you've never been hurt. 
    Dance like nobody is watching. 
 

 

-Original Message- 
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 15:49 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Hmmm...No

We have done a test rollout here to about 6 WKs. Nobody has
reported any 
issues yet. 

-Original Message- 
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:39 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Well, a couple of us have installed IE 6.0 and we seem to be
having 
frame problems. Pages display ads, but not the text just like when
we 
print them sometimes. And on some, we get the text, but no
sidebars. Any 
ideas? 

Murray 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0









I’m not
sure if this has anything to do with you or Murray’s problem, but I read an
article about QuickTime not working correctly and just searched the eWeek news
archives for it and found this (not the one I read originally, but an updated
one).

 

http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2806938,00.html

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Rogers, Jeff L (O&M)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001
3:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0

 

I just installed over IE 5.5, no file associations carried
over.  Go to joblo's movie trailers.  nothing plays.  :( 
LOL

~ 
Jeff Rogers,    [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Operation & Maintenance 
Information Technology Services -  Room 20 
1501 S. Oak 
Champaign, IL 61820 
Desk:  217-244-8013    Pager: 
217-265-3682 
 
    Work like you don't need the money. 
    Love like you've never been hurt. 
    Dance like nobody is watching. 
 

 

-Original Message- 
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 15:49 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Hmmm...No

We have done a test rollout here to about 6 WKs. Nobody has
reported any 
issues yet. 

-Original Message- 
From: Murray Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:39 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Internet Explorer 6.0 

 

Well, a couple of us have installed IE 6.0 and we seem to be
having 
frame problems. Pages display ads, but not the text just like when
we 
print them sometimes. And on some, we get the text, but no
sidebars. Any 
ideas? 

Murray 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: IE6 released

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: IE6 released





The customized install does not work if you are running Windows 2000 and probably Windows XP.  Only 9x, ME, and NT give you that option.  Very stupid if you ask me, but hey, no one asked me right?

 -Original Message-
From:   Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, August 30, 2001 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: IE6 released


Strange, I aborted 3 attempts as I was never offered the opportunity to do 
a customized install.  I know that's how I did it on the previous few IE 
downloads.  However, I ran the app, looked over all the dialog boxes, 
clicked the license agreement, and -POOF!- it appeared to have started 
doing the install.


For others with similar experiences, does it download several files 
_before_ offering the chance for a custom install?  (Like I said, I aborted 
the process after it appeared to be doing a regular install.)


>No need for a command line, run the install file in place, select customised
>install and then select full download, install later under advanced after
>selecting all opsys's you want to install to.



>thing that wasn't so clear was how to invoke a corporate download only
>version of the setup.  After some diggin, here is the syntax to run after
>you download the ie6setup.exe file.
>
>ie6setup.exe /c:"ie6wzd.exe /d /s:""E#"



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Hi !

[Allen Crawford]

Depends on
whether they are even American or not.

 

-Original Message-
From: Kelly Borndale
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:12
PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Hi !

 

Read the rest of the therad.  I
figured it as spam, but apparently not.  So now my wondering is are the
virus-coders ever going to get a clue and put things into flowing English.

 


K.Borndale

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-home email




-
Original Message - 



From: Jonathan




To: NT System Admin Issues 

Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001
6:01 PM

Subject: RE: Hi
!

 

Anyone know
what this does? I have not found out and don't feel like going
to the web page.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 5:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Hi !


Hi, how are you ? I am fine here. Please read the page xxx to get some
knowledge and prevent somebody hack you. Forword this mail to help all your
friends too.

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Icelandic Keyboard

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Could anyone that goes buy me two keyboards?  J

 

-Original Message-
From: Correa, Andre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:07
PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Icelandic Keyboard

 

OK, I have
never been there, but now want to go. 
Can we make it an onsite visit? 
If not, what about a road trip?

 

-Original
Message-
From: Don Ely
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:02
PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Icelandic Keyboard

 

It's very beautiful
there!.  I spent a year and a half there in the early 90's.  

-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001
12:00 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Icelandic Keyboard

It is beautiful there.  I know
someone there, but have yet to visit. :o(

 

-Original Message-
From: Networking Team
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001
10:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Icelandic Keyboard

What a beautiful country, I was there for
2 yearsand unless you know someone there, I would think it would quite
diffucult to find the keyboard

-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:07
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Icelandic Keyboard

Iceland?

-Original Message-----
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:54
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT: Icelandic Keyboard

Does anyone know where I
can order an Icelandic Keyboard?  I guess it is a 102-key international
keyboard, ISO 8859-1.  I'm in the US by the way, but this is for one of
our machines that we are selling.  Thanks for any help.

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

OT: Icelandic Keyboard

[Allen Crawford]

Title: OT: Icelandic Keyboard





Does anyone know where I can order an Icelandic Keyboard?  I guess it is a 102-key international keyboard, ISO 8859-1.  I'm in the US by the way, but this is for one of our machines that we are selling.  Thanks for any help.


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Code Red Rant

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Code Red Rant





Can't you access them over the LAN behind a firewall?


 -Original Message-
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: Code Red Rant



Kevin,


read my post: In my situation, I had to put the server online to get access
to the patches. Maybe MS should be mailing these services packs out the way
AOL sends out free access promo CD's .


--Charles



   
    Kevin Lundy    
    
    ewise.com>    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
  cc:  
    08/23/2001    Subject: RE: Code Red Rant   
    09:51 AM   
   Please  
    respond to "NT 
    System Admin   
    Issues"    
   
   





Don't take this the wrong way, but why was your server on a public network
before it was ready?


-Original Message-
From: Luke Brumbaugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:48 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: OT:Code Red Rant



Last night I am building a test box for 2000 AD.  I had to format a 2nd
drive to load AD and stuff.  It was going to take a while so I left and
went
home.  When I got in this morning, I had messages from other people saying
that they had got the code red.  I hadn't even got to the updates yet.
What
a pain!  So now I am rebuilding.  Will other people please fix this.  It is
such a pain, our logs are filled with hundreds of ip addresses trying to
infect us.  We got spam abuse, why can't we have a place that puts people's
ip in for not fixing their virus problems!





Luke L. Brumbaugh
System Administrator,MCSE
Ultryx Corporation



Enterprise Channel Management Software for Manufacturers
Visit us at http://www.ultryx.com



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm







http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Quick Launch toolbar

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Quick Launch toolbar









So it is
indeed possible to do a download only when you have Windows 2000?  J  Yet another IE
gripe for me.  Thanks for the tip.  You can use the advanced options on any
Win 9x/ME system and do a download only to get the full download but not on Win
2000…not sure why.

 

-Original Message-
From: Sean Martin
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001
1:39 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Launch toolbar

 

Something else that is helpful, which most
of you might already know, is obtaining the full download of IE5.5 sp2 and
not just the quick install.

 

Download the ie5setup.exe. From the
command line, execute c:\\ie5setup.exe /c:ie5wzd.exe /d
/s:#E  

 

Regards,

 

Sean Martin, MCSE
Network Administrator
Ribelin Lowell & Company
Insurance Brokers, Inc.
3111 C Street, Suite 300
Anchorage, Alaska 99503
Ph: (907) 561-1250
Fax: (907) 561-4315
Cell: (907) 229-0885
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original
Message-
From: Donna Jackson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001
10:28 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Launch toolbar

Jeff, 
Don't know for sure if it will work with 5.5, but it works great with
5.0.  It has saved me a lot of timenot having to install IE4
FIRSTthen 5.0, just to get silly toolbar!!  Not sure what the setup
file is for 5.5, but try with those switches if ie5setup doesn't work with 5.5.

Donna
Jackson, MCSE 
Network Manager 
Shark Technology, Inc. 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 





-Original
Message- 
From: Jeff Schuckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:22 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: RE: Quick Launch toolbar 

 

Thanks to all
for the replies!  

Donna: 
Thanks for the command  - I'll give it a try!  Since I'm already 
on IE5.5, this sounds like the best solution. 

Martin,
thanks for confirming it was in IE4.  I knew I didn't specifically 
install it before - it was just there.  I thought I was
loosing it. 
Although one would think that most features would continue in
upgraded 
versions unless there was a severe problem with it... 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




DO NOT read, copy or disseminate this communication unless you are the intended addressee. This e-mail communication contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you have received this communication in error, please call us immediately at (907) 561-1250 and ask to speak to the sender of the communication. Also, please e-mail the sender and notify the sender immediately that you have received the communication in error.

RE: Quick Launch toolbar

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Quick Launch toolbar









Wow…this
would’ve saved me some time in the past.

 

-Original Message-
From: Donna Jackson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001
12:32 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Quick Launch toolbar

 

Actually, you can install active desktop and quick launch toolbar
with the following command.  Just navigate to directory where you have IE
installed and run this command:

ie5setup.exe /q /c:"ie5wzd /I:Y /S:""#e""
" 

Someone posted it to this list a few months ago, and it worked
perfectly for me. 

Donna Jackson, MCSE 
Network Manager 
Shark Technology, Inc. 
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 

-Original Message- 
From: Jeff Schuckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:26 PM 
To: NT System Admin Issues 
Subject: Quick Launch toolbar 

 

I've restaged an NT 4.0 Server (ugh) for testing a software
package we 
want to use.  It's a fresh copy of NT, applied SP6a and all
upgrades, 
hotfixes I could find, but I cannot find out how to activate or
add the 
option for the Quick Launch toolbar. I've searched the archives
& technet 
and found nothing pertaining to this. Does anyone know how I can
set it 
up? 

Thanks! 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm 

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Quick Launch toolbar

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Quick Launch toolbar





Except you must install IE 4 first.  IE 5 doesn't give you the option.  I was hoping they'd fix this in the IE 6 installer.  Of course, now I don't care since we don't use NT 4 anymore, not fresh installs anyway.

 -Original Message-
From:   Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: Quick Launch toolbar


Active Desktop...  IE4 and up.


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schuckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Quick Launch toolbar



I've restaged an NT 4.0 Server (ugh) for testing a software package we
want to use.  It's a fresh copy of NT, applied SP6a and all upgrades,
hotfixes I could find, but I cannot find out how to activate or add the
option for the Quick Launch toolbar. I've searched the archives &
technet and found nothing pertaining to this. Does anyone know how I can
set it up?


Thanks!


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Quick Launch toolbar

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Quick Launch toolbar





IE 4 should be on the NT Option Pack CD.


 -Original Message-
From:   Clayton Doige [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:22 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: Quick Launch toolbar


Did Active Desktop get installed? I found a couple of years ago that
depending on the version of IE installed, you may not get Active Desktop
installed, and thus no quick launch tool bar. This I noticed when going from
IE 4 to 5. If you have an old IE 4 CD, you could remove IE from your NT box,
install IE 4 with the Active Desktop, then add in what ever version of IE
you want, of course all followed by re-applying sp6a.


Clayton Doige 
IT Manager MCSE, MCP + I
Gameday International N.V. 
Bound in a nutshell, King of infinite space... 


T: +5 999 736 0309 
C: +5 999 563 1845 
F: +5 999 733 1259 
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 



-Original Message-
From: Jeff Schuckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Quick Launch toolbar


I've restaged an NT 4.0 Server (ugh) for testing a software package we
want to use.  It's a fresh copy of NT, applied SP6a and all upgrades,
hotfixes I could find, but I cannot find out how to activate or add the
option for the Quick Launch toolbar. I've searched the archives & technet
and found nothing pertaining to this. Does anyone know how I can set it
up?


Thanks!


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Quick Launch toolbar

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: Quick Launch toolbar





You'll need to install good old IE 4 to get the ActiveX desktop stuff.


 -Original Message-
From:   Jeff Schuckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    Quick Launch toolbar


I've restaged an NT 4.0 Server (ugh) for testing a software package we
want to use.  It's a fresh copy of NT, applied SP6a and all upgrades,
hotfixes I could find, but I cannot find out how to activate or add the
option for the Quick Launch toolbar. I've searched the archives & technet
and found nothing pertaining to this. Does anyone know how I can set it
up?


Thanks!


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: log off

[Allen Crawford]

Title: RE: log off





There's one policy that shuts off logoff on the start menu only (including the ability to display the "Log Off Username" option) and a separate option that gets all the other bases.  Actually, the second one said it turns off the ability to log off the system in any manner, but it leaves the start menu thing alone, so you have to disable it in both spots.

 -Original Message-
From:   Marty Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent:   Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:31 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:    RE: log off


What about Ctrl+Alt+Del, that gets you the option to logoff as well.  Does
the policy prevent you from doing that?


-
Marty Nelson, MCSE, MCP+I, A+
Network Administrator
Transdyn Controls, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-


PLEASE NOTE: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Reader Is
Not Directly Observing This Email, It May Cease to Exist or Will Exist Only
in a Vague and Undetermined State.



-Original Message-
From: Richard McClary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 7:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: log off



IIRC, one used to be able to set up a policy that would disable permission 
to shut down.  Doing this, it seems, also kept folks from logging off (as 
they had to hit "shut down" in order to log off).


If this still holds, create a group for this user and apply this policy.


At 09:09 AM 8/22/2001 -0500, you wrote:


>Does anyone know of a way to prevent a specific user from logging off the 
>system?
>http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


--
Richard D. McClary    | Systems Administrator
ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center    | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1717 S. Philo Rd, Suite 36, Urbana, IL| (217) 337-5030 ext. 261



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: log off

[Allen Crawford]

Title: Message









Just
trying to make a certain user not be able to log off.  Don’t ask me why, it is for one of our software
engineers.  We sell mail sorting/barcoding
 machines and apparently they don’t
want the machine operator to be able to log off.  They are allowing them to reboot or shutdown though.  Of course, I’ve never used the group policy
editor before so now I just need to figure out how to apply this to one user
and not the whole system.

 

-Original Message-
From: Ian Kelly
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001
9:18 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: log off

 

Policies?

What exactly
are you trying to achieve?

 

 

Ian 

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---


History does not repeat itself. Historians
repeat each other. - Arthur Balfour (1848-1930) 

-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 22 August 2001 10:09
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: log off

Does anyone know of a
way to prevent a specific user from logging off the system?

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: log off

[Allen Crawford]

Title: log off









Please
ignore this.  I found it in the
group policy editor.

 

-Original Message-
From: Allen Crawford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 9:09
AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: log off

 

Does anyone know of a way to prevent a specific
user from logging off the system?

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm




http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

log off

[Allen Crawford]

Title: log off





Does anyone know of a way to prevent a specific user from logging off the system?


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm