[jira] [Created] (OAK-6799) OSGi service tests for Blob GC
Amit Jain created OAK-6799: -- Summary: OSGi service tests for Blob GC Key: OAK-6799 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6799 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Amit Jain Assignee: Amit Jain Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.9 OSGi initialization tests for Blob GC. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-6798) Basic Blob GC test for in-memory NodeStore and BlobStore
Amit Jain created OAK-6798: -- Summary: Basic Blob GC test for in-memory NodeStore and BlobStore Key: OAK-6798 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6798 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Sub-task Components: blob-plugins Reporter: Amit Jain Assignee: Amit Jain Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.9 Create a basic tests for BlobGC which can test the basic functionality using an in-memory Node and Blob Store. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6790) FacetResult class isn't exposed anymore
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16196475#comment-16196475
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-6790:
[~anchela], could you please review this issue? And, if it feels ok to move
this class to {{oak-query-spi}} under
{{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.*spi*.query.facet}} package?
> FacetResult class isn't exposed anymore
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6790
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6790
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
>Affects Versions: 1.7.2
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> OAK-3847 exposed {{FacetResult}} (rather
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.facet}} package) to easily consume
> extracted facet data. That exported package got removed during OAK-6304 (as
> noted in this comment \[1]).
> We need to export that class - maybe that class makes sense as part of
> {{oak-query-spi}} module - that still needs to be checked as assessed btw (ie
> if we can simply re-enable the removed export AND that its current place in
> oak-core still makes sense or not).
> [~anchela], would you remember what was the warning that was observed without
> removing this export (disclaimer: I still feel that it belongs in
> {{oak-query-spi}}... I'm just trying to have all data available).
> \[1]:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6304?focusedCommentId=16042721=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16042721
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6797) DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16196154#comment-16196154
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-6797:
-
Note the spec for Condition says:
{noformat}
* Check if a sub-key exists in a map.
{noformat}
> DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
> --
>
> Key: OAK-6797
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentmk
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-6797.diff
>
>
> Implementations currently differ in whether the "Exists" condition works on a
> non-revision property.
> (RDBDS and MongoDS seem to support it, while MemoryDS does not).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6797) DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16196146#comment-16196146 ] Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-6797 at 10/8/17 2:54 PM: -- Test case demonstrating the issue. [~mreutegg] - an alternative to fixing this would be to reduce functionality of the operation across all implementations - right now I believe it's only used for a single purpose, so maybe we can restrict the API here. was (Author: reschke): Test case demonstrating the issue. > DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property? > -- > > Key: OAK-6797 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OAK-6797.diff > > > Implementations currently differ in whether the "Exists" condition works on a > non-revision property. > (RDBDS and MongoDS seem to support it, while MemoryDS does not). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6797) DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-6797: Attachment: OAK-6797.diff Test case demonstrating the issue. > DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property? > -- > > Key: OAK-6797 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Attachments: OAK-6797.diff > > > Implementations currently differ in whether the "Exists" condition works on a > non-revision property. > (RDBDS and MongoDS seem to support it, while MemoryDS does not). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6797) DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-6797: Priority: Minor (was: Major) > DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property? > -- > > Key: OAK-6797 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentmk >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > > Implementations currently differ in whether the "Exists" condition works on a > non-revision property. > (RDBDS and MongoDS seem to support it, while MemoryDS does not). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Created] (OAK-6797) DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property?
Julian Reschke created OAK-6797: --- Summary: DocumentStore conditional remove: EXISTS on non-revision property? Key: OAK-6797 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6797 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Components: documentmk Reporter: Julian Reschke Implementations currently differ in whether the "Exists" condition works on a non-revision property. (RDBDS and MongoDS seem to support it, while MemoryDS does not). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
