[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
angela resolved OAK-2413. ------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2) 1.1.8 > Clarify Editor.childNodeChanged() > --------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-2413 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2413 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core > Reporter: Marcel Reutegger > Assignee: angela > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.8 > > > The current contract for {{Editor.childNodeChanged()}} does not specify if > this method may also be called when the child node did not actually change. > The method {{NodeStateDiff.childNodeChanged()}} explicitly states that there > may be such calls. Looking at the implementation connecting the two classes, > {{EditorDiff.childNodeChange()}} simply calls the editor without checking > whether the child node did in fact change. > I think we either have to change the {{EditorDiff}} or update the contract > for the Editor and adjust implementations. E.g. right now, PrivilegeValidator > (implements Editor), assumes a call to {{childNodeChange()}} indeed means the > child node changed. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)