[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-6201) Native Query syntax for rep:native unclear

2020-07-14 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17157472#comment-17157472
 ] 

Konrad Windszus edited comment on OAK-6201 at 7/14/20, 3:56 PM:


A page for how JCR properties paths are translated to field names in Lucene and 
Solr would be highly appreciated. [~teofili] Would you be able to come up with 
something in the near future?


was (Author: kwin):
A page for how JCR properties are translated to field names in Lucene and Solr 
would be highly appreciated. [~teofili] Would you be able to come up with 
something in the near future?

> Native Query syntax for rep:native unclear
> --
>
> Key: OAK-6201
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6201
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Documentation
>Reporter: David Gonzalez
>Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>Priority: Minor
>
> I was trying to perform a few test queries against an Oak 1.6.x repository 
> using the XPath with the rep:native(..) function and but could not get any to 
> work.
> I suspect my problem is with specifying the field, but i've tried a variety 
> of permutations to no avail. 
> For example, if tried to re-purpose the example XPath query to search over an 
> asset's dc:title [1],
> Generally, i think the documentation [2] is lacking in that 1) unclear on the 
> syntax 2) unclear if i need to do anything special to Oak indexes 3) if only 
> the provided lucene index will service these requests (these are all from a 
> lucene POV, rather than Solr, though assume all the same considerations apply)
> [1] Non-working: {code}
> //element(*, app:Asset)[(rep:native('lucene', 
> 'jcr:contnet/metdata/dc:title:(Hello OR World)'))]
> {code}
> [2] 
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/query-engine.html#Native_Queries



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (OAK-6201) Native Query syntax for rep:native unclear

2020-07-14 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17157472#comment-17157472
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on OAK-6201:
--

A page for how JCR properties are translated to field names in Lucene and Solr 
would be highly appreciated. [~teofili] Would you be able to come up with 
something in the near future?

> Native Query syntax for rep:native unclear
> --
>
> Key: OAK-6201
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6201
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Documentation
>Reporter: David Gonzalez
>Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>Priority: Minor
>
> I was trying to perform a few test queries against an Oak 1.6.x repository 
> using the XPath with the rep:native(..) function and but could not get any to 
> work.
> I suspect my problem is with specifying the field, but i've tried a variety 
> of permutations to no avail. 
> For example, if tried to re-purpose the example XPath query to search over an 
> asset's dc:title [1],
> Generally, i think the documentation [2] is lacking in that 1) unclear on the 
> syntax 2) unclear if i need to do anything special to Oak indexes 3) if only 
> the provided lucene index will service these requests (these are all from a 
> lucene POV, rather than Solr, though assume all the same considerations apply)
> [1] Non-working: {code}
> //element(*, app:Asset)[(rep:native('lucene', 
> 'jcr:contnet/metdata/dc:title:(Hello OR World)'))]
> {code}
> [2] 
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/query-engine.html#Native_Queries



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9140) Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes

2020-07-14 Thread Amrit Verma (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Verma updated OAK-9140:
-
Description: Stored index definitions introduce additional complexities. 
Also, we are moving in a direction of avoiding index editing/re-indexing. New 
index definitions instead should be created instead. Re-indexing should be 
mostly done in case of corrupt indexes (which should not happen in 
elasticsearch).  Hence we don't see a scenario in which indexed data would be 
incompatible with index definition, so we don't need stored index definitions 
for elastic indexes.

> Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes
> 
>
> Key: OAK-9140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: indexing
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Priority: Major
>
> Stored index definitions introduce additional complexities. Also, we are 
> moving in a direction of avoiding index editing/re-indexing. New index 
> definitions instead should be created instead. Re-indexing should be mostly 
> done in case of corrupt indexes (which should not happen in elasticsearch).  
> Hence we don't see a scenario in which indexed data would be incompatible 
> with index definition, so we don't need stored index definitions for elastic 
> indexes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Created] (OAK-9140) Don

2020-07-14 Thread Amrit Verma (Jira)
Amrit Verma created OAK-9140:


 Summary: Don
 Key: OAK-9140
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140
 Project: Jackrabbit Oak
  Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Amrit Verma






--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9140) Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes

2020-07-14 Thread Amrit Verma (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Verma updated OAK-9140:
-
Component/s: indexing

> Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes
> 
>
> Key: OAK-9140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: indexing
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-9140) Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes

2020-07-14 Thread Amrit Verma (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Amrit Verma updated OAK-9140:
-
Summary: Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes  (was: Don)

> Don't use stored index definition in elastic indexes
> 
>
> Key: OAK-9140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9140
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Amrit Verma
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)