[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Reschke updated OAK-4788: Fix Version/s: 1.6 > Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms > --- > > Key: OAK-4788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Vikas Saurabh >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.6, 1.5.13 > > > Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705: > {quote} > bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- > hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test"). > I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational > that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in > their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's > concern at all. > I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects. > {quote} > /cc [~tmueller] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller updated OAK-4788: Fix Version/s: (was: 1.6) 1.5.13 > Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms > --- > > Key: OAK-4788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Vikas Saurabh >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.5.13 > > > Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705: > {quote} > bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- > hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test"). > I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational > that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in > their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's > concern at all. > I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects. > {quote} > /cc [~tmueller] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Mueller updated OAK-4788: Fix Version/s: 1.6 > Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms > --- > > Key: OAK-4788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Vikas Saurabh >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.6 > > > Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705: > {quote} > bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- > hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test"). > I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational > that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in > their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's > concern at all. > I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects. > {quote} > /cc [~tmueller] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4788) Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-4788: --- Component/s: query > Fulltext parser sorts and unique-s parsed terms > --- > > Key: OAK-4788 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4788 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Vikas Saurabh >Priority: Minor > > Pasting a bit of discussion from OAK-4705: > {quote} > bq. whether it's a good idea to sort entries ("hello - world" becomes "- > hello world") and make them unique ("test test" becomes "test"). > I think parser shouldn't play with ordering .. but I can see the rational > that it allows consumer of parsed output to potentially have forward seeks in > their dictionaries. Otoh, I think making unique or not shouldn't be parsers's > concern at all. > I'd open a new issue to follow up on these aspects. > {quote} > /cc [~tmueller] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)