Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread Phil Brutsche 
That is very likely ;)

On 3/20/2010 5:56 PM, Anders Blomgren wrote:
> Are you thinking of APP-V?

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread Anders Blomgren 
No, MED-V is the "managed" xpmode. It's basically a centrally managed and
hidden xp vm that just shows the apps it runs on your regular desktop.

Are you thinking of APP-V?


-Anders

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Phil Brutsche wrote:

> My impression is MED-V is something more akin to VMware's ThinApp.
>
> On 3/20/2010 5:38 PM, jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Is med -v also vm?
>
>  --
>
> Phil Brutsche
> p...@optimumdata.com
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread jgarciaitlist 
Cool
--Original Message--
From: Phil Brutsche
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such
Sent: Mar 20, 2010 6:48 PM

My impression is MED-V is something more akin to VMware's ThinApp.

On 3/20/2010 5:38 PM, jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is med -v also vm?

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread Phil Brutsche 
My impression is MED-V is something more akin to VMware's ThinApp.

On 3/20/2010 5:38 PM, jgarciaitl...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is med -v also vm?

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread jgarciaitlist 
Is med -v also vm?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-Original Message-
From: jgarciaitl...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:37:41 
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

What med ??
--Original Message--
From: Phil Brutsche
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such
Sent: Mar 20, 2010 6:36 PM

+1

XP Mode is intended for consumers and those who aren't
ActiveDirectory-using control freaks.

Microsoft's enterprise solution for compatibility problems is MED-V or
whatever it is they call it these days.

On 3/20/2010 3:41 PM, Anders Blomgren wrote:
> If you have a large scale need for xpmode then I'd rather look at a vdi
> solution or just terminal server/citrix.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread jgarciaitlist 
What med ??
--Original Message--
From: Phil Brutsche
To: NT System Admin Issues
ReplyTo: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such
Sent: Mar 20, 2010 6:36 PM

+1

XP Mode is intended for consumers and those who aren't
ActiveDirectory-using control freaks.

Microsoft's enterprise solution for compatibility problems is MED-V or
whatever it is they call it these days.

On 3/20/2010 3:41 PM, Anders Blomgren wrote:
> If you have a large scale need for xpmode then I'd rather look at a vdi
> solution or just terminal server/citrix.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~


Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/>  ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread Phil Brutsche 
+1

XP Mode is intended for consumers and those who aren't
ActiveDirectory-using control freaks.

Microsoft's enterprise solution for compatibility problems is MED-V or
whatever it is they call it these days.

On 3/20/2010 3:41 PM, Anders Blomgren wrote:
> If you have a large scale need for xpmode then I'd rather look at a vdi
> solution or just terminal server/citrix.

-- 

Phil Brutsche
p...@optimumdata.com

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-20 Thread Anders Blomgren 
If you have a large scale need for xpmode then I'd rather look at a vdi
solution or just terminal server/citrix.

-Anders

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:44 AM,  wrote:

> Any ideas of deploying for xpmode in windows 7?
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

RE: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-19 Thread Malcolm Reitz 
We're gonna try like heck not to use it. Don't want to have to support 2
OSes on a single PC for the reasons you've mentioned and more.

-Malcolm

-Original Message-
From: jgarciaitl...@gmail.com [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 19:44
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

Any ideas of deploying for xpmode in windows 7?
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~
  ~


~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~

Re: Deploy xpmode updates av and such

2010-03-19 Thread Richard Stovall 
This is, IMHO, the Achilles heel of XP Mode.  I don't have any of the
fancy tools from MS for VM deployment, so what I've done for my
less-than-a-handful of XP Mode deployments is join them to the domain
and put them in their own OU for WSUS purposes, etc.  For my own XPM
VM, I changed the default credentials to be a domain user, but that
sort of stuff is dependent on the end user, I suppose.  Particularly
if you don't have a comprehensive management solution.

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:44 PM,   wrote:
> Any ideas of deploying for xpmode in windows 7?
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
> ~   ~
>

~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~   ~