Re: Router connection issue
One firewall with DMZ no other equip needed. Netscreen 10 would work. Ext interface to router, Int interface to your LAN, DMZ to other LAN. This would give you firewall protection between all interfaces plus NAT. Around 3k. The real problem will be...what to do with the leftover Cisco 1720 T1. Saved enough to pay for the new firewall in 60days. Keith - Original Message - From: Greg Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:40 PM Subject: RE: Router connection issue The 1720's only support one WIC, so I think your only option is to get a switch (catalyst 2912 comes to mind) where you can set VLANs up and hang firewalls between the two companies. You get the connectivity with the protection, but it will not be free. Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Router connection issue Basically, we have two fully functional networks, both with Cisco 1720 routers. We want to keep the networks separate and only want to be able to use a single T-1 instead of separate T-1s. Both routers and T-1 connections are in the same wiring closet. What I would like to do is use some sort of switch for both routers to plug into and from the switch, plug into the single T-1. We originally had their network connected to our and had all sorts of issues between our NT4 servers and their Win2K servers, which is why they went with a separate router and T-1. HTH, Pat Pat Marshall Systems Administrator Microsoft Certified Professional Flying Rhinoceros 1440 NW Overton Street Portland, OR 97209 (503) 552-8700 (503) 221-7282 (Fax) Steven.Beckwith@lsa -assoc.com To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/28/01 02:01 PM cc: Please respond to Subject: RE: Router connection issue NT System Admin Issues I don't know what a white Russian is but it sounds good for a Friday. Don't start a whole discussion on it - enough noise already. 1) the T-1 is a digital line that connects to a CSU/DSU (serial connection) on your router. As Jason points out, CSU's can be internal or external and I suspect you have an internal WIC card similar to his set up which is why there may be confusion. Although you may have an RJ-45 connector and a regular patch cord (you could actually use a regular phone line), it is NOT an ethernet type connection, so only one router can host this connection (You could opt for a THIRD router in your solution). 2) you are also going to need to know about how many real (outside) IP addresses you have and whether you intend to share them (NAT - Network address translation) or whether you will redirect them (PAT - Port address translation). A few other questions come to mind. Is there any inbound traffic that needs to be directed to a specific box (www, smtp) i.e. Do you or the other company want to have exchange servers or web servers accessible from the internet (in which case you will need dedicated static outside IP addresses for each service) or do you both still get mail via pop3, (in which case maybe you can get by with NAT). How many nodes each office, what types of routers are these? I like the idea of sharing resources to keep costs down, but I need to say AMEN to the Firewalling suggestion, esp. to protect your network from theirs and vice versa (as well as obviously - the outside). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Router connection issue -Original Message- From: Jason Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Router connection issue Where is the csu/dsu in your layout? You need one of them to talk from the t1 to the router. All of my routers were purchased with the WICT1-DSU built in so I just terminate there. If you have an external csu like from Adtran you need the cable going from the csu to the router, depending on the interface. Here's what I would recommend to segment the networks from each other. Make sure your router has 2 ethernet ports, set one port up on their network and the other on your network. Setup a loopback port and route anything going from network A to network B to that loopback and vice versa, but anything going to and from the Internet would be routed properly. Alsoit's really really really necessary to setup some sort of firewall. Perhaps that's where you can do your routing from network to internet. Setup a Linux box with 3 NICs, 1 for each network and 1 for the
Re: Router connection issue
both - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:24 PM Subject: RE: Router connection issue What type of interface does the Netscreen use? Command, Web, ? -Original Message- From: Keith Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:05 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Router connection issue One firewall with DMZ no other equip needed. Netscreen 10 would work. Ext interface to router, Int interface to your LAN, DMZ to other LAN. This would give you firewall protection between all interfaces plus NAT. Around 3k. The real problem will be...what to do with the leftover Cisco 1720 T1. Saved enough to pay for the new firewall in 60days. Keith - Original Message - From: Greg Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 10:40 PM Subject: RE: Router connection issue The 1720's only support one WIC, so I think your only option is to get a switch (catalyst 2912 comes to mind) where you can set VLANs up and hang firewalls between the two companies. You get the connectivity with the protection, but it will not be free. Greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 5:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Router connection issue Basically, we have two fully functional networks, both with Cisco 1720 routers. We want to keep the networks separate and only want to be able to use a single T-1 instead of separate T-1s. Both routers and T-1 connections are in the same wiring closet. What I would like to do is use some sort of switch for both routers to plug into and from the switch, plug into the single T-1. We originally had their network connected to our and had all sorts of issues between our NT4 servers and their Win2K servers, which is why they went with a separate router and T-1. HTH, Pat Pat Marshall Systems Administrator Microsoft Certified Professional Flying Rhinoceros 1440 NW Overton Street Portland, OR 97209 (503) 552-8700 (503) 221-7282 (Fax) Steven.Beckwith@lsa -assoc.com To: NT System Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/28/01 02:01 PM cc: Please respond to Subject: RE: Router connection issue NT System Admin Issues I don't know what a white Russian is but it sounds good for a Friday. Don't start a whole discussion on it - enough noise already. 1) the T-1 is a digital line that connects to a CSU/DSU (serial connection) on your router. As Jason points out, CSU's can be internal or external and I suspect you have an internal WIC card similar to his set up which is why there may be confusion. Although you may have an RJ-45 connector and a regular patch cord (you could actually use a regular phone line), it is NOT an ethernet type connection, so only one router can host this connection (You could opt for a THIRD router in your solution). 2) you are also going to need to know about how many real (outside) IP addresses you have and whether you intend to share them (NAT - Network address translation) or whether you will redirect them (PAT - Port address translation). A few other questions come to mind. Is there any inbound traffic that needs to be directed to a specific box (www, smtp) i.e. Do you or the other company want to have exchange servers or web servers accessible from the internet (in which case you will need dedicated static outside IP addresses for each service) or do you both still get mail via pop3, (in which case maybe you can get by with NAT). How many nodes each office, what types of routers are these? I like the idea of sharing resources to keep costs down, but I need to say AMEN to the Firewalling suggestion, esp. to protect your network from theirs and vice versa (as well as obviously - the outside). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Router connection issue -Original Message- From: Jason Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 1:47 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Router connection issue Where is the csu/dsu in your layout? You need one of them to talk from the t1 to the router. All of my routers were purchased with the WICT1-DSU built in so I just terminate there. If you have an external csu like from Adtran you
RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?
Title: IIS and CA in 2000 One rule needed to:NT System Admin Issues that's all you need all messages will be sorted -Original Message-From: Craig Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:24 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN? Any chance we can have a [NTADMIN] type part in the subject header to ease outlook sorting. I currently have three rules which pick out the messages. Craig -Original Message-From: Stu Sjouwerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 26 September 2001 12:28To: NT System Admin IssuesCc: stuhomeSubject: [LIST ADMIN MESSAGE] New on NTSYSADMIN?Importance: High New on NTSYSADMIN? Here are a few "Administrivia" pointers. 1) Lurk for a week before you dive into threads. 2) SecureIIS nailed down our Lyris server a bit too much. Unsubs were sometimes impossible. We think we got that fixed now. 3) Check Andrew Baker's FAQ before you ask a question. I have added it to the footer. 4) Filter all postings into a folder with an outlook rule. Sort by thread. Delete whole threads that are not interesting. 5) We have asearchable archive. You can get there via the "unsub link" in the footer. And remember these golden rules: ON TOPIC, NO NOISE, andFRIENDLY. Thanks. Stu Want to unsub? Do that here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=englishNeed a good FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ This E-Mail is confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not /par disclose or use the information contained in it. If you received this e-Mail in error, please contact the sender /par immediately and delete the document. This e-Mail is for information purposes only and is not intended to be relied upon /par or used as a substitute for the medical advice of physicians. Specific advice should always be sought on any individual /par matter, in particular matters relating to the addressee's health and any symptoms that may require diagnosis or medical /par attention. /par Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
RE: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay
Title: Exchange 5.5 & Preventing Mail Relay Sherry, Open IMS, routing tab, select "routing restrictions", check "hosts clients that successfully authenticate". After doing this all POP3 clients will need to check the box that says "my server requires authentication". That's all there is to it. If your POP3 clients have static addresses you could allow POP3relayingfrom thoseaddresses also. Keith JohnsonInformation Systems ManagerPulaski County DSS[EMAIL PROTECTED]Voice - 540.980.7920Cell - 540.616.6444Fax - 540.980.7993 -Original Message-From: Abercrombie, Sherry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:15 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Exchange 5.5 Preventing Mail Relay Hi all, I've got a situation that I need to resolve would like to do it without having to call MS :) I have Exchange 5.5 sp 4 (NT 4.0 sp 6), that has routing enabled for POP3/IMAP4 support. I have gone through every MS Tech Net article that I can find on how to setup Exchange to not relay mail and have not been able to get it setup correctly. Right now there is an outsourced Linux box in front of the Exchange server that checks for mail being relayed. My organization wants to get rid of that box because we are paying a monthly fee for it that should be unnecessary because Exchange is supposed to be able to do this. If anyone has any input/experience/advice on this I would really appreciate it. Sherry Abercrombie Want to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
RE: Backup Slow
Title: Backup Slow Should we not verify??? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:04 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Slow Read the logs and compare it to an old log. -Original Message-From: William Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:26 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Backup Slow Check under the job-- Advanced tab Make sure "Verify after backup completes" isn't checked. That would definitely double the time. W -Original Message-From: Dominick Romano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:32 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Backup Slow Hello, we backup our servers with a Dell DLT 7000 7 Slot Tape Drive, using Veritas Backup Exec. Ver. 8. For some strange reason it is taking double the amount of time to backup than it used to. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks. Dominick Romano Junior NT Administrator Kravet Fabrics, Inc. Tel: 516-293-2000 Ext: 637 Fax: 516-293-2158 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Want to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/Want to unsub? Do that here:http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsubNeed a good FAQ? Try this one first:http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
RE: satellite connection
Starband has a new version called 360. It uses USB or Ethernet. Use the ethernet connection with a DSL/Cable router (Linksys BEFSR41) it works great. (well OK, great for satellite) HTH -Original Message- From: Dennis Atherton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:24 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: satellite connection The offering from Radio Shack / MSN is the same service as Starband, but they make you buy the complete computer. They don't want to be liable for computer problems. The Starband Offering uses a USB box, to act as transmitter and receiver. Goes to a dish that does 2-way communications. DirectPC - the Hughes satellite offering - had for 2 years offered Sat Downloads, with a 56K modem for uploads. They are now offering 2-way communications - with SAT both ways, but are much more restrictive on what you can use it for. Hope this helps. Dennis -Original Message- From: Joe L. Casale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:20 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: satellite connection msn has one, but they make you buy it through radio shack, and right now, only w/ a new Compaq. Jlc Ps. There is a service in NYC as my friend has one, he states it gives about 6mb down! But only 33.6 kb up. -Original Message- From: Matt Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:41 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: satellite connection anyone have any exp with satellite internet conn. I keep hearing MS has a service but haven't been able to find any info. Matt Moore MCSE, MCP+I, NCSS, HP Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/ Want to unsub? Do that here: http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=unsub Need a good FAQ? Try this one first: http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/
Re: Ideas for firewall
Title: Message too slow - Original Message - From: Ross Wakelin To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:31 PM Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall It works, what more can you ask --Ross Wakelin - Independent Information Technology ConsultantTel: +64 (0)3 3433186 Fax: +64 (0)3 3433196Cell: +64 (0)21 334380 -Original Message-From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 21:15To: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewallAnyone has any opinions oncheckpoint one firewall-1? At 12:52 PM 9/24/2001 -0700, you wrote: would you be interested in this one? -Original Message- From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:31 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall Sonicwall is great, we are a reseller and currently have 10 clients using them. Darrin Carter CNE, MCP+I, MCSE Senior Systems Engineer Elegrity, Inc. 415.821.0900 (main) 415.826.7758 (fax) 415.726.0413 (direct) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elegrity.com -Original Message- From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:45 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Ideas for firewall I use the Sonicwall pro that would fit your needs and will do vpn also. I have to upgrade to Cisco equipment and will be getting a 515 pix. Check out sonicwall.com Arthur Negrete [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Ideas for firewall Hey Guys, I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall. And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of a stateful one. Met vriendelijke groet, M. Eindhoven W2K System Administrator Bevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 http://www.bevelander.nl = This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. = http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmMet vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 http://www.bevelander.nl= This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. =Want to unsub? Do that here:http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english Met vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 http://www.bevelander.nl= This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s).
RE: Ideas for firewall
WOW,I didn't knowthis was a sales platform. -Original Message-From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:53 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall would you be interested in this one? -Original Message-From: Darrin J. Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 11:31 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall Sonicwall is great, we are a reseller and currently have 10 clients using them. Darrin Carter CNE, MCP+I, MCSE Senior Systems Engineer Elegrity, Inc. 415.821.0900 (main) 415.826.7758 (fax) 415.726.0413 (direct) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.elegrity.com -Original Message-From: Negrete, Arthur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:45 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall I use the Sonicwall pro that would fit your needs and will do vpn also. I have to upgrade to Cisco equipment and will be getting a 515 pix. Check out sonicwall.com Arthur Negrete [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Ideas for firewallHey Guys,I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall.And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of a stateful one. Met vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 http://www.bevelander.nl= This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. =http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm Want to unsub? Do that here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/scripts/lyris.pl?enter=ntsysadmintext_mode=0lang=english
RE: Ideas for firewall
NetScreen...Great solution! Here's a reseller link: www.firstnetsecurity.com good bunch to work with Keith JohnsonInformation Systems ManagerPulaski County DSS[EMAIL PROTECTED]Voice - 540.980.7920Fax - 540.980.7993 -Original Message-From: Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:33 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall Netscreen's are by far the easiest and best solution I've seen. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member "Who's watching your network?" www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax -Original Message-From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 4:55 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Ideas for firewall Hey Guys,I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall.And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of a stateful one. Met vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 http://www.bevelander.nl= This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. =http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
RE: Ideas for firewall
Title: Message If you are looking for a firewallappliance www.netscreen.com It's top of the list except in price. -Original Message-From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:37 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall That's what got me here! Thanks... -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 12:06 PMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall Was it because of my wonderful words in the W2K news, newsletter? :) -Original Message-From: Tim Tullis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:25 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall Just joined this list this AM and am already finding it worthwhile. Smoothwall looks like it's a winner. Thanks Tim Tullis Director, MIS Greater Lexington Chamber of Commerce www.lexchamber.com 859-226-1625 -Original Message-From: Steve Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:22 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall Oh by the way, IT"S FREE... -Original Message-From: Steve Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:15 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Ideas for firewall Try www.smoothwall.org . It rivals the big expensive boxes. -Original Message-From: Martijn Eindhoven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:55 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: Ideas for firewallHey Guys,I'm looking for a good firewall for about 50 w2k servers. What do you guys think is the best setup, per server or one dedicated firewall.And what is according to you guys the best firewall, i'm thinkin of a stateful one. Met vriendelijke groet,M. EindhovenW2K System AdministratorBevelander Internet Services B.V. Folkstoneweg 10 1118 LM SCHIPHOL Zuidoost Tel : 020 40 53 900 Fax : 020 40 53 910 http://www.bevelander.nl= This communication contains information which is confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then destroy any copies of it. =http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
