Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:42 PM, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti: > >> >> > >> >> > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib > >> >> promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, > >> >> anyway). > >> > > >> > This doesn't seem to be due to a technical reason, but rather than > >> > because nobody has written a list of the functions in the docstring of > >> > the module. > >> > >> Is it a good idea to use this? Mixing namespaces would completely > confuse > >> me. > >> > >> >>> for f in dir(numpy.matlib): > >> ... try: > >> ... if getattr(numpy.matlib, f).__module__ in ['numpy.matlib', > >> 'numpy.matrixlib.defmatrix']: print f > >> ... except: pass > >> ... > >> asmatrix > >> bmat > >> empty > >> eye > >> identity > >> mat > >> matrix > >> ones > >> rand > >> randn > >> repmat > >> zeros > > > > > > Looks good to me. Did you plan to put this somewhere (PR, doc wiki)? > > I was hoping it isn't me that struggles with rst > > http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy-docs/reference/routines.matlib.rst/ > > (Since we are not voting based on number of PRs, I prefer the doc > wiki. Instant feedback. :) > Great, thanks. Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti: >> >> >> >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib >> >> promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, >> >> anyway). >> > >> > This doesn't seem to be due to a technical reason, but rather than >> > because nobody has written a list of the functions in the docstring of >> > the module. >> >> Is it a good idea to use this? Mixing namespaces would completely confuse >> me. >> >> >>> for f in dir(numpy.matlib): >> ... try: >> ... if getattr(numpy.matlib, f).__module__ in ['numpy.matlib', >> 'numpy.matrixlib.defmatrix']: print f >> ... except: pass >> ... >> asmatrix >> bmat >> empty >> eye >> identity >> mat >> matrix >> ones >> rand >> randn >> repmat >> zeros > > > Looks good to me. Did you plan to put this somewhere (PR, doc wiki)? I was hoping it isn't me that struggles with rst http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy-docs/reference/routines.matlib.rst/ (Since we are not voting based on number of PRs, I prefer the doc wiki. Instant feedback. :) Josef > > Ralf > > > > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 3:12 AM, wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti: > >> > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib > >> promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, > anyway). > > > > This doesn't seem to be due to a technical reason, but rather than > > because nobody has written a list of the functions in the docstring of > > the module. > > Is it a good idea to use this? Mixing namespaces would completely confuse > me. > > >>> for f in dir(numpy.matlib): > ... try: > ... if getattr(numpy.matlib, f).__module__ in ['numpy.matlib', > 'numpy.matrixlib.defmatrix']: print f > ... except: pass > ... > asmatrix > bmat > empty > eye > identity > mat > matrix > ones > rand > randn > repmat > zeros Looks good to me. Did you plan to put this somewhere (PR, doc wiki)? Ralf ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > Hi, > > 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti: >> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib >> promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, anyway). > > This doesn't seem to be due to a technical reason, but rather than > because nobody has written a list of the functions in the docstring of > the module. Is it a good idea to use this? Mixing namespaces would completely confuse me. >>> for f in dir(numpy.matlib): ... try: ... if getattr(numpy.matlib, f).__module__ in ['numpy.matlib', 'numpy.matrixlib.defmatrix']: print f ... except: pass ... asmatrix bmat empty eye identity mat matrix ones rand randn repmat zeros Josef > > Pauli > > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated
Hi, 18.04.2012 19:57, Alan G Isaac kirjoitti: > http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib > promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, anyway). This doesn't seem to be due to a technical reason, but rather than because nobody has written a list of the functions in the docstring of the module. Pauli ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
[Numpy-discussion] documentation bug: Matrix library page not populated
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/routines.matlib.html#module-numpy.matlib promises a list of functions that does not appear (at the moment, anyway). Alan Isaac ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
