Re: [Nut-upsuser] Zigor Ebro 650 compatibility

2012-09-07 Thread Daniel O'Connor

On 08/09/2012, at 5:01, Martyn Hill  wrote:
>> Windows may be connecting to the UPS using a service automatically. I am not 
>> sure how you would stop it but at a guess I would trying looking for a 
>> likely service and stop it.
> 
> Yes, thought of that and stopped and reconfigured for manual startup the 
> Upsilon USB service and even removed the UPS USB driver, but still hit the 
> same 'busy' error when trying to attch the USB device to VirtualBox.

OK, I'm not sure how you could fix that :(
Sounds like a VirtualBox bug.

>> What does pkg-config --cflags libusb say on your system?
> 'Not found' - probably because I didn't/couldn't install the libusb-0.1.12 
> port - even after disabling the FreeBSD version check in the Makefile that 
> would otherwise skip the port install. I'l try that again, however and try to 
> get make install to complete.

I just double checked my system and there is a stub port which installs a 
libusb-config script and /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libusb*.pc to point to 
the base library (which has shims for libusb 0.1 and 1.0 APIs).

If you install /usr/ports/devel/libusb_base then pkg-config should find libusb 
(and so should NUTs configure script).

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C







___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] Zigor Ebro 650 compatibility

2012-09-07 Thread Martyn Hill

Hi Daniel

Thank you for that.

On 07/09/2012 01:15, Daniel O'Connor wrote:

On 07/09/2012, at 5:01, Martyn Hill  wrote:

Unfortunately, VirtualBox refused to allow me to attach the UPS USB port to the 
guest OS (saying 'busy with a previous request'), so that came to nothing - and 
after several night's effort::-(

Windows may be connecting to the UPS using a service automatically. I am not 
sure how you would stop it but at a guess I would trying looking for a likely 
service and stop it.


Yes, thought of that and stopped and reconfigured for manual startup the 
Upsilon USB service and even removed the UPS USB driver, but still hit 
the same 'busy' error when trying to attch the USB device to VirtualBox.

So, do you (or anyone else here) have any guidance on how to force NUT to link 
against libusb-0.1 at compile time ???

I think you'd have to mangle the configure script.


I'll take a look.

What does pkg-config --cflags libusb say on your system?
'Not found' - probably because I didn't/couldn't install the 
libusb-0.1.12 port - even after disabling the FreeBSD version check in 
the Makefile that would otherwise skip the port install. I'l try that 
again, however and try to get make install to complete.



I'm still not convinced that the FreeBSD implementation of libusb v2 is fully 
compatible with v0.1 - the available documentation is confusing...

I believe it is compatible although 0.1 was evolved rather than designed :)

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer


I'll keep trying! Thanks!

--
"There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those 
who don't."


___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] Communications with UPS lost: No status from UPS

2012-09-07 Thread Fabio Cecamore

The expected behavior is fine :)
I updated again becouse with 2.6.4 i found a bug about upssched so now with 
2.6.5 all is working great.


Thank you again. Happy to use NUT.

From: Arnaud Quette
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 5:15 PM
To: Fabio Cecamore
Cc: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] Communications with UPS lost: No status from UPS


2012/9/6 Fabio Cecamore 

Updated to the last (in the testing debian repository) available: 2.6.4
This time using blazer_ser in debug i find:

363.373978read: '(233.9 140.0 233.9 006 49.8 13.7 30.7 1001'
365.162745send: 'Q1'
366.163904read: timeout
366.163991blazer_status: short reply
366.164013Communications with UPS lost: status read failed!
367.163804send: 'Q1'
367.378009read: '(234.3 140.0 234.3 006 49.4 13.7 30.7 1001'

But this time in syslogd.log no error.. i’ll check more and will let you 
know.



so the expected behavior is fine? (to be confirmed)


(nice to see an other android user)



they are everywhere ;)

cheers,
Arnaud


___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw

2012-09-07 Thread Fabio Cecamore
Oh nice, with offdelay i can do the same think so.. Thankyou :)

Fabio

From: Arnaud Quette 
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 3:44 PM
To: Fabio Cecamore 
Cc: Charles Lepple ; nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org 
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw


2012/9/7 Fabio Cecamore 

  I've done what you said but now..

  root@ProLiant:/home/fabio# upsrw -u admin -p mypass -s ups.delay.shutdown=180 
ups
  Unexpected response from upsd: ERR READONLY
  root@ProLiant:/home/fabio#

  I hope this not mean this variable is readonly..


hem Fabio, I'm sure you're actually kiding with your comment ;)
To get the list of variables that can be set, use "upsrw ".
You will see that ups.delay.shutdown is not present.
 
What you probably want is to configure the delay before powering off the UPS, 
at the end of the shutdown sequence.
Just use "offdelay = " in ups.conf, as described in the blazer manpage:
http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/man/blazer.html

cheers,
Arnaud

-- 
Linux / Unix / Opensource Engineering Expert - Eaton - 
http://opensource.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr

___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] Communications with UPS lost: No status from UPS

2012-09-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/9/6 Fabio Cecamore 

>   Updated to the last (in the testing debian repository) available: 2.6.4
> This time using blazer_ser in debug i find:
>
> 363.373978read: '(233.9 140.0 233.9 006 49.8 13.7 30.7 1001'
> 365.162745send: 'Q1'
> 366.163904read: timeout
> 366.163991blazer_status: short reply
> 366.164013Communications with UPS lost: status read failed!
> 367.163804send: 'Q1'
> 367.378009read: '(234.3 140.0 234.3 006 49.4 13.7 30.7 1001'
>
> But this time in syslogd.log no error.. i’ll check more and will let you
> know.
>

so the expected behavior is fine? (to be confirmed)


> (nice to see an other android user)
>

they are everywhere ;)

cheers,
Arnaud
___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw

2012-09-07 Thread Arnaud Quette
2012/9/7 Fabio Cecamore 

> I've done what you said but now..
>
> root@ProLiant:/home/fabio# upsrw -u admin -p mypass -s
> ups.delay.shutdown=180 ups
> Unexpected response from upsd: ERR READONLY
> root@ProLiant:/home/fabio#
>
> I hope this not mean this variable is readonly..
>

hem Fabio, I'm sure you're actually kiding with your comment ;)
To get the list of variables that can be set, use "upsrw ".
You will see that ups.delay.shutdown is not present.

What you probably want is to configure the delay before powering off the
UPS, at the end of the shutdown sequence.
Just use "offdelay = " in ups.conf, as described in the blazer
manpage:
http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/man/blazer.html

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix / Opensource Engineering Expert - Eaton -
http://opensource.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser

Re: [Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw

2012-09-07 Thread Fabio Cecamore

I've done what you said but now..

root@ProLiant:/home/fabio# upsrw -u admin -p mypass -s 
ups.delay.shutdown=180 ups

Unexpected response from upsd: ERR READONLY
root@ProLiant:/home/fabio#

I hope this not mean this variable is readonly..

-Messaggio originale- 
From: Charles Lepple

Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 12:55 PM
To: Fabio Cecamore
Cc: nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw

On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:22 AM, Fabio Cecamore wrote:


Hi all,
i've a problem with only a command in all suite: upsrw.

root@ProLiant:/etc/nut# upsrw -u monmaster -p p455w0rd -s 
ups.delay.shutdown=180 ups

Unexpected response from upsd: ERR ACCESS-DENIED
root@ProLiant:/etc/nut#

upsc and upsmon work greatly.

This is in my /etc/host.allow:
upsd : localhost, LOCAL, 127.0.0.1,[::1]   : ALLOW



In upsd.users, you need a user entry which allows the "SET" action. I'd 
recommend not using the "monmaster" user, but you could add to that entry 
temporarily.


The upsd.users man page has an example "admin" user which would work:

http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/man/upsd.users.html

--
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail



___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


Re: [Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw

2012-09-07 Thread Charles Lepple
On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:22 AM, Fabio Cecamore wrote:

> Hi all,
> i've a problem with only a command in all suite: upsrw.
> 
> root@ProLiant:/etc/nut# upsrw -u monmaster -p p455w0rd -s 
> ups.delay.shutdown=180 ups
> Unexpected response from upsd: ERR ACCESS-DENIED
> root@ProLiant:/etc/nut#
> 
> upsc and upsmon work greatly.
> 
> This is in my /etc/host.allow:
> upsd : localhost, LOCAL, 127.0.0.1,[::1]   : ALLOW


In upsd.users, you need a user entry which allows the "SET" action. I'd 
recommend not using the "monmaster" user, but you could add to that entry 
temporarily.

The upsd.users man page has an example "admin" user which would work:

http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/man/upsd.users.html

-- 
Charles Lepple
clepple@gmail




___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser


[Nut-upsuser] ERR ACCESS-DENIED in upsrw

2012-09-07 Thread Fabio Cecamore

Hi all,
i've a problem with only a command in all suite: upsrw.

root@ProLiant:/etc/nut# upsrw -u monmaster -p p455w0rd -s 
ups.delay.shutdown=180 ups

Unexpected response from upsd: ERR ACCESS-DENIED
root@ProLiant:/etc/nut#

upsc and upsmon work greatly.

This is in my /etc/host.allow:
upsd : localhost, LOCAL, 127.0.0.1,[::1]   : ALLOW

What miss ?
Thank you! 



___
Nut-upsuser mailing list
Nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser