RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread gsweers
Same here, we used to be exclusively HP on printers, we have moved to
Dell and have been very happy.  Toner is available online, ships next
day or you can goto Staples and pick most any of them up.

Warning.  On some of Dell's lower end lasers they have a mgmt tool to
install, you can access a web page but you need a password to change it
and its not documented anywhere I could find.  Tech support wants you to
install it via the software which works well, but I prefer doing it my
own way.
You can almost always get 3 yr NBD for practically nothing at end of
quarter and end of year.

-Original Message-
From: Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:25 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Printer brand recommendations

Just speaking on price, Dell is running end of the year promos on
printers.  They are discounted heavily.  I think they are doing 2 fer
1s.

Add a support contract, you are golden.   Been using them for 4+ years.
Never had a software issue.  A dell tech has had to come once to fix the
11 we have - but it had about 300K pages already printed to it.



-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Printer brand recommendations

Howdy list,

  So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field survey
is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark, Xerox, Ricoh,
Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

  Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly monochrome
laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical volume might
be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers serving supersets
of same.

  A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
disaster, which is why I'm here.

  Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some experience
a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with many brands.
Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features are severely
reduced over the network.

  One thing I really dislike is printers which require special software
installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few startup
programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support, update, and
maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and scanning; if we
stick to those, support and training are so much easier.

  Thoughts?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Martin Blackstone
I used Brother faxes at my last company for standalone machines. The cheap
ones and they stood up to a lot of punishment. They were also cheap enough
to toss when they broke.

Another note on Ink Jets is cost. The ink is so expensive that in the long
run, a laser usually ends up being cheaper to run.

 

From: Andrew Laya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:15 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Printer brand recommendations

 


I couldn't agree more, but...

I had someone ask me about a number of all in ones they saw in the local
BestBuy flyer and I noticed that Brother has a couple of all in one lasers.
Maybe something like this would be better suited for the HR manager? 

Andrew.



On Jan 30, 2008 12:10 AM, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 

I still like HP cause it's easy to find local service and you can get parts
and toner pretty much anywhere.

 

As for AIO and Ink Jets, I think they are all crap in the workplace. People
overuse them way too much. I would get a small personal laser jet and a
cheap fax. Then when they break, you toss them and buy new ones.

 

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Printer brand recommendations

 


Honestly, from what I have seen and I am no printer expert; there are no
good printers anymore...

On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Howdy list,

 So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

 Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
serving supersets of same.

 A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
disaster, which is why I'm here.

 Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
are severely reduced over the network.

 One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
easier.

 Thoughts?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 















 


 








 


 








 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Angus Scott-Fleming
On 30 Jan 2008 at 7:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 Same here, we used to be exclusively HP on printers, we have moved to
 Dell and have been very happy.  Toner is available online, ships next
 day or you can goto Staples and pick most any of them up.
 
 Warning.  On some of Dell's lower end lasers they have a mgmt tool to
 install, you can access a web page but you need a password to change it
 and its not documented anywhere I could find.  Tech support wants you to
 install it via the software which works well, but I prefer doing it my
 own way.
 You can almost always get 3 yr NBD for practically nothing at end of
 quarter and end of year.

I take it you get this on the phone when purchasing through a Dell rep rather 
than on the web?

--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread gsweers
I have my own dedicated reps, and I am a channel partner so I usually
get all of that for my clients when I can and pass it on to them.  HW is
really just a passthrough for us and our clients since they pay for our
time to do the work and bring the equipment in.  Email me offline and I
can get you in touch with my rep who will give you the best prices she
can do.  This week is deal week at Dell since it is their end of year.
I took a 4200 server and got it for 3000.00 dollars, web price was
almost 4800.00, apparently they are focusing on marketshare and not
margin right now.  Printers are screaming deals right now, some 2 for 1,
3 yr warranty, the new Tablets, wow, all I can say is wow and they are
pushing the price down on them in the channel.


-Original Message-
From: Angus Scott-Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:54 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Printer brand recommendations

On 30 Jan 2008 at 7:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:

 Same here, we used to be exclusively HP on printers, we have moved to
 Dell and have been very happy.  Toner is available online, ships next
 day or you can goto Staples and pick most any of them up.
 
 Warning.  On some of Dell's lower end lasers they have a mgmt tool to
 install, you can access a web page but you need a password to change
it
 and its not documented anywhere I could find.  Tech support wants you
to
 install it via the software which works well, but I prefer doing it my
 own way.
 You can almost always get 3 yr NBD for practically nothing at end of
 quarter and end of year.

I take it you get this on the phone when purchasing through a Dell rep
rather 
than on the web?

--

Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
+---+




~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Ben Scott
Aggregate reply to multiple people.

On Jan 30, 2008 12:10 AM, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I still like HP cause it's easy to find local service and you can get parts
 and toner pretty much anywhere.

  HP's hardware quality is still good.  Local repair isn't the issue.
It's that technical support has been absolutely horrible.  And I mean
*horrible*.  By far the worst in recent memory.  And I spend a lot of
time on tech calls.  They can't communicate in English, they don't
listen to what I say, they tell me brand new products are
out-of-warranty, they put me on hold for an hour plus, they read
scripted answers that don't apply, they tell me the product can't do
what the manual says it can do, they need me to look up information on
their own web site for them, they send me copies of MSKB articles I
originally referred them to, I could go on and on.  I don't know
whether to laugh or cry.

On Jan 30, 2008 12:10 AM, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 As for AIO and Ink Jets, I think they are all crap in the workplace. People
 overuse them way too much.

  I largely agree, but at the same time, there's a demand from the
bigwigs for such.  And ignoring the ego issues, it's not even all that
unreasonable.  So they want their own device.  It's going to be very
light use -- not an overuse situation.  Their priority is small size.
They don't care about price so much, they just don't want a giant
Konica copy machine in their office.  Or three different machines that
each get used twice a month.

On Jan 30, 2008 12:25 AM, Sam Cayze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Been using them [Dell printers] for 4+ years.
 Never had a software issue.

  I actually have evaluated a Dell 1720dn about six months ago.  We
had an issue where printing preference defaults would not propagate
properly from the server to the clients.  This was an issue since the
whole reason we bought that model was for multiple trays for different
media.  Dell tech support said the only fix was to manually tweak the
settings for every user on every workstation using the printer.  No
fix available or planned.  (Service tag BKDSTB1; tech support case
167931218.)   So we returned that model to Dell and bought an HP
P2015x.

  Still, at this point, I might be willing to give Dell another shot.

On Jan 30, 2008 10:07 AM, Za Vue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dell printers may be cheaper but they will get you on toner prices and I do
 not know who will service them where we are.

  For the Dell 1720dn vs the HP P2015x, the cost-per-page was actually
cheaper for Dell vs the HP (assuming the yield specs are honest).

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Za Vue
I have never call HP for any support on printers. There is no more than 7-8
major components with most LJ printers. I always thought they would tell me
to take back to where I purchased it. Here is one site I rely on for a lot
of issues I have encountered with printers in my work place or at home. 

www.fixyourownprinter.com

-Z.V.

-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:47 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Printer brand recommendations

Aggregate reply to multiple people.

On Jan 30, 2008 12:10 AM, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I still like HP cause it's easy to find local service and you can get
parts
 and toner pretty much anywhere.

  HP's hardware quality is still good.  Local repair isn't the issue.
It's that technical support has been absolutely horrible.  And I mean
*horrible*.  By far the worst in recent memory.  And I spend a lot of
time on tech calls.  They can't communicate in English, they don't
listen to what I say, they tell me brand new products are
out-of-warranty, they put me on hold for an hour plus, they read
scripted answers that don't apply, they tell me the product can't do
what the manual says it can do, they need me to look up information on
their own web site for them, they send me copies of MSKB articles I
originally referred them to, I could go on and on.  I don't know
whether to laugh or cry.



~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Ben Scott
On Jan 30, 2008 12:55 PM, Za Vue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have never call HP for any support on printers. There is no more than 7-8
 major components with most LJ printers.

  If it's a mechanical breakdown, sure.  Not all problems are like
that.  This month it's been:

  1. Ghosting on a color laser printer.  It turned out to be a bad
toner cartridge, but HP was no help in figuring that out, and neither
was the local service shop.  (They recommended replacing the fuser,
for $250.)  And then HP wouldn't honor the supposed warranty on their
Genuine HP better-because-they-say-so printer cartridge.  Why am I
buying Genuine HP if HP won't stand behind it any more than they stand
by somebody's knock-off?

  2. Truncated pages.  Turned out to be Microsoft Word was not
honoring the printable area metric from the driver for page borders.
It only showed up on this one new printer model, so I thought it was
the printer at first.  So it ended up being more of an MS Word problem
then an HP problem, but I had to figure that out on my own.  The HP
support was just an exercise in frustration.  (This was the case where
they sent me a link to the same MSKB article I had already referred
them to, among other stupidities.)

  3. On that AIO I mentioned, the scanner software keeps insisting the
scanner cannot be found.  Ticket is still open from yesterday.  The
battery in the phone I was using went dead after 30 minutes on hold
waiting for a rep who knew what a network was.

  It's just chance that I had three issues like this in one month, but
each support case has been absolutely horrible.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Eric E Eskam
Dell printers are rebadged Lexmark's - I think it's been mentioned before, 
but thought I would mention it again.  Dunno if the Dell's have all of 
what I am going to talk about below - might be a disadvantage of getting 
them from Dell since Dell does ship different drivers.

Lexmark is very strong on security - all firmware updates are signed, they 
can utilize smart cards for authentication (i.e. have printer hold job 
until user authenticates to printer with smartcard or PIN and then print 
while user is standing there for sensitive documents), if a printer has a 
hard drive for caching of jobs it's encrypted, etc.  Lexmark has been, so 
far, the only vendor to also provide me a whitepaper explaining why having 
one of their multifunction machines with a fax modem on my network is not 
a risk.  It's quite detailed and specific.  I had been trying for years to 
get such a whitepaper from HP, Canon and other vendors and had come up 
with nothing.  One mention to our Lexmark rep and I had a whitepaper 
within 24 hours.  As an aside, if your vender supports PS Fax, I wouldn't 
have the printer plugged into my network and the phone at the same time...

Heck, it's a 260K PDF - if anyone is interested in it send me an email off 
list and I'll forward you a copy.

The only issues we have had with some Lexmark printers is they have been 
fussy on paper, and most of that has been from users not paying attention 
to the printers specs and requirements.  A few we have had to have 
replaced, but they have been pretty responsive in working with us.  In my 
immediate office we ordered a scanner/printer combo and replaced our 
photocopier.  I hesitate to call it an all-in one since the scanner is 
separate from the printer, although it comes with a stand that integrates 
the two.  The entire cost of the scanner/printer setup was less then 
maintenance for one year on the photocopier - and it even staples!  Bigger 
printers also collate and bind, just like larger photocopiers.  The 
scanner supports emailing a PDF - I use that feature all the time to 
capture documents electronically and when duplex scanning, it scans both 
sides of the paper at the same time.  Also, every one of their scanners is 
color - even though I ordered it as a kit with a BW printer.  If I need a 
color copier, all I have to do is order a Lexmark color printer and now I 
have a color copier and BW copier from the same scanner (pretty slick!). 
the scanner has a touchscreen interface - there is a complete SDK 
available, so if I was so inclined (and actually had a developer) I could 
integrate the scanner directly into a workflow with our Lotus Note or 
Sharepoint servers.  I'm pretty happy with our Lexmarks.

Oh, they have a true universal driver and it doesn't litter your system 
tray and hard drive with gobs of utilities either.  Much friendlier in a 
networked printing environment...

Eric Eskam
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The contents of this message are mine personally and do not reflect any 
position of the U.S. Government
The human mind treats a new idea the same way the body treats a strange 
protein; it rejects it.
-  P. B. Medawar
~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Ben Scott
On Jan 30, 2008 3:20 PM, Eric E Eskam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dell printers are rebadged Lexmark's ...

  At least some of them are, for sure.  I suspect some of them might
be other OEMs, though.  For example, the Dell 1110 we got sent as a
freebie is a dead ringer for the Samsung ML-2510 I saw in Staples the
other day.  Same overall layout, lights, buttons, toner cartridge
design, port locations.  The only thing different is the labeling and
the color of the trim.

 I'm pretty happy with our Lexmarks.

  Thanks for the detailed report -- very useful.  That does sound
pretty good.  I will have to check them out, independently of Dell as
you say.

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Ben Scott
  Apropos to this thread, I can *so* sympathize with this solider:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dodPR7h_ytI

  :-

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Jonathan Link
I'll concur with what Don Ely said, but that being the case, you have to
mitigate the downside.
High end inkjets are oxymoronic.
From what you describe, in my opinion, you haven't sized your printers
appropriately to the job they are to perform.
Get the bigwigs a personal laser printer, they'll be happier with improved
availability, you'll have less support headaches.

I only ever install the driver for a printer, despite what comes with it.
 Depending on the end user, I'll leave it to them to install the rest of the
crap that comes with the printer.

IIRC Dell started making their cartridges proprietary and unavailable
anywhere but from Dell.  Is this still the case?

-Jonathan
On Jan 29, 2008 11:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Howdy list,

  So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
 month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
 been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
 from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
 survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
 Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
 Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

  Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
 monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
 volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
 serving supersets of same.

  A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
 they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
 but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
 furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
 example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
 stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
 guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
 disaster, which is why I'm here.

  Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
 they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
 frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
 experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
 many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
 are severely reduced over the network.

  One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
 software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
 startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
 update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
 scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
 easier.

  Thoughts?

 -- Ben

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread gsweers
No you are able to get most cartridges now through Staples.   

 

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Printer brand recommendations

 


I'll concur with what Don Ely said, but that being the case, you have to
mitigate the downside.

High end inkjets are oxymoronic.

From what you describe, in my opinion, you haven't sized your printers
appropriately to the job they are to perform.

Get the bigwigs a personal laser printer, they'll be happier with
improved availability, you'll have less support headaches.

I only ever install the driver for a printer, despite what comes with
it.  Depending on the end user, I'll leave it to them to install the
rest of the crap that comes with the printer.

 

IIRC Dell started making their cartridges proprietary and unavailable
anywhere but from Dell.  Is this still the case?

 

-Jonathan

On Jan 29, 2008 11:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Howdy list,

 So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

 Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
serving supersets of same.

 A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
disaster, which is why I'm here.

 Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
are severely reduced over the network.

 One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
easier.

 Thoughts?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 






 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Sam Cayze
Yeah, anywhere.
 
FYI Dell has a laser for round $130 right now.
 
Our Dell Printing costs are less than 1cent a page FYI.  Not sure if
that is really good or not, I think it is.



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 9:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Printer brand recommendations




No you are able to get most cartridges now through Staples.   

 

From: Jonathan Link [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 10:24 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Printer brand recommendations

 


I'll concur with what Don Ely said, but that being the case, you have to
mitigate the downside.

High end inkjets are oxymoronic.

From what you describe, in my opinion, you haven't sized your printers
appropriately to the job they are to perform.

Get the bigwigs a personal laser printer, they'll be happier with
improved availability, you'll have less support headaches.

I only ever install the driver for a printer, despite what comes with
it.  Depending on the end user, I'll leave it to them to install the
rest of the crap that comes with the printer.

 

IIRC Dell started making their cartridges proprietary and unavailable
anywhere but from Dell.  Is this still the case?

 

-Jonathan

On Jan 29, 2008 11:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Howdy list,

 So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

 Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
serving supersets of same.

 A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
disaster, which is why I'm here.

 Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
are severely reduced over the network.

 One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
easier.

 Thoughts?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 






 











~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Ben Scott
On Jan 30, 2008 10:24 PM, Jonathan Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Get the bigwigs a personal laser printer, they'll be happier with improved
 availability, you'll have less support headaches.

  Color laser printers, especially the all-in-one units, are all
decidedly bigger than the inkjet alternatives.  Like I've said
multiple times now, the bigwigs want something physically small, so it
doesn't conflict with their feng shui or whatever.  Maybe this is just
a case of wanting something that doesn't exist, but you'd think there
would be a market for products which don't suck.

  And lately they're wanting to print photos, too.  Anyone seen a
color laser printer with good photo printing performance?  Most seem
to be only 600 DPI.

 I only ever install the driver for a printer, despite what comes with it.

  That's what I want to do.  The driver only kit for the HP
PhotoSmart C7280 is over 300 megabytes, and doesn't work if I try to
force it to install via the Add Hardware Wizard and INFs only.
Apparently you *need* to run HP's elaborate install utility, and let
it copy tons of crap to the system, for it to setup whatever magic HP
wants.  And then the scanner doesn't work anyway.  Did I mention I
don't like HP lately?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-30 Thread Kurt Buff
I'd price out the rental of a Savin or other networked color digital copier.

If the muckety-mucks are worried about privacy/confidentiality, units
like this offer management options like passcodes for print jobs (must
put in a passcode at the printer to print the document if it's
confidential, or put a passcode in when requesting the print job from
the PC if it's color or it goes into th bitbucket, etc.)

Might be able to make the economic case with something like that.

Kurt

On 1/29/08, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Howdy list,

  So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
 month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
 been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
 from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
 survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
 Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
 Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

  Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
 monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
 volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
 serving supersets of same.

  A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
 they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
 but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
 furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
 example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
 stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
 guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
 disaster, which is why I'm here.

  Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
 they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
 frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
 experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
 many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
 are severely reduced over the network.

  One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
 software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
 startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
 update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
 scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
 easier.

  Thoughts?

 -- Ben

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-29 Thread Don Ely
Honestly, from what I have seen and I am no printer expert; there are no
good printers anymore...

On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Howdy list,

  So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
 month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
 been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
 from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
 survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
 Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
 Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

  Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
 monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
 volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
 serving supersets of same.

  A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
 they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
 but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
 furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
 example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
 stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
 guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
 disaster, which is why I'm here.

  Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
 they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
 frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
 experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
 many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
 are severely reduced over the network.

  One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
 software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
 startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
 update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
 scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
 easier.

  Thoughts?

 -- Ben

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-29 Thread Martin Blackstone
I still like HP cause it's easy to find local service and you can get parts
and toner pretty much anywhere.

 

As for AIO and Ink Jets, I think they are all crap in the workplace. People
overuse them way too much. I would get a small personal laser jet and a
cheap fax. Then when they break, you toss them and buy new ones.

 

 

From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:52 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Printer brand recommendations

 


Honestly, from what I have seen and I am no printer expert; there are no
good printers anymore...

On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Howdy list,

 So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

 Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
serving supersets of same.

 A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
disaster, which is why I'm here.

 Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
are severely reduced over the network.

 One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
easier.

 Thoughts?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

 








 


~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

Re: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-29 Thread Andrew Laya
I couldn't agree more, but...

I had someone ask me about a number of all in ones they saw in the local
BestBuy flyer and I noticed that Brother has a couple of all in one lasers.
Maybe something like this would be better suited for the HR manager?

Andrew.


On Jan 30, 2008 12:10 AM, Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


  I still like HP cause it's easy to find local service and you can get
 parts and toner pretty much anywhere.



 As for AIO and Ink Jets, I think they are all crap in the workplace.
 People overuse them way too much. I would get a small personal laser jet and
 a cheap fax. Then when they break, you toss them and buy new ones.





 *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 *Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:52 PM
 *To:* NT System Admin Issues
 *Subject:* Re: Printer brand recommendations




 Honestly, from what I have seen and I am no printer expert; there are no
 good printers anymore...

 On Jan 29, 2008 8:25 PM, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Howdy list,

  So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
 month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
 been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
 from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field
 survey is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark,
 Xerox, Ricoh, Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
 Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

  Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly
 monochrome laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical
 volume might be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers
 serving supersets of same.

  A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
 they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
 but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
 furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
 example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
 stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
 guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
 disaster, which is why I'm here.

  Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
 they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
 frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some
 experience a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with
 many brands.  Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features
 are severely reduced over the network.

  One thing I really dislike is printers which require special
 software installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few
 startup programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support,
 update, and maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and
 scanning; if we stick to those, support and training are so much
 easier.

  Thoughts?

 -- Ben

 ~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
 ~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~















~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

RE: Printer brand recommendations

2008-01-29 Thread Sam Cayze
Just speaking on price, Dell is running end of the year promos on
printers.  They are discounted heavily.  I think they are doing 2 fer
1s.

Add a support contract, you are golden.   Been using them for 4+ years.
Never had a software issue.  A dell tech has had to come once to fix the
11 we have - but it had about 300K pages already printed to it.



-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:26 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Printer brand recommendations

Howdy list,

  So, after some truly abysmal tech support experiences with HP this
month, I've decided it's time to look at other printer brands.  I've
been buying HP's almost exclusively for over a decade, so I'm starting
from scratch.  There are so many brands that even a product field survey
is non-trivial: Dell, Samsung, Canon, Epson, IBM/Lexmark, Xerox, Ricoh,
Sharp, Toshiba, Panasonic, just to name a few.
Recommendations?  Opinions?  Horror stories?

  Relatively small company, roughly 75 workstations.  Mostly monochrome
laser printers serving workgroups of 5-10 people.  Typical volume might
be 1K-3K pages/month.  A couple color laser printers serving supersets
of same.

  A few bigwigs have color inkjets in their office, because of course
they're too important to have to walk out to the printer in the hall,
but they also don't want to clutter up their fancy mahogany office
furniture with a larger laser printer that might actually work.  For
example, the Director of HR.  Since she works with personal/private
stuff, she wanted one of those print/scan/copy/fax jobs (reasonable, I
guess).  The supposedly high-end HP inkjet we bought has been a
disaster, which is why I'm here.

  Almost every printer we have is network-attached (easier to manage,
they roam with the user profile if hardware is changed, enables the
frequent requests to share printers).  As I recall from some experience
a few years ago, that seems to be a common failing with many brands.
Even if they have a network jack, functionality/features are severely
reduced over the network.

  One thing I really dislike is printers which require special software
installation to the tune of hundreds of megabytes, a few startup
programs, a dozen desktop icons, and their own support, update, and
maintenance hassles.  Windows has APIs for printing and scanning; if we
stick to those, support and training are so much easier.

  Thoughts?

-- Ben

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~

~ Upgrade to Next Generation Antispam/Antivirus with Ninja!~
~ http://www.sunbelt-software.com/SunbeltMessagingNinja.cfm  ~