Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Wayne Watson wrote: > How do I compute avg, std dev, min, max and other simple stats if I only > know the frequency distribution? If you are willing to assign to all observations in a bin the value at the bin midpoint, then you could do it with weights in the statistics calculations. However, numpy.average is, I think, the only statistic that takes weights. min max are independent of weight, but std and var need to be calculated indirectly. If you need more stats with weights, then the attachment in http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/604 is a good start. Josef > > -- > Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) > > (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) > Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet > > 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 > Make the number famous. See 350.org > The major event has passed, but keep the number alive. > > Web Page: > > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
I actually wrote my own several days ago. When I began getting myself more familiar with numpy, I was hoping there would be an easy to use version in it for this frequency approach. If not, then I'll just stick with what I have. It seems something like this should be common. A simple way to do it with the present capabilities would be to "unwind" the frequencies, For example, given [2,1,3] for some corresponding set of x, say, [1,2,3], produce[1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3]. I have no idea if numpy does anything like that, but, if so, the typical mean, std, ... could be used. In my case, it's sort of pointless. It would produce an array of 307,200 items for 256 x (0,1,2,...,255), and just slow down the computations "unwinding" it in software. The sub-processor hardware already produced the 256 frequencies. Basically, this amounts to having a pdf, and values of x. Mathematically, the statistics are produced directly from it. josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Wayne Watson > wrote: > >> How do I compute avg, std dev, min, max and other simple stats if I only >> know the frequency distribution? >> > > If you are willing to assign to all observations in a bin the value at > the bin midpoint, then you could do it with weights in the statistics > calculations. However, numpy.average is, I think, the only statistic > that takes weights. min max are independent of weight, but std and var > need to be calculated indirectly. > > If you need more stats with weights, then the attachment in > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/604 is a good start. > > Josef > > > >> -- >> Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) >> >> (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) >> Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet >> >> 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 >> Make the number famous. See 350.org >>The major event has passed, but keep the number alive. >> >>Web Page: >> >> ___ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Make the number famous. See 350.org The major event has passed, but keep the number alive. Web Page: ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Wayne Watson wrote: > I actually wrote my own several days ago. When I began getting myself > more familiar with numpy, I was hoping there would be an easy to use > version in it for this frequency approach. If not, then I'll just stick > with what I have. It seems something like this should be common. > > A simple way to do it with the present capabilities would be to "unwind" > the frequencies, For example, given [2,1,3] for some corresponding set > of x, say, [1,2,3], produce[1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3]. I have no idea if numpy > does anything like that, but, if so, the typical mean, std, ... could be > used. In my case, it's sort of pointless. It would produce an array of > 307,200 items for 256 x (0,1,2,...,255), and just slow down the > computations "unwinding" it in software. The sub-processor hardware > already produced the 256 frequencies. > > Basically, this amounts to having a pdf, and values of x. > Mathematically, the statistics are produced directly from it. > > josef.p...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Wayne Watson > > wrote: > > > >> How do I compute avg, std dev, min, max and other simple stats if I only > >> know the frequency distribution? > >> > > > > If you are willing to assign to all observations in a bin the value at > > the bin midpoint, then you could do it with weights in the statistics > > calculations. However, numpy.average is, I think, the only statistic > > that takes weights. min max are independent of weight, but std and var > > need to be calculated indirectly. > > > > If you need more stats with weights, then the attachment in > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/604 is a good start. > > > > Josef > Wayne: There is no need to "unwind": If Y(X) is the (unnormalized) freq. distr. of random variable/data X, start by computing y = Y/(Y.sum()) (if Y is already normalized, skip this step). Then: av(X) = np.dot(X, y), sd(X) = np.sqrt(np.dot((X*X), y) - (av(X))^2), and higher moment statistics can be calculated utilizing similar formulae. DG ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
David Goldsmith wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Wayne Watson > mailto:sierra_mtnv...@sbcglobal.net>> > wrote: > > I actually wrote my own several days ago. When I began getting myself > more familiar with numpy, I was hoping there would be an easy to use > version in it for this frequency approach. If not, then I'll just > stick > with what I have. It seems something like this should be common. > > ... > > > If you need more stats with weights, then the attachment in > > http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/604 is a good start. > > > > Josef > > > Wayne: > > There is no need to "unwind": If Y(X) is the (unnormalized) freq. > distr. of random variable/data X, start by computing y = Y/(Y.sum()) > (if Y is already normalized, skip this step). Then: > > av(X) = np.dot(X, y), sd(X) = np.sqrt(np.dot((X*X), y) - (av(X))^2), > and higher moment statistics can be calculated utilizing similar > formulae. > > DG I was only illustrating a way that I would not consider, since the hardware has already created the pdf. I've already coded it pretty much as you have suggested. As I think I mention ed above, I'm a bit surprised numpy doesn't provide the code you suggest as part of some function. CalcSimplefromPDF(xvalues=mydatarray, avg=ture, minmax=true, ...). -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Make the number famous. See 350.org The major event has passed, but keep the number alive. Web Page: ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
2009/11/28 Wayne Watson : > > I was only illustrating a way that I would not consider, since the > hardware has already created the pdf. I've already coded it pretty much > as you have suggested. As I think I mention ed above, I'm a bit > surprised numpy doesn't provide the code you suggest as part of some > function. CalcSimplefromPDF(xvalues=mydatarray, avg=ture, minmax=true, > ...). Feel free to submit an implementation to numpy's issue tracker. I suggest modifying mean, std, and var (at least) so that, like average, they take an array of weights. Anne ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
How would I do that? Anne Archibald wrote: > 2009/11/28 Wayne Watson : > >> I was only illustrating a way that I would not consider, since the >> hardware has already created the pdf. I've already coded it pretty much >> as you have suggested. As I think I mention ed above, I'm a bit >> surprised numpy doesn't provide the code you suggest as part of some >> function. CalcSimplefromPDF(xvalues=mydatarray, avg=ture, minmax=true, >> ...). >> > > Feel free to submit an implementation to numpy's issue tracker. I > suggest modifying mean, std, and var (at least) so that, like average, > they take an array of weights. > > Anne > ___ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > -- Wayne Watson (Watson Adventures, Prop., Nevada City, CA) (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time) Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 Make the number famous. See 350.org The major event has passed, but keep the number alive. Web Page: ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
2009/11/28 Wayne Watson : > Anne Archibald wrote: >> 2009/11/28 Wayne Watson : >> >>> I was only illustrating a way that I would not consider, since the >>> hardware has already created the pdf. I've already coded it pretty much >>> as you have suggested. As I think I mention ed above, I'm a bit >>> surprised numpy doesn't provide the code you suggest as part of some >>> function. CalcSimplefromPDF(xvalues=mydatarray, avg=ture, minmax=true, >>> ...). >>> >> >> Feel free to submit an implementation to numpy's issue tracker. I >> suggest modifying mean, std, and var (at least) so that, like average, >> they take an array of weights. > > How would I do that? > Obtain a copy of recent numpy source code - a .tar file from the website, or using SVN, or git. Then add the feature plus some tests, confirm that the tests pass, and post a request and your patch to the bug tracker. Anne ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Computing Simple Statistics When Only they Frequency Distribution is Known
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Anne Archibald wrote: > 2009/11/28 Wayne Watson : > > Anne Archibald wrote: > >> 2009/11/28 Wayne Watson : > >> > >>> I was only illustrating a way that I would not consider, since the > >>> hardware has already created the pdf. I've already coded it pretty much > >>> as you have suggested. As I think I mention ed above, I'm a bit > >>> surprised numpy doesn't provide the code you suggest as part of some > >>> function. CalcSimplefromPDF(xvalues=mydatarray, avg=ture, minmax=true, > >>> ...). > >>> > >> > >> Feel free to submit an implementation to numpy's issue tracker. I > >> suggest modifying mean, std, and var (at least) so that, like average, > >> they take an array of weights. > > > > How would I do that? > > > > Obtain a copy of recent numpy source code - a .tar file from the > website, or using SVN, or git. Then add the feature plus some tests, > confirm that the tests pass, and post a request and your patch to the > bug tracker. > > You might also want to use average as a starting point. Chuck ___ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
