[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms

2016-11-10 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Reschke updated OAK-4788:

Fix Version/s: 1.6

> Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-4788
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: query
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.6, 1.5.13
>
>
> Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705:
> {quote}
> bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- 
> hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test").
> I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational 
> that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in 
> their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's 
> concern at all.
> I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects.
> {quote}
> /cc [~tmueller]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms

2016-11-02 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller updated OAK-4788:

Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6)
   1.5.13

> Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-4788
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: query
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5.13
>
>
> Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705:
> {quote}
> bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- 
> hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test").
> I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational 
> that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in 
> their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's 
> concern at all.
> I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects.
> {quote}
> /cc [~tmueller]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms

2016-09-16 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Thomas Mueller updated OAK-4788:

Fix Version/s: 1.6

> Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-4788
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: query
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705:
> {quote}
> bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- 
> hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test").
> I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational 
> that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in 
> their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's 
> concern at all.
> I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects.
> {quote}
> /cc [~tmueller]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms

2016-09-10 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-4788:
---
Component/s: query

> Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-4788
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: query
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Priority: Minor
>
> Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705:
> {quote}
> bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- 
> hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test").
> I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational 
> that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in 
> their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's 
> concern at all.
> I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects.
> {quote}
> /cc [~tmueller]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)