[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10448) org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type

2023-09-15 Thread Manfred Baedke (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765496#comment-17765496
 ] 

Manfred Baedke commented on OAK-10448:
--

??For both org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Group and 
org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Authorizable I disagree that those 
should be Consumer type interfaces. They are IMHO correctly classified as 
provider type and no consumer bundle of the Jackrabbit API should be 
implementing those interfaces.??

Those are definitely ProviderType interfaces. Looking at e.g. 
[GroupFacade|https://github.com/ist-dresden/composum-nodes/blob/develop/usermgr/src/main/java/com/composum/sling/core/usermanagement/service/GroupFacade.java],
 it looks like Group objects are created that do not and will never exist on 
the server. I don't understand why that is necessary or helpful.

> org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type
> -
>
> Key: OAK-10448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jackrabbit-api
>Affects Versions: 1.54.0
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
>
> In the context of OAK-10252 the interface 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query}} was incorrectly converted 
> from implicit consumer type to provider type 
> (https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/dcd46825e21f373fda8dbfe61cdaeac522fe15eb/oak-jackrabbit-api/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/api/security/user/Query.java#L45).
>  In fact this interface is supposed to be implemented by consumers (e.g. 
> those leveraging 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.UserManager#findAuthorizables(...)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10440) Release Oak 1.22.17

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10440.
--
Resolution: Fixed

> Release Oak 1.22.17
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10440
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Closed] (OAK-10440) Release Oak 1.22.17

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke closed OAK-10440.


> Release Oak 1.22.17
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10440
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10440
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10442) Lucene Index - node type inheritance is not properly working for aggregation

2023-09-15 Thread Nitin Gupta (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nitin Gupta resolved OAK-10442.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.58.0
   Resolution: Fixed

> Lucene Index - node type inheritance is not properly working for aggregation
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10442
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10442) Lucene Index - node type inheritance is not properly working for aggregation

2023-09-15 Thread Nitin Gupta (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765534#comment-17765534
 ] 

Nitin Gupta commented on OAK-10442:
---

trunk : 
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/33dbf0b8b9b6fd702cf3b0b1ca1bae32c6c6f2f7
 

> Lucene Index - node type inheritance is not properly working for aggregation
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10442
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>Reporter: Nitin Gupta
>Assignee: Nitin Gupta
>Priority: Major
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10434) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update SDK dependencies

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-10434:
-
Labels: candidate_oak_1_22  (was: )

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update SDK dependencies
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10434
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: candidate_oak_1_22
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> ...to the latest versions of the "old" SDK, and update the embedded Guava 
> dependency accordingly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10434) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update SDK dependencies

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-10434.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.58.0
   (was: 1.60.0)
 Assignee: Julian Reschke  (was: Andrei Dulceanu)
   Resolution: Fixed

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update SDK dependencies
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10434
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> ...to the latest versions of the "old" SDK, and update the embedded Guava 
> dependency accordingly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10434) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update SDK dependencies

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765565#comment-17765565
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10434:
--

trunk: 
[488050fc91|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/488050fc915cedb1f975640f20eb875bf4cb7b0b]

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update SDK dependencies
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-10434
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10434
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>  Labels: candidate_oak_1_22
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> ...to the latest versions of the "old" SDK, and update the embedded Guava 
> dependency accordingly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10435) oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to "latest"

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke reassigned OAK-10435:


Assignee: Julian Reschke  (was: Andrei Dulceanu)

> oak-segment-azure/oak-blob-cloud-azure: update embedded Guava to "latest"
> -
>
> Key: OAK-10435
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10435
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: blob-cloud-azure, segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>
> Although the old Microsoft SDK is now retired, until we replaceit with 
> something new we should try to use the latest Guava.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10444) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1133 failed

2023-09-15 Thread Hudson (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765585#comment-17765585
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10444:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1143|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1143/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1143/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1133 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10444
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10444
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1133 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1133|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1133/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1133/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10343) AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu reassigned OAK-10343:
-

Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu

> AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> This happens frequently for me (Windows):
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 20, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
> 3.560 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.
> AzureTarFilesTest
> [ERROR] 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter
>  -- Time elapsed: 0.192 s <<<
>  FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[]> but was:<[ok]>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter(TarFilesTest.java:290)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at 
> org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at 
> com.arakelian.docker.junit.DockerRule$StatementWithDockerRule.evaluate(DockerRule.java:76)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.blob.cloud.azure.blobstorage.AzuriteDockerRule$1.evaluate(AzuriteDockerRule.java:112)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10343) AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765606#comment-17765606
 ] 

Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-10343:
---

[~reschke], doing a bisect I found that these failures started to happen after 
OAK-10022 was merged in trunk. Recently OAK-10272 reverted the changes in 
OAK-10022. I tested extensively locally and I couldn't reproduce the failures 
on current trunk. I propose to close this issue for now. Do you agree? 

> AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> This happens frequently for me (Windows):
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 20, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
> 3.560 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.
> AzureTarFilesTest
> [ERROR] 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter
>  -- Time elapsed: 0.192 s <<<
>  FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[]> but was:<[ok]>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter(TarFilesTest.java:290)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at 
> org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at 
> com.arakelian.docker.junit.DockerRule$StatementWithDockerRule.evaluate(DockerRule.java:76)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.blob.cloud.azure.blobstorage.AzuriteDockerRule$1.evaluate(AzuriteDockerRule.java:112)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
> {noformat}



--

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10360) unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765609#comment-17765609
 ] 

Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-10360:
---

[~reschke], doing a bisect I found that these failures started to happen after 
OAK-10022 was merged in trunk. Recently OAK-10272 reverted the changes in 
OAK-10022. I tested extensively locally and I couldn't reproduce the failures 
on current trunk. I propose to close this issue for now. Do you agree? 

> unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences 
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR]   
> AzureTarFileTest>TarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences:174 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0001=[r1],
>  --0001--=[r0], 
> --0001--0003=[r3], 
> --0001--0002=[r2]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0002=[r6],
>  --0002--=[r4], 
> --0002--0001=[r5]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=3,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0003--0001=[r8],
>  --0003--=[r7]}}> but was:<{}>
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10360) unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu reassigned OAK-10360:
-

Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu

> unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences 
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR]   
> AzureTarFileTest>TarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences:174 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0001=[r1],
>  --0001--=[r0], 
> --0001--0003=[r3], 
> --0001--0002=[r2]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0002=[r6],
>  --0002--=[r4], 
> --0002--0001=[r5]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=3,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0003--0001=[r8],
>  --0003--=[r7]}}> but was:<{}>
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10359) Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu reassigned OAK-10359:
-

Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu

> Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time 
> elapsed: 1.582 s <<< FAILURE! - in 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest
> [INFO] [ERROR] 
> binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.375 s  <<< FAILURE!
> [INFO] java.lang.AssertionError: 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0002=[b]},
>  
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0001=[c]}}>
>  but was:<{}>
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(TarFileTest.java:217)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> [INFO]  at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10343) AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765612#comment-17765612
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10343:
--

No objection. We can always open a new ticket when things start to fail again.

> AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> This happens frequently for me (Windows):
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 20, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
> 3.560 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.
> AzureTarFilesTest
> [ERROR] 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter
>  -- Time elapsed: 0.192 s <<<
>  FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[]> but was:<[ok]>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter(TarFilesTest.java:290)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at 
> org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at 
> com.arakelian.docker.junit.DockerRule$StatementWithDockerRule.evaluate(DockerRule.java:76)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.blob.cloud.azure.blobstorage.AzuriteDockerRule$1.evaluate(AzuriteDockerRule.java:112)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10359) Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765610#comment-17765610
 ] 

Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-10359:
---

[~reschke], doing a bisect I found that these failures started to happen after 
OAK-10022 was merged in trunk. Recently OAK-10272 reverted the changes in 
OAK-10022. I tested extensively locally and I couldn't reproduce the failures 
on current trunk. I propose to close this issue for now. Do you agree? 

> Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time 
> elapsed: 1.582 s <<< FAILURE! - in 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest
> [INFO] [ERROR] 
> binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.375 s  <<< FAILURE!
> [INFO] java.lang.AssertionError: 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0002=[b]},
>  
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0001=[c]}}>
>  but was:<{}>
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(TarFileTest.java:217)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> [INFO]  at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10360) unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765613#comment-17765613
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10360:
--

No objection. We can always open a new ticket when things start to fail again.

> unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences 
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR]   
> AzureTarFileTest>TarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences:174 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0001=[r1],
>  --0001--=[r0], 
> --0001--0003=[r3], 
> --0001--0002=[r2]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0002=[r6],
>  --0002--=[r4], 
> --0002--0001=[r5]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=3,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0003--0001=[r8],
>  --0003--=[r7]}}> but was:<{}>
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10359) Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep

2023-09-15 Thread Julian Reschke (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765615#comment-17765615
 ] 

Julian Reschke commented on OAK-10359:
--

No objection. We can always open a new ticket when things start to fail again.

> Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time 
> elapsed: 1.582 s <<< FAILURE! - in 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest
> [INFO] [ERROR] 
> binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.375 s  <<< FAILURE!
> [INFO] java.lang.AssertionError: 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0002=[b]},
>  
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0001=[c]}}>
>  but was:<{}>
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(TarFileTest.java:217)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> [INFO]  at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10359) Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu resolved OAK-10359.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.58.0
   Resolution: Fixed

> Unreliable test: TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep
> 
>
> Key: OAK-10359
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10359
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR] Tests run: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time 
> elapsed: 1.582 s <<< FAILURE! - in 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest
> [INFO] [ERROR] 
> binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFileTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.375 s  <<< FAILURE!
> [INFO] java.lang.AssertionError: 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0002=[b]},
>  
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0001=[c]}}>
>  but was:<{}>
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> [INFO]  at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFileTest.binaryReferencesIndexShouldBeTrimmedDownOnSweep(TarFileTest.java:217)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> [INFO]  at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> [INFO]  at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> [INFO]  at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10343) AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu resolved OAK-10343.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.58.0
   Resolution: Fixed

> AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter unreliable
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10343
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10343
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> This happens frequently for me (Windows):
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 20, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 
> 3.560 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.
> AzureTarFilesTest
> [ERROR] 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureTarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter
>  -- Time elapsed: 0.192 s <<<
>  FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[]> but was:<[ok]>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.file.tar.TarFilesTest.testCollectBlobReferencesWithGenerationFilter(TarFilesTest.java:290)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at 
> org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at 
> com.arakelian.docker.junit.DockerRule$StatementWithDockerRule.evaluate(DockerRule.java:76)
> at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.blob.cloud.azure.blobstorage.AzuriteDockerRule$1.evaluate(AzuriteDockerRule.java:112)
> at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:20)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:316)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:240)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:214)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:155)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:385)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:162)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.run(ForkedBooter.java:507)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:495)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10360) unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu resolved OAK-10360.
---
Fix Version/s: 1.58.0
   Resolution: Fixed

> unreliable test AzureTarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences 
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10360
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10360
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> {noformat}
> [INFO] [ERROR]   
> AzureTarFileTest>TarFileTest.testWriteAndReadBinaryReferences:174 
> expected:<{GCGeneration{generation=1,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0001--0001=[r1],
>  --0001--=[r0], 
> --0001--0003=[r3], 
> --0001--0002=[r2]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=2,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0002--0002=[r6],
>  --0002--=[r4], 
> --0002--0001=[r5]}, 
> GCGeneration{generation=3,fullGeneration=0,isCompacted=false}={--0003--0001=[r8],
>  --0003--=[r7]}}> but was:<{}>
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10444) Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1133 failed

2023-09-15 Thread Hudson (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765642#comment-17765642
 ] 

Hudson commented on OAK-10444:
--

Previously failing build now is OK.
 Passed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
#1144|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1144/]
 [console 
log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1144/console]

> Build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1133 failed
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10444
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10444
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk #1133 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit/jackrabbit-oak-trunk 
> #1133|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1133/]
>  [console 
> log|https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/1133/console]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-10448) org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type

2023-09-15 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konrad Windszus updated OAK-10448:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.58.0

> org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type
> -
>
> Key: OAK-10448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jackrabbit-api
>Affects Versions: 1.54.0
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> In the context of OAK-10252 the interface 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query}} was incorrectly converted 
> from implicit consumer type to provider type 
> (https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/dcd46825e21f373fda8dbfe61cdaeac522fe15eb/oak-jackrabbit-api/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/api/security/user/Query.java#L45).
>  In fact this interface is supposed to be implemented by consumers (e.g. 
> those leveraging 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.UserManager#findAuthorizables(...)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-10448) org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type

2023-09-15 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Konrad Windszus resolved OAK-10448.
---
Resolution: Fixed

> org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type
> -
>
> Key: OAK-10448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jackrabbit-api
>Affects Versions: 1.54.0
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.58.0
>
>
> In the context of OAK-10252 the interface 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query}} was incorrectly converted 
> from implicit consumer type to provider type 
> (https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/dcd46825e21f373fda8dbfe61cdaeac522fe15eb/oak-jackrabbit-api/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/api/security/user/Query.java#L45).
>  In fact this interface is supposed to be implemented by consumers (e.g. 
> those leveraging 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.UserManager#findAuthorizables(...)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-10448) org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type

2023-09-15 Thread Konrad Windszus (Jira) 


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17765644#comment-17765644
 ] 

Konrad Windszus commented on OAK-10448:
---

Fixed in 
https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/d4410fd1492acc687d38e6f041ca1e65c5efe483.

> org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query must be a Consumer type
> -
>
> Key: OAK-10448
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10448
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jackrabbit-api
>Affects Versions: 1.54.0
>Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>Assignee: Konrad Windszus
>Priority: Major
>
> In the context of OAK-10252 the interface 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Query}} was incorrectly converted 
> from implicit consumer type to provider type 
> (https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/dcd46825e21f373fda8dbfe61cdaeac522fe15eb/oak-jackrabbit-api/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/api/security/user/Query.java#L45).
>  In fact this interface is supposed to be implemented by consumers (e.g. 
> those leveraging 
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.UserManager#findAuthorizables(...)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-10376) AzureSegmentStoreServiceTest: strange behavior when Docker not running

2023-09-15 Thread Andrei Dulceanu (Jira) 


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andrei Dulceanu reassigned OAK-10376:
-

Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu

> AzureSegmentStoreServiceTest: strange behavior when Docker not running
> --
>
> Key: OAK-10376
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10376
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: segment-azure
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Minor
>
> I see a mildly weird behavior with this test when Docker is not running:
> {noformat}
> [INFO] Running 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureSegmentStoreServiceTest
> [WARNING] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 1, Time elapsed: 
> 1.845 s - in 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.segment.azure.AzureSegmentStoreServiceTest
> {noformat}
> however, when docker *is* running, it reports *6* tests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)