Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:24 PM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/11/9 Sébastien Barthélemy sebastien.barthel...@crans.org: On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ralf Gommers wrote: That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github render them properly. Unless I missed something. Would that be fine? I think a *.rst.txt extension would also be recognized by github. Yes it would, documented at https://github.com/github/markup. Note that the docutils FAQ advises against using .rst as a file extension : http://docutils.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html#what-s-the-standard-filename-extension-for-a-restructuredtext-file Good point. I agree .rst.txt is better. Renaming all files under doc/ done in https://github.com/rgommers/numpy/tree/rest-files-extension. For an example of how github renders this see https://github.com/rgommers/numpy/blob/rest-files-extension/doc/TESTS.rst.txt Looks good to me - we can just link to it from the Trac wiki. Will push this in a few days unless I hear otherwise. Cheers, Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
2010/11/9 Sébastien Barthélemy sebastien.barthel...@crans.org: On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ralf Gommers wrote: That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github render them properly. Unless I missed something. Would that be fine? I think a *.rst.txt extension would also be recognized by github. Yes it would, documented at https://github.com/github/markup. Note that the docutils FAQ advises against using .rst as a file extension : http://docutils.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html#what-s-the-standard-filename-extension-for-a-restructuredtext-file Good point. I agree .rst.txt is better. Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ralf Gommers wrote: That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github render them properly. Unless I missed something. Would that be fine? I think a *.rst.txt extension would also be recognized by github. Note that the docutils FAQ advises against using .rst as a file extension : http://docutils.sourceforge.net/FAQ.html#what-s-the-standard-filename-extension-for-a-restructuredtext-file Cheers ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:00:47 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files kept in the source tree, for example http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/TestingGuidelines is stuck at an older version. Can one of the admins point the ReST plugin to github? That would require more work on the Trac-Git integration front: http://github.com/pv/githubsimple-trac It might be more cost-effective to just use links to the Github web interface. That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github render them properly. Unless I missed something. Would that be fine? Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Ralf Gommers ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Pauli Virtanen p...@iki.fi wrote: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:00:47 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files kept in the source tree, for example http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/TestingGuidelines is stuck at an older version. Can one of the admins point the ReST plugin to github? That would require more work on the Trac-Git integration front: http://github.com/pv/githubsimple-trac It might be more cost-effective to just use links to the Github web interface. That will require renaming those files in the source tree from *.txt to *.rst, otherwise there's no way to have github render them properly. Unless I missed something. Would that be fine? I use .rst instead of .txt for my projects, so that github can render it properly. I don't know if that's the right solution, but it gets the job done. Ondrej ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
[Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
Hi, I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files kept in the source tree, for example http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/TestingGuidelines is stuck at an older version. Can one of the admins point the ReST plugin to github? Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Trac unaware of github move
Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:00:47 +0800, Ralf Gommers wrote: I just noticed that the Trac wiki is not displaying updates to files kept in the source tree, for example http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/wiki/TestingGuidelines is stuck at an older version. Can one of the admins point the ReST plugin to github? That would require more work on the Trac-Git integration front: http://github.com/pv/githubsimple-trac It might be more cost-effective to just use links to the Github web interface. -- Pauli Virtanen ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
