Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week
you guys have an agenda? I can be reached on my cell 917-971-6387 > On Jun 30, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In a week and a half, this is happening: >> >>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting >> >> It's somewhat short notice (my bad :-/), but I think it would be good >> to have a short video meeting sometime this week as a kind of >> "pre-meeting" -- to at least briefly go over the main issues we see >> facing the project to prime the pump, get a better idea about what we >> want to accomplish at the meeting itself, and gather some early >> feedback from anyone who won't be able to make it to SciPy (we'll miss >> you). >> >> The obligatory doodle: >>http://doodle.com/6b4s6thqt9xt4vnh > > Okay, let's aim for: > > Thursday July 2 at 20:00 UTC. > > I believe that's 1pm California / 4 pm New York / 9pm London / 10pm > western Europe > > And so far it looks like we'll be under the 10 person Google Hangouts > limit, which I'm assuming is simpler for everybody, so let's assume > we're doing that unless otherwise specified. (This does mean that I'd > appreciate a quick email if you're planning on dialling in but haven't > otherwise responded to the poll, though!) > > -n > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week
I’m pretty new to Numpy so I won’t be able to contribute much, but I would appreciate being able to sit in on this if possible. Honi > On Jun 30, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In a week and a half, this is happening: >> >>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting >> >> It's somewhat short notice (my bad :-/), but I think it would be good >> to have a short video meeting sometime this week as a kind of >> "pre-meeting" -- to at least briefly go over the main issues we see >> facing the project to prime the pump, get a better idea about what we >> want to accomplish at the meeting itself, and gather some early >> feedback from anyone who won't be able to make it to SciPy (we'll miss >> you). >> >> The obligatory doodle: >>http://doodle.com/6b4s6thqt9xt4vnh > > Okay, let's aim for: > > Thursday July 2 at 20:00 UTC. > > I believe that's 1pm California / 4 pm New York / 9pm London / 10pm > western Europe > > And so far it looks like we'll be under the 10 person Google Hangouts > limit, which I'm assuming is simpler for everybody, so let's assume > we're doing that unless otherwise specified. (This does mean that I'd > appreciate a quick email if you're planning on dialling in but haven't > otherwise responded to the poll, though!) > > -n > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: > you guys have an agenda? > I'm guessing a subset of what's listed on https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting Would indeed be good to make a proper agenda, so we can prepare properly for the meeting at SciPy. There are some topics (like commit rights) that can easily fill the whole call and are better done in person instead. @Nathaniel: as the organizer, do you want to make a proposal? Ralf > I can be reached on my cell 917-971-6387 > > > On Jun 30, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> In a week and a half, this is happening: > >> > >>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting > >> > >> It's somewhat short notice (my bad :-/), but I think it would be good > >> to have a short video meeting sometime this week as a kind of > >> "pre-meeting" -- to at least briefly go over the main issues we see > >> facing the project to prime the pump, get a better idea about what we > >> want to accomplish at the meeting itself, and gather some early > >> feedback from anyone who won't be able to make it to SciPy (we'll miss > >> you). > >> > >> The obligatory doodle: > >>http://doodle.com/6b4s6thqt9xt4vnh > > > > Okay, let's aim for: > > > > Thursday July 2 at 20:00 UTC. > > > > I believe that's 1pm California / 4 pm New York / 9pm London / 10pm > > western Europe > > > > And so far it looks like we'll be under the 10 person Google Hangouts > > limit, which I'm assuming is simpler for everybody, so let's assume > > we're doing that unless otherwise specified. (This does mean that I'd > > appreciate a quick email if you're planning on dialling in but haven't > > otherwise responded to the poll, though!) > > > > -n > > > > -- > > Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org > > ___ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Honi Sanders wrote: > I’m pretty new to Numpy so I won’t be able to contribute much, but I would > appreciate being able to sit in on this if possible. You certainly would be welcome. -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: >> >> you guys have an agenda? > > I'm guessing a subset of what's listed on > https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting > > Would indeed be good to make a proper agenda, so we can prepare properly for > the meeting at SciPy. There are some topics (like commit rights) that can > easily fill the whole call and are better done in person instead. > @Nathaniel: as the organizer, do you want to make a proposal? Yep. Just reorganized the wiki page a bit to hopefully highlight the big picture stuff (which I'm thinking is the stuff that's the highest priority for our limited face-to-face time?), and made a world-writeable google doc for us to use for the call here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11KC2p3cCsbDVjLcQSCehUiWGyWDNCyOunKfrO7Q7m3E/edit?usp=sharing Copy/pasting the proposed agenda for the call from that google doc: * Logistics for next week: ** What time do we want to start? ** What are our main goals for the meeting? ** How do we want to organize our time? (Maybe just sitting in a meeting room grinding through an agenda for 10 hours straight is not the best approach.) ** Are there any topics that e.g. we should plan to discuss at a particular time so Ralf can plan to join remotely? ** Stuff like that. * Do a *brief* pass through the list of topics for the meeting listed on the wiki page (linked above). The goal here is not to actually have a detailed discussion, but just: ** Get a general sense of where we stand so people can come prepared next week ** Get feedback on these topics from those who won’t be present for the meeting next week -n -- Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Video meeting this week
I _may_ be able to join -- but don't go setting up an alternative conferencing system just for me. But I'm planning on ring in Austin Tues in any case. -Chris Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 29, 2015, at 9:59 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In a week and a half, this is happening: >> >>https://github.com/numpy/numpy/wiki/SciPy-2015-developer-meeting >> >> It's somewhat short notice (my bad :-/), but I think it would be good >> to have a short video meeting sometime this week as a kind of >> "pre-meeting" -- to at least briefly go over the main issues we see >> facing the project to prime the pump, get a better idea about what we >> want to accomplish at the meeting itself, and gather some early >> feedback from anyone who won't be able to make it to SciPy (we'll miss >> you). >> >> The obligatory doodle: >>http://doodle.com/6b4s6thqt9xt4vnh > > Okay, let's aim for: > > Thursday July 2 at 20:00 UTC. > > I believe that's 1pm California / 4 pm New York / 9pm London / 10pm > western Europe > > And so far it looks like we'll be under the 10 person Google Hangouts > limit, which I'm assuming is simpler for everybody, so let's assume > we're doing that unless otherwise specified. (This does mean that I'd > appreciate a quick email if you're planning on dialling in but haven't > otherwise responded to the poll, though!) > > -n > > -- > Nathaniel J. Smith -- http://vorpus.org > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
[Numpy-discussion] annoying Deprecation warnings about non-integers
I'm trying to fix some code in statsmodels that creates Deprecation Warnings from numpy Most of it are quite easy to fix, mainly cases where we use floats to avoid integer division I have two problems first, I get Deprecation warnings in the test run that don't specify where they happen. I try to find them with file searches, but I don't see a `np.ones` that might cause a problem (needle in a haystack: Close to 4000 unittests and more than 100,000 lines of numpython) Also, I'm not sure the warnings are only from statsmodels, they could be in numpy, scipy or pandas, couldn't they? second, what's wrong with non-integers in `np.r_[[np.nan] * head, x, [np.nan] * tail]` (see below) I tried to set the warnings filter to `error` but then Python itself errored right away. https://travis-ci.org/statsmodels/statsmodels/jobs/68748936 https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/issues/2480 Thanks for any clues Josef >nosetests -s --pdb-failures --pdb "M:\j\statsmodels\statsmodels_py34\statsmodels\tsa\tests" ..C:\WinPython-64bit-3.4.3.1\python-3.4.3.amd64\lib\sit e-packages\numpy\core\numeric.py:183: DeprecationWarning: using a non-integer nu mber instead of an integer will result in an error in the future a = empty(shape, dtype, order) .. ...M:\j\statsmodels\stat smodels_py34\statsmodels\tsa\filters\filtertools.py:28: DeprecationWarning: usin g a non-integer number instead of an integer will result in an error in the futu re return np.r_[[np.nan] * head, x, [np.nan] * tail] .. ...C:\WinPython-64bit-3.4.3.1 \python-3.4.3.amd64\lib\site-packages\numpy\lib\twodim_base.py:231: DeprecationW arning: using a non-integer number instead of an integer will result in an error in the future m = zeros((N, M), dtype=dtype) C:\WinPython-64bit-3.4.3.1\python-3.4.3.amd64\lib\site-packages\numpy\l ib\twodim_base.py:238: DeprecationWarning: using a non-integer number instead of an integer will result in an error in the future m[:M-k].flat[i::M+1] = 1 ... ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] annoying Deprecation warnings about non-integers
On Jun 30, 2015 9:01 PM, wrote: > > I'm trying to fix some code in statsmodels that creates Deprecation Warnings from numpy > > Most of it are quite easy to fix, mainly cases where we use floats to avoid integer division > > I have two problems > > first, I get Deprecation warnings in the test run that don't specify where they happen. > I try to find them with file searches, but I don't see a `np.ones` that might cause a problem > (needle in a haystack: Close to 4000 unittests and more than 100,000 lines of numpython) > Also, I'm not sure the warnings are only from statsmodels, they could be in numpy, scipy or pandas, couldn't they? > > > second, what's wrong with non-integers in `np.r_[[np.nan] * head, x, [np.nan] * tail]` (see below) > > I tried to set the warnings filter to `error` but then Python itself errored right away. I'd try using a more targeted error filter. Python trends to spit out a bunch of ImportWarnings on startup. You can make a warnings filter that does "error" but only for DeprecationWarning. Or only for DeprecationWarning matching the regexp "non-integer". -n ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
