El mar, 26 abr 2022 a las 4:08, bas van beek ()
escribió:
> Hi Jelle,
>
>
>
> I’ve stumbled upon buffer-related issues multiple times when typing with
> numpy, be It either with annotating functions such as `np.frombuffer` or
> when passing a numpy array to the likes of `memoryview` (resulting in a
> false positive by type checkers).
>
> All in all I’d say this buffer-type would very much be a welcome addition.
>
Thank you!
>
>
> I do have a small remark about the name though: why not `BufferType`
> instead of `Buffer`?
>
> the classes in the `types` namespace generally have the `Type` suffix, so
> the lack thereof stands out a bit here.
>
I see it as more akin to the classes in collections.abc, which don't have a
Type suffix. I don't feel strongly about this though; I may change it if
more people bring up this feedback.
>
>
> Regards, Bas
>
>
>
> *From:* Jelle Zijlstra
> *Sent:* Monday, 25 April 2022 05:47
> *To:* Discussion of Numerical Python
> *Subject:* [Numpy-discussion] PEP 688: Making the buffer protocol
> accessible in Python
>
>
>
> I just posted https://peps.python.org/pep-0688/, which proposes adding a
> types.Buffer type that will make it possible to check in Python code
> whether a type implements the buffer protocol.
>
>
>
> I'm reaching out to the numpy community because numpy was an important
> driver for creating the buffer protocol. I'd be happy to hear any feedback
> or possible use cases for the PEP.
>
>
>
>
> ___
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> Member address: jelle.zijls...@gmail.com
>
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
