Re: [oauth] oauth_callback parameter not sent to getsatisfaction

2010-04-26 Thread k42b3

hi,


However GetSatisfaction requires that
oauth_callback=http://mysite.com/myresource be sent along with the
authorization url


As you mentioned the callback url must be send when you obtain the 
Temporary Credentials. You can set the callback to oob but then you 
have to provide the url in anotherway to GetSatisfaction.



Unfortunately since my callback url is different at different entry
points


Then you probably must use the oauth_callback param. I dont know the API 
of GetSatisfaction but if its not according to the specification you 
should probably contact them.


best regards

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
OAuth group.
To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.



Re: [oauth] oauth_callback parameter not sent to getsatisfaction

2010-04-26 Thread Lukas Rosenstock
Hi!
Just to clarify: The protocol knows two ways for sending the OAuth callback,
one is along with the request token; and the other is by attaching it to the
URL. The former (1.0a) is recommended and was introduced after security
issues had been known about the latter (1.0).

Regards,
 Lukas

2010/4/26 k42b3 k42b...@googlemail.com

 hi,


  However GetSatisfaction requires that
 oauth_callback=http://mysite.com/myresource be sent along with the
 authorization url


 As you mentioned the callback url must be send when you obtain the
 Temporary Credentials. You can set the callback to oob but then you have
 to provide the url in anotherway to GetSatisfaction.


  Unfortunately since my callback url is different at different entry
 points


 Then you probably must use the oauth_callback param. I dont know the API of
 GetSatisfaction but if its not according to the specification you should
 probably contact them.

 best regards


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 OAuth group.
 To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com oauth%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.




-- 
http://lukasrosenstock.net/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
OAuth group.
To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.



Re: [oauth] oauth_callback parameter not sent to getsatisfaction

2010-04-26 Thread Vasu Srinivasan
Ok, now I realize that there are two ways of sending OAuth callback. Thanks
for the help!

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Lukas Rosenstock 
l...@lukasrosenstock.netwrote:

 Hi!
 Just to clarify: The protocol knows two ways for sending the OAuth
 callback, one is along with the request token; and the other is by attaching
 it to the URL. The former (1.0a) is recommended and was introduced after
 security issues had been known about the latter (1.0).

 Regards,
  Lukas

 2010/4/26 k42b3 k42b...@googlemail.com

 hi,


  However GetSatisfaction requires that
 oauth_callback=http://mysite.com/myresource be sent along with the
 authorization url


 As you mentioned the callback url must be send when you obtain the
 Temporary Credentials. You can set the callback to oob but then you have
 to provide the url in anotherway to GetSatisfaction.


  Unfortunately since my callback url is different at different entry
 points


 Then you probably must use the oauth_callback param. I dont know the API
 of GetSatisfaction but if its not according to the specification you should
 probably contact them.

 best regards


 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 OAuth group.
 To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com oauth%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.




 --
 http://lukasrosenstock.net/

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 OAuth group.
 To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com oauth%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.




-- 
Regards,
Vasu Srinivasan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
OAuth group.
To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.



[oauth] Found two small mistakes in draft-hammer-oauth2-00.txt document

2010-04-26 Thread KiNgMaR
Hey,

while OAuth 2.0 seems very nice and very well thought through overall,
I couldn't help but notice two small mistakes in the draft:


a) In section 5.3, it says

  ... with a matchin hmac-sha256 secret by using the token_type
parameter when requesting an access token.

and it should say secret_type instead of token_type.


b) In the example in section 4, it says

  POST /authorize HTTP/1.1

however, according to the text above (and per common sense) it should
say POST /token HTTP/1.1 (as it's the token endpoint, not the
authorization endpoint that is being addressed).


Thanks and keep up the great work.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
OAuth group.
To post to this group, send email to oa...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en.



Re: [oauth] Found two small mistakes in draft-hammer-oauth2-00.txt document

2010-04-26 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 4/26/10 9:16 AM, KiNgMaR wrote:

 while OAuth 2.0 seems very nice and very well thought through overall,
 I couldn't help but notice two small mistakes in the draft:

Please send feedback about the Internet-Draft to the IETF list:

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

/psa



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature