RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?

[Stalzer, Jim]

I had this happen recently with a server that had 2 NICs on different
networks, but both listed in DNS.

 

Jim Stalzer

Sr Network Administrator

Administration & Support

Bank Solutions

Fiserv

Office: 605-323-6124

www.fiserv.com

 

From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:59 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?

 

That's not likely an RDP version issue. Sounds more network related. 

I don't have any 2008 on VMWare to test with, though. My 2008 on Hyper-V
have no issues. 

 
-ASB: http://xeesm.com/AndrewBaker
Sent from my Verizon Smartphone



From: "Sam Cayze"  

Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:45:04 -0600

To: NT System Admin Issues

Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?

 

Having a terrible time getting an RDP session open to my first Srv08
server.  Works 50% of the time.  Have to fire up the VMware Console to
connect.  Once I log in through the console, I can then connect to the
Srv08.

 

Firewall is disabled.  ip4 only.

 

???

 



From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:41 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?

That's the same version I have (Win7 ultimate x64).

 

Regards,

 

Michael B. Smith

Consultant and Exchange MVP

http://TheEssentialExchange.com

 

From: Sam Cayze [mailto:sam.ca...@rollouts.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:35 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: What is the latest version of RDP client for Win7?

 

I have 6.1.7600; thought 7.x was out...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
This message is intended only for the persons or entities to which it is
addressed. The information transmitted herein may contain proprietary or
confidential material. Review, reproduction, retransmission, distribution,
disclosure or other use, and any consequent action taken by persons or
entities other than intended recipients, are prohibited and may be unlawful.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this information from
your system and contact the sender. The information contained herein is
subject to change without notice. Although reasonable precautions have been
taken to ensure that no viruses are present, the sender makes no warranty
or guaranty with respect thereto, and is not responsible for any loss or
damage arising from the receipt or use of this e-mail or attachments hereto.

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: VPN's

[Stalzer, Jim]

Title: Message



Read 
the following before deciding to use PPTP.
 
http://www.counterpane.com/pptp-faq.html  

 


Jim 
Stalzer Network Services 
Specialist Precision Computer 
Systems (605) 362-1260 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 17, 
  2001 9:05 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
  VPN's
  What 
  about PPTP?
  

-Original Message-From: Richard Newton 
Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 
6:30 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
VPN's
If 
you are doing NAT at the router before the firewall and Cisco 3005, IPSEC 
won't work.  The problem is that IPSEC doesn't allow you to modify the 
IP address between the endpoints of the tunnel.

  -Original Message-From: Martin Blackstone 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 
  17, 2001 9:08 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: 
  RE: VPN's
  Speaking of VPN's, we just got a Cisco 3005. I'm setting it up 
  now.
  One thing I am confused on. I was planning to give the public side 
  a public IP until I discovered that we are doing NAT through our router 
  rather than through the FW. So would I be correct in assuming I will have 
  to give the public side a NAT'd IP then do NAT through the router for it 
  as well?
  

-Original Message-From: Roger Ali 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 
2001 5:48 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: RE: 
VPN's

Hey you can use 
Netscreen effectively; I've done it for some 
of our smaller sites with about 15 users per site.  It's reliable, but if you have 
some network heavy apps or anything that relies on the connection a lot 
I'd be careful in doing this.  
We've got 2 locations networked with 256K connections via the 
Netscreen which works but its slow.  
If you're only aiming on mail and other light apps then it should 
be fine for you network.
 
Good 
Luck
Roger 
Ali
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
Clark, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 
7:37 AMTo: NT System 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
RE: VPN's
 
Netscreen's are the 
easiest that I've seen. Don't know if you can do it over a Frame Relay - 
don't have any experience on that.
 
Steve 
Clark
Clark 
Systems Support, LLC
AVIEN 
Charter Member
www.clarksupport.com
  
301-610-9584 voice
  
240-465-0323 Efax
 
-Original 
Message-From: 
SysAdm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 
1:44 AMTo: NT System 
Admin IssuesSubject: 
VPN's
 
Hi 
everybody,
 
Very general 
question. My company is interested in changing from Frame Relay to VPN. 
It looks very interesting to us, especially since you can save quite a 
bit of money with it, but 
 
Who has made 
experiences with VPN's, good ones or bad ones. What about security, 
bandwidth, reliability etc. Am interested in any 
information.
 
Thanks.
 
Regards,Dagmar 
NeumannIT 
Operations Managerphone:   
(02) 9690 7578mobile: 
0402 223 011e-mail:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htmhttp://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Remote Control for 2000 servers

[Stalzer, Jim]

Two administrators can logon to a W2K server using terminal services if you are using 
the administrative mode.

-Original Message-
From: Normand Dionne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 6:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Remote Control for 2000 servers


We run remote control for 2000 servers which uses the terminal server
service on the server to allow a WINDOWS connection from any PC, 98 and
above, but only to 2000 servers.

The license was not clear about how many administrators could log on at the
same time. I think it is just once.

Has anyone used this program and found a way to up the license could without
having to buy a whole terminal server package?

We haven't forgotten about the terrorist attack. Hilo (small) airport had a
few flights come in to move some folks around between islands but that was
it.

Life does go on however for the lucky ones.

Mahalo,

Normand Dionne
UH Hilo
Academic Computing Services
808-974-7768 (Voice and FAX)



http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: ISA Server Issues

[Stalzer, Jim]

Title: RE: Wildcard question



You 
can have SecureNAT Clients (enter the gateway ip - these PCs are 
usually servers and can publish to the internet), Firewall Clients (install 
the firewall client - we use this for W2K Professional clients) or Web Proxy 
Clients (enter the proxy info into the browser).  Which method you use 
depends on the use of the PC.

  -Original Message-From: Roger Ali 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:38 
  AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: ISA Server 
  Issues
  
  Hey all, 
      
  Got a couple of questions regarding ISA Server?  I recently set one up and I've got it 
  running.  My questions 
  are:
      
  
  1.   
  When 
  going through the setup I read that the Gateway for the client machines IP 
  settings must be the ISA Server, is this correct?  We are on an IP frame and currently we 
  have our PC Gateways as the primary router on the frame.  I'm not sure it will work with this and 
  I'd like to be sure if it must be the Gateway for the clients, and if it must 
  why Microsoft did this as with Proxy we were not required to have Proxy as the 
  Gateway.  
  2.   
  I got 
  ISA working and users were allowed to get out but the auto discovery of the 
  setting would not work, I followed the instructions in the help files, is 
  there something I'm missing. 
   
  Please help ASAP I'd 
  like to get this rolled out for a small isolated group in our network.  Also I setup the server in an Array, 
  does this make a difference to the settings, I thought it would just be for 
  performance as we plan on expanding this group at another location and I'd 
  have this be the primary and have the users at the remote site get access 
  through a second ISA Server in the Array.  Is this idea 
  correct, Please help.
   
  Thanks
  Roger Ali  http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: VPN NEWBIE

[Stalzer, Jim]

The Cisco VPN client requires a Cisco VPN Concentrator (i.e. 3005, 3015, 3030, etc.) 
at the location you are connecting to (your home).  The cost for the Concentrator is 
$3000 plus depending on model.  The client then allows you to setup a tunnel with 
encryption to the Concentrator.

This works great connecting a number of home PCs to the office.  However, it's a bit 
expensive to connect to your home PC.  I would forget the Cisco client and look into 
some of the other options that have been suggested.

Jim Stalzer
Network Services Specialist
Precision Computer Systems
(605) 362-1260
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Tiffany Belcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2001 3:05 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: VPN NEWBIE


I have a windows 2000 server. My connection is a SDSL. What do I need to set
up a VPN? I am so new that I haven't a clue:) I want to set one up to my
home office. So I can dial into it remotly. Can anyone help me put? I have
Cisco VPN 3000 client. I just don't even understand what hardware I need or
what to do first to get a VPN up.

Tiffany Belcher
Web Developer - Network Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

RE: Kinda OT, kinda not I guess!

[Stalzer, Jim]

We currently use the Tektronix Phaser 8500's (Xerox now).  We have two and are 
purchasing a third.  We use them like printing presses, we do all of our marketing 
material in house on them.  We also have an HP 4500 which is OK but not as reliable 
and the colors are not as vivid.  We used to have a Cannon, sent it to the dump, had a 
repairman here every week.



Jim Stalzer
Network Services Specialist
Precision Computer Systems
(605) 362-1260
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Eric Brouwer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:17 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Kinda OT, kinda not I guess!


I'd like to look into getting a new color printer for our office.  We
currently use an HP Color Laserjet 5.  I won't bore you with my opinions of
this printer.  Any fast, high quality color printers anyone can recommend?

Eric


http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm