RE: SMTP server
Thanks for all the ideas everyone. I have some testing to do now. From: Joe Morlino [mailto:islands...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:03 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP server Sorry, typo it's www.stunnell.orghttp://www.stunnell.org ... From: Joe Morlino [mailto:islands...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:58 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SMTP server Greg, You might want to look at STunnel ( http://www.stunnel.com ) The scanner can connect to a machine running Stunnel and then it can send to a SSL SMTP like Gmail Joe Morlino Islands Computer Beaufort, SC From: Lewin, Greg [mailto:le...@infimed.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:42 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SMTP server We have a sister company that recently moved to Hosted Exchange 2010 and no longer have an SMTP server in house. They have a old copier that used to send emails via The old internal Exchange server(5.5). It does not have authentication capabilities, only the ability to send to an IP address. They would like to be able to send mail to their internal users from this device. I have a call into the Hosting company looking for suggestions. I was wondering if you folks might have any ideas. Thanks Greg ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.commailto:listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
Windows Web Server 2008 R2
All, I have a need for a new file server that will only have a few users on it at any given time(Under 5 ). I have an available license for Windows Web Server 2008 R2.I'm looking to save money and thought This might work for the OS. I have never used this version of Windows before and would appreciate any thoughts on whether Or not this is feasible or am I reaching here. Thanks Greg ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe ntsysadmin
RE: Storage server 2003 SLOW!!!
Antivirus? I have seen similar behavior with Vipre on a Windows 2000 Terminal server. From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:55 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Storage server 2003 SLOW!!! I'm confused. (But what's new?) So SK sees the behavior remotely and locally. CF only sees it remotely. That right? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Steve Kelsay kels...@sctax.orgmailto:kels...@sctax.org wrote: No, functionality is the same when on site. DNS looks good, ping times are good. From: Carol Fee [mailto:c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Storage server 2003 SLOW!!! Yes. Also, if you disconnect the RDP session, you can reconnect easily. If you log off or reboot the server, you better have a lot of time to do what you want to do. CFee From: Richard Stovall [mailto:rich...@gmail.commailto:rich...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:36 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Storage server 2003 SLOW!!! The behavior is different if you're physically at the console? On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Carol Fee c...@massbar.orgmailto:c...@massbar.org wrote: I have a Storage Server 2003 and another Server 2003 Standard that takes at least 20 minutes to load the RDP desktop. Once you get there, everything else seems fine. I can't for the life of me figure out why. CFee From: Steve Kelsay [mailto:kels...@sctax.orgmailto:kels...@sctax.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 11:09 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Storage server 2003 SLOW!!! Does anyone else have this problem? Remoting to the server using Remote desktop, the applying Security Settings stays on for 45 minutes, then I can sign on, but the Applying Computer Settings box stays up for another 2-3 hours. Once on the system, a simple thing like a Flash player upgrade (to get a broadband speed test done) takes over an hour. This is on several of these servers. Naturally, all are at remote sites. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
Tape Backup Device suggestions
I'm looking into purchasing a new tape backup device for backing up some file servers. I currently have a 8 slot Quantum Autoloader LTO-2. I'm considering an LTO-4 similar device. Any specific manufacturer better than the others? All my storage is locally attached no NAS or SAN involved. Thanks in advance. Greg ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
NAC Device
We are looking at purchasing a NAC device to ensure compliance on our network. I'm looking for feedback. Are they difficult to manage? What vendor would you recommend? Thanks Greg ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
RE: NAC Device
I really don't know much about the product. I do have some systems that can't have an agent installed on them. Not sure if this applies here. From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 4:52 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: NAC Device Why not the Windows 2008 NAC? Jon On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Lewin, Greg le...@infimed.commailto:le...@infimed.com wrote: We are looking at purchasing a NAC device to ensure compliance on our network. I'm looking for feedback. Are they difficult to manage? What vendor would you recommend? Thanks Greg ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
