+1 ... er, +.1 --j
On May 1, 2009, at 7:55 AM, "Matt Sanford" <m...@twitter.com> wrote: > > Option 3 … that's what versions are for, incrementing. > > On May 1, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Blaine Cook wrote: > >> >> We need to build some consensus around the version preference. As I >> see it, there are several options: >> >> 1. "1.0 Rev A" with no version string change (i.e., >> oauth_version=1.0) >> 2. "1.0a" (with oauth_version=1.0a) >> 3. "1.1" >> >> Please indicate your support for one of these options, and try to >> refrain from arguing your case here. The other thread remains open >> for >> that purpose. I would especially like to hear from library >> implementers here, and others who have not voiced their opinions in >> the other threads. >> >> b. >> >>> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
