[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Angela Schreiber updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.20.0) > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: 1.16.0 > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.14.0, 1.16.0 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: 1.14.0 > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.12.0, 1.14.0 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.12.0) > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.14.0 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.10.0) > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.12 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: 1.12 > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.10.0, 1.12 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Deparvu updated OAK-6225: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8) 1.10 > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Deparvu >Assignee: Alex Deparvu > Fix For: 1.10 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225: - Attachment: groupimpl-v2.patch > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Parvulescu >Assignee: Alex Parvulescu > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch, > groupimpl-v2.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225: - Attachment: groupimpl-v1.patch > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Parvulescu >Assignee: Alex Parvulescu > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch, groupimpl-v1.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225: - Description: As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence format for the GroupImpl members. Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of the key so it can be used for lookup. WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single one to reduce the noise. fyi [~anchela] [0] https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 was: As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence format for the GroupImpl members. Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of the key so it can be used for lookup. WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single one to reduce the noise. fyi [~anchela] [0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933 > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Parvulescu >Assignee: Alex Parvulescu > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] > https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/compare/trunk...stillalex:oak-6225 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225: - Fix Version/s: 1.8 > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Parvulescu >Assignee: Alex Parvulescu > Fix For: 1.8 > > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225: - Summary: Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl (was: Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl) > Analyse changing the persistence format of GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Parvulescu > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225: - Attachment: groupimpl-v0.patch > Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl > > > Key: OAK-6225 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Reporter: Alex Parvulescu > Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch > > > As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence > format for the GroupImpl members. > Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this > against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of > the key so it can be used for lookup. > WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single > one to reduce the noise. > fyi [~anchela] > [0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
